Post: #26

It's sad, but the citizens of France had their vote.

Maybe in 2022, after another five years of "motives unclear" incidents, they'll see things differently when the next election rolls around...

Post: #27

(08-09-2017 10:39 AM)Renzy Wrote:  It's sad, but the citizens of France had their vote.

Maybe in 2022, after another five years of "motives unclear" incidents, they'll see things differently when the next election rolls around...

People haven't paid attention to what Going Strong has said.

The "French" people voted, and they voted Le Pen.

But they were already vastly outnumbered by the cucked liberal and the overwhelming number of non-native "French" citizens.

What Samseau predicted has already happened. The demographic changes has already been in place so that no change can ever come through democratic voting. From now on every election will simply be for the sake of appearances.

If change ever come, it will come through alternative means.

Update: they caught the perpetrator, but France being France this means nothing. He will go through a very lengthy trial process during which he will be better protected than your daughter taking a walk in the street of Cologne.

Post: #28

(08-09-2017 10:38 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(08-09-2017 10:27 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(08-09-2017 10:23 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Napoleon could have won.

So, you're saying he lost?

Yeah - he lost to the globalist bankers just as the US lost over 150 years ago to the very same powers. At least he fought them head on - most countries are not even aware of them ruling over them.

Didn't realize that the conspiracy went so deep that you needed a time machine to uncover it.

Post: #29

(08-09-2017 11:40 AM)Suits Wrote:  Yeah - he lost to the globalist bankers just as the US lost over 150 years ago to the very same powers. At least he fought them head on - most countries are not even aware of them ruling over them.

Didn't realize that the conspiracy went so deep that you needed a time machine to uncover it.
[/quote]

I don't do beef with men who I like and probably agree on 95% of the most important things in life only because they have not read and seen the things I did. I am as conspiracy theorist as Carroll Quigley - the mentor of Bill Clinton & Stanford historian. Let us not deviate from the topic too much.

-------------------------

Quelle surprise - it was the usual Buddhist Chinese maniac:

Quote:Pictured: Algerian, 36, suspected of mowing down six soldiers outside barracks in Paris terror attack before being shot five times and arrested while 'driving his BMW towards Calais'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...z4pHP6uyPo
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

It's only good that those buggers are not very smart.

Also - I doubt that the soldiers were armed coming from the barracks. And even if they were - only few are authorized to use their firearms in a public street while the guy has already driven over them. If they had enough time to draw a gun before, then they would have had enough time to jump to safety. And firing after a fast moving car in a busy street can end up with a toddler being killed who lies in a baby-seat somewhere.

Post: #30

Suits is just kinda trolling as usual, don't let him get to you like that.

Here Suits read this block:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_family

Quote:The Napoleonic Wars

A landmark Rothschild Palace in Frankfurt, Germany, Villa Günthersburg (photographed 1855)
The Rothschilds already possessed a significant fortune before the start of the Napoleonic Wars (1803–1815), and the family had gained preeminence in the bullion trade by this time.[21] From London in 1813 to 1815, Nathan Mayer Rothschild was instrumental in almost single-handedly financing the British war effort, organising the shipment of bullion to the Duke of Wellington's armies across Europe, as well as arranging the payment of British financial subsidies to their continental allies. In 1815 alone, the Rothschilds provided £9.8 million (in 1815 currency, about £566 million, €717 million or US$869 million today, when using the retail price index, and £6.58 billion, €8,34 billion or US$10.1 billion when using average earnings) in subsidy loans to Britain's continental allies.[22]


One of the smaller city houses, Vienna. A collection of far larger Viennese palaces known as Palais Rothschild were torn down during the Second World War.
The brothers helped coordinate Rothschild activities across the continent, and the family developed a network of agents, shippers and couriers to transport gold across war-torn Europe. The family network was also to provide Nathan Rothschild time and again with political and financial information ahead of his peers, giving him an advantage in the markets and rendering the house of Rothschild still more invaluable to the British government.

In one instance, the family network enabled Nathan to receive in London the news of Wellington's victory at the Battle of Waterloo a full day ahead of the government's official messengers.[21] Rothschild's first concern on this occasion was not to the potential financial advantage on the market which the knowledge would have given him; he and his courier immediately took the news to the government.[21] It was then repeated in later popular accounts, such as that of Morton.[23][24] The basis for the Rothschild's most famously profitable move was made after the news of British victory had been made public. Nathan Rothschild calculated that the future reduction in government borrowing brought about by the peace would create a bounce in British government bonds after a two-year stabilisation, which would finalise the post-war restructuring of the domestic economy.[22][23][24] In what has been described as one of the most audacious moves in financial history, Nathan immediately bought up the government bond market, for what at the time seemed an excessively high price, before waiting two years, then selling the bonds on the crest of a short bounce in the market in 1817 for a 40% profit. Given the sheer power of leverage the Rothschild family had at their disposal, this profit was an enormous sum.[22]

Nathan Mayer Rothschild started his business in Manchester in 1806 and gradually moved it to London, where in 1809 he acquired the location at 2 New Court in St. Swithin's Lane, City of London,[21] where it operates today; he established N M Rothschild & Sons in 1811. In 1818, he arranged a £5 million (equal to £330 million in 2016) loan to the Prussian government, and the issuing of bonds for government loans formed a mainstay of his bank’s business. He gained a position of such power in the City of London that by 1825–26 he was able to supply enough coin to the Bank of England to enable it to avert a market liquidity crisis.

The cliff notes is that if Napoleon had conquered Europe, took a pause to hold all his gains, then subsequently conquered the entire (what is now know as the) United Kingdom. Not only would everyone be speaking French, but the entire Globalist Jewish Banker cabal aka the Rothschilds and the 4-5 cohorts whose names I forget (I'm sure Zel knows all that if you ask him), would have lost all their gold and billions/trillions in money.

Napoleon was not some "mere annoyance". He was a bonafide game changer. People try to compare him to Hitler and vis versa for a good reason. His contributions to the legal world are just a taste of what other changes he would have brought had he succeeded in conquering.

Post: #31

(08-09-2017 12:48 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  Suits is just kinda trolling as usual, don't let him get to you like that.

Here Suits read this block:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_family

Quote:The Napoleonic Wars

A landmark Rothschild Palace in Frankfurt, Germany, Villa Günthersburg (photographed 1855)
The Rothschilds already possessed a significant fortune before the start of the Napoleonic Wars (1803–1815), and the family had gained preeminence in the bullion trade by this time.[21] From London in 1813 to 1815, Nathan Mayer Rothschild was instrumental in almost single-handedly financing the British war effort, organising the shipment of bullion to the Duke of Wellington's armies across Europe, as well as arranging the payment of British financial subsidies to their continental allies. In 1815 alone, the Rothschilds provided £9.8 million (in 1815 currency, about £566 million, €717 million or US$869 million today, when using the retail price index, and £6.58 billion, €8,34 billion or US$10.1 billion when using average earnings) in subsidy loans to Britain's continental allies.[22]


One of the smaller city houses, Vienna. A collection of far larger Viennese palaces known as Palais Rothschild were torn down during the Second World War.
The brothers helped coordinate Rothschild activities across the continent, and the family developed a network of agents, shippers and couriers to transport gold across war-torn Europe. The family network was also to provide Nathan Rothschild time and again with political and financial information ahead of his peers, giving him an advantage in the markets and rendering the house of Rothschild still more invaluable to the British government.

In one instance, the family network enabled Nathan to receive in London the news of Wellington's victory at the Battle of Waterloo a full day ahead of the government's official messengers.[21] Rothschild's first concern on this occasion was not to the potential financial advantage on the market which the knowledge would have given him; he and his courier immediately took the news to the government.[21] It was then repeated in later popular accounts, such as that of Morton.[23][24] The basis for the Rothschild's most famously profitable move was made after the news of British victory had been made public. Nathan Rothschild calculated that the future reduction in government borrowing brought about by the peace would create a bounce in British government bonds after a two-year stabilisation, which would finalise the post-war restructuring of the domestic economy.[22][23][24] In what has been described as one of the most audacious moves in financial history, Nathan immediately bought up the government bond market, for what at the time seemed an excessively high price, before waiting two years, then selling the bonds on the crest of a short bounce in the market in 1817 for a 40% profit. Given the sheer power of leverage the Rothschild family had at their disposal, this profit was an enormous sum.[22]

Nathan Mayer Rothschild started his business in Manchester in 1806 and gradually moved it to London, where in 1809 he acquired the location at 2 New Court in St. Swithin's Lane, City of London,[21] where it operates today; he established N M Rothschild & Sons in 1811. In 1818, he arranged a £5 million (equal to £330 million in 2016) loan to the Prussian government, and the issuing of bonds for government loans formed a mainstay of his bank’s business. He gained a position of such power in the City of London that by 1825–26 he was able to supply enough coin to the Bank of England to enable it to avert a market liquidity crisis.

The cliff notes is that if Napoleon had conquered Europe, took a pause to hold all his gains, then subsequently conquered the entire (what is now know as the) United Kingdom. Not only would everyone be speaking French, but the entire Globalist Jewish Banker cabal aka the Rothschilds and the 4-5 cohorts whose names I forget (I'm sure Zel knows all that if you ask him), would have lost all their gold and billions/trillions in money.

Napoleon was not some "mere annoyance". He was a bonafide game changer. People try to compare him to Hitler and vis versa for a good reason. His contributions to the legal world are just a taste of what other changes he would have brought had he succeeded in conquering.

Can you elaborate on some of these legal changes? Also, any specific books you recommend?

Post: #32

Quote:The man appeared to have lain in wait for the soldiers in a pedestrian zone near their base in Levallois-Perret on the northwestern edge of the capital where France’s domestic counter-terrorism agency is based.

He accelerated his BMW car into the troops, who were starting their patrol, when they were a few meters away, Interior Minister Gerard Collomb said, before speeding off and sparking a huge manhunt.

“This was a deliberate act, not an accident,” Collomb told reporters outside the hospital where the three more seriously injured victims were being treated.

He said a terrorism investigation had been launched.

The soldiers were part of Operation Sentinel, launched in the wake of Islamist attacks in Paris in early 2015. The Levallois-Perret attack was the 15th on troops and police in the last two-and-a-half years, many of them Islamic State-inspired.

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/08/vehic...f-soldiers

The irony is that he targeted soldiers tasked with protecting citizens against guys like him. He sucker-punched them, but still.... those boys need to be more alert.

Post: #33

(08-09-2017 12:56 PM)PuppetMaster Wrote:  

(08-09-2017 12:48 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  Suits is just kinda trolling as usual, don't let him get to you like that.

Here Suits read this block:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_family

Quote:The Napoleonic Wars

A landmark Rothschild Palace in Frankfurt, Germany, Villa Günthersburg (photographed 1855)
The Rothschilds already possessed a significant fortune before the start of the Napoleonic Wars (1803–1815), and the family had gained preeminence in the bullion trade by this time.[21] From London in 1813 to 1815, Nathan Mayer Rothschild was instrumental in almost single-handedly financing the British war effort, organising the shipment of bullion to the Duke of Wellington's armies across Europe, as well as arranging the payment of British financial subsidies to their continental allies. In 1815 alone, the Rothschilds provided £9.8 million (in 1815 currency, about £566 million, €717 million or US$869 million today, when using the retail price index, and £6.58 billion, €8,34 billion or US$10.1 billion when using average earnings) in subsidy loans to Britain's continental allies.[22]


One of the smaller city houses, Vienna. A collection of far larger Viennese palaces known as Palais Rothschild were torn down during the Second World War.
The brothers helped coordinate Rothschild activities across the continent, and the family developed a network of agents, shippers and couriers to transport gold across war-torn Europe. The family network was also to provide Nathan Rothschild time and again with political and financial information ahead of his peers, giving him an advantage in the markets and rendering the house of Rothschild still more invaluable to the British government.

In one instance, the family network enabled Nathan to receive in London the news of Wellington's victory at the Battle of Waterloo a full day ahead of the government's official messengers.[21] Rothschild's first concern on this occasion was not to the potential financial advantage on the market which the knowledge would have given him; he and his courier immediately took the news to the government.[21] It was then repeated in later popular accounts, such as that of Morton.[23][24] The basis for the Rothschild's most famously profitable move was made after the news of British victory had been made public. Nathan Rothschild calculated that the future reduction in government borrowing brought about by the peace would create a bounce in British government bonds after a two-year stabilisation, which would finalise the post-war restructuring of the domestic economy.[22][23][24] In what has been described as one of the most audacious moves in financial history, Nathan immediately bought up the government bond market, for what at the time seemed an excessively high price, before waiting two years, then selling the bonds on the crest of a short bounce in the market in 1817 for a 40% profit. Given the sheer power of leverage the Rothschild family had at their disposal, this profit was an enormous sum.[22]

Nathan Mayer Rothschild started his business in Manchester in 1806 and gradually moved it to London, where in 1809 he acquired the location at 2 New Court in St. Swithin's Lane, City of London,[21] where it operates today; he established N M Rothschild & Sons in 1811. In 1818, he arranged a £5 million (equal to £330 million in 2016) loan to the Prussian government, and the issuing of bonds for government loans formed a mainstay of his bank’s business. He gained a position of such power in the City of London that by 1825–26 he was able to supply enough coin to the Bank of England to enable it to avert a market liquidity crisis.

The cliff notes is that if Napoleon had conquered Europe, took a pause to hold all his gains, then subsequently conquered the entire (what is now know as the) United Kingdom. Not only would everyone be speaking French, but the entire Globalist Jewish Banker cabal aka the Rothschilds and the 4-5 cohorts whose names I forget (I'm sure Zel knows all that if you ask him), would have lost all their gold and billions/trillions in money.

Napoleon was not some "mere annoyance". He was a bonafide game changer. People try to compare him to Hitler and vis versa for a good reason. His contributions to the legal world are just a taste of what other changes he would have brought had he succeeded in conquering.

Can you elaborate on some of these legal changes? Also, any specific books you recommend?

Read the whole article and check the sources for more information. You could also Google or Amazon search for history books on the Napoleonic Code. It's been written to death. The wiki is probably good enough.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleonic_Code

Post: #34

(08-09-2017 08:40 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

(08-09-2017 05:58 AM)Enigma Wrote:  ^ Napoleon wasn't even French though.

This is splitting hairs, probably worse. He was Corsican, and Corsica has been part of France since 1768. It's not like he was born in Puerto Rico and people call him an American.

It's only splitting hairs to someone who doesn't know what they're talking about.

The Treaty of Versailles was in 1768; the Corsicans were still fighting the French in 1769, were not formally annexed until 1770, and were not actually part of the French state until decades after that.

Napoleon was born in 1769.

Corsicans are genetically Italian, his family was descended from Italian nobility, he spoke French with a strong accent his entire life, and his heroes growing up were an anti-French Corsican revolutionary (Paoli) and ancient Roman generals.

In fact, his dreams of conquest stemmed from the fact that he considered himself "descended from the men who build empires" (i.e. Romans).

Post: #35

(08-09-2017 01:28 PM)Enigma Wrote:  

(08-09-2017 08:40 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

(08-09-2017 05:58 AM)Enigma Wrote:  ^ Napoleon wasn't even French though.

This is splitting hairs, probably worse. He was Corsican, and Corsica has been part of France since 1768. It's not like he was born in Puerto Rico and people call him an American.

It's only splitting hairs to someone who doesn't know what they're talking about.

The Treaty of Versailles was in 1768; the Corsicans were still fighting the French in 1769, were not formally annexed until 1770, and were not actually part of the French state until decades after that.

Napoleon was born in 1769.

Corsicans are genetically Italian, his family was descended from Italian nobility, he spoke French with a strong accent his entire life, and his heroes growing up were an anti-French Corsican revolutionary (Paoli) and ancient Roman generals.

In fact, his dreams of conquest stemmed from the fact that he considered himself "descended from the men who build empires" (i.e. Romans).

So because he is genetically closer to Italians, he isn't French? When he lived his adult life, served in the military, and ruled France?

Nationality is only genetic based in your mind? Let me know now, because you know damn well that I am not going to get into any ridiculous argument with you, because you could argue with a wall for 40 nights straight.

Post: #36

(08-09-2017 10:54 AM)Dalaran1991 Wrote:  

(08-09-2017 10:39 AM)Renzy Wrote:  It's sad, but the citizens of France had their vote.

Maybe in 2022, after another five years of "motives unclear" incidents, they'll see things differently when the next election rolls around...

People haven't paid attention to what Going Strong has said.

The "French" people voted, and they voted Le Pen.

But they were already vastly outnumbered by the cucked liberal and the overwhelming number of non-native "French" citizens.

What Samseau predicted has already happened. The demographic changes has already been in place so that no change can ever come through democratic voting. From now on every election will simply be for the sake of appearances.

If change ever come, it will come through alternative means.

Update: they caught the perpetrator, but France being France this means nothing. He will go through a very lengthy trial process during which he will be better protected than your daughter taking a walk in the street of Cologne.

Unless Nord-Pas-de-Calais is where the only true French people live, then I doubt it.

Didn't the Western part of France, which probably has the least the least amount immigrants and more importantly (for many of our wonderful political posters) the least amount of "non-eu immigrants" vote heavily for Macron?

Lets face it, France loves socialism.

Post: #37

(08-09-2017 01:28 PM)Enigma Wrote:  

(08-09-2017 08:40 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

(08-09-2017 05:58 AM)Enigma Wrote:  ^ Napoleon wasn't even French though.

This is splitting hairs, probably worse. He was Corsican, and Corsica has been part of France since 1768. It's not like he was born in Puerto Rico and people call him an American.

It's only splitting hairs to someone who doesn't know what they're talking about.

The Treaty of Versailles was in 1768; the Corsicans were still fighting the French in 1769, were not formally annexed until 1770, and were not actually part of the French state until decades after that.

Napoleon was born in 1769.

Corsicans are genetically Italian, his family was descended from Italian nobility, he spoke French with a strong accent his entire life, and his heroes growing up were an anti-French Corsican revolutionary (Paoli) and ancient Roman generals.

In fact, his dreams of conquest stemmed from the fact that he considered himself "descended from the men who build empires" (i.e. Romans).

Most French people from the southern quarter of the country have a thick accent (at least those who are originally from there) that they will not shed. Corsicans have much in common with the Provençals, who were also part of the Italian sphere (as part of the republc of Genoa, like Corsica).

Napoleon grew up in the French heartland, in military schools since the age of 10, he was completely inculcated in French military and cultural values.

Paoli and the Corsican revolution were funded by the British, his ephemeral republic was molded after the British system.

Napoleon started out as a mason, he was into the occult and was fascinated by ancient Egypt, that's why the main vault of the original temple of Isis sits in the Louvre. The Louvre pyramid is not there by chance, and Macron didn't have his initiative inauguration speech at the foot of that pyramid by chance. This aspect of Napoleon's background accounted for some of his early meteoritic rise, but he parted ways with them later on, retaining some of the better modern elements from the masonic mantra, while falling back on his conservative deep French and Corsican values. The globalists as Zel indicated backed England big time, and they almost lost it all.

Post: #38

People in france do not give a fuck about their soldiers, people who join the military there are seen as lost with no other options in life so they chose to become mindless drones instead of people who chose to protect their country out of patriotism. It's really not like in the US. I've only met one french guy out of many who was patriotic and was down for Marine Le Pen.

This is why I don't think this event will have any effect on the average french person's views towards muslims/immigrants in general. It's not the first attack and it wont be the last.

Post: #39

(08-09-2017 09:22 AM)Uruz Wrote:  

(08-09-2017 08:56 AM)Dalaran1991 Wrote:  We're still making the French military joke, again?

Should not be made fun of.

France waged war probably every decade plus fought in their colonies so compared to most countries that exist today, French got more victory notches than most, would not be surprised if France was in the top 5 countries that won the most wars in history.

Ahem.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Years%27_War

Post: #40

Pesky Buddhists

Post: #41

(08-09-2017 04:03 PM)godzilla Wrote:  

(08-09-2017 10:54 AM)Dalaran1991 Wrote:  

(08-09-2017 10:39 AM)Renzy Wrote:  It's sad, but the citizens of France had their vote.

Maybe in 2022, after another five years of "motives unclear" incidents, they'll see things differently when the next election rolls around...

People haven't paid attention to what Going Strong has said.

The "French" people voted, and they voted Le Pen.

But they were already vastly outnumbered by the cucked liberal and the overwhelming number of non-native "French" citizens.

What Samseau predicted has already happened. The demographic changes has already been in place so that no change can ever come through democratic voting. From now on every election will simply be for the sake of appearances.

If change ever come, it will come through alternative means.

Update: they caught the perpetrator, but France being France this means nothing. He will go through a very lengthy trial process during which he will be better protected than your daughter taking a walk in the street of Cologne.

Unless Nord-Pas-de-Calais is where the only true French people live, then I doubt it.

Didn't the Western part of France, which probably has the least the least amount immigrants and more importantly (for many of our wonderful political posters) the least amount of "non-eu immigrants" vote heavily for Macron?

Lets face it, France loves socialism.

Brittany is one of the most Catholic regions in France, but it was cucked in the early 20th century thorough the church, kind of like a precursor to Vatican II. The church was remolded in 1905 during the 3rd Reublic and became associated with social progress, and a century later the Bretons are still voting pink.

A le Pen-style platform has a ceiling of 40% tops, no amount of terror or upheaval is going to change that, the years before the elections had saturation-level grand terrorist events. That ceiling is higher than in other countries like Holland (see Wilders' 15% score), but it's not high enough to clear the 50% runoff bar. You need a softer nationalist approach to win, and you need to split the Moslem/African vote. A broader coalition that's socially conservative, economically populist, Gaullist/nationalist and racially inclusive would have won. This is the Soral line, that's why he's public enemy #1 in France.

Post: #42

(08-09-2017 01:35 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  So because he is genetically closer to Italians, he isn't French? When he lived his adult life, served in the military, and ruled France?

Nationality is only genetic based in your mind? Let me know now, because you know damn well that I am not going to get into any ridiculous argument with you, because you could argue with a wall for 40 nights straight.

Yea, that comment on Napoleon not being French puzzled me as well. According to every other reputable source, Napoleon is French.

But wait - master historian Enigma of the RVF has some groundbreaking new research to show us that, in fact, we were wrong this whole time.

Post: #43

It's more complex than that - Napoleon wanted to build a new and better France, and he definitely viewed himself as an outsider. He was treated as such growing up in military school, picked on relentlessly for years.

Post: #44

(08-09-2017 04:30 PM)CaptainChardonnay Wrote:  People in france do not give a fuck about their soldiers, people who join the military there are seen as lost with no other options in life so they chose to become mindless drones instead of people who chose to protect their country out of patriotism. It's really not like in the US. I've only met one french guy out of many who was patriotic and was down for Marine Le Pen.

This is why I don't think this event will have any effect on the average french person's views towards muslims/immigrants in general. It's not the first attack and it wont be the last.

There is a pro-military culture in the more conservative elements of French society. I've got older cousins and an uncle who got swept up in the 1969 red bullshit/color revolution and who hate anything military, but I also have peeps who went into the army including a colonel and a Parachutiste (special forces). Back when I was a kid I was considering joining the air force.

Levallois is a weird suburb, it used to be a total working class town, you had the Citroen plant, where the famous 2CV (deux chevaux) car was manufactured, and more plants around and across the river in Courbevoie. Then you also have nearby Neuilly, the poshest suburb in all of France.

The plants closed in the 80s, Levallois gentrified in the 90s and a lot of Neuilly kids who couldn't afford buying there colonized Levallois. You also have a lot of service firms and companies like Price Waterhouse and l'Oreal whose world HQs are there now, and those attract the kind of yuppyish Macron career girls and men who would never vote for le Pen and hate Trump. Those are the people who might look down on the military, they're not in the majority.

I've got at least two close friends who live or work in Levallois, one of whom two blocks away from the accident, glad to hear they're safe. The poor lads who were run over were ambushed, the jihadi was stalking them. They really didn't have their guards on and couldn't react in time after the driver pounced on them. Thankfully they're all safe, just some broken bones.

The terrorist is an Algerian legal resident with no previous record, it doesn't look like he's a local "inner city" product. He's got accomplices, his BMW was rented out under someone else's name and there is a safe house in a middle class neighborhood.

Back in the 1990s, there was a wave of Algerian jihadi terror on French soil, which turned out to be carried out by Algerian intelligence services with complicity from the deep state, along the lines of the Gladio terror wave from the 1970s-80s in Italy and W. Germany.

http://www.historycommons.org/context.js...santegidio

I'm not sure if this attack is organic or if it's a false flag, or somewhere in between, usually key facts start emerging later on. The Nice attack was not an organic jihadi event, neither was the Bataclan attack.

Post: #45

(08-09-2017 04:45 PM)911 Wrote:  

(08-09-2017 04:03 PM)godzilla Wrote:  

(08-09-2017 10:54 AM)Dalaran1991 Wrote:  

(08-09-2017 10:39 AM)Renzy Wrote:  It's sad, but the citizens of France had their vote.

Maybe in 2022, after another five years of "motives unclear" incidents, they'll see things differently when the next election rolls around...

People haven't paid attention to what Going Strong has said.

The "French" people voted, and they voted Le Pen.

But they were already vastly outnumbered by the cucked liberal and the overwhelming number of non-native "French" citizens.

What Samseau predicted has already happened. The demographic changes has already been in place so that no change can ever come through democratic voting. From now on every election will simply be for the sake of appearances.

If change ever come, it will come through alternative means.

Update: they caught the perpetrator, but France being France this means nothing. He will go through a very lengthy trial process during which he will be better protected than your daughter taking a walk in the street of Cologne.

Unless Nord-Pas-de-Calais is where the only true French people live, then I doubt it.

Didn't the Western part of France, which probably has the least the least amount immigrants and more importantly (for many of our wonderful political posters) the least amount of "non-eu immigrants" vote heavily for Macron?

Lets face it, France loves socialism.

Brittany is one of the most Catholic regions in France, but it was cucked in the early 20th century thorough the church, kind of like a precursor to Vatican II. The church was remolded in 1905 during the 3rd Reublic and became associated with social progress, and a century later the Bretons are still voting pink.

A le Pen-style platform has a ceiling of 40% tops, no amount of terror or upheaval is going to change that, the years before the elections had saturation-level grand terrorist events. That ceiling is higher than in other countries like Holland (see Wilders' 15% score), but it's not high enough to clear the 50% runoff bar. You need a softer nationalist approach to win, and you need to split the Moslem/African vote. A broader coalition that's socially conservative, economically populist, Gaullist/nationalist and racially inclusive would have won. This is the Soral line, that's why he's public enemy #1 in France.

There are still very conservative parts of Brittany. Its a complicated region.

I've always wondered if stamping out the language effects things as well.

http://www.breizh.net/icdbl/saozg/endang...itizenship

The region is very anti big business and pro union. Last year during the strikes after the labor law was passed. They boarded up, graffitied and destroyed bank buildings and hotels. They even boarded up ATMs so you couldn't get money out.

But your right on money about everything. Le Pen really can't win if Brittany and other rural parts of France are going to 70% left

Post: #46

Brittany is kind of weird in that it's both socially conservative, traditionalist, and leftist. It's a quirk that was achieved by working through the church, which was dealt a blow from the inside at the turn of the last century, at the same time the military was purged after the Dreyfus Affair in 1905.

Great people, cool headed like the Normans, and beautiful land. The local dialect is no longer endangered, nowhere as prevalent as Welsh or Gaelic but enough local kids are picking it up to carry on the heritage.

Post: #47

(08-09-2017 05:46 PM)Samseau Wrote:  It's more complex than that - Napoleon wanted to build a new and better France, and he definitely viewed himself as an outsider. He was treated as such growing up in military school, picked on relentlessly for years.

You could say it's a Napoleon......complex

Post: #48

Yesterday, there was a huge security display in the sub-urban trains (RERs) in the posh areas West and South West of Paris, just after this attack I mean. Soldiers inside many trains, in the wealthy parts of their trajectories.

That's actually the rich Globalists (ruling France), urgently protecting against their real fear: terrorists implementing attacks in the wealthy areas where they (the Globalists and their -adopted usually- children) live.

The MSM reactions (see Le Parisien), tellingly, are focused on the Where of the attack, stunned at the fact that terrorists dared attack a rich, posh area. Like, it's unfair, it's against Globalists' rules...

Post: #49

Let's hope the next slaughter is of a globalist posh pre-school. Do the kids deserve it? No. But what else will test the globalist resolve and public attitudes towards what they consider to be us plebs?

These heartless bastards and bitches were fine with thousands of European women getting raped. What's with a little bit of enrichment in their own neighborhood? These traitors are Satan's spawn, full of lies and deceit.

Post: #50

(08-09-2017 01:35 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  So because he is genetically closer to Italians, he isn't French? When he lived his adult life, served in the military, and ruled France?

Nationality is only genetic based in your mind? Let me know now, because you know damn well that I am not going to get into any ridiculous argument with you, because you could argue with a wall for 40 nights straight.

Quote:Upon graduating in September 1785, Bonaparte was commissioned a second lieutenant in La Fère artillery regiment.[21][note 4] He served in Valence and Auxonne until after the outbreak of the Revolution in 1789, and took nearly two years' leave in Corsica and Paris during this period. At this time, he was a fervent Corsican nationalist, and wrote to Corsican leader Pasquale Paoli in May 1789, "As the nation was perishing I was born. Thirty thousand Frenchmen were vomited on to our shores, drowning the throne of liberty in waves of blood. Such was the odious sight which was the first to strike me".[29]

He spent the early years of the Revolution in Corsica, fighting in a complex three-way struggle among royalists, revolutionaries, and Corsican nationalists. He was a supporter of the republican Jacobin movement, organising clubs in Corsica,[30] and was given command over a battalion of volunteers. He was promoted to captain in the regular army in July 1792, despite exceeding his leave of absence and leading a riot against French troops.[31]

He came into conflict with Paoli, who had decided to split with France and sabotage the French assault on the Sardinian island of La Maddalena.[32] Bonaparte and his family fled to the French mainland in June 1793 because of the split with Paoli.[33]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleon#Early_career

Yes, the guy who was born in Corsica, was a Corsican nationalist into his mid 20s, spent most of his early military career on endless leaves in Corsica, was involved in anti-French revolutionary activities in Corsica while he was serving as a French officer, and only left Corsica six years before the coup that made him First Consul because he was snubbed by his Corsican revolutionary idol -- is clearly as French as they come.

Did the Greeks become Turkish when the Byzantine Empire was overrun by the Ottomans? No, they were still Greek, because Greek is both a nationality and an ethnicity.

All I did was point out that the example used for the magnificence of the French, which is also both a nationality and an ethnicity, was not born in France nor was he ethnically French nor did he have any loyalties to France for a good portion of his life.

And I've provided evidence for that, unlike the people who are just making things up and trying to shut me down with rhetoric.