Post: #1

It's safe to say that men are thirstier than ever in America, perhaps throughout the whole Western world.

If I could share one anecdote that says it all, I matched with a 300lb+ black chick on Tinder the other day. (I run an autolike script to save time lol).

Her profile said "Don't try that Neflix and chill shit with me"!

I couldn't fucking believe it!

Evidently, there were loads of men trying to harpoon that whale. On the hand, those are some fucking brave sailors. On the other hand, I knew things were bad - but not that bad.

The one thing that I can't wrap my head around is...WHY? Sure, there's a lot of fat chicks skewing ratios.

But detracting from that, I see so many low-T, whiny, high-pitched voice, out of shape dudes w/ no sex drive. That's at least HALF the guys I run into on a daily basis. Then consider all the faggots running around. And the Caitlin Jenners. All these 'alternative' lifestyles are totally acceptably these days. And they mainly pull MEN out of the dating pool, not women.

Shouldn't that mean that straight, red-blooded males should have more options?

Post: #2

It's been here since the dawn of time.
Critical for the Evolutionary Masterplan.
It's just amplified through the internet.
Men are stupid. They have no self control.
Plain and simple.

Post: #3

In times past, I don't think 300 lb women really existed in large numbers. But they certainly weren't lusted after. I mean how the fuck do these guys even get up for them, and locate their snatch underneath the fat rolls?

Post: #4

Recurring Effort free sex in an overpopulated world.
Men hate being alone.

Post: #5

Screw that noise.

I'd rather pull up xhamster. Hell, I'd rather be gay.

Post: #6

Most rather not.

Post: #7

(07-16-2017 10:58 PM)vegasjohnny Wrote:  I'd rather pull up xhamster. Hell, I'd rather be gay.

At 400lb it is hard to tell what gender a naked fatso is.

All lost in the folds

Post: #8

"Shouldn't that mean that straight, red-blooded males should have more options?"

They do, so long as you aren't wasting your time on pedestal apps like Tinder which are primarily used by women to boost their ego. Not to meet men.

The 300lb land whale isn't having men lining up to take her on a date. She has millions of matches from men who just swipe right on everything giving her an inflated ego of reality.

Low T faggots are still low T faggots. If you want sex, go out and get it. Apps like these are inherently pathetic to begin with because they don't force real interaction. Nobody is getting a bitch wet with a 'witty' text message.

Post: #9

I don't know about that.
I meet men on a daily basis happily, even bragging about dating fat single mothers.
In fact, I just got put on hold for a week for a former fattie single mother 2 days ago.
I deleted her. But, the fact remains. OP has a beef. He's wasting his time. But it's real.

Post: #10

(07-16-2017 11:08 PM)Rush87 Wrote:  Low T faggots are still low T faggots. If you want sex, go out and get it. Apps like these are inherently pathetic to begin with because they don't force real interaction. Nobody is getting a bitch wet with a 'witty' text message.

No bitch is getting wet from the 60th witty txt message she got sent in a week.

Post: #11

Women aren't attracted to, nor capable of loving you, in the way you are drawn to them. Since their core needs are met thanks to modern technology, conveniences, various hand-outs and mandates from government to women, men's biological use has been lowered and given to women free of charge. Their sexual attraction is largely based on providing and protecting, since our socialist gov gives that to them for free they just don't need you. They are free to go after the top 10-20% of men who hit their primal attraction triggers....that's why drug dealers, athletes, youtube celebs, whatever, are doing better than ever with pussy.

It's hard to swallow how different men and women really are, that's why civilizations always had very different rules for men and women, it never made sense to treat them even similarly.

When you accept that women don't have agency and are closer to automations than a conscious man, then it makes a lot more sense. Your frustration stems from you placing them on the same level of agency and consciousness as a man.

Post: #12

Sperm is cheap, eggs are expensive.

Post: #13

Here you go.

Post: #14

(07-16-2017 11:29 PM)Disco_Volante Wrote:  Women aren't attracted to, nor capable of loving you, in the way you are drawn to them. Since their core needs are met thanks to modern technology, conveniences, various hand-outs and mandates from government to women, men's biological use has been lowered and given to women free of charge. Their sexual attraction is largely based on providing and protecting, since our socialist gov gives that to them for free they just don't need you. They are free to go after the top 10-20% of men who hit their primal attraction triggers....that's why drug dealers, athletes, youtube celebs, whatever, are doing better than ever with pussy.

It's hard to swallow how different men and women really are, that's why civilizations always had very different rules for men and women, it never made sense to treat them even similarly.

When you accept that women don't have agency and are closer to automations than a conscious man, then it makes a lot more sense. Your frustration stems from you placing them on the same level of agency and consciousness as a man.

Sounds like you read the manipulated man. I'm reading it now. Harsh but clear perspective.

Post: #15

Quote:I meet men on a daily basis happily, even bragging about dating fat single mothers.

One of my obese female friends confided in me how she never wants for sex; she can get it at the drop of a hat.

Also, single mothers that i know have their phones constantly being blown up by thirsty males; Guys offering to cook; guys jostling to secure dates; worker-drones falling over themselves to sign up for a lifetime of servitude.

Game has taught us that women invariably drift toward high status males. This is especially so when their SMV is still relatively high, although it doesn't stop them in their latter years. The low status males that receive the measly scraps of their attention during their lower SMV years are merely placeholders who are replaceable in an instant. These men may not realize it, but all they do is facilitate the woman.

There really isn't much of a choice for a man in today's dating world, other than to improve themselves to the highest level possible. Absent that, men must concede to living on the fringes of the dating marketplace.

But remember the basic rule: If it flies, floats, or fucks, it's cheaper to rent.

Post: #16

It's supply and demand -> pussy is demand inelastic.

The hot/average girls are getting hit up by high status guys -> pareto principle of 80% of hot women fucking 20% of men because the medium of communication is shifting to social media and apps where your value is 'listed' like a stock exchange.

Economics/statistics and even political theory can explain a lot of this.

I had a whole bunch of notes to explain this, the social science theory focusing of different stages of meeting women too;

- gift unwrapping phase (when you first meet, the interest charts of their attention supply and eagerness)
- the long time no see phase (spike in interest - charted on the same as above)
- friendzone/taking too long to be sexual (asymptotic notation -> can be broken but need time or status change)
- power struggles when in a relationship (zero sum game -> need to re-frame)
- managing harems and keeping them in the loop or not (prisoners dilemma where they bring their ego into this to lockdown instead of enjoying the ride)
- harems' usual 3-6 month duration (opportunity cost of rotating chicks vs. where they are self aware in totem pole )

Long story short, the hot/successful guys have options. More options because it's clearer to women who to target now.

If you ain't got options, you ain't one of them.

I could write more but my notebook got stolen so it's all gonna be a paraphrase.

Post: #17

Technology has benefitted women and very high status men getting laid. So lays that used to go to average guys or sub-average guys have moved up the foodchain. What that means is more thirst in the middle and especially the bottom of the foodchain. Sub-average women can now get laid hypergamously which leaves their former partners thirsty.

Twenty five years ago in college I had girlfriends with good looking friends or roommates (7s and 8s) who had trouble getting laid. The difference is technology.

Also, some lays happen because a woman wants attention/intimacy/validation. With technology and thirst, they can get a lot of that validation better online.

Post: #18

These women are getting run through by battalions of men and at the end cannot get a man to commit. Only damaged men will commit to a known whore for long term. If you love your daughter keep her on lock down.

Post: #19

Frankly though, it's the men creating the problem here. If men had the game to pursue women at their level, or higher, there would be little thirst.

It's when Ms.Fattie single welfare mommy gets hit on by troves of guys higher value than her that the whole sex market crashes. That fattie will have hot, slim friends who see that. Of course, theyll then get the distorted idea they deserve a movie star (which won't happen).

Men either need to learn game, or have the self respect to MGTOW.

Post: #20

Twenty years ago, friends of mine who picked up/dated attractive women, would occasionally have a ONS with an obese woman. It's something some of us couldn't do. But it was what it was, everyone knew the score.

Also twenty years ago, words like "plus size" and "fat shaming' didn't exist. Now, you have a plethora of obese women who are brainwashed into thinking that they are all beautiful and perfect, and when men respond accordingly, it is men who are blamed for being shallow.

There was that article from a while back where a 25 y/o obese women wrote [paraphrase] "I tried internet dating and no one replied". When anyone pointed out her weight was a problem, they were shouted down. She probably still believes that it had nothing to do with it, ya know, because all her friends said so.

So it's not that thirst has changed, rather our culture, where anything a woman does is fully supported and men (especially white men) are the problem.

Post: #21

(07-17-2017 11:18 AM)CRR Wrote:  Twenty years ago, friends of mine who picked up/dated attractive women, would occasionally have a ONS with an obese woman. It's something some of us couldn't do. But it was what it was, everyone knew the score.

Also twenty years ago, words like "plus size" and "fat shaming' didn't exist. Now, you have a plethora of obese women who are brainwashed into thinking that they are all beautiful and perfect, and when men respond accordingly, it is men who are blamed for being shallow.

There was that article from a while back where a 25 y/o obese women wrote [paraphrase] "I tried internet dating and no one replied". When anyone pointed out her weight was a problem, they were shouted down. She probably still believes that it had nothing to do with it, ya know, because all her friends said so.

So it's not that thirst has changed, rather our culture, where anything a woman does is fully supported and men (especially white men) are the problem.

One thing i really hate is how society has blended OBESE WITH PLUS SIZE and created THICK. Meaning now every overweight chick is simply THICK. Which i find very very distasteful. Its the equivalent of saying a penis between 3 inches and 10 inches is average. smh.

Post: #22

Again, read my signature. Currently, the USA/Canada population is 350 million. Europe is 750, combining the two results in 1.1 billion socialist/1st world paradigm that has some intrinsic and regional differences, much greater however given the large eastern countries in Europe that don't have 1st world economies. Still, that's 1.1 of over 7 billion people in the world total = 15%. Not only is the wealth of the West not going to last, modern socialism and that government style will see utter failure in the next 40 years, if not 10-20. Periods like this have happened, albeit with different surroundings of technology and local flavor, for thousands of years. There's always a reset. What's more, when wealth is super concentrated, which is where we're headed, things also revert back to more local dynamics. When food and survival are paramount and thought about much much more, consuming most of the time just to get to tomorrow, things like traveling and entertainment with discretionary income (now pretty much gone since the debt society is as well) become more or less irrelevant.

But back to the main point: there are a lot of countries in which survival and thus traditional living are the standard, still. Get to those. That's where girls have less options to act out and also generally believe in what normal humans always have. Yes, it's easy to say, hard to do, and then you have the issue of having to pull off being in the different culture for optimal effect. But at least I'm providing a different perspective.

Post: #23

It's simple actually. Emancipation of women combined with rampant liberalism and the decay of patriarchy brought us:

1) a generation of women who require huge amounts of Game and can get tingles only for Alphas;
2) a generation of weak effeminate men who lack basic masculinity and Game skills - the things their grandfathers took for granted.

This discrepancy causes some unpleasant effects in the sexual marketplace, one of which is the ever increasing proportion of thirsty men who are sexually unattractive to women and practically live in celibacy. Alpha fux, Beta bux.

Post: #24

turnoff #1: she's freakishly tall
turnoff #2: no fucky sucky until marriage

Post: #25

Didn't bother with reading the topic, I'll just answer the question. It's not an epidemic, it's biology. All quiet on the Western front.