Post: #26

(06-08-2017 03:57 PM)Poker Wrote:  Kaotic is spot on with his comment. SJW's use this tactic all the time. They use one outlining example that makes up a tiny, insignificant portion of what you are arguing against and then try and use it to discredit your argument, expanding it to represent the entire thing they are defending. They will normally throw in a character assassination attempt too.

Yeah, annoying, and it's done here too. Example: this thread the other day with the tranny that had a baby. Commenters were all like "The West is falling!". Sure, because of one crazy Portland couple, the West is falling.

I can't believe this woman likes her body. No woman who's fat likes her body - they're all very well aware of how it affects men. She can't just lose the weight so easily though, so they have to convince each other that they're in loooove.

Post: #27

Next report they will say that is he who takes care of the house and kids, and even lets her bang other guys in front of him.
Not sure if this couple is real or made out for the article, but if real, it proofs that men need more than muscles to get women (yes, because she is a sea lion, not a woman).

Post: #28

Maybe she's got a large trust fund?

Post: #29

(06-08-2017 03:57 PM)Poker Wrote:  

(06-08-2017 02:15 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

(06-08-2017 01:14 PM)questor70 Wrote:  Isn't that pic close to the reality of today's skewed dating marketplace, though?

No I don't think is a representation of the dating pool, this is an extreme example and propaganda pushed by the left to normalize "body positivity"

Kaotic is spot on with his comment. SJW's use this tactic all the time. They use one outlining example that makes up a tiny, insignificant portion of what you are arguing against and then try and use it to discredit your argument, expanding it to represent the entire thing they are defending. They will normally throw in a character assassination attempt too. For example:

You: I am worried about the Muslim community within my country.
SJW: I know a lovely Muslim person you racist bigot, this shows that there is no issue, the issue is you!

You: Men aren't attracted to masculine women.
SJW: I know a man who married a women who you would describe as 'masculine'. You can't handle strong, powerful women.


It stifles debate and stops society from engaging in self reflection and improvement by ignoring all problems and issues within a society, thus keeping the egalitarian, everyone is the same narrative alive.

The vast majority of any group are not perpetrators of (insert: crime/stereotype etc) so you're ''SJW'' argument is mute, null and void.

Post: #30

(06-09-2017 07:06 AM)Snowbunny Sorcerer Wrote:  

(06-08-2017 03:57 PM)Poker Wrote:  

(06-08-2017 02:15 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

(06-08-2017 01:14 PM)questor70 Wrote:  Isn't that pic close to the reality of today's skewed dating marketplace, though?

No I don't think is a representation of the dating pool, this is an extreme example and propaganda pushed by the left to normalize "body positivity"

Kaotic is spot on with his comment. SJW's use this tactic all the time. They use one outlining example that makes up a tiny, insignificant portion of what you are arguing against and then try and use it to discredit your argument, expanding it to represent the entire thing they are defending. They will normally throw in a character assassination attempt too. For example:

You: I am worried about the Muslim community within my country.
SJW: I know a lovely Muslim person you racist bigot, this shows that there is no issue, the issue is you!

You: Men aren't attracted to masculine women.
SJW: I know a man who married a women who you would describe as 'masculine'. You can't handle strong, powerful women.


It stifles debate and stops society from engaging in self reflection and improvement by ignoring all problems and issues within a society, thus keeping the egalitarian, everyone is the same narrative alive.

The vast majority of any group are not perpetrators of (insert: crime/stereotype etc) so you're ''SJW'' argument is mute, null and void.

Post: #31

(06-08-2017 08:46 PM)GreenHills Wrote:  I can't believe this woman likes her body. No woman who's fat likes her body - they're all very well aware of how it affects men. She can't just lose the weight so easily though, so they have to convince each other that they're in loooove.

This is such bullshit too. She CAN lose the weight and yes, it will require HARD work. But the SJW propaganda machine pumping out articles like this tells other hamplanets that it's ok to be a fucking walking mass of lard with legs AND still able to snag an Alpha (although let's be honest, this guy may look alpha but he is a far from it).

"Tell someone a lie enough times and they will eventually believe it"

Post: #32

The fact that it's a story is the story

Edit: Other examples...

- Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher...because normally older women can't capture the attention of younger alphas
- Terrorist didn't yell allahu Akbar...because, well, you know
- Racist southerners lynch black guy...the fact that this would be a YUGE story is the story, even though liberals think this is still a thing

The bigger the story, the more rare the event. This is a simple fact that liberals don't seem to understand.

Post: #33

(06-09-2017 07:06 AM)Snowbunny Sorcerer Wrote:  

(06-08-2017 03:57 PM)Poker Wrote:  

(06-08-2017 02:15 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

(06-08-2017 01:14 PM)questor70 Wrote:  Isn't that pic close to the reality of today's skewed dating marketplace, though?

No I don't think is a representation of the dating pool, this is an extreme example and propaganda pushed by the left to normalize "body positivity"

Kaotic is spot on with his comment. SJW's use this tactic all the time. They use one outlining example that makes up a tiny, insignificant portion of what you are arguing against and then try and use it to discredit your argument, expanding it to represent the entire thing they are defending. They will normally throw in a character assassination attempt too. For example:

You: I am worried about the Muslim community within my country.
SJW: I know a lovely Muslim person you racist bigot, this shows that there is no issue, the issue is you!

You: Men aren't attracted to masculine women.
SJW: I know a man who married a women who you would describe as 'masculine'. You can't handle strong, powerful women.


It stifles debate and stops society from engaging in self reflection and improvement by ignoring all problems and issues within a society, thus keeping the egalitarian, everyone is the same narrative alive.

The vast majority of any group are not perpetrators of (insert: crime/stereotype etc) so you're ''SJW'' argument is mute, null and void.

Not really, I doubt anyone here with the exception of you would have an issue with the following statements:

'the vast majority of Muslims hold views that are incompatible with the views that are held by the vast majority of people in the west'

'The vast majority of people from Somalia have an IQ below 100'

'The vast majority of feminists make poor partners for long term relationships'

'The vast majority of obese people are going to suffer physical health issues'



While lumping large groups of people under a banner is far from a perfect system, I still believe it holds a place when it comes to discussing millions/billions of people. Of course a degree of common sense is required, stuff like 'all men are rapists' is obviously bullshit, it only takes a tiny amount of evidence to destroy that statement. 'Saudi Arabian men view western women as beneath them', carries more weight. If you try and nit-pick these things, the conversation gets bogged down and more often than not, you entirely forget what you were debating in the first place.

Post: #34

She needs to go on the Ketogenic diet.

Post: #35

(06-08-2017 03:57 PM)Poker Wrote:  

(06-08-2017 02:15 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

(06-08-2017 01:14 PM)questor70 Wrote:  Isn't that pic close to the reality of today's skewed dating marketplace, though?

No I don't think is a representation of the dating pool, this is an extreme example and propaganda pushed by the left to normalize "body positivity"

Kaotic is spot on with his comment. SJW's use this tactic all the time. They use one outlining example that makes up a tiny, insignificant portion of what you are arguing against and then try and use it to discredit your argument, expanding it to represent the entire thing they are defending. They will normally throw in a character assassination attempt too. For example:

You: I am worried about the Muslim community within my country.
SJW: I know a lovely Muslim person you racist bigot, this shows that there is no issue, the issue is you!

You: Men aren't attracted to masculine women.
SJW: I know a man who married a women who you would describe as 'masculine'. You can't handle strong, powerful women.


It stifles debate and stops society from engaging in self reflection and improvement by ignoring all problems and issues within a society, thus keeping the egalitarian, everyone is the same narrative alive.

I don't know about you guys, but I have personally seen several men like that black dude with chicks that big and even bigger. I'm talking about men with ab muscles, traps, delts, arms, etc.

If you come down to the South, pick a popular mall, sit on a bench for a week, you will be able to see a handful or two of these kinds of couples.

Why do you think the game is so fucked up right now? Swol ass men are thirsty betas too! That's why non fat 5s and 6s act like 8s and 9s. They know they could catch a guy that looks like that with only a little bit of work on their part. Some require no work at all. Gals with phat asses are basically women with two pussies. Pussy sells itself, but phat ass is a billboard.

Sorry but I cannot co-sign on what you and Kaotic are talking about, because it sure as fuck ain't like that down here.

(06-08-2017 07:07 PM)bacon Wrote:  Probably a down low brother

Hard to say without any proof or even a hint of a clue. For example I don't see any gayface from the picture, but if we could monitor his behavior, it's possible to catch that.