Post: #26

(05-11-2017 01:21 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  So you think the Romans were nice guys, that is how they conquered most of Europe for a time. lol

Please explain to me how the current civilisation suits my needs.

I think you need to educate yourself before you talk about things you don't know.

Well I certainly don't judge people for being "nice guys" that means weak, if people kill or kill a lot, that's not saying a thing. Modern civilisation kills way more than Romans ever could, but you still call it a civilisation, right?

Well, you are black, right? Without any civilisation you would have way harder time to survive in European (Many parts of North America are really similar to Europe) climate. As you would have harder time to survive (Having to put more effort into survival compared to natural population.) there your chance of survival would be lower, at least in terms of a few generations and eventually you would disappear from the gene pool.

Post: #27

(05-11-2017 01:34 PM)Uruz Wrote:  

(05-11-2017 01:21 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  So you think the Romans were nice guys, that is how they conquered most of Europe for a time. lol

Please explain to me how the current civilisation suits my needs.

I think you need to educate yourself before you talk about things you don't know.

Well I certainly don't judge people for being "nice guys" that means weak, if people kill or kill a lot, that's not saying a thing. Modern civilisation kills way more than Romans ever could, but you still call it a civilisation, right?

Well, you are black, right? Without any civilisation you would have way harder time to survive in European (Many parts of North America are really similar to Europe) climate. As you would have harder time to survive (Having to put more effort into survival compared to natural population.) there your chance of survival would be lower, at least in terms of a few generations and eventually you would disappear from the gene pool.

Just for the record, I was born in Europe and went to all white schools and I survived. Not sure how I would have to put more into survival.

Wasn't it the Moors from Africa that civilized Europe to begin with?

In a few generations, people like you will be extinct.
White women aren't even having children these days.
You were talking about going to Europe in 10-15 years and having 8 kids with a blonde woman. You might want to go now, before it is too late for you.

Post: #28

This wont end well.

Post: #29

(05-11-2017 01:53 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  Just for the record, I was born in Europe and went to all white schools and I survived. Not sure how I would have to put more into survival.

Wasn't it the Moors from Africa that civilized Europe to begin with?

In a few generations, people like you will be extinct.
White women aren't even having children these days.
You were talking about going to Europe in 10-15 years and having 8 kids with a blonde woman. You might want to go now, before it is too late for you.

I love when people like you show their true face.

Post: #30

Just a little reminder not meant to fan the race baiting flame but which bears clarification:

Moors, as in north africans, were not negroids (If this word is taboo, please notify me to edit it if required).

Post: #31

^^People like you means not too bright, I didn't mean white.

Moors were black not Arabs or North African.

I thought this thread was about a crazy time in history.

Let's be honest, you don't like black people and I probably wouldn't like you.

I have met a lot of white forum members and they have all been cool people, so I am far from a racist.

Post: #32

(05-11-2017 01:53 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  Wasn't it the Moors from Africa that civilized Europe to begin with?

No, it was the Moops.

Post: #33

(05-11-2017 02:24 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  Moors were black not Arabs or North African.

Ok, let's defer to info-galactic:

Source Link:

Infogalactic Wrote:The Moors were Muslim inhabitants of the Maghreb, the Iberian Peninsula, Sicily, and Malta during the Middle Ages. The Moors were initially of Berber and Arab descent, though the term was later applied to Africans, Iberian Christian converts to Islam, and people of mixed ancestry.[1][2]
...
The term "Moors" has also been used in Europe in a broader, somewhat derogatory sense to refer to Muslims in general,[4] especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in Spain or North Africa.[5]
...
Moors are not a distinct or self-defined people.[7] Medieval and early modern Europeans variously applied the name to Sub-Saharan Africans, Arabs, Berbers and Muslim Europeans.[8] In the modern Iberian Peninsula, "Moor" is sometimes colloquially used for any person from North Africa, though some people consider this use of the term pejorative.[4] In Spanish the term is "moro", and in Portuguese it is "mouro".

Wikipedia has largely the same article with a few different lines:
Source Link

wikipedia Wrote:The Moors were the Muslim inhabitants of the Maghreb, North Africa, the Iberian Peninsula, Sicily, and Malta during the Middle Ages, who initially were Berber and Arab peoples from North Africa.[1][2]
Moors are not a distinct or self-defined people,[3] and mainstream scholars observed in 1911 that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value."[4] Medieval and early modern Europeans variously applied the name to Arabs, Berber North Africans and Muslim Europeans.[5]

Post: #34

Moor means black.

http://www.taneter.org/moors.html

Author and historian Chancellor Williams said “the original Moors, like the original Egyptians, were black Africans.” The 16th century English playwright William Shakespeare used the word Moor as a synonym for African. His contemporary Christopher Marlowe also used African and Moor interchangeably.Oct 7, 2013

https://www.pinterest.com/marcus47112/im...a/?lp=true

Post: #35

(04-21-2017 04:25 PM)Svoboda Wrote:  

(04-21-2017 03:52 PM)The Beast1 Wrote:  Hasn't history always been crazy?

The last generation was afraid of getting nuked off of the face of the earth.
The previous one had massive armed conflict all around the world.

The world has always been crazy in all sorts of different ways.
Yet you sit here in your comfortable home, with a computer, food on the table, and all with electrical creature comforts whining about how today is the worst day for humanity!

So some old hags have been declared the most beautiful women in the world. Would you rather live in fear of nuclear annihilation, death by preventable disease, or starvation? Because the last two were up until around 100 years or so the most common ways to die.

I don't think today is the worst in history at all. If anything I try to convince people there is less war, less violence, less rape than anytime before (I'm talking on a global scale).
What I think is crazy, is the disconnect between reality and normal.

To respond to fear of nuclear annihilation. Was it most likely? Probably not, but possibly, so it was a genuine threat.
This is not about Julia Roberts, it's about the flood of news like that, and opinions like that. We're not far from a Spanish Inquisition style of justice when it comes to anything that doesn't fit the narrative.
How is old hag Julia Roberts even close to genuinely being the most beautiful woman?

THIS IS THE ANSWER TO THIS QUESTION.

The crazy shit of the past dealt with either religion (which couldn't really be construed as 'crazy', since that's all they had to go with) or with social mores that wouldn't fit in today. The religion stuff, well, we can understand that the Aztecs thought that bloody human sacrifice was the right thing to do, and so on. So let's look past that. As for social mores, it's crazy that the Romans ran gladiatorial fights to the death, for example. And so on.

But let's take this example. On a 'reality versus unreality' scale, there's not much more real than a fight to the death. And as much as bread and circuses was a paper cover for every fault of the Roman Empire and the excesses of royalty, at the core of the activity itself- everything was up front and correct. Strength won over weakness, conflict riled the blood and excited the masses, and destruction was catchy. This is life, this is humanity. The UFC's slogan for many years was 'As Real As It Gets'. Doesn't get much more real than the sands of the Circus Maximus, if you want to know the truth.

But owing to the mass disinformation campaigns of modern media entities, empowered by the vast spread of technology and communication, we are entering into a disinformation era like none has ever seen before. We have powerful entities telling us that transgender is normal and Julia Roberts is the most beautiful woman in the world and women can beat up big dudes with karate kicks. There are 37/62/infinite genders, it's racist to point out that Muslims commit 99% of terror attacks, and Chelsea Clinton is Senate material. Don't forget to give yourself props after giving someone new a handjob.

And so on.

Aiding this spread of disinformation is the progression of technology that continues to remove us from the fire and blood and sweat and earth of life. The voices that speak unreality do so from an expectation that their mores will never be challenged by the pangs of starvation, by the invasion of a neighboring tribe, by the closed hand over a woman's throat of an unstoppable rapist. When was the last time you didn't eat anything more substantial than grass for three days? When was the last time a wild jackal tore your leg open and you barely survived the fevers of infection? When was the last time a gang of men twice your size told you want to do and what to give them, and you were physically compelled to comply under pain of beating or death or worse?

Riven from this forcible intrusion of reality that our advanced technology brings us, we are ever more susceptible to the 'craziness' that the excesses of modern wealth and security bring. For millennia humans feared starvation. Now they fear obesity. How can we find the 'real' in such a world of excess?

Disinformation is the result of the failure of the 'real', meaning the world that nature gave us, to keep up with the 'actual', which is the world we have built up, like beavers damming a flooded river. Technology and wealth caught up with us too fast, and once we had nothing to fight, we had to invent our own devils in the form of Confederate flags and racists, and conservative Christians who formed the bedrock of the greatest civilization ever known to man. We are the flagellants who whipped ourselves too bloody to heal.

Post: #36

(05-11-2017 03:13 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  Moor means black.

http://www.taneter.org/moors.html

Author and historian Chancellor Williams said “the original Moors, like the original Egyptians, were black Africans.” The 16th century English playwright William Shakespeare used the word Moor as a synonym for African. His contemporary Christopher Marlowe also used African and Moor interchangeably.Oct 7, 2013

https://www.pinterest.com/marcus47112/im...a/?lp=true

Well,I must say then that I stand corrected.

Post: #37

(05-11-2017 02:50 PM)Dusty Wrote:  No, it was the Moops.

"There's no Moops! It's Moors! Say Moors!"

Post: #38

(05-11-2017 01:53 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  In a few generations, people like you will be extinct.
White women aren't even having children these days.
You were talking about going to Europe in 10-15 years and having 8 kids with a blonde woman. You might want to go now, before it is too late for you.

This demographic trend will hit blacks too, eventually. Even sub-Saharan Africa's fertility rate is expected to fall below replacement levels by 2070. There are quite a lot of black women enrolled in university these days, so we can expect a drop in the black fertility rate in the developed countries as well.

The education of women poses an existential threat to all of mankind; it's just that the countries that developed fastest (and therefore started educating women the soonest) will be the first to suffer demographic collapse.

Post: #39

With mass communication technology the modern world is unique in its power to propagate and impose the ideology of the ruler.

But if you are talking about the social dynamics, we are far from being uniquely decadent.

At the fall of the Roman Empire life in Rome is pretty much like today: young men out of work in droves and roam the streets doing bad things, women are promiscuous and pass their times smoking weed/drugs, dont give a shit about what their "patrician" dads think. The whole economy is supported by a fake money system, corrupt politician relies on arena games to please and dull the masses (just like modern consumerism). Security of the nation is entrusted to the foederati: immigrants from conquered territories, who ultimately sacked and conquered Rome.

Really this is not new at all. The idea of an extremely prosperous society growing decadent and then extinct is taken up everywhere:

http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Fall_of_the_Eldar

" ... They had long since outgrown the need for physical labour as their society provided all, leaving them with only their own desires to satisfy. Even military conquest was waged by their machine creations, and many found themselves without purpose.[1]
Many gave in to their hedonistic desires and cults sprang up over the Eldar lands dedicated to the different aspects of arcane knowledge and sensual excesses. Gradually, the Eldar society grew more and more divided by the different cults. The people became more and more corrupt, delving into vicious practices, verging on sadism. Sadistic killers prowled the streets in search of victims, attempting to find new ways to satisfy their needs. It became harder and harder to satisfy their decadent desires, so these acts became more violent. Soon the streets were running with blood and the bestial roar of the crowds could be heard throughout the Eldar empire. Law and order broke down and some Eldar left their worlds as refugees, seeking a more peaceful existence.[1] "

The fat epidemic though, pretty sure it is unique in our time. Romans lived very well back then but I doubt they consume high fructose corn syrup everyday.