Post: #26

(04-15-2017 08:08 AM)Gmac Wrote:  ISIS confirmed death count up to 94.

Why would they do that? "you badass Pres Trump, killed 94. here's free publicity to hurt our cause."

Is there a link to the statement?

And how would they even confirm it? Do they have personnel rosters like standing armies?
The tunnels are crushed, and you can't get in without heavy dirt movers. Once you do, you will need archaeologists and forensic scientists to identify the surviving bodies, and how are you going to identify those vaporized into pink mist?

I'm not buying it.

Post: #27

(04-15-2017 07:57 PM)MOVSM Wrote:  

(04-15-2017 08:08 AM)Gmac Wrote:  ISIS confirmed death count up to 94.

Why would they do that? "you badass Pres Trump, killed 94. here's free publicity to hurt our cause."

Is there a link to the statement?

And how would they even confirm it? Do they have personnel rosters like standing armies?
The tunnels are crushed, and you can't get in without heavy dirt movers. Once you do, you will need archaeologists and forensic scientists to identify the surviving bodies, and how are you going to identify those vaporized into pink mist?

I'm not buying it.

The estimate was quite scientific. They sent a Predator over the local villages and counted how many goats were not walking funny the next morning.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #28

(04-15-2017 07:57 PM)MOVSM Wrote:  

(04-15-2017 08:08 AM)Gmac Wrote:  ISIS confirmed death count up to 94.

Why would they do that? "you badass Pres Trump, killed 94. here's free publicity to hurt our cause."

Is there a link to the statement?

And how would they even confirm it? Do they have personnel rosters like standing armies?
The tunnels are crushed, and you can't get in without heavy dirt movers. Once you do, you will need archaeologists and forensic scientists to identify the surviving bodies, and how are you going to identify those vaporized into pink mist?

I'm not buying it.

I think you misinterpreted his statement. ISIS didn't confirm anything; the number of dead ISIS people was confirmed to be 94. It can be read either way.

Story:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/worl...100496376/

Quote:KABUL, Afghanistan — The number of militants killed in an attack by the largest non-nuclear weapon ever used in combat by the U.S. military has risen to 94, an Afghan official said Saturday.

Ataullah Khogyani, spokesman for the provincial governor in Nangarhar, said the number of Islamic State group dead was up from the 36 reported a day earlier. A Ministry of Defense official had said Friday the number of dead could rise as officials assessed the bomb site in Achin district.

“Fortunately there is no report of civilians being killed in the attack,” Khogyani said.

The U.S. attack on a tunnel complex in remote eastern Nangarhar province near the Pakistan border killed at least four IS group leaders, Khogyani said. He said a clearance operation to assess the site of the attack was continuing.

Post: #29

How do you know mujahid-on-goat action was one-on-one and not gangbang?

Article--

*facepalm*

All of AP needs to be fired and executed with extreme prejudice. Nangarhar is not remote, it's a major border crossing into Pakistan, that's where Khyber pass is.

Afghan officials are liars extraordinaire. EVERYTHING is exaggerated.

Post: #30

Gotta use all those MOABs soon.

Post: #31

This place is as appropriate as any for this:

http://vidmax.com/video/155539-US-Drone-...k-of-Sheep

Post: #32

(04-15-2017 09:31 PM)MOVSM Wrote:  Nangarhar is not remote, it's a major border crossing into Pakistan, that's where Khyber pass is.

"remote" = "no direct flights from JFK"