Post: #51

Glanced through the thread, fucking disgusting. I'd have more respect for a camwhore, this bitch is repulsive on every level.

Post: #52

(03-14-2017 01:18 PM)Chowder Head Wrote:  I don't think Eckhart Tolle would approve of this behavior. But he WB and so would I.

Eckhart Tolle is leftist hippie he would be glad that she does it and probably give her a lecture about meditation on period or some shit like that.

Would take all the milk from the kids though.

Post: #53

She is disgusting. How low we have fallen as humans is incomprehensible.

Post: #54

A list of bodily fluids and products and their suitability for men's and boys' consumption:

NEVER AT ANY AGE:
- Urine (unless dying of dehydration, and then, only your own)
- Feces
- Sweat
- Vomit
- Semen
- Blood, especially menstrual
- Pus
- Fluid from boils
- Saliva that isn't yours (unless a woman's saliva mingled with yours due to deep tongue action)
- Smegma
- Earwax
- Wetness from behind the ears
- Phlegm, unless yours and there's nowhere to spit it out (if there are any solids in it, then never)
- Stomach acid
- Hair
- Skin
- Nails
- Toe jam

ONLY WHEN TOO YOUNG TO RESIST:
- Boogers

ONLY WHEN TOO YOUNG TO REMEMBER:
- Breast milk

I hope this helps.

Post: #55

(03-14-2017 02:51 PM)godfather dust Wrote:  

(03-14-2017 02:48 PM)XPQ22 Wrote:  ARE U MOM ENOUGH to have narcissistic personality disorder, to transform your male son into your surrogate husband?

Look inside and find out!

Dr. Bill Sears, another name to take note of.

edit: https://www.brainchildmag.com/2015/06/wh...-dr-sears/

His philosophy, from what this article claims, is that a women should lay in bed with the child for years, basically as a human cow breastfeeding the baby (and older.)

Breastfeeding is vital, I'm not a parent so I've never looked into how long, but vegan breastfeeding is probably worse than just putting the baby on formula off the jump.

And completely ignore the husband's needs during that time.

Post: #56

GMO soy-laden Johnson and Johnson formula would be less damaging than vegan breast milk. That is every bit as worthles and empty of nutrition as almond 'milk'. Those kids don't look like they developed properly; the one in the 'breastfeeding my 18 year old video' looks confused and frightened as hell. Vacant eyes, like an overgrown newborn.
Her children will probably not be going to school, as they're still feeding on poor quality breastmilk and are mentally and physically inadequate to be any distance from her.
She has never been to school either and has never read that Eckhart Tolle book (or any other) or she wouldn't be doing this.

Post: #57

A bit dated, but obligatory:

Post: #58

I don't understand this in the least. It made sense pre-internet that you had crappy movies that just existed for the naked tits in them, but who the hell goes on youtube for fap material when there's so much actual porn?

If you want naked tits, there's porn. If you want lactating women, there's porn for that. If you want lactating women being tied up and forced to wear a cowbell around their necks while having their soft supple udders vigorously milked by an older gentleman wearing overalls and a straw hat, there's probably porn for that too.

The only group I can see liking this stuff are female kid diddlers that sexually fantasize about having some little boy suck on their tits.

Post: #59

You forget or ignore how thirsty some men are. That boobies alone can enthrall some who identify as men... Sigh. The battle rages on.

Post: #60

Looks cute and very warming.
Don't see anything negative with what she's doing.

Post: #61

(03-15-2017 01:53 AM)sch Wrote:  Looks cute and very warming.
Don't see anything negative with what she's doing.

Post: #62

(03-14-2017 02:48 PM)XPQ22 Wrote:  ARE U MOM ENOUGH to have narcissistic personality disorder, to transform your male son into your surrogate husband?

Look inside and find out!

Bear in mind Time is trying to manipulate you into hating that woman. The magazine is designed for the mellow leftie generation who don't want to acknowledge that they gave birth to all those Antifa thugs and then took away any opportunity for them to do any meaningful work with their lives.

Last Psychiatrist breaks the Time magazine cover down: http://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2012/05/a...nough.html

Quote:The point is to show you how the media e.g. Time manipulates you to hate some things by linking them to other things: it polarizes you, which means it makes you irrelevant. E.g. when an election "is determined by" one particular group of "swing" voters-- whom you deride for being too stupid to have made up their minds yet-- it doesn't mean your vote has been factored in but that you are so predictable that you don't count. Power never thinks of you as an individual. Power never thinks of you at all.

Maybe attachment parenting is good? Bad? Time doesn't care to find out. It could easily have PubMeded the story and found a hundred scientific articles to discuss. Nope. It needed space to tell me that Dr. Bill Sears was a Catholic, converted to evangelicalism, and back to Catholicism, and his wife goes to Mass every day. Oh, I get it, they're crazy people. This is a typical media trick, rather than exploring an issue it explores a person, describes him, his background and his faults, this is the kind of person who believes this, this complicated issue that is too difficult to understand on its merits. You're free to choose.

Do you think Time cares about breast feeding? Do you think Time cares about you? Time hates you. It hates everyone, especially its readers, it thinks of them as credit card numbers, as registered voters, as organ donors. It wants what it wants and if we have to throw a kid under a boob, so be it. Like Marshall McLuhan once yelled, there's a war going on out there, and it isn't between liberals and conservatives or atheists and believers or attachment parents and detachment parents, it's between us and them, where them is defined as everyone who is not us and us is defined as me. You lose.

Let me make it clear: just as with the Time cover, you are being played. It's just the medium this time is Youtube rather than print.

A little search on Ogle reveals the MSM went fishing for your hate on this video some months ago:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...andem.html

Why do they do this? Why did the MSM target this particular woman when there are dozens of breastfeeding videos up that freely blast past the puritans on the buttons at youtube?

Because they want you to hate her. And they do it, just as with the Time magazine article, by tagging aspects to her that they know piss you off:

Quote:A mother of two who posts videos of her breastfeeding her two young sons has defended her decision to share her nursing sessions with millions of viewers.
Tasha Maile, from San Diego, who's pregnant with her third child, has been heavily criticised for the string of YouTube videos which often show her breastfeeding her sons in tandem.

What the media wants you to think of her as: breeder, Californian, likely Mexican.

Quote:The mother has defended the clips, one of which has had more than 60 million views, saying that she feels 'sorry' for those who judge her.

In one of the latest videos, posted in early November, show Tasha squirming in pain as her older son, Josiah, accidentally pushes his chin into her breast.

After telling him to move, the little boy readjusts his position and continues feeding. His little brother Soul, now two, feeds alongside him.

What the media wants you to think of her: masochist and therefore degenerate. Pain is taboo in the West: epidurals are de rigeur for childbirth, why do you think antidepressant medication production is through the roof, and one in four women have a psychiatric condition?

Quote:Another shows her stopping a work-out to breastfeed her children. In the clip, she says: 'Here I am feeding my three-year-old and one-year-old in the middle of a workout – sometimes annoying that you got to stop a work out, but us mothers do what we have to do.

What the media wants (women) to think of her: overly concerned with her looks and unemployed, unlike them madly running on the hamster wheel of career and neglected kids. In short, she has all the benefits and none of the drawbacks, which means men can hate her for her idleness and women can hate her because she's managed to choose option (a) in a world where they're compelled to choose (a) and (b) at once.

Quote:Maile's videos continue to spark debate about the correct age to stop breastfeeding with many detractors suggesting that it isn't the nursing they have a problem with, more the posting of the videos on YouTube.

We want you to think she's a narcissist. The critical comment is all about her breastfeeding videos, not the hundreds of others on youtube that are done by women without reasonably tight asses.

Quote:Maile, who has breast implants, has constantly defended putting her sons on social media, saying: 'What other people what say is 100 per cent to do with them and not with you.

Media wants you to focus on: silicone airbags, subjects her children to the adult world before they're ready for it. The latter, though, is also done by hundreds of thousands of women worldwide; they draw attention to this so said women have got something to project against.

Quote:'I listen to them [critics] and don't things too perfectly any more. I feel compassion for them.'

Media wants you to focus on the fact she talk THOT real good, therefore uneducated, therefore ignorant.

Quote:However this woman’s exhibitionism certainly takes away from the wonderful bonding between other and child.'

Media wants you to focus on the fact she's not a fat mother and therefore make the above-fifty percent of fat women who read stuff on the Internet even more hateful of her.

They don't want you to ask the important questions: namely, why was this peasant worthy of condemnation when all the other fat peasants breastfeeding their identifiable kids on youtube are not?
What in our society permits a mother with two kids and pregnant with the third to have sufficient resources to run a fucking youtube channel?
Oh, she's a narcissist? Welcome to 95% of the female population, most of whom are perfectly content to do their damage to their kids offline while watching youtube videos of fitter Hood Moms who they can feel satisfied hating.

Anger leads to hate, hate leads to pageclicks. The media doesn't really care about this THOT one way or the other; she is just a means to an end. The media wants to see the trends, the clouds of clicks as people go to look at this moron's videos, the like/dislike ratios, the strange e.e. cummings poems that are left in the firehose of insanity that is your average Youtube comments section. These are all fed back into the Big Data machine and better optimise what hate to offer and what products they can best sell you in tandem with that hate. If you're seeing it, the ad is for you.

Bonus speculation: somewhere in the background, baby formula advertisers are paying for her pageviews. Think about it.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #63

(03-15-2017 03:24 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  the strange e.e. cummings poems that are left in the firehose of insanity that is your average Youtube comments section.

Excellent phrase.

By the way, does anyone know whatever happened to the Last Psychiatrist? See him posted all the time, and all the posts are from years ago. Does he still write anywhere?

Post: #64

Interesting how she mentioned "no-fap" in the comment section while she is making the videos as hidden niche soft-porn.

Post: #65

It worries me more that it doesn't seem like there's a man in the picture to maintain boundaries and overall family balance. A real man would keep the situation from getting to this level of crazy.
Those kids living with that nutjob are screwed down the road if there's no father around.

That aside.... WB.

Post: #66

I forsee this breastfed child's future in the story of Mommy K:




This video is couple of years old, but it similar circumstance to current attention grabbing female that is abuse her son. For those who do not want to watch the video, Mommy K is vegan and lives with her son in the Great White North of Canada. Mommy K was to posting videos about her son and vegan cooking, while on the side being a prostitute. The video focus is on how much her son is basically suffering from his mother's "love" from basically the combination of malnourishment, lack of decent relationships, and mother's insanity.

This whole breasting feeding video whores are not new on youtube. Whats new is those youtube dollars you can make in producing softcore porn.

Post: #67

^ I remember reading about Mommy K on Encyclopedia Dramatica a few years ago. Last I heard, her son's living a normal life away from her now.

Post: #68

(03-15-2017 01:02 PM)fokker Wrote:  ^ I remember reading about Mommy K on Encyclopedia Dramatica a few years ago. Last I heard, her son's living a normal life away from her now.

Thank God for that small mercy.

Post: #69

(03-14-2017 03:41 PM)UlteriorMotive Wrote:  I wouldn't be surprised if a male breast feeding channel turns up at some point.

Equality and all that jazz.

Oh, it's coming.



Source.

Post: #70

(03-14-2017 12:47 PM)TrifeLife Wrote:  Do you guys ever get lactate when you suck on tits, do you like it? The idea is off putting to me. I love playing with a pair of tits but don't suck on them much.

I sucked on the lactating breasts of a young mother when I was about 22. I had a sexual history already with her, and the baby was getting older - I probably still should have expected it when milk came out, but for some reason I didn't and it caught me off guard. Anyhow, I have to say that while it was a bit odd, I did enjoy it.

In a way, I guess it's like stealing candy from a baby though.

Beyond All Seas

"The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe.
To be your own man is a hard business. If you try it, you'll be lonely often, and sometimes
frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself." - Kipling

Post: #71

Just another woman "having to" prostitute herself to make money.

She needs to pop a kid every few years, otherwise she'll lose her YT income. It's not a fortune but surely is a nice complement to government's benefits.

Post: #72

(03-15-2017 04:21 PM)Beyond Borders Wrote:  I sucked on the lactating breasts of a young mother when I was about 22. I had a sexual history already with her, and the baby was getting older - I probably still should have expected it when milk came out, but for some reason I didn't and it caught me off guard. Anyhow, I have to say that while it was a bit odd, I did enjoy it.

In a way, I guess it's like stealing candy from a baby though.

Where you been? Good to have you back.

Post: #73

OP asked you motherfuckers a question...

(03-14-2017 10:31 AM)Roosh Wrote:  ... but more importantly, would you feed?

...and most of you are dodging it.

Don't worry. It's ok to drink it but only if you're doing the necessary lifting to justify it. See, then it's a health issue. I gained 10 kilos of muscles back in the oughts thanks largely to a battery of Vietnamese women I kept in the basement for just such purposes. The hardest part was getting Domperidone without a script but a fetishist porn producer was eventually able to hook me up with a steady supply.

Sad. Most of you blokes will never know the kind of gains you can get with a dumbbell in each hand and a tit in the mouth...

Post: #74

Neubache's on the sauce again ... And he's twice as effective for it! Haha...

Post: #75

(03-15-2017 10:45 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Sad. Most of you blokes will never know the kind of gains you can get with a dumbbell in each hand and a tit in the mouth...

Fuck I need to get myself some. A lot of young mothers in Colombia so it should not be problem, at least I will spend less for creatine and all this shit.