Post: #51

(02-07-2017 11:27 PM)Kabal Wrote:  

(02-07-2017 09:01 PM)Transsimian Wrote:  

(02-07-2017 08:28 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  Bloom let her name their son after her first dead boyfriend from thirteen years before. That's beyond simple Cuck.

I see nothing wrong with it.

A widow honouring her deceased partner isn't a bad thing.

That's disgusting. Your ("you" being Miranda Kerr) teenage ex-boyfriend is dead; I don't give a shit.

You're my wife, you're already knocked-up with my kid, all your base are belong to me. The only person(s) you should be honoring are me, my paternal ancestors, or yours, in that order.

My (now ex) girlfriend had a boyfriend that died in a construction accident when they were together in High School. One day she told me that she had a bunch of his things and memento's from their time together but due to her grief, she kept the items at her parent's house. BUT, she told me, she would like to someday move those items to our place.

I immediately said "No fucking way. They day you move that stuff in here is the day I move out".

She never did move the stuff over. But I did eventually move out.

Post: #52

If you're not her alpha, you're fucked. If she won't leave the past in the past because you're the fucking man now, you had better run. You cannot win the battle, she is lost.

Post: #53

(02-08-2017 06:16 PM)Matsufubu Wrote:  If you're not her alpha, you're fucked. If she won't leave the past in the past because you're the fucking man now, you had better run. You cannot win the battle, she is lost.

He just smells like a mark ripe for a huge divorce payout. I sense she is going to chop him up and spit him out in a few years.

Post: #54

(02-08-2017 06:29 PM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  

(02-08-2017 06:16 PM)Matsufubu Wrote:  If you're not her alpha, you're fucked. If she won't leave the past in the past because you're the fucking man now, you had better run. You cannot win the battle, she is lost.

He just smells like a mark ripe for a huge divorce payout. I sense she is going to chop him up and spit him out in a few years.

Exactly--this smells like a beta bucks setup from a mile away.

Post: #55

Apparently he has no red pill friends that have told him off, or he's willfully ignored them? If the latter is true, then he deserves to be ripped off for not listening to their advice.

Post: #56

This is not really surprising. Despite being a billionaire, this guy is a complete nobody. He lucked his way into a fortune with a trendy sexting app, but psychologically he still perceives himself as a normal guy - with a normal SMV. Thus when he meets a woman like Miranda Kerr he is completely starstruck and easy prey for her highly developed, world-class girl game. I have no doubt he thinks himself hot shit for dating her (we must at least admit he's doing far better than Zuckerberg and most other rich Silicon Valley nerds in this regard) and is the sort of guy who gets a huge ego boost from dating a famous woman. In other words, this is simply a case of the high school computer geek snagging the prom queen: he thinks he's suddenly king shit and the coolest guy in the room by default since the most popular girl in school chose to date him.

To be honest, I'm surprised we haven't seen more post-wall and near-wall famous women trying to snap up these clueless but wealthy Silicon Valley nerds for quick marriages. If you're a nerdy guy who never got much play growing up but managed to build up a 9 figure (or greater) fortune, it's easy to fall prey to the predatory seduction tactics of an experienced carousel rider who also happens to be famous. These guys have no defenses. The caliber of woman they can attract with mega money is something they are completely unable to handle. This guy Spiegel probably used to jerk off to Miranda Kerr, and suddenly he finds himself in a position to date her. That's a big mindfuck. It's a concentrated dose of ego inflation unlike anything most of us will ever experience. But it's just too much. It's like handing a 15 year old kid a bottle of vodka and the keys to a Ferrari. He just doesn't have the experience to protect himself. Disaster is inevitable.

Post: #57

(02-08-2017 07:34 PM)scorpion Wrote:  This is not really surprising. Despite being a billionaire, this guy is a complete nobody. He lucked his way into a fortune with a trendy sexting app, but psychologically he still perceives himself as a normal guy - with a normal SMV. Thus when he meets a woman like Miranda Kerr he is completely starstruck and easy prey for her highly developed, world-class girl game. I have no doubt he thinks himself hot shit for dating her (we must at least admit he's doing far better than Zuckerberg and most other rich Silicon Valley nerds in this regard) and is the sort of guy who gets a huge ego boost from dating a famous woman. In other words, this is simply a case of the high school computer geek snagging the prom queen: he thinks he's suddenly king shit and the coolest guy in the room by default since the most popular girl in school chose to date him.

To be honest, I'm surprised we haven't seen more post-wall and near-wall famous women trying to snap up these clueless but wealthy Silicon Valley nerds for quick marriages. If you're a nerdy guy who never got much play growing up but managed to build up a 9 figure (or greater) fortune, it's easy to fall prey to the predatory seduction tactics of an experienced carousel rider who also happens to be famous. These guys have no defenses. The caliber of woman they can attract with mega money is something they are completely unable to handle. This guy Spiegel probably used to jerk off to Miranda Kerr, and suddenly he finds himself in a position to date her. That's a big mindfuck. It's a concentrated dose of ego inflation unlike anything most of us will ever experience. But it's just too much. It's like handing a 15 year old kid a bottle of vodka and the keys to a Ferrari. He just doesn't have the experience to protect himself. Disaster is inevitable.

Nailed it. I noted a similar dynamic at work with the sucker is soon to wife up Serena Williams:

Quote:The real issue here is that his Game is probably wack if he's prepared to wife up a 35-year old athlete who has been run through by miles of dick before him. A guy in his position certainly has better options but he can't really connect with this because for so long, being a programmer/website nerd, he didn't have access to any decent pussy at all. These days, his status has changed but his mindset hasn't. The validation he gets from being with her means his ascendancy is real, and this is made all the more potent when you consider that she wouldn't have given him the time of day 10-12 years at her sexual peak. He's become too emotionally invested in that high and can't let go. Former loser turned winner needs high-status woman to ratify his transformation---classic beta mindset. Meanwhile, the clock is ticking on Serena's fertility and a woman's gotta do what she's gotta do when all those alphas who hit-it-and-quit-it wouldn't stick around to wife it up.

/thread-60302...pid1474886


I think the reason we don't see more of this is because, 1) it probably isn't easy for even rich nerds to have contact with women like this, and 2) a lot of these women probably can't fake attraction for these geeks for even the short amount of time they'd need to put in to completely snow these dudes. Especially when they also have other options and have some wealth of their own.

Post: #58

Don´t know if relevant but Snapchat is doing an IPO soon.

Post: #59

(02-08-2017 08:08 PM)Troller Wrote:  Don´t know if relevant but Snapchat is doing an IPO soon.

At a $25b valuation.

Post: #60

Yeah...
We are all certain Miranda would date (let alone marry) this guy if he was merely the assistant manager at the local Target...?

(02-07-2017 09:01 PM)Transsimian Wrote:  I see nothing wrong with it.
A widow honouring her deceased partner isn't a bad thing.

Any chick who's focus is on someone else, can go to that someone else.
I don't care if she wastes her days at a grave.

I'll spend my time with the living.

Going on with what AnonymousBosch detailed.
My mother recently had the chance to get together with a high-school / youthful flame that she'd pined for for ~40 years after the fact.
Problem being.
The fantasy of that youthful guy was, was just that - a fantasy.
The now 40 year older guy had lived quite a crazy life in the interim :
8 years in a South American jail after getting caught up in some botched drug deal.
Other drama through his adult life.
Then despite the chance to turn his life around in his twilight years, he's now stuck in a Peruvian jail for other drug offenses.

My mother was wise enough to get away from that guy before any real drama befell her.
Yet prior to the harsh reality, that youthful fantasy played on her mind throughout her 40's & 50's.

Post: #61

She's almost past her reproductive safe zone so better hurry up.

Post: #62

(02-07-2017 09:01 PM)Transsimian Wrote:  I see nothing wrong with it.

A widow honouring her deceased partner isn't a bad thing.

You see nothing wrong with a women naming your own child after her dead boyfriend? This is your child... with the name of one of previous sex partners who happens to be dead and therefore will always be perfect and she'll forever wonder what if he was still here every time she looks at your son, for the rest of your life. You see nothing wrong with that?

If a woman is with you she shouldn't be honoring previous sexual partners, period, and certainly not dead ones. I don't understand how any guy would even consider this. Well, apparently that Bloom guy is ok with it too so there are quite a few guys out there who don't mind being cucks.

Post: #63

(02-08-2017 10:36 PM)Teutatis Wrote:  

(02-07-2017 09:01 PM)Transsimian Wrote:  I see nothing wrong with it.

A widow honouring her deceased partner isn't a bad thing.

You see nothing wrong with a women naming your own child after her dead boyfriend? This is your child... with the name of one of previous sex partners who happens to be dead and therefore will always be perfect and she'll forever wonder what if he was still here every time she looks at your son, for the rest of your life. You see nothing wrong with that?

If a woman is with you she shouldn't be honoring previous sexual partners, period, and certainly not dead ones. I don't understand how any guy would even consider this. Well, apparently that Bloom guy is ok with it too so there are quite a few guys out there who don't mind being cucks.

Cucked by a fucking dead guy.

Post: #64

Her highschool alpha that died, would've been dumped as soon as she got famous anyways. But because he died first, it lingers as a fantasy in her head that he's her true love. It rationalizes to herself why she's never content with what she has.

Post: #65

(02-08-2017 10:47 PM)Disco_Volante Wrote:  Her highschool alpha that died, would've been dumped as soon as she got famous anyways. But because he died first, it lingers as a fantasy in her head that he's her true love. It rationalizes to herself why she's never content with what she has.

Literally alpha widowed...

*Death game recognized

Post: #66

There should be a high end escort service that finds celebrity look a likes, bonus cash for those who can talk and act like said celebrity. If Evan was half the man, he'd pay that escort and bang the brains out of her and dump this soon to be wall hitter.

Post: #67

(02-08-2017 11:03 PM)Putin Closes Wrote:  There should be a high end escort service that finds celebrity look a likes, bonus cash for those who can talk and act like said celebrity. If Evan was half the man, he'd pay that escort and bang the brains out of her and dump this soon to be wall hitter.

No matter how much a man might fantasize about banging a famous actress or supermodel, he's almost certainly better off finding a non-famous girl who looks like her and banging her instead.

Post: #68

(02-08-2017 09:56 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Any chick who's focus is on someone else, can go to that someone else.
I don't care if she wastes her days at a grave.

I'll spend my time with the living.

Exactly. People are capable of building immensely-complex monuments to grief instead of processing loss in a healthy way, by accepting it, letting go and moving on. These monuments create melancholic fixation, so you end up with the sort of negative psychological and behavioural issues that make for poor partners, male or female.

My stepfather's mother lost her baby during childbirth a good sixty years ago. The body was swept away and she never saw it. She never moved past the loss. If this sort of thing happens nowadays, they quietly let the parents spend time with their dead child and hold them, so they have a concrete understanding of the very real loss that has happened to them. It sounds ghoulish, but it leads to healthier acceptance.

As such, when my stepfather was born, the woman never let herself bond with him, just in case, and only paid attention to her daughter. She chose to ignore the son she actually had and fixate on the ghost of the potential son she lost. Over the years, her issues gradually-got worse, leading to wild mood swings, deep depressions and bitch-on-wheels behaviour. I suspect all of this is why my stepdad grew up to be the Raging Gamma that he is, including the constant need for self-validation.

It took me a few years, but I gradually got the family to come around to the fact that her behaviour was deeply-abnormal and that she needed treatment and medication. This is when the children discovered that they even had a dead brother, and she was finally able to talk about it. The medication controls her depression, and whilst her cunty nature has never fully-left her, it's just an innate nastiness she possesses, not the full-on destructive whirlwind of fury she previously would unleash.

So, here's Kerr, at the beginning of a marriage to Bloom, with a new child, their future ahead of them, and what happens? Her melancholic fixation takes her back to her Monument of Grief. She's looking back to an old loss she can't change, rather than imagining the grand possibilities of her future.

This is why I always focus on what I can act upon and change in the present and the future, and not worry about the 'what ifs?' of the immutable past.

Women love being around me when someone dies. I can process it and accept it without needing to break down in tears. I'm a fucking rock to them, to weep and wail upon freely, knowing they can fully-indulge the depths of their unleashed emotions. It's Girl Crack, but, saying that, it's so they can get it out and move on.

Post: #69

(02-08-2017 10:16 PM)Extinguished Light Wrote:  She's almost past her reproductive safe zone so better hurry up.

Why? She ain't in no hurry, she already had her kid. Probably a good reason why they ain't bangin, and they won't be after the marriage either.

I'm pretty sure this cat ain't passing on his genes. My wife's son, lol.

Post: #70

Just stepping back for a minute: Seeing threads like this makes me realizes that even though I'm not a billionaire, I'm in much better shape to have a LTR or marriage that actually works due to having a great father and mother, and by also learning game as a means of avoiding pitfall women like Kerr. I see stories like this as a cautionary tale, not just something to mock. If anything, I pity this dude for being so naive. Like I said earlier, I really wonder if he has ever had a red-pilled friend or family member try to set him straight, or if he just wanders around aimlessly without a clue when it comes to women.

Post: #71

Okay... it seems no one shares my opinion on the matter.

I guess it all depends if she gave the name as an honour, or due to real obsession with a dead guy.

(02-07-2017 08:33 PM)Bluto Wrote:  The only way that I can explain this is an epic case of "oneitis." I would bet good money that this guy jerked off to her pictorials, and now he is going to do the real thing. That is how I would explain how a 26 year old billionaire is even dating a 33 year old ex-model who is probably a whore.

This /\ It reminds me of the Australian billionaire James Packer almost marrying the fat and old single mother Mariah Carrey

Post: #72

(02-08-2017 10:43 PM)LeoneVolpe Wrote:  Cucked by a fucking dead guy.

We're reaching levels of cuckoldry previously unheard of...

Post: #73

The amount of billionaires and millionaires with low quality chicks is astounding.

Theory: Men with so much money don't focus on social skills or understanding LTR game or screening. Too much mental muscle being flexed at this job, not enough mental muscle being used with women, hence the atrophy of marrying low quality chicks.

We need to start a thread on rich dudes with low quality women as a warning to newbies that money isn't the same thing as game. I'm looking at you Mark Cuckerberg.

Post: #74

I think there's a few rich simps getting played threads.

Post: #75

(02-09-2017 03:49 AM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  We need to start a thread on rich dudes with low quality women as a warning to newbies that money isn't the same thing as game. I'm looking at you Mark Cuckerberg.

This thrwad is close: High status men with ugly girlfriends

/thread-32452.html