Post: #76

The horror!
It's like a jodorowsky story cometh into IRL!!!!!!

Post: #77

I'd take any bet, no matter the odds, that this woman was sexually abused as a child. Who creates such perverse "art" without the mind of someone who is abused? I'm disgusted at her, and yet feel pity towards such a tortured soul. She's angry, demented and sick. The most charitable thing we can do for such mentally ill people is commit them to the care of mental health professionals. In saner times when men ran the show, women as nuts as this would be sent to the sanitarium.

Post: #78

That """art"""" is the definition of cultural degeneracy. I'm sure some people view it as a simple cry for attention in the form of trying to be edgy. It really is just a sick display of sin with pedophile undertones. I truly think she just wants someone to tell her to cut it out.

Post: #79

(02-05-2017 05:51 PM)Number one bummer Wrote:  That """art"""" is the definition of cultural degeneracy. I'm sure some people view it as a simple cry for attention in the form of trying to be edgy. It really is just a sick display of sin with pedophile undertones. I truly think she just wants someone to tell her to cut it out.

It very well could be just a cry for masculine authority to say "no". But then again, I still have a feeling that such demonic and evil "art" comes from a place of deep hurt. Someone probably abused her as a child. I can't imagine she or that Abramovic woman had normal childhoods. Not to say that all people who are abused turn out "damaged" but I can't help but think that abuse is part of what makes a person go off the deep end to such a degree that it would require such foul abominations to be produced as an adult.

Post: #80

What do you guys think of McInnes' "ProudBoy" labelling? Do you think that's a good term for masculine men? I would suspect that's just a term used among his fans, used to elevate his personal brand.

Post: #81

Proud of what though? I'm not sure it is the best branding. Could easily be confused with gay pride.

Post: #82

Apparently the "professor" is the inventor of "lobster porn". Somewhat NSFW: https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-7jNzbhmhOfw/W...te%2B1.png

Post: #83

(02-09-2017 03:42 AM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  Proud of what though? I'm not sure it is the best branding. Could easily be confused with gay pride.

The latter part "boy" is even worse branding in my opinion. Since when do boys have beards? It separates the men from the boys.

Post: #84

Proud Boys evolved from a long running joke on his show.

He had started riffing on the gayest song of all time, and how a father witnessing his son singing this song would be the most crushing disappointment possible:





Several months later he was inspired to actually start his own men's group or movement, and he decided to call them the Proud Boys as a sarcastic reference to this gay ass song, but also cause he thought the toughest hooligan or biker gangs had the wimpiest names. For example, a gang called the "Murder Killers" is overcompensating, but a gang called the "Nice Lads" might turn out to be the most dangerous.

I don't know. It's Gavin's logic, not mine. I agree that choosing such an outlandish name is definitely his way of promoting his own personal brand.

I'm a big fan of his, and I like most of his ideas, especially about promoting genuine men's organizations and being "unapologetic" about Western chauvinism, but I'm not about to go get the words "Proud Boy" tattooed on myself. I guess that makes me only a first degree Proud Boy.

Uhuru.

Post: #85

Not happy with this guy. I had some stuff to take care of plus I really wanted to catch up on sleep this weekend. Then I got his book "How to Piss in Public", can't put it down...

Plenty of good laughs. The style of writing puts me in mind of Spike Milligan's war memoirs (albeit filthier) in the casual, matter-of-fact recounting of extraordinary circumstances and unusual people.

Post: #86

Quote etwsake :

" It's Gavin's logic, not mine. "

Heh.
That's one way of putting it.

Post: #87

(02-05-2017 05:46 PM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  I'd take any bet, no matter the odds, that this woman was sexually abused as a child. Who creates such perverse "art" without the mind of someone who is abused? I'm disgusted at her, and yet feel pity towards such a tortured soul. She's angry, demented and sick. The most charitable thing we can do for such mentally ill people is commit them to the care of mental health professionals. In saner times when men ran the show, women as nuts as this would be sent to the sanitarium.

i'll take the other side of the bet - at any odds - though of course it would be almost impossible to know who came out on top.

i am almost certain that she has NOT been sexually abused as a child. her "art" is perverse, disturbing and simply DEMONIC, but it is also extremely REAL and comes from a place of truth and NOT pain.

Post: #88

(02-05-2017 05:54 PM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  It very well could be just a cry for masculine authority to say "no". But then again, I still have a feeling that such demonic and evil "art" comes from a place of deep hurt. Someone probably abused her as a child. I can't imagine she [...] had normal childhood[s]. Not to say that all people who are abused turn out "damaged" but I can't help but think that abuse is part of what makes a person go off the deep end to such a degree that it would require such foul abominations to be produced as an adult.

false on all counts. was the prince of the world abused as a child too?

i think you are projecting your own unresolved/undigested hurts/pains onto others. do you recall your own abuse as a child?

Post: #89

(02-19-2017 09:59 AM)medicine man Wrote:  i'll take the other side of the bet - at any odds - though of course it would be almost impossible to know who came out on top.

i am almost certain that she has NOT been sexually abused as a child. her "art" is perverse, disturbing and simply DEMONIC, but it is also extremely REAL and comes from a place of truth and NOT pain.

(02-19-2017 10:10 AM)medicine man Wrote:  false on all counts. was the prince of the world abused as a child too?

i think you are projecting your own unresolved/undigested hurts/pains onto others. do you recall your own abuse as a child?

Communist Goals circa - 1963 :

20) Infiltrate the press. Get control of book review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.
21) Gain control of key positions in radio, TV & motion pictures.
22) Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all form of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings," substitute shapeless, awkward, and meaningless forms.
23) Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."
24) Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.
25) Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography, and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio and TV.
26) Present homosexuality, degeneracy, and promiscuity as "normal, natural, and healthy."

http://www.communistgoals.com/goals/goals.htm

Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35; January 10, 1963
From "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen ).

Post: #90

(02-19-2017 10:18 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  [...]
Communist Goals circa - 1963 :
[...]

i know so much about communism. are you not a commie yourself, by any chance?

Post: #91

(02-19-2017 10:26 AM)medicine man Wrote:  i know so much about communism. are you not a commie yourself, by any chance?

If by that you mean - Cynical "Yuri Bezmenov" Contrarian.
Then possibly.

Post: #92

(02-19-2017 10:31 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

(02-19-2017 10:26 AM)medicine man Wrote:  i know so much about communism. are you not a commie yourself, by any chance?

If by that you mean - Cynical "Yuri Bezmenov" Contrarian.
Then possibly.

lololol. i meant to write "YOU know so much about communism" but made a freudian slip and spoke of my mother...

i do know quite a bit about communism - i was born in soviet union almost 34 years ago and grew up/finished high-school in "independent" ukraine before (legally) emmigrating to the states for college on a "refugee" visa that usa jews heavily lobbied for for the soviet jews.

i haven't looked deeply into the communist past of my country, but based on what my dad told me (he was born in 1948, so make your own conclusions), tsarist russia was ripe for a revolution and it happened from the inside. when lenin saw that the communist utopia prophecied by Marx and Engels ain't happening (their theory was the communist wild-fire will spread immediately and commie-revolutions in other countries will follow with "perfect utopia" settling in immediately) he changed gears immediately, dropped one of the biggest ideological points of that philosophy and introduced NEP. my grad-pa was a kid back then (he was born in 1914) but he told me that life has improved immediately and noticeably. i think it's who came afterwards [especially paranoid stalin] who fucked things up and killed a great idea.

off-top: you are the second westerner to bring up bezmenov as some kind of a hero. i looked into him the last time a guy mentioned him and all i saw was someone who grew into a paranoid lunatic as he got older. am i missing something important regarding him?

Post: #93

^
Oh it wasn't merely Yuri Bezmenov who warned of "Active Measures" & what I call the Kremlin's "Grand Strategy".

Demoralization, Destabilization, Crisis, Normalization.

There was also Anatoliy Golitsyn, Stanislav Lunev & Ion Mihai Pacepa (Romanian) among others.

Post: #94

(02-19-2017 10:55 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  [...] Ion Mihai Pacepa (Romanian) [...].

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/41...n-theology

this dude has gone off the deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep end.

golitsyn - lunatic.

lunev - real deal.

most importantly, though, soviet union is dead and modern-day putin cares not about undermining usa. he cares about his country, his people and his culture. he is the only world leader i'd do recon with for he'd watch my back when needed.

Post: #95

After Crowder was on JRE I prayed for Gavin. Low and behold.





He addresses Milo early on in the podcast as well.

Post: #96

this one was good.the last one was too much drinking and joking around.this time they stuck to topic most of the time.

apart from milo they also discussed the riots.

Post: #97

I'm at 1h:17m and Gavin still hasn't called bullshit on Joe's stupid Russian shit.

Post: #98

Gavin McInnes A-game interview with hot babe. This is how you turn on a chick. Humor, talking about her, and talking about women and sex.




Gavin is a comedic genius, but you can take some tips from this interview. You don't have to be as clever as him to have the same affect on a woman.

They may be half the population but we know so little about them. For example,
-Why can't they make machine gun sounds?
-Are Maxi Pads for losers?
-Are men gross?
-Why do they want a $10,000 purse?
-If they don't really care about looks, who does? We're not that picky. Why is such a huge part of the economy devoted to pleasing two sides who aren't really THAT concerned about how the other side looks?

Post: #99

Gavin has been taking some red pills:

Post: #100

It's crazy right now.

Sometimes I wonder if the internet wasn't the beginning of The Apocalypse.

An apocalypse (Ancient Greek: ἀποκάλυψις apokálypsis, from ἀπό and καλύπτω, literally meaning "an uncovering") is a disclosure of knowledge or revelation.

Mainstream scientists are the biggest fools on the earth.