Post: #26

Quote:Though Julian Assange says WikiLeaks did not get the emails from Russia, this has to be investigated. Did Russia hack the DNC’s email system and John Podesta’s email account? Did Putin direct that the emails be provided to WikiLeaks to disrupt democracy or defeat Clinton?

Clinton says Putin has had it in for her because he believes she was behind the anti-Putin demonstrations in Moscow in 2011.

But if there is to be an investigation of clandestine interference in the politics and elections of foreign nations, let’s get it all out onto the table.

This part is stupid. Julian and the Wikileaks worker have already said that they got their copies from internal sources.

Are you guys familiar with something called the Verizon Data Breach Investigations Reports?

http://www.verizonenterprise.com/verizon...dbir/2016/

I will give you all a quick crash course on it.

Basically, Verizon's Red Team (A term for Hacking Response Teams) publishes a large report every year on breaches on their corporate and public sector customers, that they were called in to either stop, cleanup, or investigate who broke in.

All IT Security folks just about read this when the new one comes out. Especially anyone that consults, architects, or is manager or higher.

Every year one thing can be counted on seeing in the report.

Insider Threats were the most threats they had to respond to.

What is an Insider Threat?

(God Forbid) Let's say Roosh told Tuthmosis that he is fired. He bans his account, disables his login to the server. Okay. Let's say Tuthmosis gets pissed off and wants to pay Roosh back. So he calls the Server Hosting company and they reset his password because Roosh forgot to remove Tuth's name from the account. They Tuth deletes the forum from the backend or steals a bunch of data.

Shit like this happens all the time. Companies are too lazy to change router passwords and shit like that even after they fire IT guys.

Another example:

An IT admin for a government subcontractor company has server access and login for some other applications they use. He decides he wants to collect all these high ranking people's email and expose them. He logs into a server and sees that all he has to do is add himself to the Domain Administrator's security group or add himself to the Exchange Administrators Security Group (for the mailservers). He does that, gives himself rights to the mailboxes he wants, loads them up on Outlook, makes a PST file copy of each mailbox, puts it in a thumbdrive. He removes himself from the security groups and no one finds out he did that because they did not have audit software that will alert you when an administrator elevates his own privileges.

When companies realize they have been fucked, they call Verizon, or some other Red Team firm. The first thing a Red Team does is get a copy of all the server event logs. Usually buried in there is a security log of someone's account being added to Domain Admin. When they show the IT Director who did it, they shitcan the person on the spot and call the police depending upon what he did. Sometimes they don't because that makes them look stupid to the investors and makes a story when there may not have been one. Sometimes they say it was a virus but bring in consultants to lock the network down tight with audit tools and train the employees.

The 800 pound gorilla in the room is that Seth Rich was most likely their inside source and he got murdered for it by either the Clintons, Obama, or both. The DC police won't bother investigating it properly should be your proof of that.

Did Seth have an admin login at the DNC? We know from the leaks that they commonly shared passwords around the office. Did Seth just go up to different offices with a thumbdrive and make PST copies of their mailboxes? Seth doesn't need elite hacking skills to grab all the email. He fucking worked there and they had no security controls whatsoever!!

You know what's funny? When those passwords got leaked dudes on 4Chan were actually trying them that night and half of them actually worked! They knew they were breached a while back! What does that tell you? You don't need fancy viruses to hack such a soft target. I bet someone dressed as a janitor could have stole all their email in one night with a thumbdrive!

Post: #27

The Democrats better hope Julian does not spill the beans about Seth being his source. All this Russia stuff will drop like a rock. I'm sure the DC Metro police won't reopen the case, but that does not mean that President Trump won't ask the FBI to open a formal case to track down the killers. A decent sized petition would be more than enough to get Trump to respond.

Obama and Clinton both knew Wikileaks never reveals their sources, so they knew they could get him without getting called out on it. Still a bold move because if some clue they did not think about comes out, it could blow the whole thing out of the bag.

I don't know where Julian got his Podesta files from, but he claims those were not given to him by Russia's government. I believe him because they hate him as well for those Putin docs he dropped, but it's possible he got that from mercenary hackers or from disgruntled FBI agents, if that rumor is true. Question I would have is where did the FBI agents get the Podesta emails from? Nothing is obvious or sticks out to me.

Post: #28

A private cybersecurity firm has indicated that think a Russian military unit was involved in hacks on the DNC. They were making use of some sort of Android app that had previously been used to track down Ukrainian artillery units in order to make it easier for Russian forces to target them.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat...9f481848d2

Post: #29

Well apparently the US is standing ground - Obama just declared additional sanctions against Russia in response to the alleged hacking.

Post: #30

Obama and the neocons trying to start WW3 before Trump can take office. Russia thought they were in the clear but even this small window of time the NWO is going full maniac.

Sanctions, expelled diplomats, with NO evidence. And I believe yesterday the white house said they wanted to arm the Syrian rebels more. They're insane. If we didn't have an armed populace this lunacy would already be turned on us.

Post: #31

(12-23-2016 09:39 PM)Wutang Wrote:  A private cybersecurity firm has indicated that think a Russian military unit was involved in hacks on the DNC. They were making use of some sort of Android app that had previously been used to track down Ukrainian artillery units in order to make it easier for Russian forces to target them.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat...9f481848d2

I work in IT Security and the artillery hack is a pretty impressive example for cyberwarfare.

But I don't get it why they are sure it's the GRU when it comes to the DNC leaks. Assange already said that it wasn't the Russians.

By the way, Crowdfire's (the private it security firm accusing Russia) cofounder is member of the atlantic council. http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/people/dm...lperovitch
Really makes you think huh

I found an interesting interview
(http://www.npr.org/2016/12/14/505592238/...ium=social)

Quote:CORNISH: What surprised you about how these Russian-connected groups went about their work? I mean were you surprised at the boldness of this move?

ALPEROVITCH: I really wasn't initially because at the time we were brought in, I assumed it was a traditional espionage operations. Political parties get targeted all the time. In fact during the 2008 and 2012 campaigns, we had other nation states like China targeting campaigns. But they were not releasing that information publicly. They were taking policy documents, information about people involved in the campaign and providing that as information to the Chinese leadership.

I assume that the Russians were interested in the same thing. And it really was surprising to me when we started to see all these leaks coming out from the DNC and other organizations that have been targeted. And it became very, very clear that the goal here was not just espionage but really to influence this election.

So cyber espionage has always been part of the game, but releasing data and showing the corruption of the Democratic Party is "influencing the election". I guess he's kind of right. But he says it like it's a bad thing:

Quote:CORNISH: We've also heard reports that the U.S. was concerned about essentially escalating these tensions. And is that something worth thinking about here as we go forward and figure out the rules of engagement when it comes to cyber-warfare?

ALPEROVITCH: Well, you always want to worry about escalation, and you certainly don't want any attacks in the cyber realm to then start migrate into the physical realm where we may actually get into a hot conflict with Russia. That's not in anyone's interests.

But at the same time, you can't simply take these types of attacks, particularly when they're impacting the most vital institution that we have in this country, our democratic process and the idea of free and fair election. And you have to absolutely stand up to Russia and let them know that this is unacceptable and that there will be repercussions if they continue this behavior.

He's implying that releasing information is sabotaging democratic elections. And that escalation is in order.

Oh, they really hate to lose, don't they. It looks like they are doubling down in their efforts to fuck things up in some kind of scorched earth tactic. Juvenile and sociopathic.

Post: #32

The diplomats will be brought back in three weeks.

Post: #33

They are trying to undermine Trumps win, and also force his hand to say he wants to cozy up with Putin when he tries to fix Obama mess. Obama just poisoned the well on the way out of the White House. Can't wait till this fag is gone for good. Of course all by executive order, no congressional investigation needed.

Post: #34

What a miserable, petty piece of shit Obama turned out to be - not a shred of professionalism or dignity towards The Donald!
He's trying to stir as much shit as possible before leaving the WH! Him kicking out the Russian diplomats under completely bogus charges is yet another nail in the coffin of his "legacy."

Was there ever a case of the outgoing President openly undermining and publicly disrespecting the incoming one? The establishment has showed its true colors yet again.

January 20 can't come soon enough!

Post: #35

Russia calls Obama administration hapless.

   

Post: #36

(12-29-2016 03:28 PM)reciproke Wrote:  

(12-23-2016 09:39 PM)Wutang Wrote:  A private cybersecurity firm has indicated that think a Russian military unit was involved in hacks on the DNC. They were making use of some sort of Android app that had previously been used to track down Ukrainian artillery units in order to make it easier for Russian forces to target them.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat...9f481848d2

I work in IT Security and the artillery hack is a pretty impressive example for cyberwarfare.

But I don't get it why they are sure it's the GRU when it comes to the DNC leaks. Assange already said that it wasn't the Russians.

By the way, Crowdfire's (the private it security firm accusing Russia) cofounder is member of the atlantic council. http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/people/dm...lperovitch
Really makes you think huh

I found an interesting interview
(http://www.npr.org/2016/12/14/505592238/...ium=social)

Quote:CORNISH: What surprised you about how these Russian-connected groups went about their work? I mean were you surprised at the boldness of this move?

ALPEROVITCH: I really wasn't initially because at the time we were brought in, I assumed it was a traditional espionage operations. Political parties get targeted all the time. In fact during the 2008 and 2012 campaigns, we had other nation states like China targeting campaigns. But they were not releasing that information publicly. They were taking policy documents, information about people involved in the campaign and providing that as information to the Chinese leadership.

I assume that the Russians were interested in the same thing. And it really was surprising to me when we started to see all these leaks coming out from the DNC and other organizations that have been targeted. And it became very, very clear that the goal here was not just espionage but really to influence this election.

So cyber espionage has always been part of the game, but releasing data and showing the corruption of the Democratic Party is "influencing the election". I guess he's kind of right. But he says it like it's a bad thing:

Quote:CORNISH: We've also heard reports that the U.S. was concerned about essentially escalating these tensions. And is that something worth thinking about here as we go forward and figure out the rules of engagement when it comes to cyber-warfare?

ALPEROVITCH: Well, you always want to worry about escalation, and you certainly don't want any attacks in the cyber realm to then start migrate into the physical realm where we may actually get into a hot conflict with Russia. That's not in anyone's interests.

But at the same time, you can't simply take these types of attacks, particularly when they're impacting the most vital institution that we have in this country, our democratic process and the idea of free and fair election. And you have to absolutely stand up to Russia and let them know that this is unacceptable and that there will be repercussions if they continue this behavior.

He's implying that releasing information is sabotaging democratic elections. And that escalation is in order.

Oh, they really hate to lose, don't they. It looks like they are doubling down in their efforts to fuck things up in some kind of scorched earth tactic. Juvenile and sociopathic.

It's Crowdstrike. They have connections to the Obama admin and the DNC. Those are just two of their customers. They subcontract for govt. stuff. Plenty other liberal companies are customers as well and their staff is full of liberals.

Taking their word for it is like taking the word of ArsTechnica or Huffpost posters.

Keep your eyes open fellas. Anyone dickish enough to pull passive aggressive stunts like this, would try to make smaller fish like us disappear. Don't get caught off guard. Like those old rappers used to say, it's cold outside, so keep the heat closer.

Post: #37

The open borders crowd is now viciously nationalistic and wary of foreign intentions. You can't make this shit up. Foreigners need to stay out of our elections but asking for ID is racist? What if 'undocumented' Russians could vote in our elections?

It's disturbing Mccain and Mitch McConnell are now demanding further sanctions against Russia. They are foaming at the mouth for war.

We elect the candidate who wants to get along with them, and it's 'we don't give a fuck, you're getting war whether you like it or not'. They're already talking like Trump won't have the political capital to remove whatever sanctions they can ram through in 19 days.

Post: #38

(12-29-2016 04:11 PM)Dusty Wrote:  Russia calls Obama administration hapless.

Effin brilliant piece of shitlord diplomacy there!

(12-29-2016 04:06 PM)Reaper Wrote:  What a miserable, petty piece of shit Obama turned out to be - not a shred of professionalism or dignity towards The Donald!
He's trying to stir as much shit as possible before leaving the WH! Him kicking out the Russian diplomats under completely bogus charges is yet another nail in the coffin of his "legacy."

Was there ever a case of the outgoing President openly undermining and publicly disrespecting the incoming one? The establishment has showed its true colors yet again.

January 20 can't come soon enough!

Obama better toe the line, otherwise Trump is going to reveal what kind of fraud he really is once he gets a handle on his files. Same with the Clintons.

Post: #39

   

Post: #40

Russia "hacked" something ergo we must do something drastic. Will there be a war in a couple of weeks?

Post: #41

Check out this dumb Zionist slut Julia Roginsky saying that Obama should've done something far more drastic like "freeze Putin's assets"

She also says Obama should target the Russian oligarchs.

Post: #42

(12-29-2016 10:54 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  Check out this dumb Zionist slut Julia Roginsky saying that Obama should've done something far more drastic like "freeze Putin's assets"

It is all part of an ongoing ploy by the neocons to push for war with Russia. Keep in mind that neocon warmongers aren't loyal to any particular party. They car about war, and the profits and power grabs behind it. They care not for the loss of life and limb. We have the Iraq and Afghanistan debacle thanks to these evil people. If we had never let the Saudi terrorists into the country in the first place, there would have been no 9/11. But because the House of Saud and Israel play mostly nice with each other, they keep their mouth shut. There's too much foreign money and influence in our politics, and I'm not talking about Russia.

Quote:She also says Obama should target the Russian oligarchs.

Many Russians are not very amused by the Jewish oligarchs that have run or still run large parts of FSU industries. People don't realize that the extreme tribal nature of many Jewish financial dealings means that the majority of a country will eventually react poorly once they find out that Jews see themselves as "Jewish" first, and Russians far second. That's the reason why there has been so much conflict over the years. Christians take an oath to Christ and his principles, whereas Jews' collective loyalty lies with things of this world. Keep in mind the years that they spent wandering in the dessert in the Bible. The Zionists are Hell-bent on recreating Israel as their new Heaven on Earth, while Christians are taught to be in the world, but not of the world.

One need not be a neo-Nazi who wants to purge all Jews to recognize that Jewish political activism and financial policy is distinctly anti-Christian at times. It is sad that we can't have a reason conversation about this in the mainstream media without being called a Nazi. The total self-imposed censorship by those aware of the problem will onlyl end poorly for the Jews, as it always has, once the anger boils over. The elite Jews will always flee the coop, and your neighborhood Jewish dentist will be the one people are hunting down. Sad, but I'm not sure of a way to honestly broach the Jewish Question without being accused of wanting a Final Solution.

Post: #43

(12-29-2016 10:54 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  Check out this dumb Zionist slut Julia Roginsky saying that Obama should've done something far more drastic like "freeze Putin's assets"

She also says Obama should target the Russian oligarchs.

Is that her volunteering to go to the front lines should the need arise?
I'm guessing not...

Post: #44

Meanwhile on Disqus: https://disqus.com/home/channel/newsview...tion_hack/

Check the link and read some comments if you can. I linked pro Hillary, pro Obama, anti Russian channel with mods that will ban you (they did ban me) if you dare to criticize their bias (officially they are neutral).

Post: #45

Fellas fellas! Hot off the presses! Obama's Proof of Russian hacking!!

https://www.scribd.com/document/33530738...from_embed

I have just finished reading it, so lets go through it together for all the non-hackers out there.

The Breakdown:

Quote:
Description
The U.S. Government confirms that two different RIS actors participated in the intrusion into a U.S. political party. The first actor group, known as Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) 29, entered into the party’s systems in summer 2015, while the second, known as APT28, entered in spring 2016

One of the biggest issues I have with this report is that they call Russian Intelligence Agencies the same name as malware or trojans. They claim these are alternative names of Russian Intelligence Services.

Like I said before in other posts, Russian hackers/carders modify or use Zeus bot malwares, but that does not make them Russian Intelligence....

If they are just trying to say, APT29 we are going to denote as the group using these tools and malwares in the intrusion on date XXXXXXXX, then that is fine. Just write that out clearly for the reader instead of trying to confuse others with tech-speak.

Also, APT is an American word/coined phrase that came out around 2010-ish, when the Chinese were hacking the hell out of Google and other US companies with Spearphishing. Corporate Execs and private sector though Spearphishing sounded unprofessional and did not accurately explain the targeted nature of the attack well. Most Spearphishes are broadcast spam and can get caught by a Proofpoint or Ironport appliance in front of mailservers. APT is a one shot deal, aimed at your CEO or CFO to click on and looks like it came from the COO down the hall. Most appliances will not block that. So that is why Advanced Persistent Threat was coined more or less.

Moving on.

Quote:

Description
The U.S. Government confirms that two different RIS actors participated in the intrusion into a U.S. political party. The first actor group, known as Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) 29, entered into the party’s systems in summer 2015, while the second, known as APT28, entered in spring 2016.

Both groups have historically targeted government organizations, think tanks, universities, and corporations around the world. APT29 has been observed crafting targeted spearphishing campaigns leveraging web links to a malicious dropper; once executed, the code delivers Remote Access Tools (RATs) and evades detection using a range of techniques. APT28 is known for leveraging domains that closely mimic those of targeted organizations and tricking potential victims into entering legitimate credentials. APT28 actors relied heavily on shortened URLs in their spearphishing email campaigns. Once APT28 and APT29 have access to victims, both groups exfiltrate and analyze information to gain intelligence value. These groups use this information to craft highly targeted spearphishing campaigns. These actors set up operational infrastructure to obfuscate their source infrastructure, host domains and malware for targeting organizations, establish command and control nodes, and harvest credentials and other valuable information from their targets. In summer 2015, an APT29 spearphishing campaign directed emails containing a malicious link to over 1,000 recipients, including multiple U.S. Government victims. APT29 used legitimate

domains, to include domains associated with U.S. organizations and educational institutions, to host malware and send spearphishing emails. In the course of that campaign, APT29 successfully compromised a U.S. political party. At least one targeted individual activated links to malware hosted on operational infrastructure of opened attachments containing malware. APT29 delivered malware to the political party’s systems, established persistence, escalated privileges, enumerated active directory accounts, and exfiltrated email from several accounts through encrypted connections back through operational infrastructure. In spring 2016, APT28 compromised the same political party, again via targeted spearphishing. This time, the spearphishing email tricked recipients into changing their passwords through a fake webmail domain hosted on APT28 operational infrastructure. Using the harvested credentials, APT28 was able to gain access and steal content, likely leading to the exfiltration of information from multiple senior party members. The U.S. Government assesses that information was leaked to the press and publicly disclosed.

Again more blanket statements, with no tangible proof to back it up. I am certain the CIA/NSA gets into Russian, German, French or Chinese businesses and organizations whenever feasible to collect generic information as well. Writing this as if we don't is not honest at all and hurts credibility.

Again more vague statements.... No hard dates. No IP addresses. No signatures..

Which US political party was compromised? They don't want to say the word Democrat?

If Tom Clancy ever wrote novels on hackers, that second paragraph would sound like something out of his book.

Ok, so they claim this information was leaked to the press. No mention of Wikileaks? No Julian?

Quote:Reported Russian Military and Civilian Intelligence Services (RIS)

Alternate Names
APT28 APT29 Agent.btz BlackEnergy V3 BlackEnergy2 APT CakeDuke Carberp CHOPSTICK CloudDuke CORESHELL CosmicDuke COZYBEAR COZYCAR COZYDUKE CrouchingYeti DIONIS Dragonfly Energetic Bear EVILTOSS Fancy Bear GeminiDuke GREY CLOUD HammerDuke HAMMERTOSS Havex MiniDionis MiniDuke OLDBAIT OnionDuke Operation Pawn Storm PinchDuke Powershell backdoor Quedagh Sandworm SEADADDY Seaduke SEDKIT SEDNIT Skipper Sofacy SOURFACE SYNful Knock Tiny Baron Tsar Team twain_64.dll (64-bit X-Agent implant) VmUpgradeHelper.exe (X-Tunnel implant) Waterbug X-Agent

Again, why are they calling various viruses/trojans/malwares, names of Russian Intelligence Services? Does the CIA get their name changed by the Chinese Intelligence Agency, everytime they find a new virus that comes from America?

Why can't they tell us what division of Russian government wrote which one? Would it hurt them to list out which botnets those might use? If they are encrypting email and files (which could be GBs in size), and sending them back to Russia, they likely have a botnet or zombie/jump servers they might be using. I, Mr. Network Administrator would really like to know so that I can add those IPs to my firewall!

Quote:Technical Details
Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)
IOCs associated with RIS cyber actors are provided within the accompanying .csv and .stix files of JAR-16-20296.
Yara Signature
rule PAS_TOOL_PHP_WEB_KIT { meta: description = "PAS TOOL PHP WEB KIT FOUND" strings: $php = "<?php" $base64decode = /\='base'\.\(\d+\*\d+\)\.'_de'\.'code'/ $strreplace = "(str_replace(" $md5 = ".substr(md5(strrev(" $gzinflate = "gzinflate" $cookie = "_COOKIE" $isset = "isset" condition: (filesize > 20KB and filesize < 22KB) and #cookie == 2 and #isset == 3 and all of them }

Finally!!! Some actual proof or technical details!!! What is this?! some shitty PHP Webkit query?! But that diagram up there said there was some Powershell and other stuff!!! Where are the IPs?! No hashes for the viruses?!

Dude, your average guy in the No Fap thread might have this code somewhere in their internet cache, because they have not flushed it yet! This isn't proof of Russian hacking!


The rest of the report is nothing but tips on how to secure your company or network. I am not bullshitting you. Click on the report and see the hot air for yourself!

Conclusion:

Extremely unconvincing. Complete bullshit to tell the truth. I used to have to read these reports all the time just to do my job in the past and put in countermeasures that are usually detailed enough by IPs, hash signatures, etc. So I have real world experience reading DHS and JAR reports. This one is the worse one I have ever seen, hands down, in all my years reading them.

They basically produced a report full of very high level talk that has one tiny piece of malware code that they claim is proof of an intrusion, with no reference points whatsoever. They then state there is more evidence in the form of IP addresses and hashes, but they failed to provide any. Oversight? No idea, but this report is just too high level and is not different than just making blanket claims.

I may mosey on over to ArsTechnica to see if they are willing to be honest and call out this bullshit for what it is, or will they pander hard because feelings and Trump. No IT professional worth their salt should believe anything in this report. It just does not have enough details. It's fluffier than a pillow. Hillary supporter Brian Krebs probably won't look at this either because he got shitted on by his commenters the first time. There isn't any tangible proof in here to backup his claims that Russians did it, so he will ignore it too, or he will be risking his reputation big time.

Last thoughts. If any of this was true. What this tells me is that my earlier posts were correct that the DNC was very poorly secured. Multiple actors stole data. Sometimes in private sector it is not uncommon for companies that started off small, blew up after a few huge contracts, then become targets for international competitors (China, etc.). A redteam comes in and finds out they had multiple intrusions and mischief from internal staff. When your network is swiss cheese because you had a firewall from when you were 20 employees big but now 300, and the guy that initially set it up does not work for you any longer. It's never been patched and your webserver is running a version of Apache going on 1 year of not being patched. Stuff like this is still common to see in our world.

When orgs don't have steady IT staff and use contractors to come in and set up stuff, it isn't maintained with security and that is what I think happened to the DNC. We know for a fact from the leaks, that the DNC hired contractors to set up all their IT at least once. Also some disgruntled employee grabbed emails off computers and put them in a zip drive and gave it to Julian, because he had intact headers and attachments, which means .PST files were made more or less.

Post: #46

Excellent summary of the contradictory and vague details of the report.

In my opinion there's some degree of obfuscation going on. I don't know if it's fabricated and malicious, or completely naive.

I'm a proponent of the "multiple actors stole the data" theory and that someone else leaked the data. It's the only thing that makes sense at this point. Even if they did leak it, I don't buy the "It's manipulation" argument. Cyber Espionage has been part of the game for a long time now, and while it certainly shouldn't be accepted, it's ridiculous to frame it as a quasi act of war just because the corruption of the Democratic Party was leaked.

Biggest problem is that hardly anyone has the technical knowledge or motivation to look into that topic and people and politicians have to trust and rely on established IT Security specialists. And those say in whats technobabble for regular people that it's the Russian Government. And they actively manipulated the election by leaking the documents. Again, there is no evidence for that, but the narrative is believable. This is one of their biggest PsyOps strikes for that reason. Other wrong claims could be dismissed by providing blunt facts, but this more subtle.

The question is, if that's just the last movements of a dying cadaver or part of a bigger strategy to fuck things up. Keeping a cool head always wins in the long run.

Post: #47

Russia' official response.....Class !

Post: #48

^^^

When Obama goes low, Putin goes high.

Post: #49

TravelerKai, Cernovich gave you a retweet:

Post: #50

Something tells me DT already told Putin the diplomats are coming back Jan 20. Hence the lack of retaliation.