Post: #101

(12-05-2016 12:49 AM)Fortis Wrote:  Kona is the MVP of this thread followed (closely) by Atlanta man.

Atlanta Man deserves all the credit. His posts are insightful, well thought out, and scientific.

It has been brought to my attention by another member that my posts in this thread, and a few others, are disrespectful to the feelings of certain groups of people. These groups are the British, and the Jews.

I promised this individual that I would apologize publicly for my misgivings, and explain my side of things. I love both of those groups, and am saddenened that my behavior has offended them.

On or about 9/27/2016 I posted a photo in a thread called "Juicy Jewessess." It was this one:

That's Anne Frank. She's wearing a bikini.

First off, that is not what has been called an "affiliate link" at all. I am not in any way affiliated with Annesnaughtyattic.com. I did not even see the website in the image until today, when I was informed of my anti semitism.

I know very little about Anne Frank at all. I never read the book. I do however know that she is important to some Jews and I denegrated her memory. I apologize for that, but can't in good conscience apologize for then affiliate thing.

Apparently I posted a picture of Hitler taking a selfie somewhere but I can't find it. I bet it looked like this:

I put that up just as a reference, if it triggers someone, please look away.

Yesterday, I posted an image of Princess Diana's car after it had crashed, and made some insentives joke. Here's the picture:


I love the British and I love Princess Diana. She did great things, that's why they called her the iron lady. She had pizazz. I'm really sorry to have used her tragic death in an attempt to get a few laughs.

I hope this clears the air. Again I love both of these groups, and my posts are all in good fun, not to hurt anyone's feelings.

And I think self policing of the forum is fantastic. Why bother Roosh or the moderation people over this when we can settle it like adults.

Jews ..... Mazel tof!

British.....Cheery-o!

The rest... Aloha!

Post: #102

(12-05-2016 08:35 PM)Kona Wrote:  I love the British and I love Princess Diana. She did great things, that's why they called her the iron lady.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #103

(12-05-2016 02:49 PM)kavi Wrote:  I don't agree that the expression of recessive diseases is a problem, as it rather is a mechanism to "weed out" the bad genes. Let us take an example. Below we have four individuals, two from each group, with the two from one group carrying a recessive disorder (01, 1 being the problem variant)

Inbreeding
01 01 | 00 00
00 01 10 11 | 00 00 00 00 = 2 carriers, 1 "weeded out", 5 non-carriers

Outbreeding
01 00 | 00 01
00 01 10 00 | 00 10 10 00 = 4 carriers, 0 weeded out, 4 non-carriers

It be seen that inbreeding produces a healthier subsequent population than out-breeding. 2 carriers vs 4 carriers and 5 non-carriers vs 4 non-carriers.

This is probably the greatest first-post i have ever seen in the history of RVF
i'm dying
.

Post: #104

(12-05-2016 08:35 PM)Kona Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 12:49 AM)Fortis Wrote:  Kona is the MVP of this thread followed (closely) by Atlanta man.

Atlanta Man deserves all the credit. His posts are insightful, well thought out, and scientific.

It has been brought to my attention by another member that my posts in this thread, and a few others, are disrespectful to the feelings of certain groups of people. These groups are the British, and the Jews.

I promised this individual that I would apologize publicly for my misgivings, and explain my side of things. I love both of those groups, and am saddenened that my behavior has offended them.

On or about 9/27/2016 I posted a photo in a thread called "Juicy Jewessess." It was this one:

That's Anne Frank. She's wearing a bikini.

First off, that is not what has been called an "affiliate link" at all. I am not in any way affiliated with Annesnaughtyattic.com. I did not even see the website in the image until today, when I was informed of my anti semitism.

I know very little about Anne Frank at all. I never read the book. I do however know that she is important to some Jews and I denegrated her memory. I apologize for that, but can't in good conscience apologize for then affiliate thing.

Apparently I posted a picture of Hitler taking a selfie somewhere but I can't find it. I bet it looked like this:

I put that up just as a reference, if it triggers someone, please look away.

Yesterday, I posted an image of Princess Diana's car after it had crashed, and made some insentives joke. Here's the picture:


I love the British and I love Princess Diana. She did great things, that's why they called her the iron lady. She had pizazz. I'm really sorry to have used her tragic death in an attempt to get a few laughs.

I hope this clears the air. Again I love both of these groups, and my posts are all in good fun, not to hurt anyone's feelings.

And I think self policing of the forum is fantastic. Why bother Roosh or the moderation people over this when we can settle it like adults.

Jews ..... Mazel tof!

British.....Cheery-o!

The rest... Aloha!

The Gif equivalent to Kona's post:

Post: #105

I can't wait to go to hawaii and drink watery beers and eat tropical seafood with Kona... and maybe make a good impression on his sister.

Post: #106

Lol at the people who say the wouldn't bang meghan markle, walking around where i live i rarely see girls that look like this. I doubt guys who say they wouldn't bang her are pulling better quality than that. Also Atlanta Man is definitely right, its just all the stupid racist people that have problems with the idea of an interracial couple. I mean its just science, the reason genetic mishaps happen is because of chromosomal overlap, obviously if you make a child with someone whose DNA is farther away than yours it decreases the chances of you having a rare disease.

Post: #107

Samseau, if you haven't already made the Master race thread, I think you're going to need to get on that faster than you had originally thought.

Post: #108

(12-06-2016 09:51 AM)burncushlikewood Wrote:  Lol at the people who say the wouldn't bang meghan markle, walking around where i live i rarely see girls that look like this. I doubt guys who say they wouldn't bang her are pulling better quality than that. Also Atlanta Man is definitely right, its just all the stupid racist people that have problems with the idea of an interracial couple. I mean its just science, the reason genetic mishaps happen is because of chromosomal overlap, obviously if you make a child with someone whose DNA is farther away than yours it decreases the chances of you having a rare disease.

Cool argument burncrush. Did you borrow that "you are wrong and racist" argument from the Hillary Clinton Campaign playbook?

Arguing for selective breeding is not racism. If breeding for diversity was the ultimate strategy then every domesticated plant and animal we've got is 'wrong and racist' and every farmer is literally hitler. If someone goes with a selective or diverse breeding strategy for their family, shouldn't that be their own choice? There are already laws on the books to prevent genetically dangerous family inbreeding so that argument is moot as a counter argument to selective breeding.

Last, you can't just throw out "its just science" to argue a point. Kani put a good general post up about diversity increasing recessive carriers. Do you even Mendelian cross bruh?

Post: #109

/

Post: #110

(12-06-2016 03:05 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

(12-06-2016 09:51 AM)burncushlikewood Wrote:  Lol at the people who say the wouldn't bang meghan markle, walking around where i live i rarely see girls that look like this. I doubt guys who say they wouldn't bang her are pulling better quality than that. Also Atlanta Man is definitely right, its just all the stupid racist people that have problems with the idea of an interracial couple. I mean its just science, the reason genetic mishaps happen is because of chromosomal overlap, obviously if you make a child with someone whose DNA is farther away than yours it decreases the chances of you having a rare disease.

Cool argument burncrush. Did you borrow that "you are wrong and racist" argument from the Hillary Clinton Campaign playbook?

Arguing for selective breeding is not racism. If breeding for diversity was the ultimate strategy then every domesticated plant and animal we've got is 'wrong and racist' and every farmer is literally hitler. If someone goes with a selective or diverse breeding strategy for their family, shouldn't that be their own choice? There are already laws on the books to prevent genetically dangerous family inbreeding so that argument is moot as a counter argument to selective breeding.

Last, you can't just throw out "its just science" to argue a point. Kani put a good general post up about diversity increasing recessive carriers. Do you even Mendelian cross bruh?

Recessive carriers do not express the disease phenotype and if a recessive carrier reproduces with someone who does not have the recessive gene by continuing to breed generation after generation "out group"(laymen term) the disease will cease phenotypic expression within a given population over time- given enough generations even the recessive trait will virtually be extinguished .Let me put it this way if Drake(half Jewish genetically) reproduces with a black chick, and their kid reproduces with a Cuban(of Spanish decent) person there is almost no chance that their kid will have Tay Sachs. The Punnett square analysis (assuming Drake has the recessive trait) will prove my my last statement correct.

Post: #111

(12-06-2016 03:39 PM)Atlanta Man Wrote:  

(12-06-2016 03:05 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

(12-06-2016 09:51 AM)burncushlikewood Wrote:  Lol at the people who say the wouldn't bang meghan markle, walking around where i live i rarely see girls that look like this. I doubt guys who say they wouldn't bang her are pulling better quality than that. Also Atlanta Man is definitely right, its just all the stupid racist people that have problems with the idea of an interracial couple. I mean its just science, the reason genetic mishaps happen is because of chromosomal overlap, obviously if you make a child with someone whose DNA is farther away than yours it decreases the chances of you having a rare disease.

Cool argument burncrush. Did you borrow that "you are wrong and racist" argument from the Hillary Clinton Campaign playbook?

Arguing for selective breeding is not racism. If breeding for diversity was the ultimate strategy then every domesticated plant and animal we've got is 'wrong and racist' and every farmer is literally hitler. If someone goes with a selective or diverse breeding strategy for their family, shouldn't that be their own choice? There are already laws on the books to prevent genetically dangerous family inbreeding so that argument is moot as a counter argument to selective breeding.

Last, you can't just throw out "its just science" to argue a point. Kani put a good general post up about diversity increasing recessive carriers. Do you even Mendelian cross bruh?

Recessive carriers do not express the disease phenotype and if a recessive carrier reproduces with someone who does not have the recessive gene by continuing to breed generation after generation "out group"(laymen term) the disease will cease phenotypic expression within a given population over time- given enough generations even the recessive trait will virtually be extinguished .Let me put it this way if Drake(half Jewish genetically) reproduces with a black chick, and their kid reproduces with a Cuban(of Spanish decent) person there is almost no chance that their kid will have Tay Sachs. The Punnett square analysis (assuming Drake has the recessive trait) will prove my my last statement correct.

agreed, 2 generations should remove a disease residing on one allelle. I am in agreement with your earlier statements that outbreeding is good to reduce genetic diseases. Outbreeding, or increasing diversity in a population ensures more dominant phenotypes. However, that trend to diversity can eliminate both positive and negative recessive phenotypes

For example, if being a Maasai giant is a recessive trait and that population outbreeds with a group of filipino tourists you would have a reduction in the risk of genetic disease and likely a subsequent generation much shorter than the Masai parent. If the Masai man had a child with an also tall Maasai woman then they would retain the same risks of genetic disease, but also still likely have giant, or possibly even more giant children.

edit: its always a tradeoff, back to plant breeding again. Fruit trees for example are bred for fruit yield and/or taste. A super sweet mango may come from a freak tree, but that will then be introduced into the planting stock through selective breeding. The sweet freak mango may also have terrible cold tolerance. You could breed the sweet freak mango with an apple tree to make it cold hardy and survive in the northern hemisphere, but its fruit then won't also be as awesome as the super sweet mango anymore as it will be tempered with the sourness of the apple.

Post: #112

Seeing title of this thread and clicking it:


Seeing 1 post members dropping race bait on first page:


OG ban:


And then Kona happened:

Post: #113

(12-05-2016 08:39 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 08:35 PM)Kona Wrote:  I love the British and I love Princess Diana. She did great things, that's why they called her the iron lady.

I always get the same reaction to Kona's "deliberate or not" non sequiturs before I laugh...

Post: #114

Anytime I see a man with an older woman, I find it just strange. I don't know why anyone would want to do that. That said, I agree with the poster who said he was just killing time banging her for a while, and he'll move on to younger and hotter around his 40s.

Post: #115

(12-06-2016 04:41 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

(12-06-2016 03:39 PM)Atlanta Man Wrote:  

(12-06-2016 03:05 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

(12-06-2016 09:51 AM)burncushlikewood Wrote:  Lol at the people who say the wouldn't bang meghan markle, walking around where i live i rarely see girls that look like this. I doubt guys who say they wouldn't bang her are pulling better quality than that. Also Atlanta Man is definitely right, its just all the stupid racist people that have problems with the idea of an interracial couple. I mean its just science, the reason genetic mishaps happen is because of chromosomal overlap, obviously if you make a child with someone whose DNA is farther away than yours it decreases the chances of you having a rare disease.

Cool argument burncrush. Did you borrow that "you are wrong and racist" argument from the Hillary Clinton Campaign playbook?

Arguing for selective breeding is not racism. If breeding for diversity was the ultimate strategy then every domesticated plant and animal we've got is 'wrong and racist' and every farmer is literally hitler. If someone goes with a selective or diverse breeding strategy for their family, shouldn't that be their own choice? There are already laws on the books to prevent genetically dangerous family inbreeding so that argument is moot as a counter argument to selective breeding.

Last, you can't just throw out "its just science" to argue a point. Kani put a good general post up about diversity increasing recessive carriers. Do you even Mendelian cross bruh?

Recessive carriers do not express the disease phenotype and if a recessive carrier reproduces with someone who does not have the recessive gene by continuing to breed generation after generation "out group"(laymen term) the disease will cease phenotypic expression within a given population over time- given enough generations even the recessive trait will virtually be extinguished .Let me put it this way if Drake(half Jewish genetically) reproduces with a black chick, and their kid reproduces with a Cuban(of Spanish decent) person there is almost no chance that their kid will have Tay Sachs. The Punnett square analysis (assuming Drake has the recessive trait) will prove my my last statement correct.

agreed, 2 generations should remove a disease residing on one allelle. I am in agreement with your earlier statements that outbreeding is good to reduce genetic diseases. Outbreeding, or increasing diversity in a population ensures more dominant phenotypes. However, that trend to diversity can eliminate both positive and negative recessive phenotypes

For example, if being a Maasai giant is a recessive trait and that population outbreeds with a group of filipino tourists you would have a reduction in the risk of genetic disease and likely a subsequent generation much shorter than the Masai parent. If the Masai man had a child with an also tall Maasai woman then they would retain the same risks of genetic disease, but also still likely have giant, or possibly even more giant children.

edit: its always a tradeoff, back to plant breeding again. Fruit trees for example are bred for fruit yield and/or taste. A super sweet mango may come from a freak tree, but that will then be introduced into the planting stock through selective breeding. The sweet freak mango may also have terrible cold tolerance. You could breed the sweet freak mango with an apple tree to make it cold hardy and survive in the northern hemisphere, but its fruit then won't also be as awesome as the super sweet mango anymore as it will be tempered with the sourness of the apple.

It takes more than two generations I think.

You guys are mostly right. But human phenotypes are a lot more recessive than one or two generations and cannot be captured in a simplistic punnet square.

The average White guy has Neanderthal DNA in him, there's no way that could happen unless these genes are ultra recessive.

Post: #116

I thought this chick was pretty hot in the first two seasons of Suits that I watched. Though the over the top submission and intimidation the main character had towards her was really off putting. The nerd photo memory guy, not Harvey Specter. Had no idea she was such a total SJW wackjob, eugh, boner killer right there, WNB. Didn't notice that chin either. Her boobs look like crap in that stupid dog picture too.

Anyway I found Specter's secretary, the redhead, significantly hotter. And they had her wear really nice dresses with tons of cleavage showing. Don't care what the redhead's politics are, Wood Smash for sure. I should really pick the show back up, I wonder if it's on Netflix. No idea where I'd download it from anymore. It'd be nice to see the unicorn level of rare alpha male in a TV show for once. Assuming they haven't made Harvey go full male feminist yet.

As for Prince Harry, I'm sure he's great at spouting feminist SJW talking points and rhetoric like most celebrities. Doubt he'll long term this chick though. I suggest he open a history book about his predecessors and go from there. His country is a joke compared to then, and needs a strong monarch back.

Post: #117

(12-06-2016 03:21 PM)UlteriorMotive Wrote:  


/

Yep, she is pretty hot, no doubt. She just has this weird body shape and super wide jaw that they manage to hide decently well in the show. She got less hot the longer I watched the show, but she's still hot.

Post: #118

(12-07-2016 03:51 AM)AneroidOcean Wrote:  Yep, she is pretty hot, no doubt. She just has this weird body shape and super wide jaw that they manage to hide decently well in the show. She got less hot the longer I watched the show, but she's still hot.

The whole feministy paralegal did that for me. She turned into a bitch in the last couple seasons too!


WB for sure, but a grudge fuck.

Post: #119

(12-04-2016 01:54 PM)Vicious Wrote:  A man belonging to the most mythical royal house of the last 300 years, a man with nearly unlimited resources at his disposal, a man in his prime that even without his title could clean up without even opening his mouth. And he settles for... this?

Makes me want to find a granite wall to hit my head to. Give me this man and a couple of Rvf PALS for a weekend and I'd turn his life around.

Prince Harry probably has more pussy than anyone. He is British royalty and single for most of his life.

For most women, he is probably higher status than the Beatles and Rolling stones and Justin Beiber combined.

The girl in the OP is hot, by any standard. The "elbows too pointy 2/10 wnb" doesn't really make much sense here.

Post: #120

Anyone who says they wouldn't bang her because she isn't hot enough is kidding themselves. She is a very attractive girl and if you saw her in the bar you'd be having a crack.
Sure you might not marry her but every guy here would throw one in her, myself included.

Post: #121

The guys on Stormfront wouldnt touch her with a ten foot pole, lest they betray their race, lol.

Post: #122

(12-08-2016 04:30 AM)Meat Head Wrote:  The guys on Stormfront wouldnt touch her with a ten foot pole, lest they betray their race, lol.

You just reminded me to look up their website. I couldn't even get on because it wasn't connecting. Sad!

Post: #123

(12-07-2016 10:05 PM)eradicator Wrote:  

(12-04-2016 01:54 PM)Vicious Wrote:  A man belonging to the most mythical royal house of the last 300 years, a man with nearly unlimited resources at his disposal, a man in his prime that even without his title could clean up without even opening his mouth. And he settles for... this?

Makes me want to find a granite wall to hit my head to. Give me this man and a couple of Rvf PALS for a weekend and I'd turn his life around.

Prince Harry probably has more pussy than anyone. He is British royalty and single for most of his life.

For most women, he is probably higher status than the Beatles and Rolling stones and Justin Beiber combined.

The girl in the OP is hot, by any standard. The "elbows too pointy 2/10 wnb" doesn't really make much sense here.

You're talking about something else entirely.

Would I bang her? Yes.

Would I make her a steady if I was a British royal? Not bloody likely. Here have some royal spunk in your eye lass. Now kindly defenestrate yourself from the premises before the Duchess of Monaco arrives to act as my foot stool while I play Battlefield.

Post: #124

Am I the only one that is realizing that more and more women are displaying manjaws? It is something that came to my mind a couple of years ago, and got surprised when Heartiste had mentioned it.

I connect it with 10+ years of taking the pill plus having masculine behavior. I cannot really prove it, though.

Post: #125

(12-04-2016 12:09 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Quote:For you guys who want children, it's a genetic quality for having healthier offspring.

Physically or mentally? From my experience, mixed race individuals have fare more identity/mental issues. Not being able to fit in with a "tribe" causes quite a bit of suffering.

My last girlfriend was halfwhite half latina, with immigrant parents and I confirm the huge identity issues. It made me seriously consider having children only with a European woman (I live temporarily in the US).