(11-24-2016 08:30 AM)redpillage Wrote: German and French women have basically been permitted to destroy our nation states by refusing to breed and to provide us with our genetic future. Of course that is assuming that we want to maintain our current population numbers. In essence there would have been no problem with a reduction in population, except that it does not serve the power of the elites. It is not coincidence that our civilization started to crumble the second birth control was introduced in the 1960s. All the problems we discuss in the manosphere today roots back to that single moment in time.
(11-24-2016 08:30 AM)redpillage Wrote: The good news is that political change will happen, it's unavoidable especially now that the Left in Germany and the rest of W. Europe has decided to double down. The bad news is that it's way too late. At best the fledgling anti-globalists will gain some percentages in the next election but it won't be enough. The Marxist know how to play the game too well and let's not forget that we have already lost the battle of demographics. Give it ten more years and white children in W. Europe will be a rapidly diminishing minority. EVEN IF we see a political miracle and the Right takes majority in Germany (very very doubtful) it would most likely only last one administration. They do not have the resources and the willpower of the Donald. For German standards they may be fringe neo-Nazis but for American standards they are still bleeding liberals who 'just want the old country back'. They are not the type who is prepared to use force to quell antifa resistance against political measures taken. They have become 'verweichlicht' (grown soft) as the Germans say, and as such they are doomed.
(11-24-2016 01:20 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:(11-24-2016 08:30 AM)redpillage Wrote: German and French women have basically been permitted to destroy our nation states by refusing to breed and to provide us with our genetic future. Of course that is assuming that we want to maintain our current population numbers. In essence there would have been no problem with a reduction in population, except that it does not serve the power of the elites. It is not coincidence that our civilization started to crumble the second birth control was introduced in the 1960s. All the problems we discuss in the manosphere today roots back to that single moment in time.
The world was constantly being bombarded with change. The only period the globalists let loose a bit and did not do much social engineering was from the 1940s to the late 1950s. 1960s brought not only the pill, it brought increased feminism, seperation of the generations (don't trust anyone above 30), "fuck the establishment", rebel without a cause, free love, drug culture, hippie movement (plenty of reporst that some of the main proponents of that movement were army and CIA staff - those big communies in California were sometimes paid by government grants).
This did not just "happen" - women are destroyers of civilization if run free for sure, but the globalists know that. They also know that the Muslims will conquer in the West given enough time. But they have no intention for Europe and the US to become a caliphate or an Islamist shithole. This will NEVER EVER EVER HAPPEN.
Yes - it keeps the marxists in power later on, but it will also wipe out the marxists later on when the war comes.
You really have to read more about them and their plans. I recently read a funny comment at a site where someone said that Zionists were too weak in the 1950s and did not have an influence on the US. This betrays an utter misunderstanding of the big plan and the globalist elite. They were already well under way in the year 1800. In truth they could give up the charade of democracy and out themselves, but that would immedietely be followed by a revolt of the people. So we will keep on the secret charade for a while longer until there is literally no one there to revolt. And even then will they probably be unaware of who rules them. Brave New World clearly said so and Aldous Huxley and his family are part of the scientific globalist elite who serve the money families.
Resistence is not futile, but it will take much more than voting in someone.
(11-24-2016 02:27 PM)Irenicus Wrote: So basically, what you believe that might happen is:
1. Immigration keeps increasing, and with it, terrorist attacks
They want terror to stay for decades. This will not stop until total control is here.
2. Europeans getting pissed, and dissenting ---> we are at this stage
So what? They vote in anti-immigration parties or anti-globalization parties. Most of those when given a chance have betrayed the people as soon as they were in power. This happened in Greece and it will happen again. But the West may shift ever more nationalistic - though that is only relative, since globalism will march on and Redpillage is right - after a time you cannot even vote yourself out, because the immigrants will vote as one block while the locals will be divided. That is how London got a Muslim mayor.
3. Mass unrest, ending with deportations (or worse).
No deportations of any large scale in the West - ever. Unrest yes, but that is no problem.
4. Passing of laws that will, in order to give "security", instead take away all the freedom.
There are two options here for that to pass - everyone chipped kind of surveillance:
a) totalitarian police state for security - almost everything being recorded about anyone - that would make wide terror almost impossible
b) WWIII with Islam - West & China vs Islam & Russia (which I expect to tilt Muslim - they have a 13% Muslim population and not 6,5% as reported - the military has an even higher number of them serving). Islam and Russia destroyed.
5. Brave New World
Yes - the end - just scientific advancement of humans not being born, but created in a fully controlled system that has one world culture.
?
(11-24-2016 09:41 AM)leanmeansexmachine Wrote: You are being too defeatist Redpillage.
(11-24-2016 09:41 AM)leanmeansexmachine Wrote: What do you want us all to do? It is over so we should just all kill ourselves ? Better to discuss things that we can do than can improve and help us. We should not sugarcoat the situation absolutely, but posts like 'it is already over nothing can be done' help nobody.
(11-24-2016 09:41 AM)leanmeansexmachine Wrote: Europeans are still in the majority in Western Europe and will always be, this nationalist wave saved them just in time. Germany i am not so sure because the rot may be too deep there but i still see Germany surviving, atleast part of it. Most nationalist parties in Europe (who are leading big) already talk about deportations and banning islam.

(11-24-2016 09:41 AM)leanmeansexmachine Wrote: Unfortunately, i think in the end it will come down to civil war and eventual violent removal. They will not leave in peace. And when the time comes, Europeans will not want them to leave in peace. They will want to see blood.
![[Image: dutchmen.jpg]](http://henrymakow.com/upload_images/dutchmen.jpg)
(11-24-2016 09:41 AM)leanmeansexmachine Wrote: You also have to remember a very high percentage of immigrants to Western Europe are actually Eastern European. Yes we are not German or Dutch but we are not that different from each other in all aspects and we will fight with you against the muslims and africans when the time comes, no doubt.
Any multicultural, multiracial, diverse empire will come down one day. Just look at what happened here with Yugoslavia.
(11-24-2016 09:41 AM)leanmeansexmachine Wrote: People that used to be neighbours, friends. People that used to have dinner and barbecue together. People that brought their kids to play with each other.
And then just a little while later, those same people were shooting and beheading each other, raping their wives and daughters and performing the most barbaric and brutal acts possible.
And we were basically people of the same blood.
(11-24-2016 01:25 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:(11-24-2016 08:30 AM)redpillage Wrote: The good news is that political change will happen, it's unavoidable especially now that the Left in Germany and the rest of W. Europe has decided to double down. The bad news is that it's way too late. At best the fledgling anti-globalists will gain some percentages in the next election but it won't be enough. The Marxist know how to play the game too well and let's not forget that we have already lost the battle of demographics. Give it ten more years and white children in W. Europe will be a rapidly diminishing minority. EVEN IF we see a political miracle and the Right takes majority in Germany (very very doubtful) it would most likely only last one administration. They do not have the resources and the willpower of the Donald. For German standards they may be fringe neo-Nazis but for American standards they are still bleeding liberals who 'just want the old country back'. They are not the type who is prepared to use force to quell antifa resistance against political measures taken. They have become 'verweichlicht' (grown soft) as the Germans say, and as such they are doomed.
What is your special insight into the German soul that makes you so certain of this? Have you spent a lot of time in various parts of the country there? How many German friends do you have, and what are their thoughts on this?
(11-24-2016 02:44 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote: As much as I like Samseau and his predictions they really think that Trump is going to save the world.
This will not happen. This group has been working for centuries now and one measly election should take it all away from them? No way Hose.
(11-24-2016 08:11 PM)Samseau Wrote:(11-24-2016 02:44 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:... halt the wars in the middle east and build safe zones for the refugees there, which in theory is going to cut off a lot of Muslims flooding into Europe. Trump will also embolden European nations to cut off the migrant flows
(11-24-2016 08:11 PM)Samseau Wrote: . NATO itself could be transformed into stopping migrants from entering Europe and instead staying in Africa.
(11-24-2016 11:12 PM)iknowexactly Wrote: ...
Really the key issue from a logistics POV is preventing those boats from getting to Europe; and politics necessarily means keeping them from departing Africa, because mainstream people can not tolerate mass drownings of anyone. This has been proven to work for Australia.
...
Quote:"Anyway, I hope this video will be of some help and that perhaps some small dim lightbulb in the back of that stunted growth you call a mind, will help you understand that behind the sunny multicultural smiles and the positive buzzwords like tolerance and diversity, that you are in fact about as welcome in Europe as an avalanche of toxic medical waste"
(11-25-2016 12:37 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:(11-24-2016 11:12 PM)iknowexactly Wrote: ...
Really the key issue from a logistics POV is preventing those boats from getting to Europe; and politics necessarily means keeping them from departing Africa, because mainstream people can not tolerate mass drownings of anyone. This has been proven to work for Australia.
...
From the full breadth and depth of my personal experience speaking with many Australians and following comments sections on media stories where they still exist, terrorists drowning at sea pulls very few heart strings here any more.
The idea that people here give enough of a shit about the lives of those invaders to change their vote is a complete propaganda fabrication of the MSM.
Polls routinely show that the white collar right through to the blue collar left that make up the vast majority of the Australian population don't give a shit about the fate of the invaders.
"Stop the boats" was simply more humanitarian than "feed them to the sharks" but the reality is that most Australians would have accepted either.
(11-24-2016 08:11 PM)Samseau Wrote: If the migrant flows halt, then Europe is going to be fine for a lot longer. It may still eventually die, but instead of collapsing in 20 years they are now looking at least 40 years or more.
(11-25-2016 12:12 AM)Samseau Wrote: You would think Europussies could accept building safe zones, but no, if you even suggest that anything less than complete migration with full housing and welfare for life you are a racist.
I'll never forget one German girl when I asked her about the migrant invasion, and asked her "Don't you think it's really expensive to move all of these people from the Middle East to Germany?" She turned away and refused to speak with me again. The brainwashing is deep, the women are retarded, and the men are laughably weak. Even if you bring up the subject to men they give off nervous laughter and quickly change the subject.
![[Image: DHL-Berlin.jpg]](http://newobserveronline.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/DHL-Berlin.jpg)
![[Image: Syria-736254.jpg]](http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/78/590x/Syria-736254.jpg)
![[Image: islam-3.jpg]](https://counterjihadnews.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/islam-3.jpg)
Quote:France Needs Someone to Stop Le Pen
On Sunday, France’s Republican Party will choose its candidate for the presidential election next spring. Opinion polls say that the Republicans are so far ahead that the party, in effect, is about to name the next president -- either Alain Juppe or Francois Fillon, former prime ministers offering not-too-dissimilar conservative programs.
The polls, for once, had better be right. The likely alternative to either of those men would be disastrous -- and not just for France.
Support for the Socialist party has collapsed: President Francois Hollande’s approval rating stands (if that’s the right word) at 4 percent. So the Republican nominee is likely to face Marine Le Pen, leader of the populist National Front. She’s France’s answer to Donald Trump, except with more self-discipline, added xenophobia and a clearer sense of purpose. If she wins, the European Union would be badly and perhaps fatally wounded. By comparison, Brexit would be a minor nuisance.
Le Pen celebrated Britain’s vote to quit last June as the beginning of the end for the EU -- a project she’s called “objectively a total failure.” An EU without France, which designed and built the EU alongside Germany, is objectively a hard thing to imagine. A National Front victory would shake Europe more violently than Trump’s win has rocked the U.S.
The polls suggest that either Fillon or Juppe ought to beat her easily -- but there are many unknowns. It’s unclear who will stand for the Socialists, for example, or whether Emmanuel Macron (who quit the government earlier this year and leads a new party) will gather strong support. Right now, though, the threat from Le Pen looks real.
Q&A: Francois Fillon
Fillon did surprisingly well in the first round of the primary, and seems well-placed to beat Juppe for the nomination -- which is good, because he’d be the stronger rival to Le Pen. Compared with Juppe, he’s no friend of multiculturalism or the European Commission. He takes a hard line on “Islamic totalitarianism.” He says immigrants should assimilate, wants to curb immigration from outside the union, and proposes to reform (though not dismantle) the EU’s system for borderless intra-EU travel. This puts him in a better position to stop conservative support from leaching to Le Pen.
Fillon’s proposed tough-love economic reforms -- including labor-market deregulation -- also have the advantage of being just what France needs. The country may even be ready for them.
Le Pen isn’t Europe’s only populist insurgent, and dealing with this dangerous swelling of discontent isn’t a job for French politicians alone. The EU’s other member governments and institutions need to recognize the doubts that many citizens have about the project. Without pandering or surrendering, they need to show they’re listening. Ignoring these worries failed with Brexit. The union cannot afford to make the same mistake with France.
To contact the senior editor responsible for Bloomberg View’s editorials: David Shipley at [email protected]
Quote:Law enforcement and riot police have been deployed to Bulgaria's largest migrant and refugee camp, located in the town of Harmanli, after violence erupted in the center. Inhabitants damaged the facility setting the premises on fire.
More than 2,000 people clashed with police at the camp in southern Bulgaria, close to the Turkish border, on Thursday, local news agency Novinite reported, citing Bulgarian National Radio (BNR).
The Harmanli camp, which is the largest in the country, houses some 3,000 people, mostly from Afghanistan, according to Reuters.
Some 250 police officers, firefighters and gendarmerie were deployed to the scene, local police spokeswoman Nina Nikolova told AFP. Protesters threw stones and other objects at law enforcement, who had to deploy water cannon to disperse the angry crowd.
The migrants burnt car tires, and set mattresses and furniture alight in several of the camp's buildings. Many structures, including a canteen and a new building which was supposed to open this week were damaged.
There have been no reports of arrests or of any injuries, while Bulgaria's interior ministry spokeswoman told Reuters the situation had been brought under control. "Negotiations between the authorities and the protesters are underway," she said.
The riot was reportedly caused by a quarantine, with the Harmanli camp having been sealed off following reports of skin disease outbreaks among its residents. Migrants were protesting against the temporary restrictions on leaving the center.
Officials placed the facility under quarantine after locals from the nearby town staged a protest following reports that people from the camp carried communicable skin diseases. The head of the Bulgarian Refugee Agency, which runs the camp, later said reports of the infection were false and "artificially created tension."
"We have been alarming about the problems – including health and routine issues there for such a long time. When they [officials] are neglecting the problem and only boast how much work they have done, this is the outcome we should expect," the politician told the media, as cited by FOCUS News Agency.
Bulgaria, the EU's poorest member state, has toughened its border controls to decrease the flows of illegal migrants. A security fence was built on its border with Turkey, while some 17,000 migrants have been detained since the start of the year, according to Reuters. Yet, Bulgarian nationalists have staged a number of protests recently, saying the country cannot support migrants even in lower numbers.
Quote:Violence erupted outside a former Olympic village accommodation where 1,300 migrants are being housed in Italy.
Long-standing tensions between local residents and migrants broke out on Wednesday night when two explosions were set off just outside the migrant centre in Turin.
The powerful explosions were strong enough to shake windows of nearby houses, according to local residents. In the morning, a group of around 300 migrants blocked the main road outside of the housing block. They also smashed road signs and parked cars while other shouted at the Italian locals.
Footage from nearby witnesses last night captured the migrants hurling stones and bottles at riot police. Residents also locked themselves in shops to avoid being hit by missiles.
According to locals, migrants told passerbys they were "Italian racists" as traffic was brought to a standstill outside the accommodation.
No one was injured in the blasts, which were thought to be homemade letter bombs, according to La Stampa. The Turin city council said it was "concerned" about the violence. One official said they hoped police would identify those responsible as soon as possible. Around 1,300 migrants live in the buildings originally built for athletes when the city hosted the 2006 Winter Olympic Games.
![[Image: 1037581475.jpg]](https://cdn4.img.sputniknews.com/images/103758/14/1037581475.jpg)
(11-25-2016 03:54 PM)sterling_archer Wrote: I don't agree (mildly annoyed) with Šešelj statements against Croats and existence of Croatia, but I admire his pro Trump statements.
Hope people don't mind me posting here as I am still under 250 posts.