Post: #44251

(10-20-2016 01:17 PM)Fisto Wrote:  Ken Bone is voting Trump! hahaha

Media: "Sexual pervert Ken Bone voting for Trump"

Post: #44252

(10-20-2016 01:21 PM)Enoch Wrote:  

(10-20-2016 01:17 PM)Fisto Wrote:  Ken Bone is voting Trump! hahaha

Media: "Sexual pervert Ken Bone voting for Trump"

Nailed it.

Post: #44253

(10-20-2016 01:05 PM)n0000 Wrote:  

(10-20-2016 12:48 PM)Seth_Rose Wrote:  

(10-20-2016 05:59 AM)YossariansRight Wrote:  More polling garbage:

Yougov does a D+18 sample to get Hitlery! a 4 point lead.

Reuters with a D+14 can only get "her" to +4 as well.

This needs to pointed out. What a joke!

But good news for Trump.

Can you please provide a citation for this. There is so much misinformation flying around I dont believe anything until I see it in black and white.

Here it is:

   

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/poll...mist-26280

Poll looks to be slightly weighted, but still too much towards Hillary.

Post: #44254

Today's polls. LATimes, IBD/TIPP, and Rasmussen appear to be using better methodologies, because they're showing a much closer race than the other polls.

Post: #44255

(10-20-2016 07:10 AM)Emancipator Wrote:  I think that Clinton camp and the media keep hammering on "Trump won't accept elections results" in order to frame Clinton not accepting results and blaming RUSSIA

That is exactly what they're doing.

They're setting the stage for "turn about" is fair play and send it to the courts or congress.

I'd imagine they're going to be planting evidence of "russian tampering" in swing states to nullify anything. Its nauseating.

There is some deviously, cunning cunt sitting in a room creating these false doors and traps to frame the dialogue in such a way that everything is a landmine. If like me, frame, was a bit of a foreign concept this election has been PHD schooling on frame.

And multiple lines last night confirmed that talking points are sourced from this thread/other debate threads. That is high energy.

Keep running over emotional arguments, logic bomb their weak mindsets, and keep winning.

Post: #44256

^ I believe it was the IBD/TIPP that was the most accurate for 2012. They aren't going to shill for Hillary, it seems. I think they are mostly trustworthy in their methodology.

Post: #44257

Very interesting. The +5 lead among independents is heartening. That poll still doesnt tell you how much dems vs repubs vs indepedents are weighted though.

Post: #44258

(10-20-2016 01:21 PM)Enoch Wrote:  

(10-20-2016 01:17 PM)Fisto Wrote:  Ken Bone is voting Trump! hahaha

Media: "Sexual pervert Ken Bone voting for Trump"

Media: "Dorky looking white supremacist Ken Bone, known for his lewd comments about his own name and voluminous body, which he shamelessly uses to regularly invade women's, such as Hillary Clinton's (praise be upon her name), personal space, voting for literally Hitler!

(And no, Ken, ' I'm just fat, what am I supposed to do' is not a valid excuse, you privileged buffoon.)

READ NEXT ON CNN:
I was raped by my WASP neighbor's 5 year old son! Read this lesbian Muslim Hispanic transgender woman's riveting tale about male oppression and the dirty undercurrent of racism spreading like a wildfire amongst America's kindergartners.

READ MORE:
5 year old rapist allegedly "was a Trump supporter", says victim of the wheelchair rape that shocked the nation.

OPINION, by (((John Doe))):
Mr Trump, do you disavow?"

Post: #44259

YUGE

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/789188917736071169
   

Post: #44260

^ John Doe doesn't really echo that well; you need more syllables in that last name. You know which ones.

It is nice to see Trump doing well in all 3 tracking polls today, though I don't know wtf Rasmussen is doing, it loses any credibility with its wild daily poll swings. Instead of being a 7-day rolling tally, are they doing literally a one-sample-per-week tally so this Thursday's release can only be compared to last Thursday's? It certainly feels that way especially since it'll probably be Clinton +3 tomorrow, and then tied on Monday, and then another change the next day...

Post: #44261

(10-20-2016 02:41 PM)Gmac Wrote:  YUGE

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/789188917736071169

That shit is so spicy is gonna make Hillary's anus look like the flag of Japan!

Post: #44262

(10-20-2016 02:41 PM)Gmac Wrote:  YUGE

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/789188917736071169

I assume the president and his top staff and cabinet officers have a classified email system they use for their Super Secret communications, similar to the US military's SIPRNet and JWICS systems? If so, these particular emails may not have much policy and planning stuff, but I'm hoping they have something good. I assume that by using an anonymous email handle the President's staff was trying to get around, to some degree, having to use the secure email system, which probably has cumbersome login requirements and security procedures.

Post: #44263

About to do a medium-energy Periscope: http://periscope.tv/rooshv

Post: #44264

Roosh mentioned this video and I somehow hadn't seen it:




This is beautiful.

Post: #44265

I just realized that if these emails are between the President's office and Podesta, then that explains why he used a pseudonym. When the president communicates with someone on official presidential business, then the emails have to be archived and stored according to certain procedures. If he's communicating about non-official business, such as DNC campaigning, fundraising, and the like, then he and his staff would presumably want to use a different letterhead to separate the two. I assume these emails fall in the latter camp.

If the president and his staff did use this email channel to conduct official presidential business, then that should be a violation.

Post: #44266

(10-20-2016 03:33 PM)iop890 Wrote:  Roosh mentioned this video and I somehow hadn't seen it:




This is beautiful.

Thank you for this! I also watched a related video where Joe Scarborough perfectly encapsulates it. Skip to the 8:37 mark (can't get that embedded).





Transcript of main point if you don't watch it:

Quote:This is an example, the media gets something they can absolutely freak out about and claim he's an agent of Vladimir Putin, and destroying democracy in America, and it's just another example of the media having to find a little phrase and freak out

I also like how he points out the Democrats doing this and sums it up with "you can bathe in the hypocrisy all you want", lol. Good Guy Joe this time (and taking down Kristol)

Post: #44267

(10-20-2016 02:59 PM)Roosh Wrote:  About to do a medium-energy Periscope: http://periscope.tv/rooshv

OVERVIEW OF ROOSH'S PERISCOPE "THIRD DEBATE ANALYSIS AND FUTURE PREDICTIONS"

Trump: What did Trump have to do for *this* debate (different than second debate)? Trump brought up Veritas (should mention by name), Wikileaks. What grade does Roosh give Trump for this debate?

Hillary: her debate goal = not pass out. No response to Trump bringing up Chicago violence, money from Saudi Arabia. Her old anecdotes (no one cares). Her Russian conspiracy theory. Chinese steel. Roosh grades her: D.

What does this mean? Trump will win = 100%. It's done. Now: just show up. Roosh not worried at all. Media narrative doesn't matter, dead. Wash Post and NYT psyop. Hero: Julian Assange Chinese water torture on Hillary = payback for false rape accusation (CIA). Pardon Assange.

Tomorrow: Roosh mails in absentee ballot = pain in ass, so not the only one doing this. Will Hillary supporters walk 10 minutes to nearest church/school? No enthusiasm for her.

Roosh's next move = remove from news, get on with life, talk about men/self-improvement/culture.

Q&A

Roosh's girl (watching debate), Donna Brazile, Bill Kristol, Arnold (real dog), Assange, Danny Williams, Roosh's goal after election (be in the news again?), Arnold the pug.

Broadcast ends at 34:15.

Permalink: https://www.periscope.tv/rooshv/1RDGlobMkPoKL

Post: #44268

Flashback Thursday!

Maybe Chris Wallace is a closet Trump supporter despite his highly persuasive overlords...?

Post: #44269

I saw some retweet by a cuck and want to see if anybody can verify, I can't find anything on it.

It said Trump was only ahead in the absentee ballot voting in NC by 5 points while romney was ahead by 33 in 2012

Post: #44270

In that Bill Kristol video...
"The key is to ignore him (Trump, presumably when he loses)"

The problem is, you can't. You can't because Trump is simply playing the game like the libs have been playing for years, and he's turned the table on them.

To ignore him, they'd have to ignore the last 50 years of Democratic strategy.

Post: #44271

(10-20-2016 04:09 PM)Jaydublin Wrote:  I saw some retweet by a cuck and want to see if anybody can verify, I can't find anything on it.

It said Trump was only ahead in the absentee ballot voting in NC by 5 points while romney was ahead by 33 in 2012

?

Early voting in North Carolina literally started TODAY.

Your cuck is probably referring to this NYT article from over a week ago:

http://archive.is/lZSkF

Quote:According to an analysis of early voting in North Carolina’s 10 most populous counties, conducted by Michael McDonald, an associate professor of political science at the University of Florida, ballot requests are up 17 percent from 2012 among registered Democrats and down 27 percent among Republicans.

Maybe the "5 point" lead is the gap between D+17% and R-27% from 2012, who knows.

Ballot requests... big fucking deal. I guess that is another great way to commit fraud though.

The other way to look at it: your populous counties are your fucking URBAN CENTRES that typically skew Democratic.

Check out these county results from 2012:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta...nty.5B6.5D

Of the 8 counties that had over 100,000 votes, 7 of them were blue, heavy blue in most cases.

Post: #44272

(10-20-2016 04:07 PM)Gmac Wrote:  Flashback Thursday!

Maybe Chris Wallace is a closet Trump supporter despite his highly persuasive overlords...?

What a jolly good time it's been aboard the Trump train.

Post: #44273

The front page on today Honolulu Star Advertiser says "Trump to Refuse Election Results" or something like that.

That is the big headline phrase like we've talked about here.

I don't know if anyone's said this, so I apologize if I didnt read it.

Here's my point:

If 17 intelligence agencies said that the Russians are interfering with the election, why on earth wouldn't both sides be skeptical of the results?

On top of all the other reasons that it could be rigged, such as blatant in-you-face media spin put on everything trump says, and all of Hillary's crooked ness, Hillary herself said that acceptance of Russian espionage was the biggest issue in last nights debate.

She's saying that these 17 agencies think the Russians are gonna mess with the election process but not the results. That's not logical.

Aloha!

Post: #44274

(10-20-2016 03:35 PM)C-Note Wrote:  I just realized that if these emails are between the President's office and Podesta, then that explains why he used a pseudonym. When the president communicates with someone on official presidential business, then the emails have to be archived and stored according to certain procedures. If he's communicating about non-official business, such as DNC campaigning, fundraising, and the like,

Campaigning, fundraising, and election fraud.

Post: #44275

PJW doing great work once again. He really is the best in the YouTube game, atleast when it comes to short, effective videos.