Sweden should just abolish its military. In the name of world peace and stuff.

Liberal Europe doesn't have the will or courage to deal with this issue. It will become forced to act when the Muslim pops reach around 15-20% mark in France, Germany and the Low Countries, but by then the situation will be too bad to act without serious military actions. Basically the West is fucked. Utterly self inflicted, and heartbreaking frankly. But there you go. Eastern Europe is at least united at this point against Muslim migration. They see their future as opposed to the mistakes in the west. Property prices in the East will rise year on year exponentially. Clever investors are already recognising this. The white flight East in the next 20 years will be off the charts...

(09-30-2016 06:17 AM)serpico Wrote:  The white flight East in the next 20 years will be off the charts...

Im so far ahead on this lol.

(09-28-2016 06:36 AM)redpillage Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 05:11 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I'd wager every dollar I ever owned on one white soldier being worth five arabs and a dozen blacks.
Sorry to take it to a racial place but when whites are let off the chain, unmuzzled and motivated they get kill/death ratios that boggle the mind.

Oh REALLY? So how come tens of thousands of our women and children have been raped or otherwise mistreated by Muslims and immigrants over the past decade or so? I remember perhaps one or two cases when someone fought back. What happened after literally hundreds of terrorist attacks here in Europe? At the Bataclan for example both women and men were supposedly tortured like animals. Those poor souls didn't have any family? No fathers, no brothers, no sons? No relatives or friends with revenge in their heart and nothing to lose? Where is the push back?

The only one example I recall are the Corsicans and quite frankly they are probably the outlier because they have always culturally separated themselves from mainland France. Plus they remember their own history well.

You guys have this distorted idea of the superior white warrior which just doesn't exist or, if it ever did doesn't exist anymore. Those types of people need to be bred, they need to be trained, and they evolve through combat, blood, sweat, and personal sacrifice.

I just don't see it brother... but heck, prove me wrong.

The Aussie has a point. If White men kicked off, the kill rates would go through the roof and the élite knows this very well.

This is why political, media, psychological and legal pressure in the West is exclusively on White, heterosexual men and why White women are under the most pressure to betray them for the doctrines of elite daddies.

The Rhodesian civil war is a case in point. The kill rates that the Rhodesians scored against Soviet, Chinese and North Korean trained troops was phenomenal. Despite UN sanctions and a long civil war, Rhodesia was better off then than Zimbabwe is today but no matter how many battles you win, if you lose the politics, you lose the war.

When the Saxon Began to Hate

(09-30-2016 12:59 PM)N°6 Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 06:36 AM)redpillage Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 05:11 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I'd wager every dollar I ever owned on one white soldier being worth five arabs and a dozen blacks.
Sorry to take it to a racial place but when whites are let off the chain, unmuzzled and motivated they get kill/death ratios that boggle the mind.

Oh REALLY? So how come tens of thousands of our women and children have been raped or otherwise mistreated by Muslims and immigrants over the past decade or so? I remember perhaps one or two cases when someone fought back. What happened after literally hundreds of terrorist attacks here in Europe? At the Bataclan for example both women and men were supposedly tortured like animals. Those poor souls didn't have any family? No fathers, no brothers, no sons? No relatives or friends with revenge in their heart and nothing to lose? Where is the push back?

The only one example I recall are the Corsicans and quite frankly they are probably the outlier because they have always culturally separated themselves from mainland France. Plus they remember their own history well.

You guys have this distorted idea of the superior white warrior which just doesn't exist or, if it ever did doesn't exist anymore. Those types of people need to be bred, they need to be trained, and they evolve through combat, blood, sweat, and personal sacrifice.

I just don't see it brother... but heck, prove me wrong.

The Aussie has a point. If White men kicked off, the kill rates would go through the roof and the élite knows this very well.

This is why political, media, psychological and legal pressure in the West is exclusively on White, heterosexual men and why White women are under the most pressure to betray them for the doctrines of elite daddies.

The Rhodesian civil war is a case in point. The kill rates that the Rhodesians scored against Soviet, Chinese and North Korean trained troops was phenomenal. Despite UN sanctions and a long civil war, Rhodesia was better off then than Zimbabwe is today but no matter how many battles you win, if you lose the politics, you lose the war.

When the Saxon Began to Hate

I already brought this up. It's more than likely that the Saxon of Kipling's time simply no longer exists on a genetic level.

(09-29-2016 06:05 PM)Enigma Wrote:  The argument from the past two pages is easily resolved simply by looking at ISIS' last two chief military strategists.





Both guys even had direct training by the US military.

And both guys may be even on the CIA pay-roll. Still - plenty of low- and mid-level followers are true believers - certainly the majority. I have said again and again that the Muslim terrorists are so infiltrated by globalist agents - likely even led by them, that they might as well be part of the globalist strike force. And in reality they fully are.

But unfortunately Muslims are responsible for the rapes & assaults happening every day in the West:

One Turkish guy - born and raised in Austria - attempts to copy the Nice terrorist, but fails miserably. He lets loose plenty of Allah Akbars while doing it though:

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-n...ria-Vienna

Quote:Turkish migrant screaming Allahu Akbar ploughs into crowd of pedestrians

They even have the sources wrong, because he is not a migrant, but a guy living in Austria for generations already. We all know that the 3rd generation is now more radical than the first two.

http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/nort...y-11951237

And here a couple of Mohammads (2 Mohammad to be exact) and an Omar attempting to rape 14yo girls:




First of all - why the fuck are they waltzing around with their morning coffee and second - who believes that those blokes are all 18?

Yeah - I see a bright future for those morons, when the globalist machine turns on them later on. Even their terrorist organizations have to be financed, created, protected and led by the globalists or ISIS or Al-Quaeda would not exist.

Only Persia could probably raise themselves to first world level. But that is why they ousted the shah and set up their Ayatollah agent. Nothing works as great in suppressing the advancement of a civilization than creating a radical theocracy.

(09-30-2016 02:57 PM)rw95 Wrote:  I already brought this up. It's more than likely that the Saxon of Kipling's time simply no longer exists on a genetic level.

A lot of families which existed in Kipling's day have been cut off by young men killed in WW1 and WW2 and by spinsters and abortionists from the Pill era onwards. The genetic level is still there but the scope has withered.

It took the remnant of Spain and its Portuguese offshoot 700+ years to re-conquer Iberia. The boomers will be a curse to future generations if they have to go through the same struggle.

After the reconquista, what became of the Spanish? Mere hundreds of them conquered most of South America.

I'm at the point where I support a final solution for them. Everyone of those criminals get wiped out of our society. But we all know this will not happen because they want to bring the things to a boiling point. That's why they let them in, let them rape, steal, act violent without punishment.

(09-30-2016 10:21 AM)NewMeta Wrote:  

(09-30-2016 06:17 AM)serpico Wrote:  The white flight East in the next 20 years will be off the charts...

Im so far ahead on this lol.

Maybe keep a room and a mattress handy for when Parzival and I are turning off the lights in Western Europe

(09-30-2016 04:59 PM)Parzival Wrote:  I'm at the point where I support a final solution for them. Everyone of those criminals get wiped out of our society. But we all know this will not happen because they want to bring the things to a boiling point. That's why they let them in, let them rape, steal, act violent without punishment.

I'm sure you've seen the recent stats - year to date 600,000 more, over 60% young fighting age males. Keep it up Germany!!!

An interesting video that concerns many things discussed in this thread, the Syria/Russia discussion and quite possibly the Trump & Hillary threads.

NGO's & the information war.







Another interesting analysis.

(09-30-2016 12:59 PM)N°6 Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 06:36 AM)redpillage Wrote:  

(09-28-2016 05:11 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I'd wager every dollar I ever owned on one white soldier being worth five arabs and a dozen blacks.
Sorry to take it to a racial place but when whites are let off the chain, unmuzzled and motivated they get kill/death ratios that boggle the mind.

Oh REALLY? So how come tens of thousands of our women and children have been raped or otherwise mistreated by Muslims and immigrants over the past decade or so? I remember perhaps one or two cases when someone fought back. What happened after literally hundreds of terrorist attacks here in Europe? At the Bataclan for example both women and men were supposedly tortured like animals. Those poor souls didn't have any family? No fathers, no brothers, no sons? No relatives or friends with revenge in their heart and nothing to lose? Where is the push back?

The only one example I recall are the Corsicans and quite frankly they are probably the outlier because they have always culturally separated themselves from mainland France. Plus they remember their own history well.

You guys have this distorted idea of the superior white warrior which just doesn't exist or, if it ever did doesn't exist anymore. Those types of people need to be bred, they need to be trained, and they evolve through combat, blood, sweat, and personal sacrifice.

I just don't see it brother... but heck, prove me wrong.

The Aussie has a point. If White men kicked off, the kill rates would go through the roof and the élite knows this very well.

This is why political, media, psychological and legal pressure in the West is exclusively on White, heterosexual men and why White women are under the most pressure to betray them for the doctrines of elite daddies.

The Rhodesian civil war is a case in point. The kill rates that the Rhodesians scored against Soviet, Chinese and North Korean trained troops was phenomenal. Despite UN sanctions and a long civil war, Rhodesia was better off then than Zimbabwe is today but no matter how many battles you win, if you lose the politics, you lose the war.

When the Saxon Began to Hate

Both of you all have a point.

As for Rhodesians, not saying they where/are not tough as nails, but how many African Natives fought alongside them?

Portugal also fought a bloody war in Africa between 1961-1976 against militias trained and armed by the USSR, Cuba, China, and...USA, and also had a killing ratio of 1 soldier deceased to each 8 enemies...but by 1974 black Africans constituted 50% of the Portuguese manpower. It is not a good comparison on fighting prowess, a militia (no matter how well trained and armed) at the end of the day is just a militia, you can not compare it to a an European army with centuries of warfare experience (no matter how small it is like the Portuguese one).

By the way, the most decorated Portuguese soldier in the war is a black African by the name of Marcelino da Mata, or "The Rambo from Guinea". I had the pleasure to work with one of his comrades in arms (white) and the legend is confirmed, this guy was fearless and ferocious as it can be.

Portuguese Heroes: Marcelino da Mata, or "The Rambo from Guinea" (in Portuguese language)

Also, this Rhodesian war footage and many more shows that whites and blacks fought alongside.

   

In sum, there is barely more white and proud than me, but lets be real, all nations and peoples are capable of producing excellent warriors, and like Redpillage wrote, most of western europeans are devoid of fighting spirit nowadays. The armies are possibly the few redpill institutions remaining. Even a few weeks ago two guys died by overheating in a Portuguese commandos training exercise (and of course the lefties wanted to abolish the commandos after this episode). Special forces do not play around...

Edit: Actually Marcelino da Mata is the most condecorated Portuguese soldier of all time.

Quote:all nations and peoples are capable of producing excellent warriors

All nations -- Not really. What makes western armies so successful (and Japanese back in the day, as another example) is our culture.

Here's an interesting piece worth reading, written by a former SF weapons sergeant:

What Separates First and Third World Armies?

Other things like attitudes toward hard work, class consciousness, taking the initiative, etc all affect how effective an army will be. What part of the populace the soldiers are drawn from, soldier intelligence and education, etc also matter quite a lot. I don't want to write a novel about this here, but it's not unreasonable to say the general quality of recruits before training starts is much higher in western armies than in most of the rest of the world. And of course non-white soldiers in the US Army--or other highly professional military organizations--can be extremely competent. I don't think anyone is suggesting otherwise.

The other point I want to make is more of a nitpick: soldiers aren't warriors, and all warrior virtues are not necessarily good for soldiers to have. The fundamental difference in my mind is warriors are geared more toward individual effort in the fight, whereas soldiers train to work together toward a common goal. Soldiers are much, much more dangerous than warriors in a large scale conflict. I'm aware this is largely a semantic distinction but it's useful for illustrating my next point.

It just so happens that armies from muslim nations lack most of the cultural advantages we have in the West, and they don't make great soldiers. Oh, they can be very brave and warrior-like in their own way, but that doesn't work nearly as well against an organized force of soldiers as it does when they're gunning down unarmed civilians and fighting whatever cops happened to be nearby. And that's why we mop the floor with them every time we fight them. It's not just our tech. Tech helps, but even using nothing but small arms and communication a group of soldiers is worth several times that many individual warrior types.

Napolean Wrote:One Mameluk is stronger than two French soldiers, 100 Mameluks is equal to 150 French soldiers, but 300 Frenchmen will defeat 300 Mameluks, and 1500 Mameluks will always lose to 1000 Frenchmen

If I had to guess, it's because some cultures are better at teamwork.

Nice short vid by a cute Kuweiti Ex-Muslim immigrant to the US.

She supports Trump & Milo, is bewildered at the feminists who are all for open borders and she is against Muslim immigration. (Yeah - I know that she probably rides the carousel now, has a stupid nose ring - but still - I prefer her 1000 times to the hordes of radical Niqab wearing women who will only breed more radicals.)

I have said a few times that aware Ex-Muslims are an asset. They are worth 500 SJWs and feminists.

Especially if they are young attractive women - the West can let them come - the more the better. Nothing works so well on the general behavior of women than a surplus of pussy - sausage fest is just the opposite.

As a side note - when I see Ex-Muslims like her who are happy and radiant, then I see how the Arab world would look like without Islam. (yeah - I know she is in the cultural marxism epicentre at US colleges and it is literally coloring her hair by now, but still...) But I am afraid that we will only see that day after one final bloody war.

(09-30-2016 07:17 PM)weambulance Wrote:  

Quote:all nations and peoples are capable of producing excellent warriors

All nations -- Not really. What makes western armies so successful (and Japanese back in the day, as another example) is our culture.

Here's an interesting piece worth reading, written by a former SF weapons sergeant:

What Separates First and Third World Armies?

Other things like attitudes toward hard work, class consciousness, taking the initiative, etc all affect how effective an army will be. What part of the populace the soldiers are drawn from, soldier intelligence and education, etc also matter quite a lot. I don't want to write a novel about this here, but it's not unreasonable to say the general quality of recruits before training starts is much higher in western armies than in most of the rest of the world. And of course non-white soldiers in the US Army--or other highly professional military organizations--can be extremely competent. I don't think anyone is suggesting otherwise.

The other point I want to make is more of a nitpick: soldiers aren't warriors, and all warrior virtues are not necessarily good for soldiers to have. The fundamental difference in my mind is warriors are geared more toward individual effort in the fight, whereas soldiers train to work together toward a common goal. Soldiers are much, much more dangerous than warriors in a large scale conflict. I'm aware this is largely a semantic distinction but it's useful for illustrating my next point.

It just so happens that armies from muslim nations lack most of the cultural advantages we have in the West, and they don't make great soldiers. Oh, they can be very brave and warrior-like in their own way, but that doesn't work nearly as well against an organized force of soldiers as it does when they're gunning down unarmed civilians and fighting whatever cops happened to be nearby. And that's why we mop the floor with them every time we fight them. It's not just our tech. Tech helps, but even using nothing but small arms and communication a group of soldiers is worth several times that many individual warrior types.

yeah, this is all very beautiful, but facts is that these muslim mofos where in Iberia for 800 years and later conquered Byzantium and were at the Gates of Vienna.

Do not underestimate your enemy using white supremacy bullshit.

(10-01-2016 01:28 AM)Rocha Wrote:  

(09-30-2016 07:17 PM)weambulance Wrote:  

Quote:all nations and peoples are capable of producing excellent warriors

It just so happens that armies from muslim nations lack most of the cultural advantages we have in the West, and they don't make great soldiers. Oh, they can be very brave and warrior-like in their own way, but that doesn't work nearly as well against an organized force of soldiers as it does when they're gunning down unarmed civilians and fighting whatever cops happened to be nearby. And that's why we mop the floor with them every time we fight them. It's not just our tech. Tech helps, but even using nothing but small arms and communication a group of soldiers is worth several times that many individual warrior types.

yeah, this is all very beautiful, but facts is that these muslim mofos where in Iberia for 800 years and later conquered Byzantium and were at the Gates of Vienna.

Do not underestimate your enemy using white supremacy bullshit.

Whoa there - don't throw around such mighty words here. Pointing out the reality of ineptitude of Muslim soldiers compared to modern military is known. The Islamic forces had different reasons for their success and we mentioned them multiple times here. But they missed the boat when it came to university and secularism driven modern methods. Also the reason for such a long duration was also based on the infusion of Persian, Berbar and then Janissar European slave soldier (Ottomans) cultures. There were plenty of great military minds and soldiers in the middle ages under Islamic rule. And most importantly they were massive united armies under the banner of political Islam, while the Europeans were divided and warring among each other.

But the truth of the matter is that they have not been learning in the last centuries and continue that adherence to ignorance and stupidity. The Chinese and Japanese when given a free market system quickly absorb the knowledge of the West and adapt it to their own culture. The Chinese are still backwards, but will adapt quickly enough.

This is not white supremacy speaking - just common sense. It's not that the Muslim world could not theoretically do the same for some genetic reason - they just have many things limiting them - mostly it is their religion, but they refuse to acknowledge that. It is tough for them to face the fact that the very thing that united them in the past and made their empire great now limits them the most.

Another thing that's preventing Islamic nations from building modern and capable armies is Islam's inherent tribal nature. The Russians have been exploiting this in their fight against Chechen militants in the Caucasus in recent times.

In Islam, your family/tribe is everything, which translates into a strong distrust for foreigners no matter where they come from. This makes Islamic militaries/nations ineffective all the way from top to bottom - whether on the scale of a military regiment, or on a national scale, your average Muslim will distrust another fellow Muslim just slightly less than a Christian, Jew, or any other non-Muslim.

I remember reading an article on this some time ago. The authors analyzed several historical examples, one of which was the poor performance of Arabic nations during their 20th century wars in Israel. I believe it was the Yom Kippur War of 1973 - it was mentioned that the Egyptians and Syrians refused to share intelligence on Israeli military activities, and didn't even think of jointly coordinating their offensives. That's how deep the divisions within Islamic societies go.

You know what we learn in school? To concentrate. Listen to reports about soldiers that train guys in Afghanistan or Iraq. After 15 minutes their attention is gone. Their system, their culture never teach them to shape their mind to focus, to concentrate and to overcome difficulties. Many of those Arabs give up when it becomes tricky, they can't follow for longer. Their benefit is the raw aggression and that they form a violent mob. Violent mobs can be dangerous still history show a small well trained and organised group can win against a bigger enemy. Of course at the end when you don't care about manpower or other stuff you can win in the long run by outnumber them, outproduce them and so on.

When you take a look about how effective western military is, the dead rate of soldiers dropped since WW II drastic. In the long run organisation beats the brute nature, when the organisation is prepared for this. Furthermore the Islamic culture don't focus on self improvement and critics of thinking. Its a culture where you give up everything to be part of the Zerg.

I second the above. Tribalised societies turn out shitty armed forces and even their insurgencies are crap by comparison. You can boil it down to nothing more complicated than the idea of personal/tribal outcomes trumping group outcomes. It's why the Afghan national army is still a load of shit ten years and billions of dollar later. When it comes time to storm the trenches (so to speak) nobody is interested in dying for Afghanistan because their loyalty is to their tribe, so everyone sits on their ass and hopes that the other guy they're sitting next to of no blood relation gets killed instead of them.

And ease off the white supremacy bullshit. This isn't Safespace University.

(10-01-2016 01:28 AM)Rocha Wrote:  yeah, this is all very beautiful, but facts is that these muslim mofos where in Iberia for 800 years and later conquered Byzantium and were at the Gates of Vienna.

Do not underestimate your enemy using white supremacy bullshit.

In other words, you didn't understand what I wrote and decided to lash out with an baseless accusation.

Good one. Maybe you can point out where I mentioned race as a primary factor in determining martial efficacy? Here's a hint to get you going: "muslim" isn't a race.

Despite your lack of understanding, I invite you to consider that what muslims did centuries ago may not have much bearing on what they can do now. And as such, it is hardly a compelling argument.


Edit - nicer language

Seems like an opportune moment to post this. Oh Abu Hajaar, will you never learn?!

(09-30-2016 07:17 PM)weambulance Wrote:  It just so happens that armies from muslim nations lack most of the cultural advantages we have in the West, and they don't make great soldiers. Oh, they can be very brave and warrior-like in their own way, but that doesn't work nearly as well against an organized force of soldiers as it does when they're gunning down unarmed civilians and fighting whatever cops happened to be nearby. And that's why we mop the floor with them every time we fight them. It's not just our tech. Tech helps, but even using nothing but small arms and communication a group of soldiers is worth several times that many individual warrior types.

First of all it seems that I seem to have opened a Pandora's box by simply stating that whites, handicapped by their current cultural condition, will be unable to overcome the ethnic/genetic repopulation that is happening right underneath their noses. Whether or not whites make better warriors/soldiers is completely beside the point AS THERE ARE PRACTICALLY NONE IN EXISTENCE IN WESTERN EUROPE RIGHT NOW!!!

If we had 10/15 years to raise a new generation of young and physically fit nationalistic warriors then all that would be a completely different story and I would concede that there is hope. But what we are facing is one huge TROJAN HORSE that has been dumped smack middle into Western Europe. This endless debate as to whether or not whites are superior when it comes to modern warfare is completely negligible and an utter waste of time. It's an academic discussion that accomplishes absolutely nothing.

Just look at the RESULTS people - look at REALITY. WHO is organizing and working in tight knit groups? White men or Muslim men? It doesn't matter if you hit the gym every single day (check) and are an expert in hand to hand combat (check). If there are more than three or four guys jumping you then you'll get your ass kicked and may wind up dead. Many many examples of this out there and why do you think Muslim men usually attack native men in groups and not on a 1-on-1 basis? They may not share your awesome intellect but they understand one thing well: there is strength in numbers. Why do you think they keep fucking like rabbits and force their women to pop out as many children as possible?

So here you are in an online echo chamber trying to convince each other of your own superiority. Meanwhile those fuckers are out there taking over territory street by street, city block by city block, region by region. They're building mosques, establishing Sharia patrols, raping white women of all ages as well as children as young as 7 years old, graveyards and churches are vandalized, people attacked in the streets, etc. etc. Western men have been humiliated on a daily basis and they are laughing at us, they are ridiculing us because they can see that we are weak. Plus they know that our own liberal systems are handicapping us.

WHERE ARE all those superior Western warriors you all speak of? Let me repeat the question I posted on several occasions here: WHERE is the push back? If those guys exist somewhere today then they must be hibernating or something because if there was ever a time of need then it would be now. Or maybe you are all waiting for Holger Danske to return? Unfortunately believing in myths and your own superiority will not safe Western civilization. Only hands on action will - you'll have to get your hands dirty. And here in the West I have seen zero willingness across the board to risk anything to protect your own cultural heritage.

And while I typed all this this a few dozen more Muslims entered Western Europe. They expect to be fed, sheltered, and have all their personal needs taken care of. And guess who's paying the bill? That's right YOU ARE. With your taxes. Instead of supporting your own countries and your own families and children you are actively supporting a slow motion Muslim insurgence.

So please let's cut the crap and focus on reality for a moment. What Merkel has done to Western civilization is tantamount to a crime against humanity. Long term her name will be remembered in infamy, along the ranks of Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin.

Academic discussion threads like this are the very reason why I have long given up hope on Western Europe. 50 or 100 years ago there would have been millions of Europeans in the streets every single week, protesting against this invasion and if need be actively resisting it. But in the age of instant worldwide communication that seems to be somehow impossible. Just like protecting borders is now considered impossible.

The rabbit hole goes very deep and you may not like what you find at the end of it. Because it may just be you.

I agree that we're seeing very little in the way of pushback now, but these things run their course in their own time.

Redpilage, you are at the front of this issue and feel alone but others are catching up as we speak. It's not going to happen overnight but anger and resentment are building. The men of Germany and France are not watching these terrorist attacks and rapes and shrugging their shoulders. For now they feel they have to remain silent because of their job or their friends or their higher education or whatever, but as times get harder they will have a lot less to lose and only then will we start to see what the modern European man is capable of.

(10-01-2016 06:27 AM)redpillage Wrote:  So please let's cut the crap and focus on reality for a moment. What Merkel has done to Western civilization is tantamount to a crime against humanity. Long term her name will be remembered in infamy, along the ranks of Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin.

Academic discussion threads like this are the very reason why I have long given up hope on Western Europe. 50 or 100 years ago there would have been millions of Europeans in the streets every single week, protesting against this invasion and if need be actively resisting it. But in the age of instant worldwide communication that seems to be somehow impossible. Just like protecting borders is now considered impossible.

The rabbit hole goes very deep and you may not like what you find at the end of it. Because it may just be you.

Heh - 100 years ago maybe, but you see 100 years ago Merkel's idea would be laughed at as utterly mindbogglingly insane, that she would not be able to do it. Her own politicians would have strangled her.

50 years ago - they already could have pulled it off with a negative unemployment rate. And indeed they pulled it off by bringing scores of Turks who mostly did not assimilate, but found instantly work. The current migrants would have found work as well then. The media was fully controlled then and even 20.000 rapes would be unnoticed. There would not be any demonstrations just as there were no demonstrations for the Maghreb migrants that were put into the Netherlands in the 1970s. The numbers then were high as well.

The people currently react by demonstrating already, many shift towards nationalistic parties and this tendency will become stronger. I predict over 60% of nationals to vote far right. In 15-20 years many would prefer voting for a new Hitler than taking one more terrorist attack.

Then we will see what happens. When I walk around the cities in Eastern Europe I see 30 million European soldiers that can be put into uniform within 4 weeks if need be. And they will be fighting for their homecountries, their families and their nations.

But yeah - no one will be lynching rapefugees or playing soccer with their heads. That is something that the Middle Easterners like to do.

The globalists call the shots and they have zero fear of a Muslim takeover of the worldl - absolute zero. You really think that they will take over one country after another?

This is utterly ridiculous. Muslims in the current form are utterly useless as consumer-producers to the globalists. The wealthy countries are excellent consumers for them until they run out of money. Muslims might become useful to them if they can get rid of Islam and replace it with a different set of thought pattern.

Either way - this discussion is useless. No demonstrations will change anything and this is not 1916 - even the government workers would not have gone for that kind of policy. The globalists can only implement changes which the people can swallow.