Cernovich posting a recent Hillary pic with her sick seizure eyes.


NSFL












































eye bleach:

The meme that just keeps on givin' :

Hillary Motorcade At Greensboro NC Airport Includes an Ambulance.


Meanwhile, back at the Trump hotties world...

Wouldn't read into her motorcade having an ambulance. That's SOP.

She still has Parkinson's.

(09-15-2016 07:58 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  A person can be a gigantic hamburglar but the least they can do is brush their goddamn teeth or get it cleaned once every year at minimum.

Still dicking bimbos

(09-15-2016 10:28 PM)Peregrine Wrote:  Wouldn't read into her motorcade having an ambulance. That's SOP.

She still has Parkinson's.

I have seen a handful of motorcades in the past and I never recall seeing one like that. Now if the event is large the local fire department will have one off to the side maybe. For Hillary, this is SOP.

Interesting article. This guy sounds like he reads RVF or other Manosphere sites, even though he is a former US diplomat. He sure does have balls to say this shit publicly.

http://www.infowars.com/ex-us-diplomat-w...sia-china/

Quote:EX-US DIPLOMAT WARNS HILLARY WILL START NUCLEAR WAR WITH RUSSIA & CHINA
"Hillary is the candidate of an endless war"
Paul Joseph Watson - SEPTEMBER 16, 2016 166 Comments
Ex-US Diplomat Warns Hillary Will Start Nuclear War With Russia & China
Former U.S. diplomat James Jatras warns that Hillary Clinton will start numerous “regional wars” if she elected, including a potential nuclear confrontation with Russia, China or both.

“Hillary has never met a war she does not like. She is a true believer in the idea that the US can, as this vanguard of all progressive humanity, use military force to transform the world. We are looking at numerous regional wars and very possible at nuclear war with Russia or China, or both,” Jatras told Sputnik Radio.
Jatras, who worked for 18 years as a foreign policy advisor to Senate lawmakers, said that Hillary is the candidate of “endless war” and has surrounded herself with like-minded hawks.

“Look at the people surrounding her: Mike Morell, acting former director of the CIA who wants to assassinate Russians in Syria; you have Michele Flournoy, (the former Defense Department official) who wants to start bombing in Syria as soon as Hillary takes office, when she becomes secretary of defense,” he said.
Jatras remarked that Hillary was the hand-picked candidate for the “deep state,” but the oligarchy had planned to have her run against Jeb Bush so that Americans were stuck with “Tweedledee – Tweedledum” choices like we usually get.”
According to Jatras, having succeeded in sinking the candidacy of Bernie Sanders, the elite were shocked that another insurgent candidate – Donald Trump – was able to become the Republican nominee.
As we reported earlier this month, during a speech, Hillary openly threatened to use military power against Russia if Moscow is merely suspected of being involved in hacking or cyberattacks.

George’s comments on why the leftist establishment in America has aggressively pushed anti-Russian sentiment are also extremely interesting.
“A lot of progressives really-really-really hate Russia. They look at it as at almost a failure that ruined this “great progressive experiment” called communism and they really resent it and hate it. So you actually find much more Russophobia in the US on the progressive side today,” the former diplomat said.
He also noted that progressives are antagonistic towards Russia because its leaders have not stopped the Church from playing a strong role in public life and the country is now very conservative.
“The Russians don’t go along with a lot of the things here like same sex marriage, transgenderism and all the other silliness we see in America and Europe today,” said George, adding that Russia is no longer a communist country.

(09-15-2016 12:04 PM)DarianFrey Wrote:  

(09-15-2016 07:10 AM)philosophical_recovery Wrote:  

(09-15-2016 07:05 AM)rotekz Wrote:  You guys seen this #PedoJoe creepy shit? MikeCF's onto it.

That's nasty as hell. #DirtyBiden!

Pepper that angus is still killing me over here

I was reading about levoflocacin, which she is taking for her pneumonia. It's been mentioned above how bad it is, what with the risk of snapping tendons, but that's only the beginning. It can wreck tensions, joints, and nerves, and can do so up to six months after you take it. One doctor was quoted in an article saying it causes thousands of deaths per year, as many as a 747 going down every month!

This is only used as a last resort, in life or death circumstances when the risk is justified. She must have already tried every other alternative, meaning she's been fighting this thing for months, and hasn't been able to beat it.

I'd like to see MikeCF push this angle, if he's not already.

(09-15-2016 04:55 PM)Slim Shady Wrote:  Huffington Post still gets cited as a legitimate news source...

At this point, the fact that NBC news or the NYT get cited is also a joke...

In my experience, liberals simply consider everything that they agree with legitimate and everything that they don't agree with a right wing extremist site.

I once had someone tell me the Washington Post is conservative.

Meanwhile they'll eat shit up from the most weirdo, fringe conspiracy sites without batting an eyelash if it fits their narrative.

(09-16-2016 09:11 AM)Enigma Wrote:  

(09-15-2016 04:55 PM)Slim Shady Wrote:  Huffington Post still gets cited as a legitimate news source...

At this point, the fact that NBC news or the NYT get cited is also a joke...

In my experience, liberals simply consider everything that they agree with legitimate and everything that they don't agree with a right wing extremist site.

I once had someone tell me the Washington Post is conservative.

Meanwhile they'll eat shit up from the most weirdo, fringe conspiracy sites without batting an eyelash if it fits their narrative.

Actually, under it's previous owners the WaPo was less liberal. They tried to portray themselves as being the newspaper with the best access into the DC political scene. So, they would often dig up and publish dirt on both parties and tried not to appear completely partisan. Under Bezos, however, they've completely lost the plot. I hope after the election that Trump's people completely shuts them out and only gives scoops to the Washington Times.

GOLD !!!

   

Hillary is getting savaged on all TV shows right now, I love how Hannity keeps replaying it over and over

This is what losing looks like folks:

   

I'm surprised she didn't add

It's 2016, I literally can't even...

Just over heard a conversation between two feminists I work with talking about Hillary and how "badass" she is. I could hear the desperation in their voices....what a treat on this glorious Friday!

That last tweet sounds a lot funnier if you envision Hillary as a short circuiting robot.

I think these debates will remind us a lot of the 1960 debates(the first televised debates) in that the optics will be the story, assuming that Trump doesn't totally waffle, contradict himself or be totally uninformed. In 1960, for the debate, Nixon had a cold and looked a bit stiff, was running a fever, and Kennedy was young and healthy.

It didn't hurt Kennedy that he did some major ballot stuffing on election day, but the optics of that debate really helped him.





Watching the debate, I don't think Nixon tanked at all, but it really hurt that for the first ever televised debate, he was running a fever, was sweating and had a runny nose. A lot of independents don't like either candidate this year, and after watching her on a televised debate, it all depends what sort of day she is having health wise. If she is hacking, and spends 2 minutes coughing instead of answering a question, she is done. If she sounds raspy, or dehydrated(she may opt for no catheter and just not drink water all day) she is done. If she is sweating, or looks like a frankenstein's monster like on 9/11, she is likely done.

The 1960 election was totally winnable for Nixon, he was probably the heavy favorite in terms of betting, he was vice president to one of the most popular presidents of the 20th century, and more seasoned than JFK. During the debate, JFK sounded relaxed, confident and like a winner. Nixon was ill and looked like something was a little bit off, but we aren't sure what's wrong, in comparison. Hillary has 3 debates, plenty of opportunities for her health to tank. She has plenty of experience in these sorts of debates after running for president twice, but her body is failing her, even if she is of sound mind(she isn't, but even if she was of sound mind, she would be completely fucked right now)

Edit, I just watched the debate again, Nixon is looking straight into the camera for all of his answers, JFK addresses the person who was asking the question, sometimes looks into the camera to make a point, but Nixon just looks extremely awkward with his delivery.

Forgive me if this was already posted, but someone recently Tweeted: Why don't you people understand? The medical condition that I don't even have makes it impossible for me to remember the crimes I didn't even commit?

Dyin' Hillary let loose with rapid fire damage control tweets on Twitter a while ago.

Try again, Hillary...

Quote:Stefan Molyneux Verified account
[email protected]
After leaving the government, Hillary Clinton made over $12 million giving speeches - now she speaks for free, and no one shows up!

(09-16-2016 01:41 PM)eradicator Wrote:  That last tweet sounds a lot funnier if you envision Hillary as a short circuiting robot.

I think these debates will remind us a lot of the 1960 debates(the first televised debates) in that the optics will be the story, assuming that Trump doesn't totally waffle, contradict himself or be totally uninformed. In 1960, for the debate, Nixon had a cold and looked a bit stiff, was running a fever, and Kennedy was young and healthy.

It didn't hurt Kennedy that he did some major ballot stuffing on election day, but the optics of that debate really helped him.





Watching the debate, I don't think Nixon tanked at all, but it really hurt that for the first ever televised debate, he was running a fever, was sweating and had a runny nose. A lot of independents don't like either candidate this year, and after watching her on a televised debate, it all depends what sort of day she is having health wise. If she is hacking, and spends 2 minutes coughing instead of answering a question, she is done. If she sounds raspy, or dehydrated(she may opt for no catheter and just not drink water all day) she is done. If she is sweating, or looks like a frankenstein's monster like on 9/11, she is likely done.

The 1960 election was totally winnable for Nixon, he was probably the heavy favorite in terms of betting, he was vice president to one of the most popular presidents of the 20th century, and more seasoned than JFK. During the debate, JFK sounded relaxed, confident and like a winner. Nixon was ill and looked like something was a little bit off, but we aren't sure what's wrong, in comparison. Hillary has 3 debates, plenty of opportunities for her health to tank. She has plenty of experience in these sorts of debates after running for president twice, but her body is failing her, even if she is of sound mind(she isn't, but even if she was of sound mind, she would be completely fucked right now)

Edit, I just watched the debate again, Nixon is looking straight into the camera for all of his answers, JFK addresses the person who was asking the question, sometimes looks into the camera to make a point, but Nixon just looks extremely awkward with his delivery.

In an oddity that likely has to do with a generational gap (Great Generation vs. Baby Boomers), most people who listened to the 1960 debate on the radio thought Nixon won, while most who watched it on TV though Kennedy won. In fact the numbers aren't even close. Kennedy massacred Nixon with the TV audience and vice versa.

Shows how much the medium is the message, I guess.