Yeah 19th district is very good. And Vienna is very bike friendly, the drivers dont try to kill you like in Budapest....

^Article:

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-n...mb-suspect

Quote:Police all over the city are on high alert after the man was described as having "cables hanging out of his clothes".

Despite the sweltering heat, he wore a heavy winter jacket – possibly to hide a device.

The streets are packed as the city prepares for Belgium's national day tomorrow – a bank holiday celebrating the coronation of the first Belgian King in the 19th century.

(07-20-2016 06:52 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  ...
Also - I doubt it if only the Halils come to Europe. I have read reports about Pakistani middle managers quitting their jobs just in order to come to Germany for a life of milk and honey.

Hell, with those kind of benefits I'm considering it myself.



All I need is a viable disguise and not only do I get a free apartment but I get to masturbate on the train too?

Where do I sign up?

One of Sargon's latest videos speaks a lot about the migrant crisis.
This is excellent, he breaks it down, using the relevant statistics.
Even the most reality denying progressive cannot refute the data in this, or Sargon's very fair analysis of same.

Thanks for the tips. I will be asking again closer to when I may go (There is some time left).

Regarding the quotas I am suggesting that it is somewhat out of character for career politicians to measure themselves by objective criteria......such as their goal of settling a million migrants. It seems more likely to me that Merkel is doing it because she was ORDERED to settle no less than one million migrants.

Again, remember her response to criticism that settling the migrants was "God's will", and reference some of the discussion in the Hollywood thread. When politicians say "God's Will"(Especially ones like Merkel who couldn't give a shit less about Christianity), they aren't talking about God as you or I understand the concept.

A team from an Arab country has been banned from a kids' football tournament in Gothenburg, Sweden. During the opening ceremony about 30 players and their coach, aged 36, surrounded three Swedish girls and sexually assaulted them.

(07-20-2016 04:57 PM)Akwesi Wrote:  A team from an Arab country has been banned from a kids' football tournament in Gothenburg, Sweden. During the opening ceremony about 30 players and their coach, aged 36, surrounded three Swedish girls and sexually assaulted them.

In Northern Europe you have to be a migrant to being permitted to rape and assault native children. Clearly they didn't get the memo.

(07-20-2016 04:57 PM)Akwesi Wrote:  A team from an Arab country has been banned from a kids' football tournament in Gothenburg, Sweden. During the opening ceremony about 30 players and their coach, aged 36, surrounded three Swedish girls and sexually assaulted them.

Link?

(07-20-2016 05:33 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(07-20-2016 04:57 PM)Akwesi Wrote:  A team from an Arab country has been banned from a kids' football tournament in Gothenburg, Sweden. During the opening ceremony about 30 players and their coach, aged 36, surrounded three Swedish girls and sexually assaulted them.

Link?

http://www.gp.se/nyheter/g%C3%B6teborg/s...-1.3490525

(07-20-2016 05:13 PM)redpillage Wrote:  

(07-20-2016 04:57 PM)Akwesi Wrote:  A team from an Arab country has been banned from a kids' football tournament in Gothenburg, Sweden. During the opening ceremony about 30 players and their coach, aged 36, surrounded three Swedish girls and sexually assaulted them.

In Northern Europe you have to be a migrant to being permitted to rape and assault native children. Clearly they didn't get the memo.

I'm surprised gang rape itself hasn't already become a sport in northern europe.

(07-20-2016 08:58 AM)philosophical_recovery Wrote:  

Quote:Police all over the city are on high alert after the man was described as having "cables hanging out of his clothes".

Despite the sweltering heat, he wore a heavy winter jacket – possibly to hide a device.

The streets are packed as the city prepares for Belgium's national day tomorrow – a bank holiday celebrating the coronation of the first Belgian King in the 19th century.

   

(07-20-2016 07:13 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(07-20-2016 06:56 AM)Easy_C Wrote:  

(07-18-2016 07:12 PM)RaccoonFace Wrote:  Is this a terrifying everyday reality that Merkel will
impose on Germany, because "refugees quotas are the most important"?:

Here is one of those questions that is almost too obvious to ask. WHY? Why is it necessary to meet a certain, arbitrary quote? It is almost like she is following an order.

Frankly the quotas or official numbers barely matter.

I have made the statement some time ago that for example Austria lets in roughly the same number of people as Sweden - 80.000 to 100.000+.

The housing market is more robust (since the state and semi-public agencies build many appartments that are rented out for cheap to the people) and they can stomach that for now.

Still - I visited Vienna recently and was there during the Turkish uprising. Some districts I visited reminded me of little Mogadishu. Hijab wearing black and Arab women were everywhere. The situation changed even massively from 2 years ago. The only good thing was that Turkish local supermarkets were able to compete with globalist corporations. But that is literally the only positive thing.

I saw many conservative Muslim couples and one tiny Arab (literally under 5ft) tried to pick a fight with me in a train station. Another one tried to give me a blowjob as I was taking a piss in a park. I saw many Arabs lounging around and dealing drugs right in the vicinity of Vienna's central locations like the opera.

When the problem with Turkey happened I saw hundreds of nationalistic Turks with Turkey flags shouting "Erdogen .... Allahu Akbar". So yeah - probably second or third generation 'Austrians' would rather die for Turkey than ever fight for Europe. I don't mind their nationalism, but they are standing behind a more radical Islamist against a secular establishment.

Most countries will go that way in the West. Next time I go to a Western country I will arm myself. I have been traveling a lot in the past, but now live mostly in Eastern Europe and only move around Poland, Latvia, Czech Republic, Hungary. As I cross to the West I should be ready to expect trouble like an American who goes into a bad neighborhood. (I had experiences with that there as well - US is safe in some areas and very unsafe in others.) The West is turning to a shithole where you have to have your eyes open all the time.

Never thought that Poland would become a safe space relative to a civilized country like Austria or Germany.

Nothing but the truth. Absolute shame and disaster the right wing candidate did not win last time in major cities. People who voted for that other bastard need to be put on trial in the future.

Vienna has turned into islamic shithole, no doubt. I have been to many cities in Western Europe and Vienna is worst off when it comes to islamic attacks.

I have been there 4 times and got into altercation everytime with muslims there. Albanian, Arab, Chechen. They have the whole lot there.

One time myself and a couple other Serbs and Croatian friends got jumped there for no reason by Albanians and Chechens. Put me in the hospital for one month.

Your average Westerner will not have much problems there but if they find out you are Serb or orthodox christian they will jump on you without hesitation.

(07-19-2016 02:03 PM)Nineteen84 Wrote:  (...about the taxi driver caught with ISIS flag when searchers were sent for a different charge)

As a researcher in criminology ,this seems very important to me. A lot, maybe a majority of of Islamic Terrorists--self styled maybe more so than centrally dispatched ones-- have some type of criminal history prior to their commission of terrorist massacres.

Those offenses were, unfortunately, big missed opportunities to legally and ethically -- for non racial reasons-- supervise the hell out of them, maybe to the point of trying to see if they chafe at heavily supervised parole etc. and tease out the marginally crazy.

Let's say someone has been convicted or pled out for threatening. Instead of the light one year probation they're getting now, sentence them to a year in prison and then parole them. They can be violated for just about anything the parole officer wants and put back in prison.

It's worked pretty well for native grown Californian criminals. We have a ton of guys locked up, I personally have met many and you may not know it, but you're pretty glad the violent ones are in jail. Otherwise you could never walk the streets of any major city without being harassed a lot more than you are now.

(Of course everyone can say put them in jail for 5 years for threats but it may not be realistic. And of course, people will squeal like a girl if THEIR FRIEND gets 5 years for threats alone.)

(07-20-2016 08:29 PM)iknowexactly Wrote:  

(07-19-2016 02:03 PM)Nineteen84 Wrote:  (...about the taxi driver caught with ISIS flag when searchers were sent for a different charge)

As a researcher in criminology ,this seems very important to me. A lot, maybe a majority of of Islamic Terrorists--self styled maybe more so than centrally dispatched ones-- have some type of criminal history prior to their commission of terrorist massacres.

Those offenses were, unfortunately, big missed opportunities to legally and ethically -- for non racial reasons-- supervise the hell out of them, maybe to the point of trying to see if they chafe at heavily supervised parole etc. and tease out the marginally crazy.

Let's say someone has been convicted or pled out for threatening. Instead of the light one year probation they're getting now, sentence them to a year in prison and then parole them. They can be violated for just about anything the parole officer wants and put back in prison.

It's worked pretty well for native grown Californian criminals. We have a ton of guys locked up, I personally have met many and you may not know it, but you're pretty glad the violent ones are in jail. Otherwise you could never walk the streets of any major city without being harassed a lot more than you are now.

(Of course everyone can say put them in jail for 5 years for threats but it may not be realistic. And of course, people will squeal like a girl if THEIR FRIEND gets 5 years for threats alone.)

The criminal mind here? Yeah - that guy was pretty young - not 17, but certainly not 30.

Here a transcript of the declaration video:

https://conservo.wordpress.com/2016/07/2...h-aufrege/

Quote:"I am a soldier of the Islamic State. I will commit in Germany, God willing, a suicide attack as a martyr. Your unbelievers, gone are the days that you come to our countries to kill our men, women and children. None of you asked for this. The tyrants were silent massacres against. None of the Muslims who dared to disagree with you. Those days are over! Now the Islamic Caliphate has emerged in Iraq, Syria, Khorasan, Libya and Yemen. Allah willing, the soldiers of the Islamic State will reach you. Allah willing, they will deliver you heads in your homes. You will be in your houses and on your land! They will set up their state in your soil. They will meet in every village, every town and in every airport, Allah willing. Your it should know that the Islamic Caliphate is now strong and will take as target your Parliament. I've lived in your house and have planned on your soil that. Allah willing, I will behead in your house and in your street. I'm going to let you forget the attack in France, Allah willing. I will kill you as long as blood flows in my veins. With this knife I'll behead you and behead you with the ax, if Allah wills. My message to the Islamic nation, until when will you sleep? You shall stand up, the Islamic Caliphate has arisen. Ye Abu Baker Al Baghdadi Al Hussani and Al Qurashi homage. You shall go to Khorasan and in the provinces of the Islamic caliphate. The provinces have emerged all over the world. If you can not go to Sham (Levant), kill the renegade soldiers in your countries. "

So what is the criminological explanation for his behavior? Sure - his friend got killed, but it's likely that his friend was a Jihadi soldier.

Islam has fueled his entire being. Sure - it's a violent interpretation, but Mohammed would be proud. His life was marked by a military campaign every few weeks (the last violent 10 years at least). So frankly the Salafis and ISIS Jihadis are in my opinion the correct and most truthful Muslims living it exactly as Mohammed has decreed it.

Islam is his motivation. His violent and potentially criminal nature just made it possible for him to live it. For everyone like him there are 1000 'moderate' Muslims who know that his behavior is right and they would never condemn him. They rather condemn someone who has insulted Mohammed.

Then of course you find the lukewarm Westernized Muslims who know only the customs and basic rules of Islam - they don't even read the Quran. Guys like Adam Saleh have skipped through some verses and uphold the customs they like. They ignore the later parts of the Quran and the broad Hadiths, which call to violence against the unbelievers.

That is why the axe Jihadi said that we have to submit to the ISIS leaders. Submit or die - that is the iron rule of Islam.

Thus his motivation was not poverty, discrimination, revenge etc. - it is pure and simple the poisonous ideology.

I also saw a TV report where they interviewed the people from the village where the guy wanted to behead the dirty unbelievers in the street:





At minute 1:50 you see elderly Germans sitting around beer and wine and being utterly baffled what his motivations might have been. They treated him well and gave him a potentially good future.

They don't realize that his mind was long gone. If you had questioned him in an interview, then it would have been clear, because I doubt that he would be a modern James Bond in his answers.

Essentially all Middle Eastern immigrants would have to be vetted similarly to the Islamist airport test Roosh once mentioned. Likely 95% of immigrants to Europe would be excluded after such a test. The rest would be highly secular Muslims, Ex-Muslims and Christians or other sects - they would have a much better chance of integrating and contributing.

Another question is whether you would allow for such a potentially dangerous ideology that wants to subjugate you all to be taught in a Western country. Personally I am for a ban of Islam, because every mosque is also legally a sharia court and the teachings are just too volatile. You would have to engage in massive surveillance of anyone who is a Muslim. Even guys like me who read the Quran would have to have to be watched by the NSA.

It's essentially an eternal clusterfuck without end. Much easier to end it all once and then the future generations also in the Middle East are free of the stifling inhumane ideology. And by ending I don't mean ending all Muslims - they are just as us born in a bad system and poisonous mental state. It's better to end the doctrine of war that masquerades as a religion.

(07-20-2016 08:29 PM)iknowexactly Wrote:  ...
Let's say someone has been convicted or pled out for threatening. Instead of the light one year probation they're getting now, sentence them to a year in prison and then parole them. They can be violated for just about anything the parole officer wants and put back in prison.

It's worked pretty well for native grown Californian criminals. We have a ton of guys locked up, I personally have met many and you may not know it, but you're pretty glad the violent ones are in jail. Otherwise you could never walk the streets of any major city without being harassed a lot more than you are now.

(Of course everyone can say put them in jail for 5 years for threats but it may not be realistic. And of course, people will squeal like a girl if THEIR FRIEND gets 5 years for threats alone.)

Take France. 70 percent of the inmates of France's prisons are muslim. Try for a second to really comprehend that. They make up 10 percent of the population but make up 7 of every 10 prisoners.

And these are the guys that didn't get a "slap on the wrist". Imagine how many there would be if you were doling out a year in the clink for threatening people.

Add to this the fact that we know prison hardens criminals and is also used as a place to "radicalise" muslims.

Try to imagine the sheer amount of resources it would take to effectively police parolees on that unprecedented scale.

There is no "civilised" solution to what's going on in Europe. There is no gentle wind-back or 7 step solution for muslim integration.

The islamic world has sniffed blood in the air and now the hyenas and jackals of Mohammed are circling the old lion, harrying him, tiring him out, wearing him down. They wont be assimilated because they sense that Christendom is weaker than they are, and you do not assimilate with a weaker culture. You conquer them.

(07-21-2016 05:22 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  The islamic world has sniffed blood in the air and now the hyenas and jackals of Mohammed are circling the old lion, harrying him, tiring him out, wearing him down. They wont be assimilated because they sense that Christendom is weaker than they are, and you do not assimilate with a weaker culture. You conquer them.

And here is where they are wrong. The West and the rising East are not weaker cultures. They are just betrayed by the elite, highly indoctrinated and used for their Christian compassion and empathy.

The Muslim countries buy their arms from the West, they learn from them the next gen military strategies. The elite don't love them since they bomb them in the Middle East right now. Sooner or later they will be wiped out utterly. They have zero chance of succeeding. Sooner or later the Big Boys will let their media shift gears and even with a 35% Muslim population will they have no chance whatsoever of winning.

Real eglitarian enemies could be Russia or China. Russia could actually turn Islamic within 30 years, so it's possible that they will join forces with the Caliphate. And still they would not win. But then billions would die.

(07-21-2016 05:38 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(07-21-2016 05:22 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  The islamic world has sniffed blood in the air and now the hyenas and jackals of Mohammed are circling the old lion, harrying him, tiring him out, wearing him down. They wont be assimilated because they sense that Christendom is weaker than they are, and you do not assimilate with a weaker culture. You conquer them.

And here is where they are wrong. The West and the rising East are not weaker cultures. They are just betrayed by the elite, highly indoctrinated and used for their Christian compassion and empathy.

The Muslim countries buy their arms from the West, they learn from them the next gen military strategies. The elite don't love them since they bomb them in the Middle East right now. Sooner or later they will be wiped out utterly. They have zero chance of succeeding. Sooner or later the Big Boys will let their media shift gears and even with a 35% Muslim population will they have no chance whatsoever of winning.

Real eglitarian enemies could be Russia or China. Russia could actually turn Islamic within 30 years, so it's possible that they will join forces with the Caliphate. And still they would not win. But then billions would die.

Long term you may be correct. Short term it doesn't matter whether or not the lions still have the strength to kill those hyenas if he's handcuffed and neutered. Plus their numbers are dwindling - those millions of Europeans are on average over 40 years old. Just look at those Pegida rallies - it's my generation and older.

Frankly at this point I don't know who is going to fight Islam as the population curves are going to start changing exponentially in both directions - down on our end and up on theirs.

I think most of Western Europe is fucked. At minimum we will see be a bloody drawn out cold civil war with hundreds of terrorist attacks and thousands of victims each year. And it'll just keep getting worse and worse and worse. The only way to turn the corner would be a BREXIT type movement all across W. Europe right now today. But it won't happen - we all know that. In the interim the Left continues to funnel the new master-race into our countries - thousands of them every single day.

Not to keep repeating myself but the West is fucked. Europe will NEVER EVER be as it used to be in the 20th century. If you have any illusions to the contrary then you are living in Beirut in the 1960s:





This strategy worked so well in Lebanon - why would it be different given that our Western populations are even more cucked and liberal than the Lebanese living in the 1960s and 1970s?

This is how Western Europe is going to look like 20 years from now:

How does Soros say this with a straight face? He bets on Europe failing then prescribes destructive measures that only a moron would see as sincere.

George Soros Doubles Down: Accept 300k Refugees Costing $30Bn, Or Risk EU Collapse

Quote:Simply put, the billionaire says the EU must take in hundreds of thousands of refugees a year, spend at least 30 billion euros (a minor sum, since he believes it can all be financed by debt and taxes) or Europe faces an "existential threat."

(07-21-2016 06:40 AM)redpillage Wrote:  Not to keep repeating myself but the West is fucked. Europe will NEVER EVER be as it used to be in the 20th century. If you have any illusions to the contrary then you are living in Beirut in the 1960s:





This strategy worked so well in Lebanon - why would it be different given that our Western populations are even more cucked and liberal than the Lebanese living in the 1960s and 1970s?

Redpillage - that is an excellent post showing the parallels with Lebanon in the 1970s...

Do you know when that video was made and who is the lady speaking ?

A man in Finland successfully defends himself against 3 home invaders with a kitchen knife. They were armed with bats and a gun.

For his trouble he is punished by the Orwellian police state:

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=55208

Leftists in Finland have thrown a man in jail for using "excessive self-defense" to fight off a home invasion.

From RT:

Quote:A homeowner in Finland has been sentenced to four years in jail and a hefty fine after fighting off three intruders who attempted to rob his house. The thieves, meanwhile, got lesser prison terms and are to be paid damages by their victim.

In April, a 35-year-old man from Hyvinkää, a town just 50km north of the Finnish capital, Helsinki, heard a knock on the front door of his suburban house and rushed to open it. As soon as he unlocked it, three strangers rushed in and launched at him, toting baseball bats and a gun. The man retreated to the kitchen, where he found a knife and with it was able to overpower the intruders, two men and one woman.
One man armed only with a knife fought off three armed robbers with a gun.



Rather than get a medal and a parade held in his honor, he's getting a jail sentence.
The court spent nearly four months examining the case to come up with the unexpected ruling.

The homeowner has been convicted of “excessive self-defense and attempted manslaughter,” Helsinki news reports. He will serve an unconditional sentence for four years and two months, which he has to spend in prison. The man also has to pay damages to his attackers, with the fine totaling €21,000 (US$23,000). The newspaper does not provide information on the severity of injuries sustained by the home-invaders, however, it is known that they survived the event.

The attackers were also convicted for felony home invasion and assault, yet their punishments are much less harsh.

All three received one-year-and-two-month conditional sentences, which is similar to probation or house arrest in Finland, depending on the case. The offender serves the sentence outside of jail, but has to follow strict jail-like rules.

The trio was also ordered to pay the homeowner damages, but their combined fine was ruled to be €3,000 (US$3,300).
Perhaps the judge could have just given the robbers the man's home as well, after all, they're clearly the real victims.

In all seriousness, this is why in the US people say if you're getting robbed you should shoot to kill.

----

As for Lebanon - it was fucked in the region anyway:



It had a 45% Muslim rate in the 1930s, but there was a time up until the 1970s when the elite and the entire media establishment in all countries (among those countries like Pakistan or Iran where people looked strangely at a woman in a Burka or even Niqab) actually promoted secularization.

That trend stopped and if you have a 50% Muslim population and find yourself in the Middle East then you are fucked. Israel only survives because of closed borders and highly ethnic nationalist sentiment.

Europe is Christian. 150 mio. Eastern Europeans who reproduce at much higher rates than Westerns will never become Muslim. Muslims won't be able to grow via masscring Europeans. At best France, Sweden or Austria might reach a 35% Muslim level in 20 years.

It will be a clusterfuck, but it won't become Lebanon. But yeah - it's a good example of what can happen if you let Muslims in without discrimination.

At this point in European jurisprudence the appropriate mainstream question to ask is whether or not the courts would have been more lenient with him if he ran over to his sleeping sister and threw her to the ground, tore down her panties, and spread her pussy lips enough so the muslim home invasion robbers could properly penetrate.

There is currently no reliable means to predict how this is going to turn out, and that's just a fact. There are dozens of possible black swan events that are growing more likely by the minute.

That said, the longer an extremely disruptive event takes to manifest the harder it will be for Europeans to purge islam from their lands.

How it will turn out?
Either Europeans surrender or they spill blood.

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
I suppose Thomas Jefferson wasn't even thinking about fighting off a muslim invasion, but his words are very accurate.


I have spent past couple of days trying to think on what to do with the existing muslims in Europe that were born here.
Send them back? Back to where if they are "French" and never been to Algeria?
Even though I am an advocate of free speech and freedom of religion, I agree with a ban of Islam, Islamic congregation, and the consequent destruction of mosques. Not very "western" and certainly not tolerant, but sometimes we need to sacrifice some of our own values.

(07-21-2016 07:06 AM)Mercenary Wrote:  Redpillage - that is an excellent post showing the parallels with Lebanon in the 1970s...

Do you know when that video was made and who is the lady speaking ?

Watch the video - she grew up in Lebanon but managed to flee before being killed by Islamists. WHEN? I don't know - I happened to come across this by accident a while back. Based on the quality it's not recent, maybe in the 1990s if you do the math - she would have been in her 30s then.