This video is truly amazing:
https://twitter.com/Latinos4Bernie/statu...1524220928

Companion to the MoreTrustedThanHilary hashtag are these "extremely careless" tweets:

Quote:Stephen Green @VodkaPundit
BREAKING: FBI finds John Wilkes Booth "extremely careless" in discharge of firearm.

Carl Gustav [email protected] 22h22 hours ago Georgia, USA
Ted Kennedy was #extremelycareless behind the wheel of a car.

Andrew Klavan [email protected] 22h22 hours ago
Michael Corleone was #extremelycareless with that gun behind the toilet.

Ive just finished reading Crisis of Character by Gary Byrne. It reinforces what we already know, that the Clinton Industrial Complex is an insidious cancer that only desires one thing: power. The level of detail re: the Clintons' "House of Cards" style relationship, and their total lack of any guiding morals or principles in the book is both amazing and terrifying.

Highly recommend.

On second thought this whole thing may be worse for her politically than I thought.

Talked to the wife today and she's saying that her whole facebook feed has people complaining about how it's BS that they say she committed a crime and isn't being prosecuted. Given that her Facebook consists mostly of women parading their babies for status, middle aged women posting about their families, and similar people I'm surprised to hear that comment from her.

(07-06-2016 03:09 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  On second thought this whole thing may be worse for her politically than I thought.

Talked to the wife today and she's saying that her whole facebook feed has people complaining about how it's BS that they say she committed a crime and isn't being prosecuted. Given that her Facebook consists mostly of women parading their babies for status, middle aged women posting about their families, and similar people I'm surprised to hear that comment from her.

In the span of one week, Clinton has a "secret" meeting with Lynch in Phoenix, that was supposedly a chance encounter. Reporters, cameras, cell phones etc are kept clear of the tarmac. Let's be honest, Phoenix isn't a happening place. For the current AG and a former president whose spouse is running for pres to both be there is a bit strange to begin with. To have a "social" meeting with the head of the agency that is investigating your spouse for criminal conduct seems a bit strange. Most people under investigation wouldn't pay social visits to their prosecutors.

After that meeting, Clinton has her own meeting with the FBI ON A SATURDAY MORNING DURING THE JULY 4TH HOLIDAY WEEKEND. A time when no one is paying any attention and most of the cable news stations are off.

On Tuesday, the head of the FBI makes a press conference excoriating Clinton, her staff, and their handling of sensitive/classified material. And then, out of the blue, he says they don't recommend indictment because there was no intent, only gross negligence.

How can you not look at those events and not think something is up? As Mika Brzezinski said this morning, "do they think we're that stupid?"

What they did isn't a show of corruption just for those who don't support her. It's a display for all to see. Even some of those who support her do have their moral compasses working properly, and they will see that the system is rigged and they won't take it lightly.

(07-06-2016 03:10 AM)sixsix Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 02:23 AM)rotekz Wrote:  He also says that not indicting is actually a blessing as it denies Obama the opportunity to pardon Hillary, meaning a future indictment by a Trump AG is not then blocked by double-jeopardy. Comey may actually be acting a lot smarter than we all realise, knowing that to indict her now would be to die on a hill with no reward as Obama would pardon her.

It's very easy, and indeed tempting, to rage about Comey as another traitor in a corrupt system and that might just be true. But maybe not:

• Indictment would enable a pardon and the continued accusations about the existence of a widespread right-wing witch hunt to destroy Hillary Clinton. Comey is a Republican and did not recommend to indict.
• Comey could have just said there was no case and be done with it. He didn't. He listed many very damning facts, stated that other people under the same circumstances could have face consequences but not Hillary Clinton, making the case for her corruption and her special treatment.
• With this, he has hinted to behind-the-scenes power. She didn't get indicted for a reason. "She broke the law. But. No reasonable prosecutor would bring this case." In other words, she is guilty as hell but I don't want to accidentally commit suicide under mysterious circumstances.
• Comey has made the case for a #riggedsystem, has given the material for devastating campaign ads, and has enabled a future administration to go scorched earth with her and everyone connected to the Clinton Foundation.
  

I want to believe.

Based on the events of the past week, I think it is now safe to conclude that poster on /pol/ is legit.

He said the reason they would refuse to indict Hillary is to avoid an all-out Civil War in America, because indicting Clinton would literally indict hundreds of other players who are involved with her.

And we know Obama can just pardon as well, but that would just convince ordinary people of corruption and possibly incite them to violence. Thus the FBI dude on /pol/ concluded that it was too much to indict Hillary.

THAT SAID, the FBI /pol/ guy said most of the department was rooting for Trump, and the way Comey delivered the case against Hillary without recommending an indictment shows that Comey was giving tons of ammo to the Trump campaign which supports the idea that Comey supports Trump as does most of the FBI department.

All of the guy's claims have matched up too well with reality, at over an 80% correlation, which means he is more likely than not a real source.

His next claims to look for leaked info on the internet plus dig into the Clinton Foundation should obviously be taken very seriously. We need to get Trump elected so he can clean out the system without a horrible and destructive 2nd Civil War.

As I posted in the Trump thread, this was his last appearance: http://imgur.com/7xxTcIJ

They're doing great work on /pol/ now, they are basically trying to connect the dots concerning the Clinton Foundation like the insider instructed them to do.



Here is a document with the work /pol/ has done so far: https://docs.google.com/document/d/184cs...ZD_0s/edit

Albums with graphics, posters, etc:
https://sli.mg/a/ig9VWX
https://sli.mg/a/itrtzz
https://sli.mg/a/f4emzK

The General Thread were /pol/ assembles to discuss the Clinton Foundation and FBI Anon:
http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/79974...#p79985363 (last one)
http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/79985386#p79985386 (new one)

(07-06-2016 03:05 PM)Adonis Wrote:  Ive just finished reading Crisis of Character by Gary Byrne. It reinforces what we already know, that the Clinton Industrial Complex is an insidious cancer that only desires one thing: power. The level of detail re: the Clintons' "House of Cards" style relationship, and their total lack of any guiding morals or principles in the book is both amazing and terrifying.

Highly recommend.

His book just topped the NY Times best seller list for June, despite a media blackout.

When is WikiLeaks going to release the password to that file they dropped a while ago? Where is that bombshell that julian had on Hillary?

Via HRC's tweet:

Quote:Hillary
[email protected]
"In America, we don’t begrudge people being successful…but we do if they get rich by destroying other people." —Hillary

9:52 AM - 6 Jul 2016

Pot tweeting the kettle black.

(07-06-2016 04:01 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 03:10 AM)sixsix Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 02:23 AM)rotekz Wrote:  He also says that not indicting is actually a blessing as it denies Obama the opportunity to pardon Hillary, meaning a future indictment by a Trump AG is not then blocked by double-jeopardy. Comey may actually be acting a lot smarter than we all realise, knowing that to indict her now would be to die on a hill with no reward as Obama would pardon her.

It's very easy, and indeed tempting, to rage about Comey as another traitor in a corrupt system and that might just be true. But maybe not:

• Indictment would enable a pardon and the continued accusations about the existence of a widespread right-wing witch hunt to destroy Hillary Clinton. Comey is a Republican and did not recommend to indict.
• Comey could have just said there was no case and be done with it. He didn't. He listed many very damning facts, stated that other people under the same circumstances could have face consequences but not Hillary Clinton, making the case for her corruption and her special treatment.
• With this, he has hinted to behind-the-scenes power. She didn't get indicted for a reason. "She broke the law. But. No reasonable prosecutor would bring this case." In other words, she is guilty as hell but I don't want to accidentally commit suicide under mysterious circumstances.
• Comey has made the case for a #riggedsystem, has given the material for devastating campaign ads, and has enabled a future administration to go scorched earth with her and everyone connected to the Clinton Foundation.
  

I want to believe.

Based on the events of the past week, I think it is now safe to conclude that poster on /pol/ is legit.

He said the reason they would refuse to indict Hillary is to avoid an all-out Civil War in America, because indicting Clinton would literally indict hundreds of other players who are involved with her.

And we know Obama can just pardon as well, but that would just convince ordinary people of corruption and possibly incite them to violence. Thus the FBI dude on /pol/ concluded that it was too much to indict Hillary.

THAT SAID, the FBI /pol/ guy said most of the department was rooting for Trump, and the way Comey delivered the case against Hillary without recommending an indictment shows that Comey was giving tons of ammo to the Trump campaign which supports the idea that Comey supports Trump as does most of the FBI department.

All of the guy's claims have matched up too well with reality, at over an 80% correlation, which means he is more likely than not a real source.

His next claims to look for leaked info on the internet plus dig into the Clinton Foundation should obviously be taken very seriously. We need to get Trump elected so he can clean out the system without a horrible and destructive 2nd Civil War.

Then it might be as bad as I feared. It is quite possible those 8 Top Secret and 32 Secret emails possibly contain correspondence with Obama or several others in his cabinet, maybe even Eric Holder himself. Clinton Foundation stuff might be in the rest of them as well.

They should have sent in a Seal Team to kill Julian Assange a long time ago. It might be too late to stop them now, if they actually plan on releasing the rest of the emails they have.

I bet they are trying to gauge the best time to release the rest.

Thing is, if the FBI decided to stay out of the mess due to pressure, etc. Speaker Ryan will not likely be able to stop the rest of the Republicans from starting impeachment proceedings, once they get access to the emails in a closed door session. They probably cannot use ill gotten documents from Wiki, so they will have to appoint a special investigator or demand Comey to hand over what he has.

Typically only a handful of House members on certain committees have access to top secret level stuff. If I remember correctly they can force access in certain circumstances, but they close the chamber doors first (media is kicked off the premises) and only senior House members (on certain committees) typically get to stay to review the material.

That could end up being a VERY nasty situation. I can easily see some of the Republicans and most of the Dems trying to stop the others that want the truth no matter what, by making the argument that proceedings will take longer than Obama has left in office, let's just demand resignations, let's keep the peace, blah blah...

If it ever got that bad, I can see Dems losing alot of seats next go round. Any Repubs involved would be in big trouble as well. We all know some are buddies with the Clintons.

(07-06-2016 06:44 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  Via HRC's tweet:

Quote:Hillary
[email protected]
"In America, we don’t begrudge people being successful…but we do if they get rich by destroying other people." —Hillary

9:52 AM - 6 Jul 2016

Arrogant idiot. Keep poking at the bear and you will get your comeuppance.

I had a dream last night that Julian Assange was found dead right before he exposed everything. I hope that wasn't a prophetic dream.

It feels good to be on the right side early.
RaccoonFace deserves more rep points for informing us about all this.

Remember that the Insider said Soros is close collaborator with Netanyahu. This seems to go against the theory that there are two kind of Jewish globalists: liberal vs Zionist, or, egalitarian vs supremacist, being at odd with one another, with Soros on the former side and Netanyahu on the latter. Soros is also a zionist supremacist.

Someone knowledgeable about Soros and Zionists should make a Soros thread or something related. He is at the center of the whole thing. I'd like to learn more as well.

(07-06-2016 08:24 PM)Liberty Sea Wrote:  It feels good to be on the right side early.
RaccoonFace deserves more rep points for informing us about all this.

Remember that the Insider said Soros is close collaborator with Netanyahu. This seems to go against the theory that there are two kind of Jewish globalists: liberal vs Zionist, or, egalitarian vs supremacist, being at odd with one another, with Soros on the former side and Netanyahu on the latter. Soros is also a zionist supremacist.

Someone knowledgeable about Soros and Zionists should make a Soros thread or something related. He is at the center of the whole thing. I'd like to learn more as well.

Soros isn't the Kingpin people around here believe he is. He's a pawn of the Rothschilds. He's a rook or bishop at most.

(07-06-2016 03:09 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  On second thought this whole thing may be worse for her politically than I thought.

Talked to the wife today and she's saying that her whole facebook feed has people complaining about how it's BS that they say she committed a crime and isn't being prosecuted. Given that her Facebook consists mostly of women parading their babies for status, middle aged women posting about their families, and similar people I'm surprised to hear that comment from her.

If there's one thing women love it's getting special treatment.

If there's one thing that drives women bat-shit insane, it's another woman getting special treatment.

Via Scott Adams' tweet:

Quote:Scott Adams
[email protected]
Hey, former FBI agent and author @navarrotells, did FBI director Comey sound honest to you?
9:42 AM - 5 Jul 2016

Joe Navarro [email protected] Jul 5
@NHMommy1 @ScottAdamsSays More like stressed

Scott Adams [email protected] Jul 5
@navarrotells @NHMommy1 That's an artful response. Nicely done.

Joe Navarro [email protected] Jul 5
@MPierce1337 @ScottAdamsSays @NHMommy1 Stress can be caused by the seriousness of the presentation

Scott Adams [email protected] Jul 5
@navarrotells @MPierce1337 @NHMommy1 But did he seem stressed and truthful or stressed and intentionally vague?
3 retweets 17 likes

Joe Navarro [email protected] Jul 5
@ScottAdamsSays He seemed stressed - you can't detect deception from statements that are rehearsed or written by others

Scott Adams [email protected] Jul 5
@navarrotells You can't detect a GOOD rehearsed lie. But you can detect a bad one, no matter how well-rehearsed.

Joe Navarro @navarrotells
@ScottAdamsSays to detect lies one has to ask many questions in a forensic setting from read statements not likely

(07-06-2016 08:38 PM)captain_shane Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 08:24 PM)Liberty Sea Wrote:  It feels good to be on the right side early.
RaccoonFace deserves more rep points for informing us about all this.

Remember that the Insider said Soros is close collaborator with Netanyahu. This seems to go against the theory that there are two kind of Jewish globalists: liberal vs Zionist, or, egalitarian vs supremacist, being at odd with one another, with Soros on the former side and Netanyahu on the latter. Soros is also a zionist supremacist.

Someone knowledgeable about Soros and Zionists should make a Soros thread or something related. He is at the center of the whole thing. I'd like to learn more as well.

Soros isn't the Kingpin people around here believe he is. He's a pawn of the Rothschilds. He's a rook or bishop at most.

While I would tend to agree, do you have evidence to back that up?

(07-06-2016 11:40 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 08:38 PM)captain_shane Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 08:24 PM)Liberty Sea Wrote:  It feels good to be on the right side early.
RaccoonFace deserves more rep points for informing us about all this.

Remember that the Insider said Soros is close collaborator with Netanyahu. This seems to go against the theory that there are two kind of Jewish globalists: liberal vs Zionist, or, egalitarian vs supremacist, being at odd with one another, with Soros on the former side and Netanyahu on the latter. Soros is also a zionist supremacist.

Someone knowledgeable about Soros and Zionists should make a Soros thread or something related. He is at the center of the whole thing. I'd like to learn more as well.

Soros isn't the Kingpin people around here believe he is. He's a pawn of the Rothschilds. He's a rook or bishop at most.

While I would tend to agree, do you have evidence to back that up?

Quote:In a story entitled “Geneva Gnome’s Global Dread," Arnaud de Borchgrave, the editor at large of the Washington Times and United Press International, identified the various golden Rothschild threads woven into the globalist tapestry held up as an ensign by George Soros.

The Gnomes of Zurich were derogatory caricatures of secretive, greedy, stiff Swiss-German bankers, pince-nez aquiver, who ruled over the land of secret numbered accounts for tax dodgers the world over. With the world’s best financial intelligence service, they knew their stuff and seldom spoke, even in retirement.

Their Geneva counterparts in French-speaking Switzerland were more sophisticated, relaxed in the company of global wheeler-dealers, and weren’t afraid to speak their minds, albeit off the record. Such was George C. Karlweis, the brain behind Banque Privee, owned by the late Baron Edmond de Rothschild. His biggest claim to fame: George Soros and the launch of his Quantum Fund in 1969.

An original $100,000 stake in Mr. Soros’ fund was worth $150 million by 1994. Between 1970 and 2000, the return was 3,365 percent. (For 10 consecutive years, it did 42.6 percent per year.)

Soros is a front man. Google him and the 4th result is "George Soros: Top 10 Reasons He Is Dangerous". Google Nathaniel Rothschild and compare the results.

I'm of the belief that the Rothschilds are pawns as well, pawns to the Vatican and the various royal families around the world. It's been speculated that the Vatican makes an average of 10$ per catholic member each week. 500+ billion dollars a year, which is funneled through various rothschild banks.

The catholic church is anything but a church of christ.










All major religions are sun god religions. Saturn more accurately. The belief is that Saturn was the second sun in our solar system thousands of years ago.

I could go into this much further, and I'll probably start a topic on it, but I've got some strange coming over right now, so I'll leave it at this for right now.

(07-07-2016 12:25 AM)captain_shane Wrote:  It's been speculated that the Vatican makes an average of 10$ per catholic member each week. 500+ billion dollars a year, which is funneled through various rothschild banks.

Where did you get that number?

The economist says:

Quote:Anecdotal evidence suggests that America’s Catholics give about $10 per week on average. Assuming that one-third attend church regularly, that would put the annual offertory income at around $13 billion.

But America is the richest country in the world, and its GDP per capita one of the highest. It cannot be assumed that all 1.2 billion Catholics around the world also give the same amount every week. Not everyone is as well off as the average American church-goer and not everyone goes to church regularly. Your figure is only possible if that assumption is true, but it's likely not. The same link also says:

Quote:The American church may account for as much as 60% of the global institution’s wealth.

Since the Economist also estimates the American Catholic Church spend 170 billion dollar in 2010, it's true that it does have revenue in the hundred of billion. But it does not come from small dollar offertory income alone, but more from elite donations. I really doubt that its total revenue is $500+ billion, but it's freaking high nonetheless.

America ranks very low in number of Catholics compared to the rest of the world.



America would not be a good region to get a good sample. Our country was founded on Protestant belief systems. Catholics in America mostly came from legacy Spanish and French Settlement territories before Manifest Destiny (Louisiana and Florida), immigrant Italians and Polish, and immigrant Latinos. Notice that in that graph they blended America with Canada and it's still small?

Shane's numbers included the entire ~1.2 billion Catholics worldwide.