Post: #301

Vox Day sums up brilliantly the reason for the death of churches in Canada (and America):



https://twitter.com/voxday/status/737234578432233472

Post: #302

May have to start a Migrant Invasion of Canada soon.

EXCLUSIVE: Liberals plan to build refugee camps on seven Canadian military bases -- Taxpayers will fund mosques, Korans

http://www.therebel.media/breaking_liber...ues_korans

Quote:The Canadian military has been ordered by Justin Trudeau’s Liberals to draft plans to house more than 6,000 Muslim migrants on a long-term basis at military bases, according to documents obtained exclusively by The Rebel (see below.)

Included in the Department of National Defence budgets are hundreds of thousands of dollars set aside for “religious support," including the purchase of Muslim Korans, prayer mats and foot-washing towels.

The plans also call for the construction of mosques or “worship centres," using taxpayers dollars.

The planning documents, in English and French, were released in response to a Rebel "Access to Information" request about religious expenditures by the Department of National Defence.

But the detailed Quebec budget plans also shed light on the sheer scale of the Trudeau government’s plans to set up refugee camp-style accommodations on seven Canadian Forces Bases across Quebec and Ontario.

The budget for Quebec alone totals more than $46 million for the first six months.

For a typical migrant family, that’s a $200,000/year subsidy — not including medicare or welfare.

It’s shocking that Canadian Armed Forces personnel will be ordered to abandon the coalition battle against ISIS and return to Canada to become waiters, chauffeurs and social workers for Muslim migrants, and that Canadian Forces Bases will be turned into squalid refugee camps.

It’s a disgrace that Canadian military personnel have been sent eviction notices to make way for foreign migrants.

But for the DND's budget to be diverted away from military purposes and towards buying Korans and building mosques for foreign migrants, is especially outrageous.

Post: #303

Not sure if folks here are familiar with Tarek Fatah. Columnist for Toronto Sun and one of the loudest voice against Islam and Islamism in Canada , while claiming to be a secular Muslim. (Which I don't believe he still. is, just for security as he already gets loads of death threats and been disowned by Pakistan (his country of birth).

In this video, he is answering questions from senators about threats of jihad and security of Canada, radicalization etc and absolutely roasts those regressive Islam sympathizers. Felt like watching Hitchens. Definitely recommended. It's an intellectual slaughter, extremely high energy!
There is also a first part video that starts the whole thing,'but isn't as good since the c Moments for interrupts too much with some awful music.

Post: #304

It's their country now.

Post: #305

There are a couple of different elements to this story, but this thread seems like the place to put it.

Dead Soldier National Post

Quote:The fiancée of a dead soldier has been banned from their home on a Canadian Forces base...

Sienna Potter, who is eight months pregnant, has been told that because she is not on the tenant list she is not able to return to the home she shared with Pte. Tyrell Vail at 14 Wing Greenwood in Nova Scotia.

Inside are all of Potter’s possessions as well as the clothes and toys of her 18-month-old son Declan. Vail viewed the toddler as his own son, even though he wasn’t the biological father, the family says.

Quote:But Ottawa lawyer Michel Drapeau... said what happened to Potter and the Vail family is not that unusual.

There is a tendency for the military to follow protocols, jettisoning common sense and decency in the process, he said.

Wow, go figure, the military following protocols, how heartless.

This is not one of those "game would have saved his life" scenarios since cause of death seems unrelated. However, he would not have had this chick fighting over his worldly possessions, which may or may not have been accounted for in his will.

This chick obviously saw a chance to hook a chump who was willing to pay her meal ticket and now he's gone.

The other issue is how the NP presents the story: she's the victim, not just some low-rent gold-digger, at the mercy of the military machine.

Also, the left loves to virtue signal 'supporting the troops' while hating everything to do with the military. This gives them the perfect opportunity to appear empathetic to the plight of the female while supposedly mourning the loss of a fallen warrior and demonizing the big machine.

Post: #306

I'm not sure what to think of the above story to be honest, but if that's the way the military does things, then that's just the way it is. One story that is pretty shocking is how the Canadian government is nickle and diming injured vets over their compensation, they're demoting them in rank in some cases and paying them out based on the lower rank, which is pretty damn greasy:
Ottawa imposes unequal increases in benefits for injured veterans:

Quote:The federal government is increasing the amount it pays to veterans who are so incapacitated they can no longer work, but many of those who currently make the least will get raises of just a couple percentage points while those at higher ranks will get 20 per cent more.

The unequal adjustments are part of a deliberate attempt by the Liberal government to ensure that those who are discharged from the lower ranks after being injured in the line of duty make less money than soldiers who are still actively serving.

To do that, the government will essentially demote some veterans to a rank below the one they held when they left the military – something that the veterans say is not only unfair but humiliating.

“And they are only doing it for the bottom ranks,” said Don Leonardo, the founder of the advocacy group Veterans Canada who, because he retired 20 years ago as a master corporal, will be among those affected. “Why would you pick on the most vulnerable?”

The Earnings Loss Benefit pays those veterans who are “totally and permanently incapacitated” 75 per cent of what they were making on the day they were released from the Armed Forces until they reach the age of 65.

In 2011, the then-Conservative government said no one who is entitled to that benefit would receive less than $40,000 annually, which was then 75 per cent of the salary of a basic corporal. That provided a substantial boost, especially to those who were injured in places such as Bosnia, Somalia and Yugoslavia and who were discharged at salaries far below what their successors were making as a result of significant raises in the late 1990s and over the past decade.

But for years, veterans advocates and politicians have said 75 per cent is insufficient.

The Liberals promised during last year’s election campaign to invest an additional $40-million annually to provide the permanently injured veterans with 90 per cent of their prerelease salary. It was a commitment they kept in their first budget, with changes that are slated to take effect in October if the budget legislation passes without amendments. But there is a hitch.

The Liberals say the minimum payments will be based on the current salary of a senior private, even if the disabled soldier left the military at a higher rank.

The government says on its website that this is being done in the interest of fairness. “To do otherwise,” it explains, “would mean that some veterans receiving the benefits could be making more than their comrades on active duty.”

When asked to explain why it is so important to ensure that injured veterans do not make the equivalent of serving members of the Canadians Forces, the Veterans Affairs officials did not offer a direct response. “What is of paramount importance is that injured veterans have access to benefits that allow them to focus on their recovery,” they said in an e-mail.

Those former members of the Armed Forces who were discharged at salaries higher than the $49,449 that is currently paid to a senior private – the majors, the colonels, the generals and even the high-ranking non-commissioned officers – will not be affected by the rank reductions. Their Earnings Loss Benefits payments will climb by 20 per cent under the government’s plan, which, in some cases, will amount to tens of thousands of dollars.

But those at lower ranks, the mid-range non-commissioned officers who departed the military decades ago, and the reservists who were paid by the day, will get much less.

Mr. Leonardo, who was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder related to his service as a peacekeeper in the former Yugoslavia, and who makes $42,426 annually through the Earnings Loss Benefit, will get an increase of less than 5 per cent.

“If you can’t provide for your family, eventually you are going to give up,” said Mr. Leonardo. Politicians “keep talking about mental health. Well, if you can’t provide for your family, why would you even stick around. You feel like you’re not worth anything any more and they demote you a rank to private. It just gets worse and worse and worse.”

Veterans advocate Sean Bruyea said one of the harshest aspects of the government’s plan for veterans such as Mr. Leonardo is the loss of esteem.

“I know intellectually this is humiliating,” said Mr. Bruyea, a former captain and military intelligence officer who was also diagnosed with PTSD. “What’s Don’s value as a Canadian civilian now? His value is his memory of being honoured by Veterans Affairs. How do they honour him? They say, ‘We are going to demote you for no reason whatsoever other than to save money.’”

Cathay Wagantall, a Conservative MP who is her party’s deputy critic for Veterans Affairs, said she is trying to amend the budget bill to protect the lower-income disabled veterans. “I don’t have an answer for why they are choosing to do it this way,” Ms. Wagantall said of the government.

Irene Mathyssen, the NDP critic, said it is clear that the higher ranked officers will benefit the most. “And those poor guys at the bottom get very, very small increases,” Ms. Mathyssen said. “When you start to crunch the numbers, it’s Liberal voodoo.”

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/poli...e30227709/

Post: #307

(06-02-2016 06:37 PM)scotian Wrote:  I'm not sure what to think of the above story to be honest, but if that's the way the military does things, then that's just the way it is. One story that is pretty shocking is how the Canadian government is nickle and diming injured vets over their compensation, they're demoting them in rank in some cases and paying them out based on the lower rank, which is pretty damn greasy:

It's hard to tell without knowing all the details of that story; to me it sounds like people who served a few years and made it to mid-NCO/officer ranks are wondering why they're not getting the equivalent of a full pension.

Also:

Quote:Those former members of the Armed Forces who were discharged at salaries higher than the $49,449 that is currently paid to a senior private... will not be affected by the rank reductions.

Since pretty much every rank is higher than private, does this mean the exception applies to someone who served an entire career in the CAF and yet never made it above the rank of private? That's what the outrage is about? Would this not incentivize members to strive to raise above the lowest possible rank over the course of a 25-year career?

As for the demotion when injured 'on the job' so to speak, I'm curious as to what exactly the details are on that agreement.

Post: #308

I just read this long article from the Globe and Mail about the "struggles" of the South Asian community in the Toronto suburb of Brampton, AKA Brampghanistan. I've never been there and have only visited Toronto briefly a couple of times, so maybe some of you with more experience in that area can comment on this article but it really left me scratching my head.

TLDR: Indian journalist who spent years living in Chicago compares the experience of Indian immigrants to that of blacks in Chicago's violent south side, doesn't appear to care for white people very much.

As Djembadjemba mentioned, immigrant communities in Canada have successfully participated in the political process, the Indians being some of the most successful. However, as most people are prone to do, they prefer to live among their own kind and the author seems to relish in the fact that she doesn't have to deal with nasty white people in Brampton because they all left. She goes on to complain about how Brampton is unfairly labelled as a ghetto but fails to mention any crime statistics. I'm not familiar with Brampton but if its anything like Surrey, the gang violence is largely a Sikh problem, often kids from wealthy families who shoot each other up, of course, she doesn't mention this. Unsurprisingly, she blames whitey for down voting government spending to expand parks, because as we all know, the gang bangers would drop their guns if the government would just build more parks with gazebos like they have back home.

To compare the experience of Indians with the blacks in Chicago is laughable, I've never seen an Indian pan handler on the streets in Canada, but I have met many Indian doctors, dentists, engineers, etc. Basically this article contradicts a lot of what I've seen in Canada among the South Asians, especially since moving out west because I don't recall ever meeting an Indian person in Nova Scotia, they're smart, they go where the money is!

Quote:I love that I don’t stick out like a sore thumb. As a South Asian Muslim, Indian on my dad’s side, Pakistani on my mom’s, I feel like I finally fit in. I am part of the non-white majority. I don’t need to worry about someone judging me by my hijab or hurling racist comments. I don’t have to worry about the patronizing tone of a white person in a mall parking lot, talking down at me like I don’t speak English about some asinine rule.

Ya those shitty white people and their stupid "rules", this entire article is full of doozies like that one.

I hate to give the Slop and Pail clicks but here it is: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/toro...e30273820/

Post: #309

Quote:I love that I don’t stick out like a sore thumb. As a South Asian Muslim, Indian on my dad’s side, Pakistani on my mom’s, I feel like I finally fit in. I am part of the non-white majority. I don’t need to worry about someone judging me by my hijab or hurling racist comments. I don’t have to worry about the patronizing tone of a white person in a mall parking lot, talking down at me like I don’t speak English about some asinine rule.

That comment is striking bigotry. She doesn't represent the majority of south Asians, but unfortunately retrenchment by the community is happening more when it grows in numbers and concentrates into small areas. The elders are usually bigots, and culturally alien from western ways. They instill in their kids that adopting western values is akin to becoming a degenerate. A poignantly one dimensional way of looking at the world. I grew up slamming South Asian sluts in Toronto and see how the young have to straddle between old world Indian subcontinent values systems (of community, caste and religion) and modern western values of liberty and individuality.

The reporter who wrote this confirms what I wrote earlier about the way some people view the relationship between themselves, the state and their in-groups. She has found her 'ethnic identity raft'. She will now cling onto it for the remainder of her life. Terrified of falling from it into the river of open pit competition. Heaven forbid she may have to compete on the basis of her personal achievements and not her identity. She can now hide out in Brampton, in her little ethnic cauldron, where she can be another unremarkable, boring, uninspiring drone that does what the community elders tell her to (while her kids disobey her, go party, drink, and talk back - just like the evil white kids!).

Don't look at the Ontario government for handouts either, they're broke, and the rest of the money is tied up in health-care, education, and strangely enough, a bizarre energy policy that seems to be a financial black hole.

This article also reads more like a Facebook post than a newspaper column. Does the Globe and mail not do quality control on their articles? There an increasing number of articles written by questionable characters with bullshit conjectures.

Post: #310

I'm reading all those things and I really like my own province Quebec right now

Post: #311

(06-04-2016 01:05 PM)MrRoundtree Wrote:  I'm reading all those things and I really like my own province Quebec right now

The thing that's saving La Belle Province for the time being is their dogmatic adherence to secularism.

Post: #312

(06-04-2016 01:05 PM)MrRoundtree Wrote:  I'm reading all those things and I really like my own province Quebec right now

That journalist would love Herouxville.

Post: #313

As a Canadian, watching from the outside as I was an expat for many years I see many problems creeping up. From the real estate bubble in some areas to the real estate crash in Alberta. Electing Trudeau on happy feel good policies where there are more debits than credits is irresponsible. An 8th grader can see that. I know Harper wasn't perfect either. Mulclair and free handouts, forget it.

That being said, it seems like they are all controlled by globalist elites. I hope Kevin oleary from shark tank runs for office. It is rumoured that he will run for the Conservative party leadership. A fiscally responsible individual. It's about time.

Post: #314

(06-02-2016 07:59 PM)ed pluribus unum Wrote:  

(06-02-2016 06:37 PM)scotian Wrote:  I'm not sure what to think of the above story to be honest, but if that's the way the military does things, then that's just the way it is. One story that is pretty shocking is how the Canadian government is nickle and diming injured vets over their compensation, they're demoting them in rank in some cases and paying them out based on the lower rank, which is pretty damn greasy:

It's hard to tell without knowing all the details of that story; to me it sounds like people who served a few years and made it to mid-NCO/officer ranks are wondering why they're not getting the equivalent of a full pension.

Also:

Quote:Those former members of the Armed Forces who were discharged at salaries higher than the $49,449 that is currently paid to a senior private... will not be affected by the rank reductions.

Since pretty much every rank is higher than private, does this mean the exception applies to someone who served an entire career in the CAF and yet never made it above the rank of private? That's what the outrage is about? Would this not incentivize members to strive to raise above the lowest possible rank over the course of a 25-year career?

As for the demotion when injured 'on the job' so to speak, I'm curious as to what exactly the details are on that agreement.

It's hard to say what will actually happen. The Canadian Armed Forces is run by bean counting, robotic bureaucrats and sociopaths and both types absolutely love to screw their own. Entitlements are usually sheathed in vague and complicated legalistic language and people with power at both Veterans Affairs and National Defense Headquarters are well known for denying people who are quite clearly eligible. It seems what you'll get is down to which case manager you have. Flip a coin because it's completely random.

As far as I can recall, Paul Franklin, who lost both legs below the knee in Afghanistan, now only has to prove to VA that he's still an amputee once every three years instead of yearly like he initially had to.

Post: #315

(06-01-2016 07:22 PM)LouEvilSlugger Wrote:  It's their country now.

I don't understand how GaysLesbiansTranniesBiSexuals can co-exist with Middle Eastern religions? Do the Liberals believe that they can indoctrinate Middle Eastern people with feminism as they do with the rest of 250,000 immigrants who arrive in Canada yearly?

Canada awfully persecutes people with Christian views, even if it's quotes from the Holy Bible itself, end up getting the person charged for "hate crimes" for saying "Merry Christmas" or "Praise the Lord" to the wrong person who might feel offended.

Post: #316

(05-30-2016 02:11 PM)Ghost Tiger Wrote:  

(05-30-2016 01:40 PM)RBerkley Wrote:  the Quebec feminazis, are sexually liberated and pro-sex.

They're French, so they think whores are cute.





Quebec still has her share of feminazi's...



(Pauline Marois, former Premier of Quebec 2012-2014)

But you're right, Quebec has a lot more whores. Or at least their whores are better looking and you would actually WANT to fuck them. That's because Quebec abandoned the Catholic Church in the 1960's and fully embraced the secular attitude on a grand scale. Quebec whores are proud to be whores. They even date politicians.



(Julie Couillard and Maxime Bernier https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2008..._aide.html)

Ontario still has that lingering Protestant puritanical culture that frowns upon prostitution. While the churches are dying in Ontario, they're not utterly empty like they are in Quebec. When you combine that puritanism with the outright hatred of heterosexual men that is emanating from the anti-culture cesspool of Toronto, you have a very toxic mix that results in, as you say, anti-sex and anti-fun. Milo has lucidly pointed out that lesbians are intrinsically anti-sex as he describes the phenomenon of "lesbian bed death".

Milo Wrote:It’s not like they’re in it for the sex. Maybe it’s the faint whiff of cat sick, maybe the chafing of polyester bedsheets, but it’s well known that lesbians stop having sex after the first few months and retreat into hobbies like softball, vegetarianism, penis envy and Twitter.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/05/...ler-dykes/

I'd been in Quebec looking like a pauper, living on around 5$ a day, and I got some fun there ,but I know a few men in Toronto who work for at least 60,000$-100,000$ a year and find it difficult to get dates despite they have the looks that would make an LA chick feel wet inside...and when the guys do find dates, they end up incurring around 400$ in a dinner date and not get laid.

Some of the Francophone chicks would be with their anarchist looking boyfriends in the metro subway, and they would just give this look of interest and femininity as if they want to be approached and fucked. I don't do "Imma take away yo bitch" game though.

Contrast this as when I just came back from the USA and ended up in Toronto on a Saturday night...I saw this chick giving me a nasty stare at me.

However, the rise of the Anglo Toronto femi-Nazis in Montreal from the student unions of McGill University and Concordia University have infected the place with the toxic Anglo-feminazism. Before the Roosh V fiasco, the female cashier in a busy day would say "Bonjour" and when I replied back in Le Francais, she would smile to herself and blush.

Fast forward to the Roosh witch-hunt, I clearly remembered going to some stores near the university area of Montreal and the female cashiers would behave passive-aggressive to me like the ones in Toronto.

The problem in Canada is that arguing with women is considered a jailable offense, and calling women names like "stupid","slut", "whore", "hoe", "bitch" to their face is considered a hate crime, so I can understand why many men in Toronto suffer in silence in such an uptight city where men are supposed to act like gentlemen, while women can parade naked on the streets and not be judged as a cheap hoe.

Another thing with Toronto is if I stand up on one spot in downtown Toronto too long, I get nasty stares, and then security guards appear to be prowling around the proximity of a public sidewalk.

I just heard that nearly all of those entertainers who do Batman moves, Spiderman jumps, Freestyle rapping and street preaching have all been BANNED from doing their busking near the Yonge & Dundas area in Toronto.

I've also heard and seen footage of police clamping down on homeless Aboriginal people, disabled men and homeless men who owe child support. I guess those Yuppies don't want dem homeless people devaluing their million dollar condominums and penthouses.

Post: #317

I love Quebec's whorish culture, I'm also from a fairly uptight province (there's only one strip club in all of NS) so I used to take road trips to Montreal with my buddies for wild long weekends. As soon as you cross the border from NB, there were signs advertising exotic dancing (the Quebecois ballet) which was probably in some guy's basement at his house in Gaspesie. We'd hammer it a few more hours to get to Mtl and blow whatever money we had on poutine and strippers, I really miss those days!

Post: #318

(06-04-2016 11:44 AM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

Quote:I love that I don’t stick out like a sore thumb. As a South Asian Muslim, Indian on my dad’s side, Pakistani on my mom’s, I feel like I finally fit in. I am part of the non-white majority. I don’t need to worry about someone judging me by my hijab or hurling racist comments. I don’t have to worry about the patronizing tone of a white person in a mall parking lot, talking down at me like I don’t speak English about some asinine rule.

That comment is striking bigotry. She doesn't represent the majority of south Asians, but unfortunately retrenchment by the community is happening more when it grows in numbers and concentrates into small areas. The elders are usually bigots, and culturally alien from western ways. They instill in their kids that adopting western values is akin to becoming a degenerate. A poignantly one dimensional way of looking at the world. I grew up slamming South Asian sluts in Toronto and see how the young have to straddle between old world Indian subcontinent values systems (of community, caste and religion) and modern western values of liberty and individuality.

The reporter who wrote this confirms what I wrote earlier about the way some people view the relationship between themselves, the state and their in-groups. She has found her 'ethnic identity raft'. She will now cling onto it for the remainder of her life. Terrified of falling from it into the river of open pit competition. Heaven forbid she may have to compete on the basis of her personal achievements and not her identity. She can now hide out in Brampton, in her little ethnic cauldron, where she can be another unremarkable, boring, uninspiring drone that does what the community elders tell her to (while her kids disobey her, go party, drink, and talk back - just like the evil white kids!).

Don't look at the Ontario government for handouts either, they're broke, and the rest of the money is tied up in health-care, education, and strangely enough, a bizarre energy policy that seems to be a financial black hole.

This article also reads more like a Facebook post than a newspaper column. Does the Globe and mail not do quality control on their articles? There an increasing number of articles written by questionable characters with bullshit conjectures.

The first pussies I ever seen were on brown girls. They all seem to go through a phase in their teens and early 20's where they want to fuck anyone not Indian. Then they snap to it, put on weight in their mid to late 20's and marry an Indian guy. But other than one Hindu, all the girls I tapped over the years were Sikh. I did not know any Pakistanis, though I played V-Ball against some at tournaments and them and the Sikhs had all sorts of nice things to say to each other.

So its shocking that Brampton, with putting all these brown folk together and mixing in a bunch of Punjabi and Urdu speakers that there would not be war. But lets face it, the Sikhs will integrate much further and build big business. They likely leave the Pakis in the dust financially.

Like Scotian said, Sikhs work hard and are smart. They integrate as much as they need too, while still holding on to their roots. When it comes to gang shit, yeah they shoot each other all the time. But stealing kids BMX and robbing liquor stores... not likely.

This happened over the weekend here town. Could be the start of another Sikh political war.
http://bc.ctvnews.ca/suspect-sought-afte...-1.2933749

Post: #319

(06-07-2016 09:57 AM)scotian Wrote:  I love Quebec's whorish culture, I'm also from a fairly uptight province (there's only one strip club in all of NS) so I used to take road trips to Montreal with my buddies for wild long weekends. As soon as you cross the border from NB, there were signs advertising exotic dancing (the Quebecois ballet) which was probably in some guy's basement at his house in Gaspesie. We'd hammer it a few more hours to get to Mtl and blow whatever money we had on poutine and strippers, I really miss those days!

Nice..As much as femi-nazis and their cucked husbands in Toronto have clout to try and ban stripclubs in their city---in Quebec, there is a saying that "Everyone comes here for the sex".

It was strange in Quebec, how I didn't look like the typical wealthy, middle-upper class man in his early 30s (the preferred group of men to have as a walking ATM Machine, I mean, women choose to date), yet one Saturday night in Montreal was like an experience I have yet to accomplish in uptight cities like Toronto.

It's a relief that there are some places in Canada where women don't screen a person based on the car they drive, the house they own and the amount of money they have...yet the femi-nazi groups in Ontario are complaining about the prolific amount of Oriental stripclubs popping up everywhere in Toronto.

Many chicks in Toronto are driving Range Rovers, Audis, Porsches, Telsas and other high-end vehicles....some of them look miserable in their vehicles though...yet a person can arrive in Quebec living on about 5$ a day and having more fun than the guys in Toronto who spend hundreds of dollars a month in clubs, bars, etc only to end up on Roosh's "Toronto Sucks" YouTube video or his blog.

Post: #320

Foreign students is the number one reason why Montreal sucks now, specifically the McGill-Concordia scenes/crowds. Most of the femininazis in Montreal are McGill student that aren't locals.

Post: #321

You should hit up some cities on the east coast if you want to meet some more down to earth women, specifically Moncton, Halifax and St John's. Since everyone is broke down that way, there's less emphasis on ostentatious displays of wealth and more emphasis on getting hammered drunk and being able to tell a good story, its something that I really miss since moving out west.

Out here in Alberta its a shitty combination of people being obsessed with money and bad male to female ratios. Its always been a sausage fest out here, especially compared to Halifax where its the complete opposite (a pussy fest!) but I think its gotten even worse since the oil down turn because all of the rig pigs and laid off tradesmen are in town and flooding the bars. Its gotten so bad that now the police are banning people from Whyte because of the increase in fights and other related violence.

Vancouver seems to be much of the same as Toronto as far as displays of wealth but may be decent if you're into some kind of hipster scene stuff or FOB Asian women. I've heard that if you're black there it can be good. I'm considering a move to the more red neck parts of BC, the outskirts of Vancouver or the Okanagan Valley but I'm undecided. I'm also considering Montreal or a return to Halifax as I'm about to being a 2/2 rotation in the Mac but flying that far east is a bit of a pain in the ass. Basically everywhere else in Canada is a no-go zone for me!

Laner, maybe the guy who got capped had some old beefs with his terrorist affiliated group he was a member of in the past, maybe he didn't didn't donate enough to the free Khalistan cause, who knows.

Post: #322

Looks like Trolander's spreading his influence...

Quote:Ontario cabinet minister stepping down for gender parity

Ontario’s minister of municipal affairs and housing is resigning his cabinet post, a move he says he is making to help the premier achieve gender parity.

Ted McMeekin wrote in a Facebook post Monday that he will continue to serve as minister until Premier Kathleen Wynne names a replacement.

Speculation about a pending cabinet shuffle is rampant at the Ontario legislature, and Wynne has said that in a “hypothetical” one, she would like to have an equal number of men and women in her cabinet.

She said in a statement Monday that, “As we take steps towards gender parity in cabinet, selfless and bold action like Ted’s is welcome.”

There are currently twice as many men as women in the Ontario Liberal cabinet.

The Hamilton-area member of provincial parliament wrote that he is a feminist who, thinking of his three daughters and his wife, has often “dreamed of a day” when the question of gender parity wouldn’t even arise.

“Sometimes the best way for a man to advance the equality of women may be to step back and make room at the table,” wrote McMeekin. “Ultimately, I support the premier’s leadership in this matter and I want to do what I can to help her achieve it.”

McMeekin wrote that when a new cabinet is named, he’ll return to serving his constituents of Ancaster-Dundas-Flamborough-Westdale, but his post does not say whether he’ll run again in 2018.

He was first elected to the legislature in 2000. He has also served as minister of government and consumer services, minister of agriculture, food and rural affairs, and minister of community and social services.

Prior to his move to provincial politics, McMeekin was a Hamilton city councillor and mayor of the town of Flamborough.

In his statement McMeekin included among his achievements bringing in a poverty reduction strategy with the goal of ending chronic homelessness in 10 years, a new affordable housing strategy with a portable housing benefit and introducing a local food act.

Wynne thanked McMeekin for his cabinet contributions.

“Ted is a strong progressive voice, advocating for such important issues as social housing and poverty reduction,” she wrote. “I am very pleased that Ted will continue to be a valued and valuable member of our caucus.”

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/nati...99784ba473

Post: #323

(06-07-2016 05:21 PM)LouEvilSlugger Wrote:  Foreign students is the number one reason why Montreal sucks now, specifically the McGill-Concordia scenes/crowds. Most of the femininazis in Montreal will be a McGill student that aren't locals.

Definitely true. Many women from Toronto especially flock to Montreal. I've heard they been causing problems with people and giving Montreal a poor image, in particularly, the angry mob which attacked Roosh in one of the most frequented tourist areas of Montreal.

I've heard the anarchists in Montreal have bought into the feminist lies, recently attacking men who were suspected or admitted their intention to visit an RoK meetup last February.

The reason I avoid being present in these feminist mobs is because it's easy to get a year or two in prison in Canada just for yelling back at the femi-nazis. Just look at how G.A.E suffered a long trial with threat of 6 months imprisonment for disagreeing with Toronto feminazis on Twitter.

Another feminazi hypocrisy..Feminazis want to form angry mobs to attack their targets, but if their target only defends themselves, the target ends up in prison for at least a year.

I wonder if feminazis form angry mobs and bait their targets with police problems in areas like Jane & Finch?

Post: #324

(06-07-2016 05:41 PM)RBerkley Wrote:  

(06-07-2016 05:21 PM)LouEvilSlugger Wrote:  Foreign students is the number one reason why Montreal sucks now, specifically the McGill-Concordia scenes/crowds. Most of the femininazis in Montreal will be a McGill student that aren't locals.

Definitely true. Many women from Toronto especially flock to Montreal. I've heard they been causing problems with people and giving Montreal a poor image, in particularly, the angry mob which attacked Roosh in one of the most frequented tourist areas of Montreal.

I've heard the anarchists in Montreal have bought into the feminist lies, recently attacking men who were suspected or admitted their intention to visit an RoK meetup last February.

The reason I avoid being present in these feminist mobs is because it's easy to get a year or two in prison in Canada just for yelling back at the femi-nazis. Just look at how G.A.E suffered a long trial with threat of 6 months imprisonment for disagreeing with Toronto feminazis on Twitter.

Another feminazi hypocrisy..Feminazis want to form angry mobs to attack their targets, but if their target only defends themselves, the target ends up in prison for at least a year.

I wonder if feminazis form angry mobs and bait their targets with police problems in areas like Jane & Finch?

Quebec City is still nice. It has that feel of Montreal before social justice convergence.

Post: #325

(06-07-2016 05:31 PM)scotian Wrote:  You should hit up some cities on the east coast if you want to meet some more down to earth women, specifically Moncton, Halifax and St John's. Since everyone is broke down that way, there's less emphasis on ostentatious displays of wealth and more emphasis on getting hammered drunk and being able to tell a good story, its something that I really miss since moving out west.

Out here in Alberta its a shitty combination of people being obsessed with money and bad male to female ratios. Its always been a sausage fest out here, especially compared to Halifax where its the complete opposite (a pussy fest!) but I think its gotten even worse since the oil down turn because all of the rig pigs and laid off tradesmen are in town and flooding the bars. Its gotten so bad that now the police are banning people from Whyte because of the increase in fights and other related violence.

Vancouver seems to be much of the same as Toronto as far as displays of wealth but may be decent if you're into some kind of hipster scene stuff or FOB Asian women. I've heard that if you're black there it can be good. I'm considering a move to the more red neck parts of BC, the outskirts of Vancouver or the Okanagan Valley but I'm undecided. I'm also considering Montreal or a return to Halifax as I'm about to being a 2/2 rotation in the Mac but flying that far east is a bit of a pain in the ass. Basically everywhere else in Canada is a no-go zone for me!

Laner, maybe the guy who got capped had some old beefs with his terrorist affiliated group he was a member of in the past, maybe he didn't didn't donate enough to the free Khalistan cause, who knows.

Before I was told by some guys I met that Alberta was the best choice for employment and money. However, I noticed that the newly-elected NDP Notley appears not to care about the oil industry in Alberta (other than collecting higher taxes to pay her feminazi cronies). Fort Mac was burning to the ground and some politicians were even cheering!

Some guys in Alberta are complaining that the Ontario women are flocking to Alberta and causing a mess because they bring their values and attitudes with them too.

Alberta sounded highly feasible for a guy from 2010-2013 when oil prices were high and there wasn't a feminazi provinical government which hated on the oil industry.

It's bizarre that Notley's gov't can refuse to help laid-off oil workers, but her government can magically create several make-work bureaucratic six-figure jobs for her feminazi cronies.

I'm not really knowledgeable about displays of wealth in Alberta,but if it's a guy working in a business or oil sands purchasing a 2016 model Chevy Silverado 1500 with flare kits and mag rims, then that sounds more of like a personal favourite matched with the convenience of using the pick-up truck for heavy duty work.

However, if it's like in Toronto where men are taking on huge loans to purchase Audis, Mercedes, Teslas, and even Maseratis just to park it near a club, then that's a different case. Vehicles like post-2010 Range Rovers, BMW X3 and X5s are like the Dodge Caravans of Toronto. Post-2010 Mercedes Benz coupes and sedans are like the Toyota Corollas.

The sad part is that a guy once said that in the late 1990s, in hypergamous Los Angeles, he used to drive an old-beater van that is grandpa owned, while the rest of rows of parked cars would be newer model vehicles. He still got laid.

I'm guessing that men who earn more money in Canada are likely to be "scammed" into thinking that purchasing a newer vehicle which depreciates automatically in value as soon as it leaves the dealer parking lot would result in the "dream".

Alberta oil money salaries in a place like Quebec or Newfoundland would be paradise because I know men in Toronto who earn at least 60,000$ a year, and they are unhappy and almost broke.

It's probably have to do with the "lifestyle" being told to rent/purchase expensive condos, buy expensive cars, dine with $100 dinner meals, etc.

Even the LA guy who drove the old van and still got laid used to be amazed at men in Toronto spending 200$ on upscale meals for two on dinner dates, where most likely the woman would be asking the man questions like a job interview.

And maybe this is why the status quo in Toronto lost their minds when Roosh wanted to conduct speeches in Canada.

How dare Roosh tell men in Toronto that their 100,000$ savings will last a decade or two in a poosy paradise like Eastern Europe or South-East Asia (while that same 100,000$ will be used as a "downpayment" on a house in Toronto which was paid an extra 300,000$ overasking due to a bidding war---Garth Turner's blog have a few of such stories).

AND one final rant:

1. Man transfers his 100,000$ savings to mortgage a home for wifey in Toronto= BANKS APPROVE.

2. Man wants to withdraw 10,000$ from his 100,000$ in savings to use when he moves abroad= BANKS DISAPPROVE. Authorities called under the Anti-Money Laundering Act and Anti-Terr0rism Act.