Post: #1

Just another reason why it's laughable that these national women's football teams demand as much as the men.

http://www.sportingnews.com/football/new...piiojuc5qm

Of course the other reason is this:

Post: #2

Only kind of football women are cut out for:

Post: #3

This is gonna make all the dykes I know very mad.

Post: #4

Post: #5

I hope those boys were gentlemen and took those girls out after the game for ice cream sprinkled with anti-depressants.

Post: #6

(05-25-2016 09:18 PM)HornyRamone Wrote:  I hope those boys were gentlemen and took those girls out after the game for ice cream sprinkled with anti-depressants.

Not to mention a gangbang to relieve them of all that horniness brought on by male domination

Post: #7

(05-25-2016 09:26 PM)EDantes Wrote:  

(05-25-2016 09:18 PM)HornyRamone Wrote:  I hope those boys were gentlemen and took those girls out after the game for ice cream sprinkled with anti-depressants.

Not to mention a gangbang to relieve them of all that horniness brought on by male domination

Better not do that. Wouldn't want to get suspended from school.

Post: #8

This is barely news worthy for people on the forum.
But I'm sure the leftist gang is surprised by this.

*I came in thinking this was a old repost. Cause I remember that the U.S.national soccer team got beat by a bunch of boys too.

Post: #9

Well, at least it's consistent on both sides of the Pacific. The US Men's under-17 team took on the US Women's National Team, 3 months before the women's team "won" gold at the Olympics. The teenagers beat them 8-2. And according to the thread reporting it...

http://forums.bigsoccer.com/threads/uswn...t.1939180/

...the US Women's National Team has been beaten by 15 year olds in the past, too.

EDIT: And in Sweden, same thing: http://www.barstoolsports.com/dont-use/s...man-short/

Again, the Swedish National Women's Team, only this time against a local football club of under-17s which only played with 10 men. 3-0.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #10

(05-25-2016 09:18 PM)HornyRamone Wrote:  I hope those boys were gentlemen and took those girls out after the game for ice cream sprinkled with anti-depressants.

I was thinking the only way the chicks had a chance was to spike the Capri Sun packets and the orange slices with vodka.

Post: #11

(05-26-2016 01:40 AM)Sourcecode Wrote:  This is barely news worthy for people on the forum.
But I'm sure the leftist gang is surprised by this.

*I came in thinking this was a old repost. Cause I remember that the U.S.national soccer team got beat by a bunch of boys too.

It's been a big story in Australia over the past few months. Sadly it's not just the leftist brigade that get surprised by this… A healthy number of non leftist Australians have become so brainwashed as to think females and males can compete to the same level in every field.

The big picture in all of this, is that this discrepancy doesn't only exist in a physical context. If the world was so inclined, they could no doubt show a similar discrepancy between male and female employees in a broad range of employment fields…

You have to wonder just how much money corporate employers cost themselves, both in terms of efficiency and productivity as a result of their forced equal employment outcomes.

Post: #12

Another case of 'careful what you wish for'.
Whether it's laughable losses to younger men.
Or failing ratings for female sports coverage (even despite mass marketing & hype).
These chicks & their enablers are merely setting themselves up for a series of own goals. Pun intended.

Post: #13

On a practical level, this is one of those good facts to keep tucked away in your mind for when you are around women bragging about how much better they are then men. Just drop it into the conversation, and say, probably doesn't mean anything.

Post: #14

(05-26-2016 02:37 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  Well, at least it's consistent on both sides of the Pacific. The US Men's under-17 team took on the US Women's National Team, 3 months before the women's team "won" gold at the Olympics. The teenagers beat them 8-2. And according to the thread reporting it...

http://forums.bigsoccer.com/threads/uswn...t.1939180/

...the US Women's National Team has been beaten by 15 year olds in the past, too.

EDIT: And in Sweden, same thing: http://www.barstoolsports.com/dont-use/s...man-short/

Again, the Swedish National Women's Team, only this time against a local football club of under-17s which only played with 10 men. 3-0.

I checked out a few minutes of several games during the women's World Cup last year. The level of play was shocking. The high school team I played on back in the day could have easily handled most of the teams. When the media promotes women athletes as being as good as the men...

Here in Canada a big deal is made of a female ice hockey player named Hayley Wickenheiser. She's widely regarded as the best woman to ever play the sport. Hayley got tired of the level of play with women and wanted to play with the big boys. Got a try out with an NHL team? Nope. Team in Russia? Nope. Finland? Yup. Got on a men's team in Finland. In their second tier league. To a team in the bottom half of the standings. Where she was a bit player and didn't earn much game time. Lasted a season or two then got released and came home. To hear the Canadian sports media talk about her you'd think she's on the level of Gretzky, though.

Post: #15

Imagine all the rug burns

Post: #16

And here we are wanting to put Ms Starbucks up against trained killers of other nations.

Post: #17

Thanks Roosh for putting this on your Twitter. I've relied upon it to settle an argument I had a few weeks ago about whether the Canadian Women's Soccer Team would lose to the Men's or not.

The girls at work were so butthurt that one challenged me to a 100m dash later this summer. I immediately accepted. This is hysterical.

Post: #18

^^ Lols. I once had a debate at work with a colleague that me and my friends could beat the England Womens Team. Atleast that was a debate.

To argue that a womens team can beat the equivalent mens side is a joke.

Post: #19

^ I know. But they don't feel that way. That's the worst part of it. They believe all the BS feminist programming. They think they can match any man physically.

I'll report to the Forum on how bad I beat this girl (who is 11 years younger than me) as soon as the race occurs. It's set for July.

Post: #20

It's not the least bit surprising, happens all the time. Just watch a minute of any women's football game and you immediately get why these happen. It looks like a completely different game. Same with tennis. You just can't watch women's tennis after seeing a men's match.

I bet 2/3 of that team are dykes though. I have no idea why any normal woman should care about football, let alone want to play it.

Post: #21

Women National Team think they could beat boys in football...?

Post: #22

This was a soccer match, not NFL type football. Just a heads up to anyone who did not open the link.

Post: #23

(05-26-2016 06:42 PM)Atlanta Man Wrote:  This was a soccer match, not NFL type football. Just a heads up to anyone who did not open the link.

Yep. In Europe and elsewhere around the world, it is called "football". But in the US, we called it "soccer".

Post: #24

(05-26-2016 07:10 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  But in the US, we called it "soccer".

As God intended.

Post: #25

Soccer would be so much better if the rule for fouls was blood or broken bones during contact.

If no blood or broken bones then it's not a foul.