I wonder if she's on psych meds. She's got some weird facial expressions and wide eyed vacant stares.

"Y'all got any more of them black votes"

https://twitter.com/Negro_Senpai/status/...=twsrc^tfw

Whatever your opinion of Christopher Hitchens, watching him go in on Hillary was always high times.

Quote:People who think with their epidermis or their genitalia or their clan are the problem to begin with. One does not banish this specter by invoking it. If I would not vote against someone on the grounds of 'race' or 'gender' alone, then by the exact same token I would not cast a vote in his or her favor for the identical reason. Yet see how this obvious question makes fairly intelligent people say the most alarmingly stupid things.

Quote:Those of us who follow politics seriously rather than view it as a game show do not look at Hillary Clinton and simply think 'first woman president.' We think—for example—'first ex-co-president' or 'first wife of a disbarred lawyer and impeached former incumbent' or 'first person to use her daughter as photo-op protection during her husband's perjury rap.

Quote:Indifferent to truth, willing to use police-state tactics and vulgar libels against inconvenient witnesses, hopeless on health care, and flippant and fast and loose with national security: The case against Hillary Clinton for president is open-and-shut. Of course, against all these considerations you might prefer the newly fashionable and more media-weighty notion that if you don't show her enough appreciation, and after all she's done for us, she may cry.

Hillary was caught trying to pander hard on some black show. Bill Burr gives his take on it.

The Wrath of Farrakhan

(04-22-2016 08:31 PM)EuphoricWizard Wrote:  Hillary was caught trying to pander hard on some black show. Bill Burr gives his take on it.

Burr sounds like a Bernie bro who will definitely vote for Trump.

Hillary Clinton: Half of my Cabinet will be women

Fuck.

The Russians are going to be crying from laughter with these pussies trying to talk tough.

KKK endorses Hillary
A Grand Dragon of the California Klan claims to have raised about $20K for her campaign
http://www.vocativ.com/312479/kkk-endors...president/

A prominent Ku Klux Klan leader says that the group has raised thousands of dollars for Hillary Clinton’s campaign and that the Klan is officially endorsing the Democratic frontrunner for president—a claim the Clinton campaign vigorously denies.

Shortly after setting a giant cross on fire with dozens of other members of various white nationalist groups in Georgia on Saturday, Will Quigg, a Grand Dragon in a California branch of the KKK, sat down with Vocativ—which was there for a larger reporting trip about the modern state of the hate group—to talk about the 2016 election. According to Quigg, “For the KKK, Clinton is our choice.”

“She is friends with the Klan,” Quigg said. “A lot of people don’t realize that. She’s friends with Senator Byrd. He’s been an Exulted Cyclops in the Klan. He’s been King Kleagle.” (King Kleagle is another KKK title for the leader of an entire “realm,” or state. Quigg is the King Kleagle for California.) Quigg was referring to the late U.S. senator Robert Byrd from West Virginia, who organized and served as the leader of a West Virginia Klan chapter in the 1940s. In 2005, Byrd publicly disavowed the Klan and called his involvement “wrong.” Upon the senator’s death in 2010, Hillary Clinton called Byrd a “friend and mentor.”

Quigg said that he and other Klan members have raised more than $20,000 for the Clinton campaign and donated it anonymously.

“In the Bible, it says when you pray, pray in a closed, dark place by yourself,” Quigg said. “Do not pray on the street corners where people can see you … that’s why I got $20,000 together and sent it to Hillary Clinton’s campaign anonymously.”

The Clinton campaign strongly denies receiving any donations from the Ku Klux Klan and rejects the organization’s endorsement. “This is completely false,” Clinton campaign spokesman Josh Schwerin told Vocativ. “We want no part of them or their money and vehemently reject their hateful agenda.”

It’s possible for the Klan to have donated the money without the Clinton campaign knowing —Federal Election Commission rules allow for small anonymous donations. And members of the Klan wouldn’t need to disclose their affiliation with the group if they did donate to Clinton’s campaign—only their names would appear on Clinton’s campaign finance filings.

According to Schwerin, the campaign has “not received anywhere close to $20,000 in anonymous donations in total, [so] it is impossible that they are telling the truth.” Vocativ independently verified this through FEC filings.
More Donald Trump, The “Gateway Drug” To White Supremacy

The endorsement seems a clear attempt to mar Clinton’s reputation—or perhaps a backhanded way to push voters towards Donald Trump, the GOP frontrunner whose stance on issues like illegal immigration falls more in line with the KKK’s. But Quigg denies this. Trump “couldn’t run this country more than he could run a county,” he says. “He knows nothing about politics, or about foreign affairs. He went to Israel and almost got thrown out.”

Former Klan leader David Duke previously endorsed Trump in the 2016 presidential campaign—an endorsement Trump didn’t immediately disavow. Duke, however, does not speak for the Klan, according to Quigg.

As for Clinton, “All the stuff she’s saying now, she’s saying so she can get into office, okay? She doesn’t care about illegal immigrants—she’s acting like she does so she can get into office. Once she’s in office, then she’ll implement her policies. She’s a Democrat. The Klan has always been a Democratic organization,” Quigg said


@ "King Kleagle"

(04-26-2016 03:24 PM)DamienCasanova Wrote:  KKK endorses Hillary
A Grand Dragon of the California Klan claims to have raised about $20K for her campaign
http://www.vocativ.com/312479/kkk-endors...president/

A prominent Ku Klux Klan leader says that the group has raised thousands of dollars for Hillary Clinton’s campaign and that the Klan is officially endorsing the Democratic frontrunner for president—a claim the Clinton campaign vigorously denies.

Wait for this to appear in the mainstream media, just like that time a FORMER Grand Wizard endorsed Donald Trump. Wait for it...wait for it...

Hillary only once mentioned the slogan Make America Whole Again, so I'm not sure she's going to use it in her campaign.

But if you've played Dead Space, you'll get an extra special laugh out of that one.

Regardless of Hillary's claim for 50% female cabinet, what are the odds that the bulk of them will be for the relatively insignificant departments?

If not, well, I'm sure our new female Secretary of Defense will be just as scary as Germany's....

The one who never served in the military.

The Hag is up to her neck in it.

http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/20...ebels.html

Quote:Seymour Hersh Says Hillary Approved Sending Libya’s Sarin to Syrian Rebels

(04-26-2016 12:35 PM)The Truth Wrote:  Hillary Clinton: Half of my Cabinet will be women

Fuck.

The Russians are going to be crying from laughter with these pussies trying to talk tough.

Too bad Carly Fiorina is Republican, she'd be a fitting Secretary of Commerce or Labour in an HRC administration.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/clinto...le/2590075

It turns out that the corruption of the Clinton Foundation could be the real crux of the FBI investigation, which is apparently not getting a lot of press lately. This will hopefully get interesting.

On a similar note, I just bought one of these:



We can hope can't we?

Quote:An FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton's conduct could extend well past the election, a former chairman of the House Oversight Committee said Sunday.

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., argued the scale of potentially wrongful activity Clinton engaged in while leading the State Department is slowing down investigators.

"I believe they are going to have to make a summary finding as to her violation of the national records act, her taking of the documents, and of course a classified portion," said Issa who wielded subpoena power and oversaw an investigative staff while he chaired the Oversight Committee.

"They're going to have to leave the ... coordinating her activities and President Clinton's activities and Chelsea's activities in the Clinton Foundation, they're probably going to have to leave that until after the election," Issa said.

The FBI has been investigating the charge that Clinton mishandled classified information for nearly a year. In January, that probe reportedly expanded to look at how operations at State may have been improperly coordinated with activity at the nonprofit Clinton Foundation, and at whether the foundation benefited from the arrangement.


The prospect that Clinton or her associates could face public corruption charges related to the foundation has been largely overshadowed by the issue of whether Clinton mishandled classified information. But Issa said the focus could shift once the FBI finishes the first part of its investigation.

"The foundation business is [a] complex … series of events in which foreign governments have given large amounts of money simultaneously or nearly simultaneously," Issa said. "It's complex, it's the kind of thing that can take the FBI a long time."

Issa argued that it was going to be a hurdle for Clinton to get beyond the server issue, even if the FBI does not recommend an indictment. Clinton says nothing she emailed was classified at the time. Federal officials later designated some of the material classified or secret.

But Issa said the former secretary and the former president were familiar enough with the classification process to know better.

(05-01-2016 10:39 PM)bootyhuntah Wrote:  http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/clinto...le/2590075

It turns out that the corruption of the Clinton Foundation could be the real crux of the FBI investigation, which is apparently not getting a lot of press lately. This will hopefully get interesting.

Not before the election, though, and this suggestion that "there's too much to investigate" is a very handy cover story.

Referees in a big final match know better than to make controversial calls in the fourth quarter with only minutes remaining. They will "let the players play" because the referee doesn't want to get tagged as the guy responsible for Team X winning/losing the match. The FBI is no different. The suggestion there's too much for a law enforcement agency to look at in a short-ish period of time is ludicrous.

Classic video from the 2008 election but still accurately poignant to this day.

Hillary Clinton is really fighting hard for "all women" , playing the gender card over and over again, except...

^^^ I guess this is just the tl;dr highlight meme. Suzanne Coleman, Judy Dibbs and Paula Grober weren't as lucky as the women listed above who still managed to stay alive...

This is what is really bothersome to me

http://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/ind...tion-2016/

Quote:DAVID WASSERMAN 6:26 PM
Clinton is crushing it in early returns from rural Indiana. She’s winning Fayette County with 64 percent, Daviess with 65 percent, Whitley with 54 percent, Knox with 57 percent. These are places Sanders should be winning to win statewide. So far, the exit polls look way off and Clinton is looking pretty good.

When results are way far off from exit polling, that can be a clear case of voter fraud.

This is a preview of what she will try in November, the exit polls of how people actually voted will be not even close to the results, especially in key swing states. Why do we even bother having elections?

(05-03-2016 05:56 PM)eradicator Wrote:  This is what is really bothersome to me

http://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/ind...tion-2016/

Quote:DAVID WASSERMAN 6:26 PM
Clinton is crushing it in early returns from rural Indiana. She’s winning Fayette County with 64 percent, Daviess with 65 percent, Whitley with 54 percent, Knox with 57 percent. These are places Sanders should be winning to win statewide. So far, the exit polls look way off and Clinton is looking pretty good.

When results are way far off from exit polling, that can be a clear case of voter fraud.

This is a preview of what she will try in November, the exit polls of how people actually voted will be not even close to the results, especially in key swing states. Why do we even bother having elections?

The Clintons have always been involved in shady business. It should come as no surprise that voter fraud is part of the larger package. The only question is, if she pulls off fraud in the general election, will the Trump camp spot it and make the necessary legal challenges? Will he be able to shake off the stigma of being a poor loser if the fraudulent results show a Clinton victory? Hmmm, one wonders?

   

I may have jumped the gun saying that about this evening: the exit polls were showing Sanders winning by about 10 points, 55% to 45% and when the results were first coming in with 2% of precints reporting, it was flipped in Hillary's favor, but that may have just been because she has the older cat lady demographic cornered, and they tend to vote via absentee ballot which gets counted first. It doesn't really make much sense for Hillary to cheat in Indiana, she has the nomination wrapped up, but she absolutely was cheating in Iowa and other early states when it was very much up in the air.

Clinton can't explain her anti-coal mining positions to coal miner.

(05-04-2016 02:48 AM)bacon Wrote:  Clinton can't explain her anti-coal mining positions to coal miner.

Does this hag understand basic demand and supply? about 40% of all energy consumed by USA comes from coal, she wants to cut 40% of all energy in the USA and send Americans to the 19th century.