Post: #26

Quote:1.) They are good looking

2.) They say what guys want to hear

It's pathetic and disingenuous, just like the "nerd gurl" thing. They are playing into the fantasy that these orbiters have built up in their head about a girl who "gets it". It's really incredible how adept these chicks are at finding new ways to extract the maximum amount of attention from desperate men.

Post: #27

Well I think the only card she has is the woman's card. She's got nothing else going, and, frankly, if [Nicole Arbour] were a man, I don't think she'd get 5% of the [views.] The only thing she's got going is the woman's card, and the beautiful thing is, women don't like her. OK?

Post: #28

I was able to listen to only up to the 18 second mark, not all at once; before I had to stop it.

Post: #29

Serious downgrade there without the makeup. Fooled again!

Post: #30

I just want to know where this is heading. What will become of the children born to these women and the men who worship them?

Father time needs to hurry up!

Post: #31

Nicole is a comedienne and this video is for effect. Her fat-shaming video is classic.

I do know of two older women in my area who do a podcast about their dating lives. I'd like to post on it, but definitely don't want to give them any extra publicity. These two are like Nicole but without any sense of humor. Or looks. In other words, it's what you all have to look forward to if you date fortysomthing women someday.

Post: #32

(04-30-2016 09:47 AM)General Stalin Wrote:  

(04-30-2016 01:46 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(04-30-2016 12:53 AM)General Stalin Wrote:  Everything about "dating" for generation Y is casual. Just hanging out, whatever, grabbing a couple drinks and maybe going back to one of eachother's apartments to bang if you're feeling it, and maybe seeing eachother again a week or two later if you care to and can fit it into your suuuuper busy schedule.

That's because women have spent the last two decades punishing men for having serious intentions.

This is true. Women have spent the last two decades devaluing men who want to court traditionally, provide, and family-up. Women have been brainwashed since the 60's to think that settling down with a man and taking care of a family and a home is basically slavery. Any man who resembles that sort of paradigm is unattractive.

(04-30-2016 01:46 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(04-30-2016 12:53 AM)General Stalin Wrote:  The reason being that the point of dating in the first place is finding a suitable mate to start a family with. Nobody wants families anymore so what's the point of taking a person seriously? Most young men and women don't believe in marriage, and certainly don't want to have kids - so what incentive is there besides just fucking eachother? People don't even know how to properly love and care for eachother anymore because there is no goal besides just not being alone for a while.

A lot of guys are serious about having a family. However, the female 7's and above (and many of the 5's and 6's) have no intention of trading all the attention and free prizes they get for having boobs in exchange for a responsible family life.

They only start taking marriage seriously once their looks begin to fade, the attention from high value males disappears and they need a quick bail out.

I don't know man from my observation a lot Millennial men have drank the Kool-Aid too. I have a lot of lefty-leaning male friends who have the same mindset as women: kids are icky and just get in the way of the fun and exciting life that 99% of them are never going to have.

For every man who has drunk the cool-aid, there's a guy in his early twenties that falls below the 20th percentile on the attractiveness scale for men, who would happily be a reliable husband. This is because men who are not more attractive than 80% of men are invisible to women and would jump at a chance be locked into a stable relationship with a 6 or better.

Until the wall is imminent, every female 6 or above believes that she deserves a man who is more attractive than 90% of his peers.

Of course, these man are almost always natural players (who will enjoy the ride until about thirty and then settle down with a ball-buster that will make his life a disappointment, which will lead to lots of use of the phrases "whatcha gonna do?" and "women, can't live with 'em, can't live without 'em. Shucks."

The sweet spot is the 80-90% percentile of men on the attractive scale. These men are visible to women, but not good enough to settle down with because they lack absolutely perfection. These guys have witnessed the success of the 90%+ crowd and faced the rejection of women who will fuck them, but not "settle" for them. The smart ones realize that the best plan is improve themselves and marry a woman a decade younger than them a their peak in their early to mid-thirties.

The dumb ones get locked down by an unattractive wall-approaching ball buster who ends up even uglier than the one the 90%+ gang has to put with.

My point being, that there's a ton of guys an attraction percentile equivalent to everything south of an 8 who would definitely go for marriage to a woman of an equal level of attractiveness who is still in her early twenties.

But that doesn't work for the charming women of the new millenium because YOLO.

Post: #33

(04-30-2016 01:43 PM)eatthishomie Wrote:  Well there's my post-RFL side hustle right there.

Post: #34

(04-30-2016 01:39 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  

(04-30-2016 12:45 PM)Red_Pillage Wrote:  I can't stand all these "ZOMG IM A CUTE GURL ON YOUTUBE WITH LOTZ OF THINGS TO SAY!" bitches. I tried watching the vid in the OP and got about 8 seconds in. If you can sit through that whole video you need to have your T levels checked.


Another example is that shoe on head cunt. She only has a following because she is hot and has more orbiters than a supermassive black hole.

2.) They say what guys want to hear

That's what puzzles me, after looking at a few of the videos' stats, she has an overwhelmingly large number of dislikes on each, most outnumbering the likes by a wide margin. If that's the case, why does she have 337,618 subs?

Post: #35

We've already broken down how this bitch works.

She isn't an ally, even if she is spitting truths (which have been known for years on ROK and RVF)

She's another semi famous youtube girl making inflammatory videos, like she has done in the past.

It's not thing new, just another bitch in front of the camera.

Now give me Hurricane Katrina, that's a woman I could listen to all goddamn day.

Post: #36

(05-02-2016 03:25 PM)DJ-Matt Wrote:  

(04-30-2016 01:39 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  

(04-30-2016 12:45 PM)Red_Pillage Wrote:  I can't stand all these "ZOMG IM A CUTE GURL ON YOUTUBE WITH LOTZ OF THINGS TO SAY!" bitches. I tried watching the vid in the OP and got about 8 seconds in. If you can sit through that whole video you need to have your T levels checked.


Another example is that shoe on head cunt. She only has a following because she is hot and has more orbiters than a supermassive black hole.

2.) They say what guys want to hear

That's what puzzles me, after looking at a few of the videos' stats, she has an overwhelmingly large number of dislikes on each, most outnumbering the likes by a wide margin. If that's the case, why does she have 337,618 subs?

A lot of people like to "hate watch" content they don't agree with. It is the staring at a train wreck kind of fascination. Yes, it is awful, but they just can't look away. The second reason why she has 300k+ subs is because dudes are thirsty as all get out, given that she is literally an 8 or a 9, in a modern day America where the average woman has the face of a 4-6, and is at least 20 pounds overweight. This is the Pussy Inflation fix. She is getting massive loads of attention because she is literally three or four times hotter than the average American woman when you factor in her looks plus she isn't a fatty. Sad, but true.

Post: #37

(05-02-2016 03:40 PM)kaotic Wrote:  We've already broken down how this bitch works.

She isn't an ally, even if she is spitting truths (which have been known for years on ROK and RVF)

She's another semi famous youtube girl making inflammatory videos, like she has done in the past.

It's not thing new, just another bitch in front of the camera.

Now give me Hurricane Katrina, that's a woman I could listen to all goddamn day.

We convince ourselves they are different because they are marginally attractive and say what we want to hear. Her, Shoe0nhead, whoever.

They are all this:

Post: #38

I wonder if she ever realizes she is part of the problem.

Post: #39

(05-02-2016 03:57 PM)Glaucon Wrote:  I wonder if she ever realizes she is part of the problem.

That would require self-awareness, which she isn't capable of, nor are most narcissistic people in the modern culture we live in. This applies to many men as well. We are all capable of self-delusion.

Post: #40

Stalin made a good point on everything being "casual", but I'd like to peel another layer off that onion.

They are casual because they're SELFISH. A proper relationship isn't easy. Yes there are some amazing ones out there, but they are that way because the spouses involved are mature adults who both put the interests of the family as a whole first. When you are in that mindset there's absolutely no room for narcissism, childish mind games, or instant gratification mindset.

Most millenials are completely incapable of that. When the relationships are all "casual" it means you can put off the grownup behavior as long as possible. When a difficulty does crop up you can then let the relationship die on its own....and you don't lose much because hou didnt invest much.