In case you're not familiar with the story a asian-american NYPD officer, was convicted of shooting a a unarmed black man.
http://news.yahoo.com/chinese-lives-matt...17959.html
Quote:Former officer Liang, a Hong Kong-born cop, just a year and a half on the job, fired his gun in a darkened stairwell in a Brooklyn housing project in late 2014. The bullet, fired accidentally, according to the young officer’s testimony, ricocheted off a wall and killed Akai Gurley, who was visiting his girlfriend and son. Earlier this month, Liang was convicted of manslaughter and official misconduct by a Brooklyn jury. He faces up to 15 years in prison.
I haven't been following the case closely but like in a lot of these cases like the Trayvon Martin case nobody can say with absolutle certainty what happened. I first read about it in a NY Times story where they noted some Chinese-Americans were upset White police officers went free but the one officer they decided to convict was of Chinese descent. I was upset by the story but shrugged because what was anyone going to do?
But something did happen this weekend.
Quote:But from Philadelphia to St. Louis to Los Angeles, Asian-American protesters on Saturday this time decried the conviction of a police officer who shot and killed an unarmed black man. The protesters both have been emboldened by the new age of civil rights and galvanized by what they see as an injustice at least partly brought on by the Black Lives Matter protests.
Now I want to emphasize that even though I am a asian-american (not crazy about that label) I couldn't say Peter Liang is innocent and I'm not 100% behind these protests. But I think whats important here is that the facts of the case are irrelevant. Whether Peter Liang is guilty or not guilty is not the issue, the issue is that as America is becoming more and more balkanized we are devolving into tribes. And in a tribe you must defend your own kind, no matter what as if they were your brother.
The hypocrisy of many (not all) African-Americans is they pretend to be the objective champions of social justice when every stand they take can easily be put into the filter of "They always stand up for other blacks". Its pure tribalism and doesn't have a thing to do with any grand notion of "justice for all". If Peter Liang was black and the black man who was shot: Akai Gurley, was Chinese then the liberal, race obsessed blacks would be standing up for Peter Liang saying he was being scapegoated because he was black and how white officers get away with these types of shootings.
Now I am not saying this to criticise the african-american community at large. Though more homogenous than most I don't think all african-americans act and think this way. There is no perfect label for these types of black people. "SJW Blacks" are inaccurate because a lot of these black activsts dont share the standard affinity for LGBT or transgender rights that SJWs do. In my experience many of them dislike gays and trans people. Its a combination of older black people reacting in a very tribal sense (sticking up for blacks regardless of the facts) + the college indoctrinated SJW young blacks.
But what I really want to talk about is the asian-american reaction or more specificially the Chinese-American reaction. Remember asian-american is a pretty inaccurate term. Indians and East Asians barely have any cultural ties and even among the East Asian Chinese, Korean and Japanese American groups there can be little affinity for each other.
So this was mainly a Chinese-American protest against Peter Liang being scapegoated because he was asian.
Now where it gets confusing is that there are many different factions. I don't claim to be a expert but here is my general sketch of the general factions in the Chinese/Asian Peter Liang protesters.
There are Hardcore SJW Asians, SJW Asians and simply tribal Asians.
Here is a example of the SJW Asian as shown by this young woman
https://twitter.com/ThisIsFusion/status/...6691580929
The SJW Asian believes in white privilege and all the other cultural marxist mumbo jumbo. She belives in the SJW narrative but she sees Peter Liang as a scapegoat of the white controlled society (from her POV). So it would be as if Peter Liang was sent to prison for shooting a unarmed white person.
The Tribal Asians are the asians that dont believe in the SJW/Cultural Marxist narrative they're just sticking up for the asian/Chinese person as a matter of racial loyalty.
The third and final group I want to really focus on are the hardcore "cuck" SJW Asians. This is best exemplified by the infamous SJW troll Arthur Chu. I'm sure you are all familiar with him.
Here is his column demonstrating the absolute cuckold nature of many Asian SJWs.
https://fusion.net/story/164764/not-in-o...-minority/
Quote:I care about the obvious wedge strategy of turning Asians into front-line soldiers in the war against black America so wealthy white people can play “neutral observer.” I care about the protests in support of NYPD Officer Peter Liang that treated his being thrown under the bus by his superiors as somehow being a worse tragedy than Akai Gurley being shot dead for no goddamn reason.
I care about the fact, usually politely talked around by Asian-Americans, that Asian America is willing to be pretty damn racist against black people when we feel like it, and that white supremacist ideology tends to come with an asterisk saying “Asians are OK too.” It bothers me a lot that the white supremacist Pace Amendment proposing the deportation of all non-white Americans made an exception for people who had Asian blood. It bothers me that Dylann Roof was happy at the thought of East Asians “carrying on” the imperialist legacy of the West should the white race die out, that he applauded us as “by nature very racist” and “great allies of the White race.”
Quote:And yes, I continue to argue that means we are oppressed, that there’s ultimately no such thing as a “good” stereotype, that the price we’ve paid for this devil’s deal is too high a price for anyone to pay in the end. I think the ultimate goal should be understanding how the racial hierarchy we live in screws all of us–except for a very few people at the very top–in the end, that there can’t be an Asian-American movement without solidarity with African-Americans. (I’ve tried to write pieces in the past, albeit deeply flawed ones, to this effect.) Even the idea of an “Asian-American identity” was born of Asian solidarity with the black civil rights movement in the 1960s and ‘70s, a history that all too many of us today forget.
But we have to recognize in the end that we did make that deal and we do get “model minority” privileges in return for helping keep other people down. We are complicit. White professors can spout ignorant bullshit about how our hardworking assimilationist ethic proves black people are just whiners because our own leaders have spent years singing the same tune.
I'll spare you any more of that idiotic drivel. But I want to Chu to show the unique war in the Asian-American community regarding social justice.
-Arthur Chu, who is acting like the asian equivalent of a Cuckservative or "Uncle Chan" as Asian Masculinists on Reddit would call him, is saying that asian-americans should not engage in the same identity politics that african-americans do when it is a asian person vs a black person. This is Oppression Olympics at its finest which Chu realizes and lampshaded at the start of the article.
Obviously I recognize that in the end a asian officer killed a unarmed black person so its easy to take the "asians shouldn't protest route" because its hard to take the moral high ground when you are defending someone who killed a person (accidental or not). The fact that he is a police officer makes it even harder.
However Chu is either ignorant or intentionally misleading people because what nobody talks about is that thousands of asians are being assaulted and murdered by blacks every day in the United States.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CzB0e61...inFlaherty
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7ghaWGs...inFlaherty
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MC2FKOJn...ashpulatov
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXvdqwjP...inFlaherty
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHJLmHeC...inFlaherty
Much like black-on-white violence it is either ignored by the media or mentioned without highlighting the races and the persistent nature of it.
Now I want to be very clear. I'm not saying all black people are bad or violent. Obviously you have some bad apples in any group. But what I want to highlight is the complete hypocrisy of Uncle Chan's like Arthur Chu essentially saying asian/Chinese Americans should shut up about Peter Liang because asians dont get oppressed as badly as blacks then listing all the violence done to blacks and acting like the worst racism a asian-american is not getting into Harvard because of Affirmative Action when in fact incredible violence is done to asians by blacks and it is never reported on. You will never see a story of black on asian murder get as much coverage as the Trayvon Martin case because it obviously doesn't fit the narrative.
Also I'm not saying asian individuals or gangs dont engage in violence against blacks or any other group. But from my readings its clear that black on asian violence is very widespread. The obvious reason being that many asians are immigrants who dont speak english and also the sterotype of the meek asian is encouraging these attacks. Now the obvious retort by a SJW would be, don't you think young white males or white gangs attack asians too? No doubt but I don't think its a as prevalent and if there was the same # of young white males beating up asians you'd have Salon or the Guardian or the other SJW rags bombarding us with it nonstop.
My main point is that in this kind of scenario asians have the worst of both worlds. Asian-Americans face racism. There is the typical "ching-chong" joke type of racism/disrespect and there is the actual violence of which only the former is mentioned much by the media. Personally I think the term "racism" has been sucked of all meaning because it has been abused so much. I don't believe in the SJW narrative or a "institutional racism". But I do believe asian-americans face racism and discrimination in its most conservative definition.
So you have that bad side. But when asians try to protest using the same identity politics as african-americans they get shut down. By white SJWs, by liberal/SJW/tribal blacks and by traitorous cuckold scum like Arthur Chu.
Sure Asians can protest racism against them when its WHITE people doint it and they may get some crumbs of support from white/black SJWs but when they go up against a black victim or a situation where its the blacks at fault that's when they hit a wall.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8UTj8lQ...l=RobTrent
What I've noted is the supreme hypocrisy of SJWs mainly whites where they claim to be about equality for all (false). You knew that but many people especially in the alt right think they are anti-white and pro-everyone that is not white. I don't think that's true either. What SJWs follow a inverse pyramid where they hate whites the most because they are the most "privileged" so they are at the very bottom. Now asian-americans because they are fairly successful as a group financially (though not in terms of leadership postions like whites or white jews) are the very next lower group. Obviously you have african-americans at the very apex because their oppression (both legitimate and phony) is so widely publicised.
So white SJWs and liberals when confronted can't tell asians to knock it off because that would be "whitespalining" so they instead use cuck, Uncle Chan collaborators like Arthur Chu or Steph Yin.
Here is a article on this story by Steph Yin.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steph-yin/...89990.html
Quote:I'm a proud Chinese American, but today I am disappointed by those in my community who rallied this weekend in support of Peter Liang, the NYPD officer who killed Akai Gurley and was recently convicted of second-degree manslaughter. My parents and many of their friends attended these rallies or have spoken up in support of Liang. They have stayed silent and very far away from any Black Lives Matter protests, but they find the time to pay attention and show up when it is a member of their community.
Notice she criticises Chinese-Americans for only protesting when its a member of their identity group. As if every racial group besides whites don't do this? That's what happens in balkanized America. You teach everyone to be hyperconscious of their race instead of as Americans that's what they're gonna do.
Most of Black SJW/Social Justice is old fashioned tribalism/group loyalty dressed up as perfectly demonstrated by Black Lives Matter. With the exception of the self-loathing white liberal of which I'm sure you're familiar.
So sorry for the long-winded rant, just had to get that off my chest. As a Asian-American who knows whats really going on in the world I find it sad to see a lot of asian-americans go directly against their interests (like whites) and become SJWs and be lead by the likes of that pile of crap Arthur Chu.
Unlike whites who at least have the advantage of fighting a single front, Asians have to fight a two front war where they have to fight SJWs who want to denigrate their achievements are because the white patriarchy allowed, and take away "asian privilege" in the form of rejecting asians from Ivy League colleges thanks to Affirmative Action aka White Guilt. And of course you have the old fashioned racists on the right. You've seen how Roosh was attacked by the SJW left and the racist right (alt right, Pamela Gellar) for being a person with nonwhite roots.
Quote:(Unfortunately for those of Asian descent, the Yellow card is essentially worthless, as in SJW eyes, Yellow is nothing but an honorary form of White.)
Source: SJWs Always Lie: Taking Down the Thought Police