Post: #1

We got a tip that Mary Honeyball is going to double down on the "pro-rape" and "rape rally" orgy of lies to propose a ban from Schengen. It will probably be officially announced on Monday.

Quote:In a revelation to be dropped within a day or two, a reliable source has told us that a London newspaper will report that Mary Honeyball, a UK Labour Party Member of the European Parliament (MEP), will propose that Roosh and any organizer of the ROK meetups face bans or “visa restrictions” upon trying to enter the EU.

Honeyball intends to outright lie and deceive members of the EU Parliament by portraying ROK as a “pro-rape” group presenting an imminent sexual assault danger to all European women. All this comes as Honeyball and her mainstream colleagues in the European Parliament and other national legislatures do nothing to combat the epidemic of migrant rapes striking Europe and its women.

Our source has stated that Mary Honeyball will present a letter demanding visa restrictions for Roosh and ROK readers who reveal themselves as meetup organizers. As far as we can work out, she will be attaching not a shred of factually based evidence that correlates with or proves the notion that any men involved with the February 6 meetups planned to do anything more than legally gather for beers or other beverages with fellow ROK readers.

http://www.returnofkings.com/80941/europ...rom-europe

If I get banned from Europe while Muslim migrants are invited in, I'll just disguise myself as a refugee to get free housing, money, and a welcome parade by Europeans.

Post: #2

It will be interesting to see who (if anyone) defends you (in any way) or ROK, or free speech in general, in that debate.

Those that have the guts to do that publicly might be silent supporters or even possible future allies.

Post: #3

Our overlord's patience must be growing thin.

They tried the loser narrative ("PUA, MRA basement dwelling losers!"), it didn't work.
Then they tried the moral high ground argument ("How can someone think like that IN THE CURRENT YEAR??"), it didn't work.
Then came the outright lies and that failed too!

This attempt to outright ban you is just desperate at this point.

Post: #4

Ban Roosh and anyone who might challenge the feminazi, man-hating bandwagon! Immigrants who actually do rape women en masse? All are welcome!

Post: #5

(02-21-2016 02:54 PM)Mr West Wrote:  Our overlord's patience must be growing thin.

They tried the loser narrative ("PUA, MRA basement dwelling losers!"), it didn't work.
Then they tried the moral high ground argument ("How can someone think like that IN THE CURRENT YEAR??"), it didn't work.
Then came the outright lies and that failed too!

This attempt to outright ban you is just desperate at this point.

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you..."

Post: #6

Roosh,

if you, or any trusted person you know, or even a girl you are still on very good terms with....has good connections to an MEP who will be present at that debate, now is the time to mobilise them.

Often, single individuals or politicians would LIKE to dissent from the mainstream view, but lack the courage to do so because they feel they are alone in their view.

All it takes is 1 single MEP who is not scared to disagree publicly, to motivate a whole group to then suddenly lose their hesitation in opposing this nonsense.

If an MEP, or someone who knows an MEP on trusted terms is reading this in time....ask them to oppose banning Roosh or ROK supporters in this debate.


Our future is at stake here.

Post: #7

(02-21-2016 03:16 PM)Mercenary Wrote:  Roosh,

if you, or any trusted person you know, or even a girl you are still on very good terms with....has good connections to an MEP who will be present at that debate, now is the time to mobilise them.

Often, single individuals or politicians would LIKE to dissent from the mainstream view, but lack the courage to do so because they feel they are alone in their view.

All it takes is 1 single MEP who is not scared to disagree publicly, to motivate a whole group to then suddenly lose their hesitation in opposing this nonsense.

If an MEP, or someone who knows an MEP on trusted terms is reading this in time....ask them to oppose banning Roosh or ROK supporters in this debate.

First they have tarnished Roosh's good name (in our internet age) with ludicrous, false, made-up "rape-rally" allegations, then they go after him on parliament, sensing that no MEP will dare defend him (because of their previous "rape-rally" allegations).

So it's the culmination of their two-pronged, non-synchronized attack. First, character assassination (through rape-rally allegations). Then a few days later, attack on Roosh's professional-life through visa denying.

All of this appears to have been carefully planned...

Post: #8

(02-21-2016 03:16 PM)Mercenary Wrote:  Roosh,

if you, or any trusted person you know, or even a girl you are still on very good terms with....has good connections to an MEP who will be present at that debate, now is the time to mobilise them.

Often, single individuals or politicians would LIKE to dissent from the mainstream view, but lack the courage to do so because they feel they are alone in their view.

All it takes is 1 single MEP who is not scared to disagree publicly, to motivate a whole group to then suddenly lose their hesitation in opposing this nonsense.

If an MEP, or someone who knows an MEP on trusted terms is reading this in time....ask them to oppose banning Roosh or ROK supporters in this debate.


Our future is at stake here.

It's a pity this guy isn't around anymore:





Based on his other public comments on feminism&women, he seems to be pretty much red pill.

Post: #9

Is it possible for you to sue them in the European Court of Human Rights? These guys and their respective official bodies are loaded and could provide a massive payout if you won a case.

Post: #10

Wikipedia dixit:

Wikipedia Wrote:she had not been elected in the European Parliament Election, 1999, but replaced Pauline Green who resigned as an MEP in November 1999

She is someone who has not even rightfully obtained her office.

Wikipedia Wrote:When commenting on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill in May 2008, Honeyball asked whether ministers should be allowed to sit on the front bench of government if they are committed Roman Catholics.In the same article, Honeyball also said that Catholicism exercised a "vice-like grip" on the legislative processes over large parts of Continental Europe, blocking women in Ireland and Portugal's right to abortion.
The remarks were cited as a contributory reason for the resignation of Conor McGinn, the vice chairman of Young Labour, who described it as a "sectarian diatribe".

A nice resume of an extremist agenda totting politician of second rate apparently.

The question is:
How much influence does this woman command?

More importantly:
How much more of her dirty laundry is hanging around the webz ?
The wikipedia article is already pretty damning

Post: #11

(02-21-2016 03:45 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  Is it possible for you to sue them in the European Court of Human Rights? These guys and their respective official bodies are loaded and could provide a massive payout if you won a case.

Of course it's possible, but by the time you get a verdict in your favour YEARS will pass while the ban is still in place.



Guys, do you realise how serious this is ?!

If this ban is approved by the Euopean Parliament, Roosh and ROK supporters will be banned in more than 25 different countries.


...

Post: #12

Is the Human Rights commission the only way I can appeal?

Post: #13

(02-21-2016 03:54 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Is the Human Rights commission the only way I can appeal?

You could also contact an immigration solicitor in either the UK or the EU about potential obstacles.

Post: #14

It sucks, but how many EU member states are you going to want to visit soon anyway? And how many current EU states will remain that way? Don't forget:
-your beloved Poland is taking a hard line against immigration
-the Czech president has had nothing but bad things to say about resettlement
-Hungary has condemned EU directorates
-the UK is either going to leave or force a renegotiation of membership
-Germany is fed up of making bailout payments and other assistance to the PIGS, and popular opposition to other issues is increasing
-the PIGS aren't too impressed themselves (at least their citizens- I haven't heard anything from the various governments other than Greece)
-even in Sweden the worm is turning
All of which indicates that the EU will have to change enormously to survive or vanish altogether. Regardless, you'll be the least of Honeyball's worries either way in a year or so.
And the only states that take this seriously will not be attractive places to live or visit.

Post: #15

She isnt that very popular either.
In any event it could prove interesting to get in contact with the various catholic labour party members she has rather drastically offended


warning: articles are from 2008
http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008...bour-party
http://dolphinarium.blogspot.de/2008/06/...nn-on.html

Post: #16

(02-21-2016 03:54 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Is the Human Rights commission the only way I can appeal?

If you have a European friend, relative or business partner (who could appeal in your name), he or they may try appealing with the EU ombudsman.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Ombudsman

"Any EU citizen or entity may appeal the Ombudsman to investigate an EU institution on the grounds of maladministration: administrative irregularities, unfairness, discrimination, abuse of power, failure to reply, refusal of information or unnecessary delay. The Ombudsman can not investigate the European Court of Justice in its judicial capacity, the General Court, the Civil Service Tribunal, national and regional administrations (even where EU law is concerned), judiciaries, private individuals or corporations"

Post: #17

The EU in general and the parliament in particular is mostly occupational therapy for the political equivalents of the village idiot, sent there so the member states' national parties can get rid of them, or a reward for loyal cadres, who enjoy a good life with taxpayers' money.

I doubt this woman will be able to get a resolution passed, especially on banning an individual on completely made up charges, and even if so, it would be just a recommendation and not binding law. The EU parliament is a paper tiger.

Post: #18

This list shows there are 41 people banned from the EU:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:P...pean_Union

They are all Serbian and Russian politicians.

Post: #19

(02-21-2016 02:24 PM)Roosh Wrote:  We got a tip that Mary Honeyball is going to double down on the "pro-rape" and "rape rally" orgy of lies to propose a ban from Schengen.

Christ, her name sounds like some sort of new feminist villain from a James Bond movie. Well, I guess this impacts a large group of us, including yours truly, who did participate as meetup organizers. Although I maintain this anonymous identity, I have proclaimed the fact that I helped with the organization in several different platforms, and remain fiercely proud of doing so. So much so, in fact, that I could be willing to drop my anonymity if it would help your case at all Roosh, and I'm sure there are others that feel the same way I do. I think a few of us are in a "I am Spartacus" kind of mood. They can fucking bring it.

I know Nigel Farage is also a British MEP... he might be a useful ally in this. I suppose perhaps Paul Weston of Pegida UK and maybe Tommy Robinson might be willing to help too. In any event, PM me if there's anything I can do.

Post: #20

(02-21-2016 05:03 PM)Roosh Wrote:  This list shows there are 41 people banned from the EU:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:P...pean_Union

They are all Serbian and Russian politicians.

But what a badass badge of honour it would be to be on that list, eh? Count me in! They probably have some wild club member parties somewhere in the Siberian gulag surrounded by gorgeous blonde Russian women! Let the vodka flow Roosh!

Post: #21

(02-21-2016 03:45 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  Is it possible for you to sue them in the European Court of Human Rights? These guys and their respective official bodies are loaded and could provide a massive payout if you won a case.

There may be some traction there. The ECHR already says Roosh wouldn't be responsible for reader comments on one of his web sites.

Of course, it all depends how far they push the envelope of "hate speech" definitions.

Alternatively, Roosh should either claim refugee status or get married to some girl in the Schengen area, then apply for citizenship as soon as possible. It'd be difficult to keep him out once he's entitled to a passport.

Post: #22

(02-21-2016 05:25 PM)SlickyBoy Wrote:  Alternatively, Roosh should either claim refugee status or get married to some girl in the Schengen area, then apply for citizenship as soon as possible. It'd be difficult to keep him out once he's entitled to a passport.

There are dozens of other ways to get a 2nd citizenship without resorting to this.

Post: #23

(02-21-2016 05:03 PM)Roosh Wrote:  This list shows there are 41 people banned from the EU:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:P...pean_Union

They are all Serbian and Russian politicians.

Big shout out to Serbia from this Russian right here. Our Orthodox brethren.

I can't fucking stand the EU. The faggoty French and pussy-ass Germans.

Italians are cool in my book but that's about it

Post: #24

This is a stunt. I doubt it will get any relevance to be honest.

She has zero to no importance in the EP so she is pulling this little trick to raise up some strings. This is a serious thing and not some SJW fuckwittery festival, the EU is terrible, but this would be a long stretch.

Post: #25

Do we have someone here in her district that can run against her?
If not, can someone go find someone to run against her and make it a point in the campaign to make this an issue?

This idiot needs to be driven from office. She can't even be bothered to look at the facts or the issues. We know she didn't read the article. Someone needs to find a list of her financial contributors and staff, and inform them of what she is doing and that she is trying to bring Orwell 1984 to life.

What the hell does being a member of ROK even mean? One who contributes to the site? One who buys a Roosh book? One who posts here? Someone who reads the board? Or is it changeable depending on 'how she feels'?

They have people making their way all the way across Europe from the Middle East to get the higher level of benefits in England but now they are going to start a witch hunt to track us (and me) down for talking? F them.

These people need to be unmercifully mocked so everyone around them knows what kind of militant fascists there are, and they are all driven from office. They all need to be discredited so this kind of idiotic behavior stops. None of us here wanted or cared about politics before, but apparently the machinery of the state is going to be set in motion against all of us by the SJWs and the cucks that refuse to put the SJW in their place. (In the past, SJWs would have been seen for the lying crazies they are; not today, the cucks all fall over themselves trying to please them and put their insane ideas into action.)

I don't know about the rest of you, but I am not going to take it anymore. I has hope that even after that absurd Gari post that would be the worst of it, but all of these people need to be mocked endlessly until they are discredited. We are right and they are wrong. It is the only way these attacks are going to stop. They are just going to keep after us until they 'win' and even then will keep going and pushing whatever they can get away with. None of them will be happy until every man on the planet is in some kind of concentration camp or so drugged up they can't think or do anything. (Of course, everything will fail at that point, but it will be too late and some of them may even say 'you should have stopped us' One article written by a former feminist recounts who in her 60s, when she realized how she messed up with her life and others around her, made this remark. The man she was talking to said,"We tried to [stop the militant feminist ideology] but couldn't".)

I expect that Gari isn't going to do anything, even after getting the letter from the lawyer. She will sit there with typical passive/aggressive militant feminist behavior and come up with all kinds of wacky justifications as to how she is doing nothing wrong and shouldn't have to retract anything, mostly because of how she 'feels'.

I think this sums up how I feel.
Bluto's Speech from Animal House :




I have not even read the full text of what they are proposing or they are doing with ROK restriction, but I expect, if nothing is done, they will continue to 'crank it up over time'.

I wouldn't be surprised if they start to convince some of the United States agencies to start 'looking into ROK' and its members; meanwhile people planning all kinds of other stuff are ignored or resources are diverted because the 'womyn feel' that ROK is more important of a threat. (Until someday someone does a repeat of the Boston bombing or something even worse because they diverted so much resources based on what a bunch of irrational womyn think, that it effected other investigations.)

I have gone much further in the emotion of this posting, than I usually would, and hope people will understand that I find it infuriating that anyone would think they have the right to tell me who I can or can't talk to, or what I can and can't read; especially given the fact that none of these people even seem to be interested in reading the article.

I think none of them care what the article says is because they (politicians) all see this as a crisis that they can use to further their reach and power. Who cares if there even was an article, as long as they have the support of the mob to put through whatever measures and laws they want? And the SWJs would be happy if they would get multiple agencies across the globe to start hunting every last one of us down?

That is why I think none of them care about reading the article, but I believe that if we put it out there what is going on, mock and discredit everyone that is 'on board' with the SJWs, then the situation can be turned around.