Post: #1

Swedes failed the test. "Co jest kurwa" is the winner.

Post: #2

Most of the men appear dumbfounded, absolutely no reaction.

Post: #3

So I gather the message is to shame Swedish men to defend women from violent immigrants. Even though women overwhelmingly voted leftist and let immigrants in.

That's just 1 man so it's easier for people to intervene, try a gang of 4 which is a more likely scenario since the immigration crisis. No sane man is going to stick up for a strange woman or two in that situation.

Post: #4

I don't know what to say about this. On one hand, the passerbys are pussified and passive. On the other hand, this is more of a harassment. It seems that she wasn't getting slapped, beaten or othervise violently assaulted as the video title implies, and that would have surely provoked more reactions.

Post: #5

Yep, and the guy playing the attacker appeared to be white and Swedish. Not a good test. Try it with a brown guy not speaking Swedish and see what happens. My optimistic side hopes that he'd get his ass beat, but I kind of doubt it.

Post: #6

I get an intense feeling of wanting to blindside that guy with a full force hook to the jaw and start stomping the shit out of him. But then again, I left Scandinavia because I don't really feel like the normal feminized male there. And it's just become crazier. I'll be back when the revolution is around the corner.

One thing I would never interrupt is domestic violence. Almost to the point where the woman is getting killed right in front of me. Her choice, and the excuses are bullshit. Yes you can run away, and yes you did know he was violent. You just liked a violent man, and now, as an adult, you need to take the consequences. Besides, women usually choose to stick with violent men so it won't make any difference if you beat up some random "bad guy", and even if you kill him she'll probably find another man who beats her. The normal result is if you intervene, the violence turns her on, and they have good sex afterward. No thanks.

And yes, the normal scenario is a gang of immigrants where some are armed, so even if you're an advanced martial artist you're pretty much screwed acting alone, unless you carry a gun. Which, of course, is strictly forbidden and severely punished.

Post: #7

So in a country where men are vilified for being men and are being told that women are perfectly equal and can do everything they can, they are now being vilified for letting those women fend for themselves?

Post: #8

(02-20-2016 08:23 AM)zigZag Wrote:  So in a country where men are vilified for being men and are being told that women are perfectly equal and can do everything they can, they are now being vilified for letting those women fend for themselves?

Whoa, whoa, what are you doing? Didn't you know using logic is a punishable offense in feminist-land?

Post: #9

Funny thing that one guy green was security and he did jack shit. It was the guy with a green shirt and hat with väktare written on it.

Post: #10

To protect a woman from violence means to expose my body to the risk if physical harm

Women need to understand they're not entitled to my body.

Post: #11

(02-20-2016 09:56 AM)T and A Man Wrote:  To protect a woman from violence means to expose my body to the risk if physical harmRE: Violence against women in Sweden (social experiment)
Funny thing that one guy green was security and he did jack shit. It was the guy with a green shirt and hat with väktare written on it.

Women need to understand they're not entitled to my body.

Congratulations. I guess it's guys like you who uphold traditional masculine values like.. what, actually?

I don't respect any able-bodied man who actively refuses to help when innocents get attacked. Even when the attacked are Swedish feminists.

Speaking of cultural decline.

Post: #12

(02-20-2016 10:04 AM)Flint Wrote:  

(02-20-2016 09:56 AM)T and A Man Wrote:  To protect a woman from violence means to expose my body to the risk if physical harmRE: Violence against women in Sweden (social experiment)
Funny thing that one guy green was security and he did jack shit. It was the guy with a green shirt and hat with väktare written on it.

Women need to understand they're not entitled to my body.

Congratulations. I guess it's guys like you who uphold traditional masculine values like.. what, actually?

I don't respect any able-bodied man who actively refuses to help when innocents get attacked. Even when the attacked are Swedish feminists.

Speaking of cultural decline.

They aren't innocent. They voted for it, now they can reap what they've sown.

Post: #13

(02-20-2016 07:36 AM)Malone Wrote:  Yep, and the guy playing the attacker appeared to be white and Swedish. Not a good test. Try it with a brown guy not speaking Swedish and see what happens. My optimistic side hopes that he'd get his ass beat, but I kind of doubt it.

You've got it totally backwards I think. People will feel confident to stand up to a White Swedish guy at least, because they won't fear being called racist.

If this guy was totally brown/black, then everyone would be running away in fear.

Post: #14

Dumb ass, I'll protect older women, I'll protect modestly dressed women.

I won't protect women that have tats, ir dress like sluts.

Part of that masculine value is to endorse what's is valuable. Its called a social compact, and its masculine to adhere and protect standards, rather than blindly accept a cry to "man up".

Women get conditioned to be cunts, when there is no adverse consequences to their behaviour.

Post: #15

(02-20-2016 10:04 AM)Flint Wrote:  

(02-20-2016 09:56 AM)T and A Man Wrote:  To protect a woman from violence means to expose my body to the risk if physical harmRE: Violence against women in Sweden (social experiment)
Funny thing that one guy green was security and he did jack shit. It was the guy with a green shirt and hat with väktare written on it.

Women need to understand they're not entitled to my body.

Congratulations. I guess it's guys like you who uphold traditional masculine values like.. what, actually?

I don't respect any able-bodied man who actively refuses to help when innocents get attacked. Even when the attacked are Swedish feminists.

Speaking of cultural decline.

People like you who wanna defend women no matter how shitty their behavior is, create these women. When a woman attacks a man and he defends himself and you rush in blindly to attacking the man. Women become emboldened to continue.

When You say that we should protect women no matter what, they feel entitled to your protection.

So no, these guys did the right thing keeping to themselves and not white knighting. This is the new social contract.

Post: #16

(02-20-2016 10:16 AM)Samseau Wrote:  They aren't innocent. They voted for it, now they can reap what they've sown.

So, by default you can safely assume that those women voted for feminism and mass immigration? I wish I had your cold reading skills.

Quote:People like you who wanna defend women no matter how shitty their behavior is, create these women. When a woman attacks a man and he defends himself and you rush in blindly to attacking the man. Women become emboldened to continue.

When you see a stranger getting attacked in the subway or in the pedestrian zone you have no clue of their backstory. You need to make an ad hoc decision and, yes, you could be wrong. Was the girl a mentally ill bitch attacking a guy? Was the guy getting kicked to the ground a pedophile or a thief?

In the heat of the moment you usually cannot know that. I made the decision to always side with the weaker part when I witness such an incident. You may find that naive or consider it whiteknighting, but that's my code of ethics and so far I did well with it. I rather try to protect a potential idiot or someone who actually does not deserve it than just passing by and congratulating myself for not taking a risk.

Quote:Dumb ass, I'll protect older women, I'll protect modestly dressed women.

I won't protect women that have tats, ir dress like sluts.

In your original post, you spoke of women in general.

But great, feel free to stride through life with that attitude. I have no problem to extend the courtesy to a girl with ugly tattoos.

Post: #17

(02-20-2016 02:39 PM)Flint Wrote:  

(02-20-2016 10:16 AM)Samseau Wrote:  They aren't innocent. They voted for it, now they can reap what they've sown.

So, by default you can safely assume that those women voted for feminism and mass immigration? I wish I had your cold reading skills.

You don't need much of a cold reading ability.

http://www.thelocal.se/20151201/sweden-d...inion-poll

Swedish Democrats are the only ones who want to end mass immigration.

Quote:The Sweden Democrats’ support is still split very unevenly on gender lines. 24.3 percent of men support the nationalist party, compared to just 15.4 percent of women.

And given how we know that universities are responsible for the indoctrination of women, it's safe to assume those 15% of women who support the SD are rural Swedish women and not the ones who attend the universities at the big cities. We also know young women are 10x more likely to vote left as well. Therefore if you see a young Swedish woman in a big city, the odds are astronomical she voted for a leftist politician responsible for destroying Sweden.

Why save her at your own expense? Unfortunately, that pretty young girl is your enemy.

Post: #18

Flint, if you want change to come there needs to be collateral damage. You cannot have a good percentage of the population ignorant on issues such as these and then expect strangers to step up who risk harm to themselves and almost certain state reprisals.

- The woman who used mace to defend herself against a rapist? She was fined and warned by the police.
- The mother who allowed migrants into her home, telling her children to be understanding? An iraqi migrant raped one of her children because he needed to get his rocks off
- The young, dumb American liberal girls who ended up with their heads caved in after fucking some third world savage?
- Cologne?
- The numerous gang rapes?

All of this is collateral damage. It needs to happen for people to examine their own delusions and Disney land world view. Here we are, a group of nations that for many decades now has seen peace. We then invite barbarians into our countries and expect them to play by the rules.

The third world is the third world because of these types of people. We will never get the best of those countries but instead we get the violence. If you faced death in your home country for rape and thievery, why wouldn;t you travel a few thousands miles to a place that gives you a slap on the wrist for it, has better looking women and very few if any people who will kill you for it.

These migrants are smart and ruthless in this way. No death squads in Europe.

Post: #19

I say way to go Swedish dudes.

My personal policy is whenever you see something like that, either find a cop/security guard/authority figure/dumber guy than you.

In my younger days I would have been all over the alleged attacker. Not in this day and age.

About two years ago I saw some cracked out looking man smacking around a cracked out looking woman. I got in the middle and stopped it. Right when the cops happened to get there, with the guy laying on the ground, the crackwoman yells "This guy attacked us" and pointed at me. The cop saw through it, and nothing happened, but I've been in way too many situations just like that.

If I see something I know is off, like the person getting attacked is a friend or family member, or it's just outrageously obvious, then a different story.

But the woman in the brown coat with the kids at the beginning clearly made the first move, all be it small. You never know with something like that. It could be the baby's daddy, or something like that.

I do hear Swedish jail is nice but Honolulu sucks, so never again for me.

Aloha!

Post: #20

I don't understand people who would help the woman.
She's a stranger, you have nothing to win to fight her abusive BF, everything to loose.

Even if you were 100% sure you could beat his ass / restrain him without a scratch, you could still go to jail.
Do you think the woman will vounch for you?
You can bet she won't.

If today I see a strange woman getting attacked, I won't bat an eye.
Nor will I feel any remorse.

PS : exception for women in my family.

Post: #21

Not only would I not help the woman, I may join the attacker.

Joking. But as was already mentioned, a woman with an abusive boyfriend picked him for a reason.

Post: #22

Quote:In your original post, you spoke of women in general.

I also expressed it in an incentive perspective, "women aren't entitled to my body".

This means that my protection should not be viewed as a default position, but something they need to earn

Quote:But great, feel free to stride through life with that attitude. I have no problem to extend the courtesy to a girl with ugly tattoos.

Great, feel free to go through life with no standards.

Talk about cultural decline.

Post: #23

(02-20-2016 03:27 PM)Samseau Wrote:  And given how we know that universities are responsible for the indoctrination of women, it's safe to assume those 15% of women who support the SD are rural Swedish women and not the ones who attend the universities at the big cities. We also know young women are 10x more likely to vote left as well. Therefore if you see a young Swedish woman in a big city, the odds are astronomical she voted for a leftist politician responsible for destroying Sweden.

Why save her at your own expense? Unfortunately, that pretty young girl is your enemy.

Firstly, SD as of today doesn't want to end mass immigration. They just want it lowered to the level of Norway, which is still suicidally high, just not quite as suicidal. They used to be a nationalist party, now all the nationalists have been purged. SD is the strongest Israel/zionist supporting party in Sweden, they have the most in common with the Christian right, who, of course, are usually barely noticable in immigration policy from anyone else in Northern Europe.

Secondly, you seem to assume that everyone votes. Well, only 2/3 do. And you can make the case that not voting is the only right thing to do now, since SD is a sham party suckering moderate nationalists (ie. normal people in the rest of the world) into supporting a system that itself is the problem.

Post: #24

(02-21-2016 01:22 AM)Lechon Wrote:  

(02-20-2016 03:27 PM)Samseau Wrote:  And given how we know that universities are responsible for the indoctrination of women, it's safe to assume those 15% of women who support the SD are rural Swedish women and not the ones who attend the universities at the big cities. We also know young women are 10x more likely to vote left as well. Therefore if you see a young Swedish woman in a big city, the odds are astronomical she voted for a leftist politician responsible for destroying Sweden.

Why save her at your own expense? Unfortunately, that pretty young girl is your enemy.

Firstly, SD as of today doesn't want to end mass immigration. They just want it lowered to the level of Norway, which is still suicidally high, just not quite as suicidal.

Even lower immigration would help move the pendulum to the right. More rightest policies can form after a party like SD becomes dominant.

Quote: They used to be a nationalist party, now all the nationalists have been purged. SD is the strongest Israel/zionist supporting party in Sweden, they have the most in common with the Christian right, who, of course, are usually barely noticable in immigration policy from anyone else in Northern Europe.

Link?

Quote:Secondly, you seem to assume that everyone votes. Well, only 2/3 do. And you can make the case that not voting is the only right thing to do now, since SD is a sham party suckering moderate nationalists (ie. normal people in the rest of the world) into supporting a system that itself is the problem.

I would argue those who don't vote are also part of the problem.

People who don't care about politics don't care about their neighbor. A society is only strong if it's neighbors love each other. So people who refuse to vote for their neighbors best interests: Why should anyone go out of their way to help them out of danger?

The only people I would help are those that I know, and those under the voting age. Anyone else would most likely be a waste of time.

Post: #25

(02-21-2016 01:22 AM)Lechon Wrote:  They used to be a nationalist party, now all the nationalists have been purged. SD is the strongest Israel/zionist supporting party in Sweden, they have the most in common with the Christian right, who, of course, are usually barely noticable in immigration policy from anyone else in Northern Europe.

Link?

From Jerusalem Post:

However, starting from 1995 the party underwent major reform that changed it completely. In 1999, they officially rejected Nazism; in 2001, all radical groups were completely expelled from the party. In the last elections, the party won 12.9 percent in the Swedish parliament and 9.7% in the European Parliament, making it the third largest party in Sweden.

[While it is true that SD had a radical nationalist start and some members were neo nazi/racist, the purgings that still go on also affect moderate nationalists, that is to say, just normal people with a normal sense of pride in the rest of the world.]

The party officially bans anti-Semitism.

As part of the popular right in Europe, Sweden Democrats cooperate with the UK Independence Party, promoting a new immigration policy in Europe. Party leader Jimmy Åkesson has fought Jew-hatred straight from assuming office in 2005.

["A new immigration policy". Basically one less caustic than the one other parties in Sweden, looser than the US and about the same as Norway, which is drowning in refugees too.]

He argues that Muslim immigration is the biggest threat to the country since World War II.

[Securing the nationalist vote.]

During Operation Protective Edge, Åkesson expressed his support for Israel, saying that “Hamas uses civilians as human shields, we support the right of Israel to defend itself.”

MANY DO not know, but the party actually has a Jewish representative in the parliament, Kenth Ekeroth, fighting against Jew-hatred and Islamization.

[Out with the old, in with the new. Kenth Ekeroth was scandalized in the "iron pipe"-incident, one of a kind in Swedish politics in recent years, yet out of the three participants, one is dead after an apparent overdose and being forced out in a separate purge, one was forced to quit the party, rescinded his membership and left the country, while Kenth took a 2 month break from active duties and is still a front figure. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_pipe_scandal ]

The Sweden Democrats are known to be pro-Israeli.

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/The-pro-Isr...den-379139

I don't have an easy to read English article about the purgings of nationalists, but if you read the wikipedia section from 1995 and onwards, you can see all the people who were thrown out for being "too radical". And again, some were extremists, but others weren't.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweden_Democrats