(01-28-2016 02:32 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  Goodbye Sweden. Just look at this comment:

Quote:Most Swedes, me included, are proud that we look beyond branding people evil*, which is ridiculous. No one is born a criminal. Things happen, bad things happen, people do bad stuff, but evil is not some tangible immutable thing. Well said Eliasson. Hopefully the boy gets the help he needs, and the woman's family get all the support they need. One doesn't exclude the other. Hail humanism!

* Unless they're at all affiliated with the Right, in which case they're Satan Incarnate.

(01-28-2016 02:04 AM)JWLZG Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 01:45 AM)spokepoker Wrote:  Almost seems like that sign should have an arabic translation on it, like how we have mexican translation on everything around here.

"Mexican" isn't a language.

It is over here.
I can understand mexican just fine, but I can only make out every third word in spanish.

I don't know if this was posted but it's very funny:

edit

I hope this is not a dupe, it may have been covered in this thread. I see articles being shared on Facebook like this one:

10 Reasons Why You Should Not Fear Muslims

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/omar-alnat...5746.html?

These articles make the claim that the majority of terrorism, worldwide and in the US, is in fact not done by Islamic people/is not jihad. Another article even said that most terrorism is done by white nationalists. I think there has to be some serious statistic manipulation here. I cannot imagine they are counting death tolls, and count any minor white nationalist incident or protest as a terrorist incident.

Does anyone have the real numbers and stats from a legit source? I know Islam has been on a rampage since its inception. That is what it does. Let's get some real numbers. Or, maybe we will get to the bottom and find these articles are true. Hence I don't think this is race baiting or even religion bating. I just want to know for sure to what extent these articles are BS or not.

There may just be hope for Sweden yet:

Sweden to expel up to 80,000 refugees

Quote:Sweden intends to expel as many as 80,000 refugees and migrants who arrived in 2015 and whose applications for asylum have been rejected.

"We are talking about 60,000 people, but the number could climb to 80,000," Interior Minister Anders Ygeman was quoted as saying by Swedish media.

He added on Wednesday the government has asked police and authorities in charge of refugees to organise their expulsion.

Sweden, which is home to 9.8 million people, is one of the European Union countries that has taken in the largest number of refugees in relation to its population. Sweden accepted more than 160,000 asylum seekers last year.

But the number of refugee arrivals has dropped dramatically since Sweden enacted systematic photo ID checks on travellers on January 4.

The mass expulsion was announced as Europe struggles to deal with a crisis that has seen tens-of-thousands of refugees arrive on Greek beaches with the passengers - mostly fleeing conflict in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan - undeterred by cold, wintry conditions and deadly seas.

The UN says more than 46,000 people have arrived in Greece so far this year, with more than 170 people killed making the dangerous crossing.

Controlling movement

Ygeman said the expulsions - normally carried out using commercial flights - would have to be done using specially chartered aircraft, given the large numbers, staggered over several years.

Swedish officials on Tuesday called for greater security at overcrowded asylum centres, a day after the fatal stabbing of an employee at a facility for unaccompanied youths.

The death led to questions about overcrowded conditions inside some centres, with too few adults and employees to take care of children, many traumatised by war.

In neighbouring Denmark, meanwhile, the government this week approved legislation to seize the valuables of refugees to help pay for resettlement costs.

Perhaps the first of the coming mass deportations. The only way to solve this without going Starship Troopers or surrendering to Camp of the Saints.

Unfortunately "over several years" is a long time.

Of course they use a picture of a woman and child below the headline.

(01-27-2016 06:09 PM)LEMONed IScream Wrote:  http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/01/...be-at-war/

Oh myyyyyy.

This is so ambiguous. Who are the enemies?

Quote:“The global environment we are experiencing which is also demonstrated by strategic decisions [taken by politicians] leads us to the conclusion we could be at war within a few years”.

They blame the politicians for creating the environment they are in... will these guys try and throw a coup? They would be necessitated to do so. Once Muslims begin large scale assaults on small towns (not to mention the current hundreds of thousands of unreported crimes every year, including tens of thousands of rapes) and start burning them down the Swedish military will be forced to defend. This means attacking and destroying Islamic neighborhoods.

But this also means closing down the borders (and not just the cuck borders they currently have) with lethal force. But if they actually stop the flow of Muslims, this means the liberal politicians will be unable to increase their source of power.

Thus, the left will arm the Muslims against their own Swedish military once it becomes apparent that they are losing control. This type of Civil Warfare will spread to every European country with open borders. Again, I predicted this all back on Nov. 3rd because I understand how

1. Talmudic Jews operate (divide and conquer).
2. Traitors operate (all they want is power at any cost, they are true sociopaths which is what describes the left).
3. Muslims operate (they are "the beast" described in the book of revelations, they have been the same for 1400 years, they have done more genocides and more conquests than any other group of people on the planet by a landslide).

The question is what should the USA do? Help out these countries who are complete failures? There is no point in helping out Europe unless we institutionalize a 1st and 2nd amendment on this pozzed out population, which they would probably work to resist even if we did help them. Again, it would probably be easiest to let them die and just take the White refugees who actually understand American values and can assimilate here. Then, once all the productive Whites are gone, Europe will be unable to support the Muslims, and they will starve out. Once their numbers have depleted, the continent can be recolonized as new American states.

Samseau takes the most insane leaps of faith I have ever seen any person do.

Really.

Moto, below is a comment I posted on an SJWs status several months ago concerning an article about how white nationalists are more dangerous than Muslims. Let's just say some heads exploded. The links to the bullshit "studies" from these "think tanks" can be found here. I do some basic math regarding casualties in the comment, but you should also look at what incidents they considered to be white terrorist attacks. For example, years ago there was a guy in Austin that lost his job or something, so he burned his house down and flew his personal plane into an IRS building. That was considered a terrorist attack.

"So this article is yet another reason I point to as to why the "statistics" that today's "think tanks" put out are quite meaningless and are merely a vehicle used to propagate an opinion. The point this article makes is that nearly twice as many people have been killed by right wing attacks vs jihadist attacks (48 to 26) since 9/11, as a result, that's where our concern should lie. However, using the data from the New America Foundations study (reference http://securitydata.newamerica.net/extre...tacks.html) I can dick around with the statistics to paint whatever picture I want. For instance, let's take kill ratio on a per incident basis. There were 19 right wing incidents resulting in 48 deaths, 48/19=2.53. There were 7 jihadist incidents resulting in 26 deaths, 26/7=3.71. 3.71/2.53=1.47, so 1.47 times as many people are killed on average in a jihadist attack vs a right wing attack, but that doesn't sound good enough....147% more people are killed on average in a jihadist attack vs a right wing attack! We can also do it on a per perpetrator basis.....the average jihadist kills 2.17 people per incident and the right winger 1.5 per incident, an increase of 144% omg! Then of course we can back this up to 1995 let's say, then it all goes to shit. Totaling up right wing attacks (reference http://www.adl.org/assets/pdf/combating-...5-2015.pdf) we get 35 incidents resulting in 241 deaths (the OK City bombing causing the jump in casualties). For jihadist attacks, just including 9/11 and nothing else before 2001, we get 8 attacks and 3003 deaths. That's a 1,246% increase in the number of deaths! And again we can play with the whole per incident/perpetrator basis but you see where this is going. And that ladies and gentlemen, is your introductory lesson to propaganda."

(01-28-2016 08:39 AM)LEMONed IScream Wrote:  Samseau takes the most insane leaps of faith I have ever seen any person do.

Really.

What's the point of posting if you do not support reasons for your thoughts? No one can reply to this and it does not offer any conversation. This is the definition of a bad post.

(01-28-2016 08:39 AM)LEMONed IScream Wrote:  Samseau takes the most insane leaps of faith I have ever seen any person do.

Really.

Samseau tends to be right a lot, too. Maybe not leaps of faith, but rather educated guesses.

Looks like there are celebrities left who have the balls to speak up against the ongoing madness.
Remember Felix Baumgartner?

That guy:



A few days ago he posted this on his Facebook account:



"A country where you are fined for fishing without a license but where people cross the border without passports is run by idiots"

Of course he was attacked by Refugees Welcome hyenas but instead of apologizing he showed real Alpha qualities and wrote a longer response where he basically told them to go fuck themselves.

More info here:

https://www.rt.com/news/330256-baumgartn...s-america/

Quote:In concluding his two-page long post, Baumgartner suggested giving the Nobel Peace Prize to Hungary’s PM Viktor Orban, who, he said, has done the “right thing” and “protected” his people. He also questioned whether US President Barack Obama, who was awarded the prize in 2009, really deserved it. "

Like Trump, this guy realizes that you ALWAYS lose if you apologize. Never apologize if you're right!

Latest news from the BBC, a man with two guns, a box of ammo, and a copy of the Koran has been arrested at Disney Land Paris. Strict gun control again doing a fantastic job of ensuring bad guys can't get guns.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-35431086

A little refresher on what Felix Baumgartner is banging:





http://www.returnofkings.com/231/picture...icole-oetl

And now, for some much needed humor. The new Angry Red Birds movie is going to Red Pill the masses about the Islamic invasion of Europe:





The trailer was released two days ago, and it's going mass viral thanks to /pol/ and reddit.

Top comment:

Quote:Pigs = Muslims and Africans
Ostracized red bird who has anger issues = German Citizen
Owl living in delusion that nothing is wrong = Merkel
Eggs = Future native European population being stolen and replaced
Yellow and Black Birds = Right Wing Polish and Serbian Citizens
Eagle = Donald Trump

(01-28-2016 08:05 AM)Libertas Wrote:  There may just be hope for Sweden yet:

Sweden to expel up to 80,000 refugees

I seriously doubt it.

First, look at the the subtle quantifier of the title, namely up to. Technically speaking, they can expel 0 migrants and the statement - Sweden to expel up to 80,000 - would still remain true.

Second, the government of Sweden has been completely taken over by SJWs. The first law of SJWs is that they always lie. The SJW Swedish government could claim that they weren't lying when they fail to deport any migrant after making the above statement. Nonetheless, the Swedish SJW government is definitely lying about its intention to expel all the migrants from Sweden. Remember, a Swedish minister cried when she realizes that Sweden can no longer accept anymore refugees.

Third, even if the Swedish government wasn't run by SJWs, the liberal democratic governments of the West fail to solve even the most basic problems. The migrant invasion is not a recent problem. About, twenty-five years ago, the problems associated with immigration in Europe and America started to arise during the late 1980's and early 1990's. What did our modern liberal democratic governments do? At best nothing. At worst, their policies exacerbated the problem. Reagan granted the illegals in America amnesty. Subsequently, a few years later California granted illegals some rights. Meanwhile, in Europe, the leaders promised to limit immigrants and be stricter on assimilation. Nonetheless, they all failed to stop all immigration. This is why after all this time Japan is still Japan meanwhile the West no longer resembles the West.

Like I said before, in order for the West to save itself it must reaffirm its historical traditions, culture, and identity. The only way I see that happening is through a cultural/political revolution in which expunges the assumptions of egalitarianism and reaffirms its identity.

Back to the regularly scheduling programing of depressing reality:

http://www.dw.com/en/online-anti-refugee...a-19005888

Online anti-refugee posts lead to offline visits by Dutch police

Quote:In rare instances, Dutch police are knocking on social media users' doors and asking them to be careful writing posts about refugees that could lead to real-life violence and, ultimately, to charges of online incitement.

One example is Mark Jongeneel, a small business owner in the small city of Sliedrecht who tweeted his reaction to asylum plans in his city:

"The college of Sliedrecht has a proposal to receive 250 refugees in the coming 2 years. What a bad plan! #letusresist"

Hours later, his mother (with whom he lives) contacted him to say local police had visited her house and were now on their way to his office.

"I asked them what the problem was. And they said, 'Your tweets,'" Jongeneel told DW. "And they asked me to be careful about my Twitter behavior, because if there are riots, then I'm responsible."

They cannot find and arrest guys doing huge crime and rapes... but they'll be at your door within hours of an "inappropriate tweet."

People don't think the police and left won't full totalitarian? They're already halfway there. Americans do not understand, things are obviously much more different in Europe. Any dissent can be punished with police action.

^^^ You wonder if these cops who have to chase down a mean tweet are thinking, "this is my fucking job now?" I wonder if it is so PC now even cops can't tell right from wrong.

Here in the UK we have such draconian anti-terror and hate speech laws.

Although never enshrined in a constitution or law, like the US, freedom of speech is no longer how things are done on this island.

Seriously fuck them, if people are going to let their government send cops about a fucking tweet, they don't deserve their country.

This is beginning of the end of modern day europe.

(01-28-2016 01:15 PM)Samseau Wrote:  Back to the regularly scheduling programing of depressing reality:

http://www.dw.com/en/online-anti-refugee...a-19005888

Online anti-refugee posts lead to offline visits by Dutch police

Quote:In rare instances, Dutch police are knocking on social media users' doors and asking them to be careful writing posts about refugees that could lead to real-life violence and, ultimately, to charges of online incitement.

One example is Mark Jongeneel, a small business owner in the small city of Sliedrecht who tweeted his reaction to asylum plans in his city:

"The college of Sliedrecht has a proposal to receive 250 refugees in the coming 2 years. What a bad plan! #letusresist"

Hours later, his mother (with whom he lives) contacted him to say local police had visited her house and were now on their way to his office.

"I asked them what the problem was. And they said, 'Your tweets,'" Jongeneel told DW. "And they asked me to be careful about my Twitter behavior, because if there are riots, then I'm responsible."

They cannot find and arrest guys doing huge crime and rapes... but they'll be at your door within hours of an "inappropriate tweet."

People don't think the police and left won't full totalitarian? They're already halfway there. Americans do not understand, things are obviously much more different in Europe. Any dissent can be punished with police action.

Time to register Twitter accounts under the names of people we don't like. This could be wildly fun in places where that trash goes on.

(01-28-2016 08:05 AM)Samseau Wrote:  The question is what should the USA do? Help out these countries who are complete failures? There is no point in helping out Europe unless we institutionalize a 1st and 2nd amendment on this pozzed out population, which they would probably work to resist even if we did help them. Again, it would probably be easiest to let them die and just take the White refugees who actually understand American values and can assimilate here. Then, once all the productive Whites are gone, Europe will be unable to support the Muslims, and they will starve out. Once their numbers have depleted, the continent can be recolonized as new American states.

Insane.

I need to party with this guy!

What's actually Putins goal considering russian news coverage.

Does he want to weaken the german canceler? Was this mentioned in this thread somewhere?

What are some safe countries to go to if these leaders end up starting ww3? South American countries? South Pacific islands? New Zealand? Madagascar?

I can't imagine anywhere in the Northern Hemisphere will be safe.