(01-17-2016 07:06 PM)LEMONed IScream Wrote:  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnew...lence.html

I'm sorry. WHAT?! You have crimes going up, huge rape incidents, and you're worried about the far-right movement? Really?

As predicted, the insanity of the left knows no bounds. They will never admit they are wrong, and will greedily cling to power. WW3 is approaching fast my friends.

Read the language used, simply unbelievable straight out of 1984.

Quote:Vigilante groups have formed in several cities claiming to protect women from asylum seekers. But Mr Münch warned many of them may be a front for far-Right violence.

“We have to look carefully at who is active among the so-called vigilantes,” the police chief said.

“There has been as much talk on far-Right internet forums since New Year's Eve as there was after the Paris attacks. They invoke self-defence in order to be socially acceptable.

“We cannot have random Pakistani citizens being beaten up by vigilantes. We cannot allow that.”

Mr Maas has summoned the justice ministers of Germany’s 16 federal states to discuss the issue in Berlin on March 10, according to Spiegel.

In his letter, he wrote that it was the duty of the judiciary to protect people from violence “regardless of their skin colour or origin”.

Notice there is no mention of the incredible violence being foisted upon the Germans. 300+ women raped in one night? No need to worry, just a bunch of extremists. But men protecting their wives, sisters, and daughters? Gonna have to call the police.

And the judiciary gives the same rights to citizens as non-citizens? Protect them all the same even though one group gets to live free and never fear the cops? The hypocrisy is off the charts, but this is what a government gone full totalitarian genocide looks like.

The same language was used by Communists and Fascists. Was used by Roman dictators. It's the language of tyranny.

It's OK, this is the first step. The People have to see the current State, which is what the police are, as their enemy, before they will take appropriate action. When a German police uniform is seen not as the sign of a well-meaning ally and authority, but as a sadomasochist anti-German enemy and oppressor, things will change.

(01-17-2016 07:06 PM)LEMONed IScream Wrote:  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnew...lence.html

I'm sorry. WHAT?! You have crimes going up, huge rape incidents, and you're worried about the far-right movement? Really?

From the article you posted.

Quote:Germany’s justice minister Heiko Maas summoned officials to discuss “a wave of xenophobic and Right-wing extremist violence that threatens the peace of our society” in a letter leaked to Spiegel magazine.

Googled the German justice minister Heiko Maas. Couldn't find a lot of info on his background but there are several pics of him which confirm he supports the cause. It's the faggot second from the right.





Nothing new under the sun ... just the ancient and lethal martial art of Jew-Jitsu at it again.

So how do you "it's all just the Jews" brigade explain right-wing figures like Yaron Brook & Ben Shapiro?

It's all too easy to blame some "external baddies". It takes much more effort to see the piecemeal self-interested degenerate actions of thousands that stem from a faulty constitution, and add up to produce these very effects. Sure, the question of why the Jews are disproportionately leftist is a fair one, but the fight is against the left, not some component of the left.

RT has been on fire lately, reporting every single migrant crime in Europe. This is a great editorial article. Already triggering the feminists on Twitter, should be up on their FB page soon as well.

Europe’s tragedy: Too much Angela Merkel, too little masculinity

Quote:After the incidents of sexual assault in Cologne, Germany on New Year’s Eve committed by Muslim refugees against German women, feminist apologetics have acquired renewed vigor in the European debate.
Pundits and politicians assure the public that refugee males now storming the gates of Europe from the Middle East, Northern Africa and Central Asia will be required to learn that Western women are independent and sexually liberated. Such arguments, however, are obviously too weak to have any impact on the male cultures representative of certain refugee groups.

To these individuals, strong European women are ‘easy’ and easy victims; they have respect only for strong men – and strong men aren't exactly thick on the ground in Europe.

The deficiency of masculinity in European culture renders it impotent in the face of the political and cultural chaos that has escalated along with growing immigration.


Instead of a single-minded focus on imposing liberal feminist values on Muslim males, it might well be much more beneficial for Europeans to consider if the feminist war on masculinity might be the underlying cause of the weakness of European culture - feeble and defenseless as it is - against the culture of immigrants and refugees. The irony is that the vacuum feminism has created means that women become victims of an aggressive male culture.

A recent survey conducted by the Pew Research Centre shows that the number of young men in the US who want to marry has dropped to the lowest level ever recorded.

American author Suzanne Venker claims that the pervasive cultural influence of feminism is the cause. Venker states that men explain their lack of desire to marry with the observation that “women are no longer women”; feminism has programmed women to see men as the enemy. As a result, males have been made redundant in post-modern Western culture. Women no longer need men as a provider, protector or father of her children; an anonymous semen donor can do the job of creating a baby if a woman so chooses.

Since the 1960s, modern mothers have raised their sons to be women, soaking them in feminine values like accepting responsibility for household chores, being caring, understanding and attentive, and bend to every wish of the woman. This has produced a generation of soft, insecure men, who are out of touch with their masculine nature, identity and strength.


Today, many boys also grow up with no father in the home and have no male role models. The average modern Western male has been feminized, with no knowledge or habit of manly virtues like courage, resolve, self-sacrifice, justice, temperance, self-reliance, self-discipline and honour. He has no sense of true expression of manliness. Feminism despises and rejects these virtues, and this has had a profoundly detrimental impact on a European culture, the “battered wife” of a feeble continent.

The massive feminization of culture has had a major impact on politics. The prevailing ideology of Western liberal democracy is secular humanism, which is particularly feminine in character. Policy, especially as applied to immigrants, is a motherly embrace of goodness and overbearing indulgence. One could also interpret it as naivety, weakness and accommodation. As the refugee crisis erupted and overwhelmed Europe, its political leaders - spearheaded by German Chancellor Angela Merkel - acted like timid mother hens, not as strong men responsible for guarding their country from an invasion.



Indeed, Danish police officers were seen playing with refugee children on motorways instead of doing their job of enforcing the law. They were lauded as heroes in the media. They acted like women with soft hearts and not as men entrusted with defending their country and the rule of law.

Camille Pagilla, self-professed “feminist dissident”, put it like this in the Daily Mail: “The entire elite class now, in finance, in politics and so on, none of them have military service - hardly anyone, there are a few. But there is no prestige attached to it anymore. That is a recipe for disaster… These people don't think in military ways, so there's this illusion out there that people are basically nice, people are basically kind, if we're just nice and benevolent to everyone they'll be nice too. They literally don't have any sense of evil or criminality.’ According to Paglia, the results are there for all to see in the on-going dysfunction in Washington, where politicians ‘lack practical skills of analysis and construction’”.

The precise problem is that Europe's political leaders have no military background, unlike leaders of the past, for instance Roosevelt, de Gaulle and Churchill. For this reason, they lack the basic understanding for defending their culture, their country and its inherent values. They are self-deprecating and apologetic, gullible and caring to the point where their policies become severely harmful to the populations they are supposed to protect.

Read more
© Kai PfaffenbachDanish town 'prefers biker gangs to asylum seekers'
The feminine approach threatens to throw society into chaos and outright collapse because the rule of law and its enforcement are made subject to the priorities of care, understanding and inclusion. The shortage of masculine virtues affects society and the political system. The shortage of masculine virtues is the underlying cause of the immigration problems.

The present clash with Islam, driven as it is by a dominant male culture, reveals the lamentable shortcomings of post-modern feminist culture, which does not possess the strength to defend itself against a male-dominated culture. The gross violations against women on New Year’s Eve in Cologne provide a chilling reminder of the contrast; male aggression has gained a foothold and feminine values are helpless and unable to resist.

At the moment, Europe resembles a woman who allows herself to be battered and abused by her man. Like many battered women, she tries to cover her man's violations, makes excuses for him, and returns to him time after time.

At the same time, immigration is inevitable in a globalized world. If Europe is to survive in an age of mass migration, there must be a male revolution. This revolution will be as important as the struggle for women's rights in the 1960s. It is vital for Western men to acknowledge this need and start building social, cultural and political capital based on masculine virtues to defend the values upon which Europe is based.

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/329241-europe...migration/

(01-15-2016 07:30 PM)Libertas Wrote:  I'm starting to come to the conclusion that liberalism is not compatible with democracy or republics. This may sound odd since liberalism and democracy are thought of as being inextricably linked, but that's not the case. Liberalism is a political philosophy, while democracy is a form of government.

Liberalism's central essence is that it elevates the individual above everything and centers around on him, but this opens questions of loyalty and paves the way for a lack of social cohesion, since each individual is treated as an automaton in some ways without tribe, community, or nation.

Now give people the vote and they don't have civic virtue because they don't have a duty to anything, and hence no loyalty to anyone but themselves. Voting will reflect this.

I'm rethinking our political philosophic assumptions too, not just our voting system. Going to coalesce them around a new philosophy to complement some of the other things we've been doing.

It is interesting to watch what is happening in Poland. Standard & Poor has downgraded the country's credit rating and the zloty is selling off as the various arms of the globalist octopus get the new government's message straight and tighten their grip.

They are citing the independence of the country's insitutions. It's a bit 1984, as their focus on "independence" can be read as dependence on the EU and the Atlanticist consensus.

I shared this article on Facebook a few months ago to the consternation and outrage of a few r-selected colleagues of mine.
They huffed and puffed, 'Discrimination!' said one, 'Protectionist!' came another, but nobody actually came up with a rational rebuttal of the points made by the author.
That said, such was the indignation from people, that I pulled it off a while later and laid low til things calmed down.
It was fascinating and disturbing to watch as peoples' worldview was challenged, said people chose not to look at the facts, choosing instead the easy way out, double down!
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buz...676?page=3

I was asked by a leftie friend (female, short hair) to follow a few 'solidarity' groups related to the 'jungle' camp site in Calais - for 'balance'. This is basically a slum where a bunch of migrants avoid registering with french authorities, preferring instead to storm trucks and the Chanel tunnel in a fruitless effort to illegally enter the UK.

So far the group has hilariously descended into group think bitching about whether wearing high visibility vests offends migrants, with various neon haired freaks turning on each other in an effort to establish that they 'care' more than anyone else. Typical do-gooder group dynamics. Then today this:

Before:


After:


Now I certainly don't welcome any woman being molested by anyone, especially lower apes, but ffs at some point you need to grow the fuck up and take off your rose tinted glasses.

@Zoids That's indeed a sad story, but Christ how deluded, naïve and brainwashed is this woman?
I did a search online for her and sounds like she's quite a damaged woman, abused in childhood, PTSD, etc
Not exactly an ideal candidate for braving the jungle in Calais, I can't say I'm surprised she was sexually assaulted.
From my own experience with such women, they also seem to court further abuse, like a Stockholm syndrome of sorts, sad but entirely predictable.
Somebody in her university or some of her friends or family should have taken this woman aside and told her to get a grip, and if she wanted to help out people in the UK fair enough, but wandering into the migrant hordes of sex starved Muslims in Calais was never going to end well, especially for a damaged person like this.

(01-18-2016 06:01 AM)Zoids Wrote:  Before:
...
After:
...

Also see Pathological Altruism.
From the first result:

Quote:Pathological altruism is sincere attempts to help others that instead harms others or oneself and where this harm could have been reasonably anticipated. It is often caused by cognitive and/or emotional biases that blind people to the potentially harmful consequences of their actions.

From a review of the book with the same name:

Quote:“Pathological altruism” (PA) is a relatively new concept; the term entered the scientific literature only in 1984. There has been very little written about it, partly because altruism is so highly regarded in the West that few scientists dare criticize it. This book makes it clear that PA is a problem well worth studying.

PA is generally defined as a sincere attempt to help others that instead harms others or oneself, and is “an unhealthy focus on others to the detriment of one’s own needs.” Several of the contributors offer tantalizing definitions: PA is likely when people “falsely believe that they caused the other’s problems, or falsely believe that they have the means to relieve the person of suffering.” Or, it is “the false belief that one’s own success, happiness, or well-being is a source of unhappiness for others.” PA “often involves self-righteousness,” and can result in “impulsive and ineffective efforts to equalize or level the playing field.”

(01-18-2016 12:42 AM)Phoenix Wrote:  So how do you "it's all just the Jews" brigade explain right-wing figures like Yaron Brook & Ben Shapiro?

It's all too easy to blame some "external baddies". It takes much more effort to see the piecemeal self-interested degenerate actions of thousands that stem from a faulty constitution, and add up to produce these very effects. Sure, the question of why the Jews are disproportionately leftist is a fair one, but the fight is against the left, not some component of the left.

You can't break it down into left or right wing. Zionism encompasses the entire political spectrum and is an ethnonationalist type movement.

For example the Likud party is right wing and was the thinktank behind the right wing neocon policy. Whereas you have plenty of Zionist type academics in the U.S. who are very leftist but still support Israel in all endeavors. There are also many Zionist allies like some evangelical christians ie. cuckservatives who support Zionism for rather facetious biblical reasons to fulfill Judeo-Christian destiny.

When most people on here are talking about Jews it's referring to Zionists and Ivory tower Marxists who take an active role in screwing around with other countries and utilizing foreign policy for their own agenda. Most people here are not blaming every Jew on the street in some grand conspiracy..at least that's not what my point is in criticizing Zionism.

Just posting this great example of debating style that is applicable to any topic, not just the migrant invasion.



Remember gentlemen, shame and shock and awe turn more minds around than reason and politeness.

(01-18-2016 12:42 AM)Phoenix Wrote:  So how do you "it's all just the Jews" brigade explain right-wing figures like Yaron Brook & Ben Shapiro?

It's all too easy to blame some "external baddies". It takes much more effort to see the piecemeal self-interested degenerate actions of thousands that stem from a faulty constitution, and add up to produce these very effects. Sure, the question of why the Jews are disproportionately leftist is a fair one, but the fight is against the left, not some component of the left.

The intellectual and financial leaders of the left are Jews. Prominent boss Jews, like Soros, have lots of visibility but the vast majority of powerful Jewry stay hidden as much as possible.

Now, I know: Not all Jews are like that. But, a tremendous amount of them are. You have to realize that inside Talmudic Jewish culture is a hateful, anti-Christian grudge. I won't bore you with all the historical details, but the short of it is that Jews tried to revolt against Rome and were genocided in punishment. Jews had to pay a special tax to Rome for nearly 400 (I'm not totally correct on the exact number here) years. However, about 250 years after this genocide, the Romans converted to Christianity. Talmudic Jews saw that not only did a Jewish heresy manage to survive, but it ended up being appropriated by their oppressors.

At the same time was happening, the Jews who became Christians (and were the ones who converted the Romans and Greeks) were loudly denouncing their Jewish cousins who rejected Christ and goading on Romans and Greeks to keep their suspicions of Jews intact. This lead to wars and betrayals between Talmuds and Christians. The split between Christians and Jews became permanent in the 600's AD after Jews led a revolt against the Byzantines under Emperor Heraclius.

The Jews today, such as Soros, are part of this anti-Christian tradition; they rarely 'conspire' with one another because they do not need to. Their upbringing and tradition provides them with an unspoken tradition of how to handle the Christian heresy, as well as punish those would harm their brothers and cousins.

People mistakenly think Jews act with some mastermind directing them, but in reality it's just extreme tribalism mixed with maliciousness they have for many goyim. I believe the total amount of malicious Jews within Jewry is somewhere between 10-30% of the population, but it's more complicated than that. Good people can become evil and vice versa, and within a Jew's lifetime he can go from promoting Communism to converting to Christianity or start as an indifferent atheist but end as a religious prosecutor of gentiles.

Overall, short of banning Jews from civilization and throwing them in ghettos, the best way to handle the Jews are just to educate people about Jewish history, Jewish biases, and the split between Talmuds and Christians. I think if people were more aware of these problems, less people would be taken advantage by the malicious Jews.

While we're at it, here is a story from a woman who worked in a "refugee" camp in Hamburg.

https://translate.google.com/translate?h...glich.html

At first she was idealistic and bumbed and ready to show the world that she isn't a Nazi like so many "Refugees Welcome" lunatics but after working in this camp her experience turned into nightmarish clusterfuck.

The report starts like this:

Quote:Since the autumn of 2015 I have been working full-time and permanent employees in a Hamburger initial reception center for refugees. In this job I had applied explicitly, that was exactly what I wanted to do. When I finally had the commitment it in my mailbox, I've been looking forward like crazy about it; I finally could not only help in theory, but also really convenient to do something for the refugees.

and ends with:

Quote:But usually I stay in my little office, if possible, even during the day. And I no longer take the train to work or go back - because lately a colleague of some of the young men has been traced to the metro station and even molested in the train. I would like to spare myself and therefore I'm in the car.

Should we send all of the Refugee Welcomers to such a camp for at least a few months? I'd say yes!

(01-18-2016 02:41 AM)AManLikePutin Wrote:  https://www.rt.com/op-edge/329241-europe...migration/

Damn it - that article really made my day. Enjoyed every single word - spot on. Check out the original author:

   

Admittedly over the hill but would bang and impregnate just out of principle.

http://www.n24.de/n24/Nachrichten/Panora...-aus-.html

"Ich halte es dort nicht mehr aus"
Eine Sozialarbeiterin bekommt einen Job in einer Hamburger Erstaufnahmestelle. Sie freut sich darauf - und muss schnell alle ihre Vorstellungen in Frage stellen. Protokoll einer Desillusionierung.
Seit dem Herbst 2015 arbeite ich hauptberuflich und fest angestellt in einer Hamburger Erstaufnahmestelle für Flüchtlinge. Auf diesen Job hatte ich mich explizit beworben, das war genau das, was ich machen wollte. Als ich die Zusage dafür dann endlich in meinem Briefkasten hatte, habe ich mich wie verrückt darüber gefreut; endlich konnte ich nicht nur theoretisch helfen, sondern auch wirklich praktisch etwas für die Flüchtlinge tun.
Dementsprechend bin ich dann auch bestens gelaunt an meinem ersten Arbeitstag in die Erstaufnahmestelle gegangen; ich war natürlich aufgeregt, klar, ist man ja immer am ersten Arbeitstag im neuen Job, aber ansonsten hat es mir da gut gefallen. Die Kollegen waren engagiert und sehr nett, mit den Flüchtlingen hatte ich da zwar noch keinen direkten Kontakt, aber ich habe voller Begeisterung in die Gegend gegrüßt und fand die alle ganz toll.

"Das wird sicher richtig super hier", habe ich mir gedacht. In den nächsten Tagen habe ich mich dann absolut motiviert in die Arbeit gestürzt. Die sollte mit den bis zu 1500 Flüchtlingen stattfinden, die dort untergebracht waren. Ich war für deren Sozialberatung zuständig, sollte also Ansprechpartnerin für alle sozialen Probleme der Flüchtlinge sein, sie bei ihrem Asylverfahren unterstützen oder Arzttermine festmachen, wenn sie welche brauchten.
Mehr zum Thema: Schon jetzt kamen 17 Mal mehr Flüchtlinge
Tja, und dann kamen die ersten Flüchtlinge in mein Büro, in dem ich die Sozialberatung abhalten wollte – und ich habe schon nach den ersten paar Besuchen von ihnen gemerkt, dass meine sehr positive und idealistische Vorstellung von ihnen und ihrem Verhalten sich doch deutlich von der Realität unterschied.
Natürlich darf man auf keinen Fall pauschal über alle Flüchtlinge urteilen, es gibt unter ihnen viele, die sehr freundlich sind, sehr dankbar, sehr integrationswillig, sehr froh hier zu sein. Aber wenn ich ehrlich bin, dann ist die Zusammenarbeit mit 90 Prozent von denen, die ich treffe, eher unangenehm und leider nicht so, wie ich mir das vorher gedacht habe.
Wohnung, schickes Auto und am besten ein richtig guter Job
Erstens sind viele von ihnen extrem fordernd. Kommen zu mir und verlangen, dass ich ihnen jetzt sofort eine Wohnung und ein schickes Auto und am besten auch gleich noch einen richtig guten Job beschaffe, weil ich das ja müsste, dafür sitze ich ja da und sie seien ja nun mal hier angekommen. Wenn ich das dann ablehne und stattdessen versuche, ihnen zu erklären, dass das nicht geht, dann werden sie oftmals laut oder auch mal richtig aggressiv.

Ein Afghane hat erst letztens gedroht, er werde sich umbringen. Und ein paar Syrer und eine Gruppe Afghanen haben erklärt, sie würden in den Hungerstreik treten, bis ich ihnen helfen würde, an einen anderen Platz zu ziehen. Eine ursprünglich aus dem arabischen Raum stammende Kollegin von mir haben sie mal wirklich angeschrien "Wir köpfen dich!". Wegen solcher und anderer Sachen war die Polizei mehrmals in der Woche bei uns.


Zweitens machen sie häufig sehr unzuverlässige Angaben. Sie kommen zu mir, haben ihre Papiere dabei und erzählen dann eine Geschichte, die so gar nicht ganz stimmen kann. Aber sie halten daran fest und ich kann mir dann erst sicher sein, wenn ich mit meinen Kollegen darüber gesprochen habe und die sagen dann oft, dass die Person am Tag vorher schon bei ihnen gewesen war und da alles ein bisschen anders erzählt habe.
Es gab beispielsweise einen Bewohner, der kam mit seinem Abschiebe-Bescheid zu mir und wollte wissen, was nun passieren würde. Ich habe es ihm erklärt, er ist dann gegangen. Bald darauf kam er zu meiner Kollegin und zeigte plötzlich völlig neue Ausweispapiere auf einen anderen Namen vor und sagte, er sei dieser Mensch mit dem anderen Namen. Er wurde dann nicht mehr ausgewiesen, sondern nur in ein anderes Lager verlegt.

Drittens halten sie sich nur selten an Absprachen. Ich mache ja auch die Arzttermine für die Flüchtlinge fest. Alle von ihnen müssen eine Grunduntersuchung über sich ergehen lassen, das heißt durchs Röntgen, eine Impfung und einen generellen Check-up durch. Aber viele von ihnen wollen noch zu anderen Ärzten, vor allem zu einem Zahnarzt oder zum Orthopäden. Dann mache ich Termine für sie, aber wenn der Termin da ist, tauchen sie einfach nicht auf. Das passiert so häufig, dass die Ärzte uns mittlerweile schon gebeten haben, nicht mehr so viele Termine festzumachen – aber was soll ich denn da tun? Ich kann ja nicht einfach die Bitte um einen Termin ablehnen, nur weil ich vermute, dass der Bittende dann nicht erscheinen könnte.
Und dann ist da das Frauen-Problem
Und viertens, und das ist für mich das Schlimmste: Einige der Flüchtlinge verhalten sich indiskutabel uns Frauen gegenüber. Es ist ja bekannt, dass es vor allem alleinstehende Männer sind, die hierher zu uns kommen, etwa 65 Prozent oder vielleicht sogar 70 Prozent, würde ich mal ganz persönlich so schätzen. Die sind alle noch jung, erst so um die 20, höchstens 25 Jahre alt.
Und ein Teil davon achtet uns Frauen überhaupt nicht. Sie nehmen es hin, dass wir da sind, das müssen sie ja auch, aber sie nehmen uns überhaupt nicht ernst. Wenn ich als Frau ihnen etwas sage oder ihnen eine Anweisung geben will, dann hören sie mir kaum zu, tun es sofort als unwichtig ab und wenden sich danach einfach noch einmal an einen der männlichen Kollegen. Für uns Frauen haben sie oft nur verächtliche Blicke übrig – oder eben aufdringliche.
Sie pfeifen einem laut hinterher, rufen einem dann noch etwas in einer fremden Sprache nach, was ich und die meisten meiner Kolleginnen nicht verstehen, lachen. Das ist wirklich sehr unangenehm. Es ist sogar mal passiert, dass sie einen mit dem Smartphone fotografiert haben. Einfach so, ungefragt, auch wenn man protestiert hat. Und letztens bin ich eine etwas steilere Treppe hinaufgegangen. Da sind mir einige von den Männern hinterher gelaufen, hinter mir die Stufen hochgegangen und sie haben die ganze Zeit gelacht und – vermute ich – über mich geredet und mir etwas zugerufen.
In den letzten Wochen ist es schlimmer geworden
Kolleginnen haben mir erzählt, dass ihnen auch schon Ähnliches zugestoßen ist. Sie haben aber gesagt, dass man nichts dagegen machen kann. Dass es hier halt zum Job dazu gehört. Das kommt so oft vor, wenn man da jedes Mal jemanden anzeigen oder gleich verlegen würde, wäre die Einrichtung deutlich leerer. Also ignorieren sie es und versuchen, es nicht weiter an sich rankommen zu lassen – und so habe ich es dann eben auch gemacht. Bin mit nach vorne gerichtetem Blick weitergegangen, wenn die mir hinterhergepfiffen oder mir etwas nachgerufen haben. Habe nichts gesagt und das Gesicht nicht verzogen, um sie nicht darin zu bestärken, um ihnen nicht das Gefühl zu geben, dass sie mir damit weh tun oder mich beeinflussen können.
Doch das hat nicht geholfen; es ist sogar schlimmer geworden – ehrlich gesagt: besonders in den letzten Wochen, als immer mehr Männer aus Nordafrika, aus Marokko, Tunesien oder Libyen, hierher zu uns in die Einrichtung gekommen sind. Die waren noch aggressiver. Da konnte ich es dann nicht mehr ignorieren – und habe reagiert. Um mich nicht weiter dem auszusetzen.

Plötzlich gibt es No-Go-Areas
Konkret heißt das: Ich habe begonnen, mich anders anzuziehen. Ich bin eigentlich jemand, der gern auch mal etwas engere Sachen trägt – aber jetzt nicht mehr. Ich ziehe ausschließlich weit geschnittene Hosen und hochgeschlossene Oberteile an. Schminke benutze ich sowieso immer schon sehr wenig, höchstens mal einen Abdeck-Stift.

Und nicht nur äußerlich habe ich mich verändert, um mich etwas vor dieser Belästigung zu schützen. Ich verhalte mich auch anders. So vermeide ich es zum Beispiel, auf unserem Gelände an diejenigen Orte zu gehen, an denen sich die alleinstehenden Männer oft aufhalten. Und wenn ich es doch mal muss, dann versuche ich, sehr schnell da durchzukommen und lächele dabei niemanden an, damit man das nicht falsch verstehen kann.
Aber meist bleibe ich in meinem kleinen Büro, wenn möglich, dann sogar den ganzen Tag über. Und ich fahre nicht mehr mit der Bahn zur Arbeit hin oder wieder zurück – denn letztens ist eine Kollegin von einigen der jungen Männer bis zur U-Bahn-Station verfolgt und sogar noch in der Bahn belästigt worden. Das möchte ich mir ersparen und komme daher mit dem Wagen.
Allein auf dem Erstaufnahmeflur

Ich weiß, dass sich das alles heftig anhört: Anders anziehen, bestimme Räume meiden und nur noch das Auto nehmen. Und ich finde es selber furchtbar, dass ich das alles mache und ich es für nötig erachte. Aber was soll ich denn tun, was wäre die Alternative? Mich einfach weiter anstarren und anmachen zu lassen, das kann es ja nicht sein.

Von offizieller Seite habe ich da keine große Hilfe zu erwarten. Weder bei dieser Sache, noch bei den anderen Problemen, die es bei uns gibt, weder bei der Innenbehörde noch beim hiesigen Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge. Wenn man bei denen anruft, gehen die oft gar nicht mehr ans Telefon.
Mir bleibt also eigentlich wirklich nur noch die Kündigung. Doch die habe ich bisher immer für mich ausgeschlossen; ich mag meine Kollegen sehr gern, die Flüchtlingskinder auch. Und ich war doch vorher so sehr überzeugt von dem Job und von der ganzen Sache an sich – da fällt es sehr schwer, sich einzugestehen, dass das alles doch ein wenig anders ist, als man es sich vorgestellt hat. Und die Kündigung wäre natürlich genau dieses Eingeständnis.
Mittlerweile denke ich trotzdem konkret darüber nach. Viele Kollegen und Kolleginnen wollen ebenfalls kündigen. Weil sie es nicht mehr aushalten, weil sie nicht mit ansehen können, wie schief das hier alles läuft und dass sie nichts dagegen machen können. Und wenn ich ehrlich bin: Ich halte es auch nicht mehr aus."

18.01.2016 | 10:04 Uhr

Give us at least a short summary in English, please. Just a few sentences is enough.

(01-18-2016 11:53 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  Give us at least a short summary in English, please. Just a few sentences is enough.

The German text is the same as:

(01-18-2016 08:08 AM)UncleSam Wrote:  While we're at it, here is a story from a woman who worked in a "refugee" camp in Hamburg.

https://translate.google.com/translate?h...glich.html

At first she was idealistic and bumbed and ready to show the world that she isn't a Nazi like so many "Refugees Welcome" lunatics but after working in this camp her experience turned into nightmarish clusterfuck.

The report starts like this:

Quote:Since the autumn of 2015 I have been working full-time and permanent employees in a Hamburger initial reception center for refugees. In this job I had applied explicitly, that was exactly what I wanted to do. When I finally had the commitment it in my mailbox, I've been looking forward like crazy about it; I finally could not only help in theory, but also really convenient to do something for the refugees.

and ends with:

Quote:But usually I stay in my little office, if possible, even during the day. And I no longer take the train to work or go back - because lately a colleague of some of the young men has been traced to the metro station and even molested in the train. I would like to spare myself and therefore I'm in the car.

Should we send all of the Refugee Welcomers to such a camp for at least a few months? I'd say yes!

Young girl is happy that she get work in a refugee camp. Later she get sexual harassment, don't wear good clothes or make up, is frustrated, never leave the office.
Also she say the refugees demanding and show no respect. They lie to get benefits or expect that they get a good job, a fancy car and a nice house. About 90 % of them are like that and only 10 % are nice people.

She want to quit, not taking public transport any more because the rapefugees follow her, she now takes the car. All her illusions get crushed by the brutal reality.

(01-18-2016 06:01 AM)Zoids Wrote:  I was asked by a leftie friend (female, short hair) to follow a few 'solidarity' groups related to the 'jungle' camp site in Calais - for 'balance'. This is basically a slum where a bunch of migrants avoid registering with french authorities, preferring instead to storm trucks and the Chanel tunnel in a fruitless effort to illegally enter the UK.

So far the group has hilariously descended into group think bitching about whether wearing high visibility vests offends migrants, with various neon haired freaks turning on each other in an effort to establish that they 'care' more than anyone else. Typical do-gooder group dynamics. Then today this:

Before:


After:


Now I certainly don't welcome any woman being molested by anyone, especially lower apes, but ffs at some point you need to grow the fuck up and take off your rose tinted glasses.

Would you be able to provide us with other screencaps from these Facebook groups in the future? It's a good chance to see how the "other side" thinks and behave.

I know some people might be thinking "told ya so" but this was still a bit hard for me to read.

(01-18-2016 12:02 PM)Parzival Wrote:  Young girl is happy that she get work in a refugee camp. Later she get sexual harassment, don't wear good clothes or make up, is frustrated, never leave the office.
Also she say the refugees demanding and show no respect. They lie to get benefits or expect that they get a good job, a fancy car and a nice house. About 90 % of them are like that and only 10 % are nice people.

She want to quit, not taking public transport any more because the rapefugees follow her, she now takes the car. All her illusions get crushed by the brutal reality.

TL;DR version:

* German girls is indoctrinated with leftist ideology since birth.
* Wants to help poor migrants.
* Is overjoyed when she nails an admin job at a migration camp.
* Gets culturally enriched.
* Starts experiencing cognitive dissonance.
* Writes essay depicting her increasing disillusionment.

This is good stuff brothers. Our esteemed muzzi friends are killing feminism one silly wench at a time.

(01-18-2016 08:03 AM)Samseau Wrote:  The intellectual and financial leaders of the left are Jews. Prominent boss Jews, like Soros, have lots of visibility but the vast majority of powerful Jewry stay hidden as much as possible.

Jews have long been prominent on the left, yes. But then you have people like Roy Jenkins, one of the original partisans for British multiculturalism, who to my knowledge was as gentile as they come. Merkel, Cameron, Blair, Corbyn, Reinfeldt, Sahlin, Romson, Sipila...there are countless non-Jews leading the charge to destroy western civilization.

I think the Jewish elite can be said to be firmly globalist, but this completely unexceptional in the west, as the same can be said of the elites of many non-Jewish peoples across the western world.

A long article but 100% worth the read. In Novemeber he wrote the prediction of mass sexual assualts by the pigs against infidel women and lo and behold on new years eve it occured.

http://gatesofvienna.net/2015/11/tet-tak...offensive/

(01-18-2016 12:34 PM)sonoran_ Wrote:  A long article but 100% worth the read. In Novemeber he wrote the prediction of mass sexual assualts by the pigs against infidel women and lo and behold on new years eve it occured.

http://gatesofvienna.net/2015/11/tet-tak...offensive/

This guy wrote his article on Nov. 30th. I posted my original predictions on Nov. 3rd. Many of his conclusions are exactly the same as mine:

Quote:There will be no means of finding or creating permanent quarters for them before the Central European blizzards come. When the snow is deep in Germany and across Europe, these men are going to enter local houses, demanding to be taken in as boarders — or else. Where it is useful, small migrant children will be held up in front as human shields for their emotional blackmail value, elsewise they will be discarded. One way or the other, Muslim migrants will be attempting to move inside of German homes and apartments seeking heat and food, and the young Muslim men will be seeking undefended infidel or kafir women to slake their lust, (which is their right, under Islamic Sharia law).

In disarmed Europe, any group of a dozen or more cold, hungry and angry Muslim men armed with clubs and knives will be able to enter any German house or business that they like. Worse, there are now reports of vast quantities of firearms being smuggled into Europe by the muhajirun, with cowed European authorities afraid to search the migrants or their baggage, lest they provoke riots. And weapons are not only smuggled in “refugee” baggage: eight hundred assault-style shotguns were just seized in a single truck in northern Italy, bound from Turkey to Belgium. How many truckloads of weapons and explosives have not been stopped?

In Germany, even before the winter snows, the migrants are flash-mobbing and looting shops and stores. Seeking to forestall a social eruption, police do not respond until the mobs have safely departed. For now, the German government is paying these store owners for their lost merchandise, but this cannot continue forever. Businesses are closing and Germans are retreating in fear, as the muhajirun learn that they can invade private property and rob Germans without repercussions, convincing them even further of the docile passivity of their hosts, and the inevitability of their ultimate hijra invasion success.

As attacks mount, the German police will nearly always fall out on the side of the traitor-elite politicians who pay their salaries, and they will not come to the rescue of besieged ethnic Germans. At least, not under official orders, or in uniform. This calculated disregard by the international socialist elites for the safety and welfare of ordinary German citizens will in time lead to vigilantism and death squad actions by “off-duty” German military and police personnel. They will be acting against their “hands off the Muslims” orders, which are ultimately emanating from Brussels. And in time, enough firearms will find their way from the military, police and black markets into the hands of ordinary European nationalists for them to mount an armed resistance.

I'm glad that people pay attention to me and that my ideas get widely circulated. I don't care if I get credit for it, I just care that the truth is known.

(01-18-2016 12:27 PM)Saga Wrote:  

(01-18-2016 08:03 AM)Samseau Wrote:  The intellectual and financial leaders of the left are Jews. Prominent boss Jews, like Soros, have lots of visibility but the vast majority of powerful Jewry stay hidden as much as possible.

Jews have long been prominent on the left, yes. But then you have people like Roy Jenkins, one of the original partisans for British multiculturalism, who to my knowledge was as gentile as they come. Merkel, Cameron, Blair, Corbyn, Reinfeldt, Sahlin, Romson, Sipila...there are countless non-Jews leading the charge to destroy western civilization.

I think the Jewish elite can be said to be firmly globalist, but this completely unexceptional in the west, as the same can be said of the elites of many non-Jewish peoples across the western world.

Who cares about gentile traitors there's been plenty always.

The difference is that without jews there would never exist multi-culturalism or marxism or third wave feminism AT ALL.

Consider that, consider a world without those things, and you see enormous impact jews have had on the West and not in a good way.