That video almost made me tear up. God bless Poland. I got a three month trip planned there. I've been getting reacquainted with my Catholic roots and would like the church to have a large presence in any future family I may have. I wonder if Poland still has a decent supply of believing catholic women? If I find one, I might have to stay, I'm sure as hell not bringing her back to Canada.

Im glad Poland has it's balls, but Ive heard they are now openly hostile to ANY foreigner hitting on their women. So if you're a drunk white dude you wont get a pass just cause you're not a kebab. Still worth it though, better than them turning muslim.

(12-17-2015 07:00 PM)kamoz Wrote:  

(12-17-2015 05:26 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  I wouldn't be surprised if Poland was sold out by the US and EU over their antagonism towards liberals and migrants. We did it before in WW2 and communism.

I hope they can defend themselves against our betrayals next time. I would fight alongside them.

This is something I'm concerned about as well.

Related to this, I also see a lot of blind support for Putin on this forum. I would caution against this. I will agree that he is trying to return Russia to a more traditional and nationalist country and repair the damage done by Communism which is good. But like Merkel is former Stasi, Putin is former KGB. He's not afraid to puff his chest, but just look at the current state of Ukraine and the deaths that have resulted. I fear that if he had the right opportunity he would go after Poland as well, even considering the list of traditional white/Western/Christian allies is growing thin, but hopefully I'm wrong.

Putin looks after number 1. However looking after number 1 doesn't entail suicidal foreign policy and moving armour brigades onto European borders, he leaves that to the US which has very little in the way of self-preservation.

(12-17-2015 08:05 PM)Disco_Volante Wrote:  Im glad Poland has it's balls, but Ive heard they are now openly hostile to ANY foreigner hitting on their women. So if you're a drunk white dude you wont get a pass just cause you're not a kebab. Still worth it though, better than them turning muslim.

Good for them. All Europeans should start enforcing this. At any other time in history a foreign drunkard screwing local women would be a walking corpse. A beat down would be the least of his problems.

Its bad news for the Brits, because the majority of them become drunken cunts while travelling (no offense to the Brits on the board).

As for me, I once did enjoy a good night out. But now I'm more in Legacy mode. Although if I did step out of line while in Poland and a Polish guy wanted to throw down, I'd respect that. Its how I grew up in a rural Canada. Hell, we'd get into fights with guys one town over when they tried to hit on our local girls.

(12-17-2015 08:05 PM)Disco_Volante Wrote:  Im glad Poland has it's balls, but Ive heard they are now openly hostile to ANY foreigner hitting on their women. So if you're a drunk white dude you wont get a pass just cause you're not a kebab. Still worth it though, better than them turning muslim.

Doubt that is true. Do you have any proof?

(12-17-2015 08:23 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(12-17-2015 08:05 PM)Disco_Volante Wrote:  Im glad Poland has it's balls, but Ive heard they are now openly hostile to ANY foreigner hitting on their women. So if you're a drunk white dude you wont get a pass just cause you're not a kebab. Still worth it though, better than them turning muslim.

Doubt that is true. Do you have any proof?

I was going to add, I don't really believe it. I was in Poland for two months last year. I have Nordic features (Canadian Dutch) and I rarely encountered any friction. It helps that a lot of poles thought I looked Polish as well. Some latent Jealousy, yes. But this was quickly smoothed over by buying a few drinks for any Polish lads that had any issues with me. They became my best friends after spending 8-12 zloty's for a couple beers, whoop-de-do.

Maybe things have changed dramatically since the migrant issue. But I'm not worried in the slightest. Again, if they got qualms with the attention I give to their women while I'm there, I got nothing but respect, aside from the obvious insecure jealous cockblockers that exist in every country.

(12-17-2015 08:18 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  

(12-17-2015 07:00 PM)kamoz Wrote:  

(12-17-2015 05:26 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  I wouldn't be surprised if Poland was sold out by the US and EU over their antagonism towards liberals and migrants. We did it before in WW2 and communism.

I hope they can defend themselves against our betrayals next time. I would fight alongside them.

This is something I'm concerned about as well.

Related to this, I also see a lot of blind support for Putin on this forum. I would caution against this. I will agree that he is trying to return Russia to a more traditional and nationalist country and repair the damage done by Communism which is good. But like Merkel is former Stasi, Putin is former KGB. He's not afraid to puff his chest, but just look at the current state of Ukraine and the deaths that have resulted. I fear that if he had the right opportunity he would go after Poland as well, even considering the list of traditional white/Western/Christian allies is growing thin, but hopefully I'm wrong.

Putin looks after number 1. However looking after number 1 doesn't entail suicidal foreign policy and moving armour brigades onto European borders, he leaves that to the US which has very little in the way of self-preservation.

History repeats itself. It may seem ridiculous now, but let's say Poland gets out of the EU and/or NATO has a fallout and a schmuck like Hillary or Bernie gets elected. Putin does indeed look out for his interests and he seizes opportunities. I'm just saying that the Poles have reason to be cautious of Russia, and with the way things have played out this year there's no telling what will happen next.

This song and video should be getting a lot of play in Germany and all over Europe these days:

(12-13-2015 10:28 PM)Neo Wrote:  

(12-12-2015 01:49 PM)scotian Wrote:  Interesting video of a US government bureaucrat (deputy assistant secretary for screening coordination, office of policy of homeland security) getting grilled on her lack of knowledge regarding the number of Syrians coming into the country, I don't understand how people like her get into these positions.

This woman is a disgrace, you can tell she's an idiot within a few seconds. I see this in the corporate environment too thanks to 'equality' hiring policies. Hire low IQ women to fill some type of quota, what a joke.

On the other hand my read on the guy asking the questions was 'Conservative, tough, mid western guy' had no idea who he was so I looked him up.

"While at Graham, he was a four-time state wrestling champion with a career record of 150–1. He graduated from the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 1986, obtaining his bachelor's degree in economics. Jordan was a two-time NCAA Division I wrestling champion."

Funny how you can tell so much from a person so quickly, just through observation and their political affiliation.

Earlier today I saw a guy in a car with a 'Bernie 2016' bumper sticker. Decided to drive past him and in my mind I said 'He's either overweight or grossly underweight'...yup. Guy looked tall and rail thin.

Same with comments on social media, all the liberals posting garbage seem to be fat chicks or lazy guys.

The guy posting often and openly about banning refugees is a tough as nails BJJ black belt I have as a FB friend who doesn't give a fuck. Anyone in the community knows who he is.

It can't always be the case, but I'm definitely noticing the tough guy = conservative and weak guy = liberal more often than not.

(12-14-2015 12:32 AM)quino_16 Wrote:  

(12-13-2015 10:28 PM)Neo Wrote:  It can't always be the case, but I'm definitely noticing the tough guy = conservative and weak guy = liberal more often than not.

Relevant:

Quote:The two psychological tendencies that underlie modern leftism we call "feelings of inferiority" and "oversocialization." Feelings of inferiority are characteristic of modern leftism as a whole, while oversocialization is characteristic only of a certain segment of modern leftism; but this segment is highly influential.

When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This tendency is pronounced among minority rights activists, whether or not they belong to the minority groups whose rights they defend.

...

Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist's real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful.

Words like "self-confidence," "self-reliance," "initiative," "enterprise," "optimism," etc., play little role in the liberal and leftist vocabulary. The leftist is anti-individualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve every one's problems for them, satisfy everyone's needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of person who has an inner sense of confidence in his ability to solve his own problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagonistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.

...

The leftist is not typically the kind of person whose feelings of inferiority make him a braggart, an egotist, a bully, a self-promoter, a ruthless competitor. This kind of person has not wholly lost faith in himself. He has a deficit in his sense of power and self-worth, but he can still conceive of himself as having the capacity to be strong, and his efforts to make himself strong produce his unpleasant behavior. [1] But the leftist is too far gone for that. His feelings of inferiority are so ingrained that he cannot conceive of himself as individually strong and valuable. Hence the collectivism of the leftist. He can feel strong only as a member of a large organization or a mass movement with which he identifies himself.

That was from the Unabomber Manifesto.

The sad part is that it was written in the early 1990's. Like metal and punk in the 1980's, the Unabomber Manifesto warned of the upcoming collapse of Western Civilization before the collapse became obvious for many people.

Anyhow, I highly recommend checking it out for those who haven't read it. It is free and widely accessible. In case you missed it, Roosh reviewed it.

Men who are physically strong are more likely to have right wing political views

-Weaker men more likely to support welfare state and wealth redistribution
-Link may reflect psychological traits that evolved in our ancestors
-Strength was a proxy for ability to defend or acquire resources
-There is no link between women's physical strength and political views

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/articl...views.html





Rich liberal women prefer conservative men
http://dailycaller.com/2014/02/14/rich-l...ative-men/

(12-15-2015 04:38 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(12-14-2015 10:18 AM)RaccoonFace Wrote:  Many Iraqis already want out of Finland – “I'm dying on the inside here”

http://www.helsinkitimes.fi/finland/finl...-here.html

Quote:Iraqis are by far the largest nationality group among the voluntary returnees, having accounted for 60 of the 78 people who left the country in October and for 72 of the 111 who did so in November.

The numbers do remain low in comparison to the overall number of asylum seekers, however.

Thabeet Al-Aswad from Baghdad is another asylum seeker who is desperate to get back home, despite the fact that his family was threatened because of him. Al-Aswad says he is tired and distressed, unable to sleep well in the cramped reception centre, and desperate for something meaningful to do.

“The service here hasn't been what we were expecting. It'd be great if we got to work and live a normal life,” he says.

Yes - wait for the media to spin the story - tens of thousands come in, but 100 are leaving.

Most will not work, but can expect to join the unemployed underclass.

--------

In other news ISIS has published a music video taunting Germans to come over, so that they can kill them. Somehow I really wonder about those extremist idiots.






It's only a matter of time they do a terrorist act so big, that all gloves come off and the Muslim world gets truly obliterated. Then they won't care about going door to door, but will simply wipe out entire countries off the earth. Also - do those immigration-Jihadists truly think that the Western and Asian countries will acquiesce to shariah-rule and a subsequent return to the Middle Ages? Hollebeq's book is way too optimistic in that regard.

Here they behead two men accused of sorcery: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/is...-1.2458447

I am sure they will continue by destroying buildings, burning books, wiping out science and any meaningful technology. And folk claim that it's not anti-civilizational.

Those morons just commit long-term suicide being played by globalist powers who actually want them to act out that way, so that their boot of control can come down on all of us.

Also I might add - it has nothing to do with race or heritage - recently a Polish Jihadi named Jacek blew himself up in Iraq: http://www.thenews.pl/1/10/Artykul/21695...ck-in-Iraq
There are some two dozens Polish Islamists in the region. But differently from Sweden they are not getting a social worker on their return, but are instantly arrested. Saw a report recently in the local news.

The ideology is so utterly mind-numbingly evil and does what it was created for - to facilitate conquest and control for a conqueror of the Middle Ages who put a religious spin on it, so that his orders would not be questioned. Unfortunately for him it has inbuilt limits on progress and technology and thus is destined to be wiped out sooner or later by more advanced societies. Their biggest chance was conquering the entire world in the Middle Ages and keeping the world that way. And to be honest - they did their best in that regard, but now the end of their reign awaits the most bloody ending.
---------

Bill Still made a video recently of what could be done in that respect, but of course it's all wishful thinking:

I think Islam will implode, there is no way they can sustain this level of radicalism without the support from the West, Europa politicians are starting to feel the fire from the natives, this is not the Middle Ages anymore when they could jihad a part of the world and the rest of the world will not see it, everyone with internet connection can see Islam is not a religion of peace.

Take USA for example, IS and Islam preachers talk about conquering USA, but how they will do that without attacking other big minorities within the USA? are they really going to attack Hispanics and Latinos like me for listening to infidel music? and blacks for hip hop, are they going to attack Italians American groceries and restaurants for selling pork in their foods, how are jihadists planning to make American gun owners to summit when there are 350 millions guns in civilians hands? something that could happens if Islam push to mush in USA, is that minorities groups that are normally in the side of democrat progressive would move more to the right and more nationalist side.

This is Raqqa, what is considered the IS capital, it used to be a very modern city with waters parks, now is a place without running water and not electricity that force people to stand in lines to get food.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...s-sky.html
This is what millions of Islam followers around the world support, they rather live like this than in a peaceful Polish Christian modern town in Europe.

(12-16-2015 07:30 PM)Lizard King Wrote:  Local politicians discussing plans for "refugee" centre in a Dutch town




Then this happens, or: the view from outside.

(12-17-2015 05:26 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  I wouldn't be surprised if Poland was sold out by the US and EU over their antagonism towards liberals and migrants. We did it before in WW2 and communism.

I hope they can defend themselves against our betrayals next time. I would fight alongside them.

Well, since Western Europe sold out eastern Europe to get involved in the first place at the beginning of the war, it comes off highly possible. Remembering that an attempt to ethnically cleanse the Germans was made by the Allied powers. Poland, and the rest of Eastern Europe had sizable portions of their populations sent to die in the gulags makes it even more frightening.

Plebs may think that a Trump presidency along with success among the far right parties of Europe spells some kind of rabid white revenge when it's really the best defense against globalists mounting a likely genocide themselves.

(12-17-2015 12:21 PM)Wutang Wrote:  Posted on Roosh's twitter, a guy who appears to be a Polish Catholic priest gives a speech at a rally calling for defending the spirit of his nation and for his church against leftism and the migrant invasion accompanying it





I'm not Polish (or even white) nor Catholic but I'm getting chills from this.

Something I noticed is that in the above video you hear mostly men in the audience. Compare it to this video where a bunch of Dutch sing a song welcoming refugees as they arrive from the airport

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d9c_1441497156

Notice the difference in the gender balances of both groups?

And this is why it's always been men that preserves civilization and culture.

(12-18-2015 12:19 AM)Wutang Wrote:  

(12-17-2015 12:21 PM)Wutang Wrote:  Posted on Roosh's twitter, a guy who appears to be a Polish Catholic priest gives a speech at a rally calling for defending the spirit of his nation and for his church against leftism and the migrant invasion accompanying it





I'm not Polish (or even white) nor Catholic but I'm getting chills from this.

Something I noticed is that in the above video you hear mostly men in the audience. Compare it to this video where a bunch of Dutch sing a song welcoming refugees as they arrive from the airport

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d9c_1441497156

Notice the difference in the gender balances of both groups?

And this is why it's always been men that preserves civilization and culture.

If invaders take over your country, the women ultimately don't care, because they just sleep with the invaders. Women down deep are happy to see their men slaughtered if they get stronger men in their place. Women will always dump their boyfriend or husband if a richer or stronger man takes them.

More information about the priest who gave the speech above:

http://www.catholicworldreport.com/Blog/...alism.aspx

"As he belongs to a religious order—the Congregation of the Mission, or the Vincentian Fathers—Father Międlar is not under the jurisdiction of a bishop. However, according to the national newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza, his parish in Wrocław is divided in their opinion of their priest’s appearances at nationalist rallies. Some parishioners have congratulated him, whereas others have written letters of complaint. “I am making my own quiet protest by no longer going to St. Anne’s,” said one."

(12-16-2015 07:30 PM)Lizard King Wrote:  Local politicians discussing plans for "refugee" centre in a Dutch town




Then this happens, or: the view from outside.

The woman in that first video doesn't even speak proper Dutch (I'm a native speaker).

truthbomb

(12-18-2015 12:37 AM)MrLemon Wrote:  If invaders take over your country, the women ultimately don't care, because they just sleep with the invaders. Women down deep are happy to see their men slaughtered if they get stronger men in their place. Women will always dump their boyfriend or husband if a richer or stronger man takes them.

Import millions of women from Brazil, The Philippines, or Russia and the tables will be turned.

(12-18-2015 12:50 AM)Wutang Wrote:  More information about the priest who gave the speech above:

http://www.catholicworldreport.com/Blog/...alism.aspx

"As he belongs to a religious order—the Congregation of the Mission, or the Vincentian Fathers—Father Międlar is not under the jurisdiction of a bishop. However, according to the national newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza, his parish in Wrocław is divided in their opinion of their priest’s appearances at nationalist rallies. Some parishioners have congratulated him, whereas others have written letters of complaint. “I am making my own quiet protest by no longer going to St. Anne’s,” said one."

The more I read, the more I think, the more certain I become that the only realistic chance we have of resisting the Islamisation of the West is though a resurgent Christianity, and a large scale return to the Christian church by all concerned citizens. All religions seem to me to be a vehicle for a more fundamental truth, so one need not necessarily believe in the personified Christian God to be a serious Christian. The sharing of ritual with your brethren, the tradition and custom, the sacrifice and the charity, all of these will create bonds that will be far harder to break than those formed by mere political allegiance. Indeed, one of the oft-cited reasons for the Left's success is that their politics is in fact a religion of its own, with a virulent ideology. Perhaps the reason we on the Right have lost so easily is because we have declared ourselves 'too clever' to believe in a personified God, and therefore thrown out all that was real and wonderful about Christianity because we don't believe in a sky wizard, which in itself is about the most childish, low-level caricaturisation of 'God' in Christianity.

As a life long aethiest and someone who, to my shame, always took pride in ticking the 'no religion' box on a form as though it made me cleverer than those 'poor deluded saps', I am considering a return to the church.

Not sure if this was posted yet, I searched but didn't find anything.

Sweden: Muslim Migrants Batter Gay Man to Death, Wrap Snake Around His Neck

http://www.infowars.com/sweden-muslim-mi...-his-neck/

Sorry gays... Muslims are the new hard-on obsession of the left.

(12-18-2015 08:03 AM)H1N1 Wrote:  The more I read, the more I think, the more certain I become that the only realistic chance we have of resisting the Islamisation of the West is though a resurgent Christianity, and a large scale return to the Christian church by all concerned citizens. All religions seem to me to be a vehicle for a more fundamental truth, so one need not necessarily believe in the personified Christian God to be a serious Christian. The sharing of ritual with your brethren, the tradition and custom, the sacrifice and the charity, all of these will create bonds that will be far harder to break than those formed by mere political allegiance. Indeed, one of the oft-cited reasons for the Left's success is that their politics is in fact a religion of its own, with a virulent ideology. Perhaps the reason we on the Right have lost so easily is because we have declared ourselves 'too clever' to believe in a personified God, and therefore thrown out all that was real and wonderful about Christianity because we don't believe in a sky wizard, which in itself is about the most childish, low-level caricaturisation of 'God' in Christianity.

As a life long atheist and someone who, to my shame, always took pride in ticking the 'no religion' box on a form as though it made me cleverer than those 'poor deluded saps', I am considering a return to the church.

You're saying exactly what I have been going through as well, H1N1. In my childhood, religion was absent and when I got older I became fascinated with the concept from an almost anthropological perspective. "How can adults around the world believe in such obvious nonsense?"

I have never and will never belief in a personal deity. It's just not going to happen since the concept does not provide any explanatory power to me. That being said, my youthful arrogance has mostly subsided and I am starting to realize the wisdom of the elders.

For some time I have looked at religion as a good evolutionary strategy: guide sexual behavior towards reproduction, guide social behavior towards stability, make sure men are invested in a common goal.

I just figured we needed a secular narrative. But that's not going to convince the masses. And the fear of God and the reward of an afterlife are such strong motivators that any secular reasons are just not going to cut it. If one side wants to fight for the death and the other does not, you know which side has the edge.

(12-18-2015 08:24 AM)sixsix Wrote:  I just figured we needed a secular narrative. But that's not going to convince the masses. And the fear of God and the reward of an afterlife are such strong motivators that any secular reasons are just not going to cut it. If one side wants to fight for the death and the other does not, you know which side has the edge.

The view I've come to is that a secular narrative will never suffice, as it is at its core, a fundamental belief in nothing. The secular narrative places the sole importance of the temporal plane as a metaphysical truth - something that is objectively unknowable. I personally view formal religion as codified dogma, of 2rd hand written accounts of teachings that were intended to be oral, part of a dialogue, and appropriate to their time and setting. But there is plenty in the works of the Great Christian figures such as St Bernard, and Meister Eckhart, to suggest that they would have had some sympathy with this view. I think, as I have, you would find a deeper study of the ideas behind the literal, written word, quite fulfilling, and make your attraction to the church easier to reconcile (if you have not done so already).

(12-18-2015 08:24 AM)sixsix Wrote:  

(12-18-2015 08:03 AM)H1N1 Wrote:  The more I read, the more I think, the more certain I become that the only realistic chance we have of resisting the Islamisation of the West is though a resurgent Christianity, and a large scale return to the Christian church by all concerned citizens. All religions seem to me to be a vehicle for a more fundamental truth, so one need not necessarily believe in the personified Christian God to be a serious Christian. The sharing of ritual with your brethren, the tradition and custom, the sacrifice and the charity, all of these will create bonds that will be far harder to break than those formed by mere political allegiance. Indeed, one of the oft-cited reasons for the Left's success is that their politics is in fact a religion of its own, with a virulent ideology. Perhaps the reason we on the Right have lost so easily is because we have declared ourselves 'too clever' to believe in a personified God, and therefore thrown out all that was real and wonderful about Christianity because we don't believe in a sky wizard, which in itself is about the most childish, low-level caricaturisation of 'God' in Christianity.

As a life long atheist and someone who, to my shame, always took pride in ticking the 'no religion' box on a form as though it made me cleverer than those 'poor deluded saps', I am considering a return to the church.

You're saying exactly what I have been going through as well, H1N1. In my childhood, religion was absent and when I got older I became fascinated with the concept from an almost anthropological perspective. "How can adults around the world believe in such obvious nonsense?"

I have never and will never belief in a personal deity. It's just not going to happen since the concept does not provide any explanatory power to me. That being said, my youthful arrogance has mostly subsided and I am starting to realize the wisdom of the elders.

For some time I have looked at religion as a good evolutionary strategy: guide sexual behavior towards reproduction, guide social behavior towards stability, make sure men are invested in a common goal.

I just figured we needed a secular narrative. But that's not going to convince the masses. And the fear of God and the reward of an afterlife are such strong motivators that any secular reasons are just not going to cut it. If one side wants to fight for the death and the other does not, you know which side has the edge.

I'm glad to hear this from guys on the forum. You're very right, it will take another Christian awakening to save the West. The alternatives will either be Islamic rule (less likely) or a Marxist police state (more likely). I grew up with religion but never was devout. I also realized later in life that it's very well possible there is not a literal God. We all know about the asshole atheist who gives people shit about believing in a "man in the sky" or says the world would have less violence or war without religion. But this is simplistic thinking. You don't have to literally believe in God to understand the true value of religion to a society, and the "asshole atheist" is only one step towards that realization yet they flaunt it like they know everything. Religion has always existed and like any fundamental tool in humanity like the wheel or fire or the bow and arrow it too arose independently among different tribes and peoples. Whether it's worshipping nature, ancestors, many gods, or one God it's part of our nature and although it's not necessary for survival of an individual it's necessary for the survival of a society. Secular societies don't last long and we're seeing that with the west today. Poland owes its survival over the past millennium to Catholicism. As devout as they may seem in that video though, they too are starting to trend like Western Europe. Young people aren't going to church as much anymore. It's nowhere near as bad and they're definitely not past saving, but don't assume everyone is like that obviously. If there's something we can do its to get people to understand the value of Christianity to our society whether or not you believe the "man in the sky concept" and to oppose the denouncing of Christianity in favor of Islam or secularism. Banging sloots out of wedlock isn't exactly walking our talk but hey you can't have your cake and eat it too right?

(12-13-2015 02:58 PM)civpro Wrote:  

(12-12-2015 09:00 PM)TheBMan Wrote:  

(12-12-2015 01:49 PM)scotian Wrote:  Interesting video of a US government bureaucrat (deputy assistant secretary for screening coordination, office of policy of homeland security) getting grilled on her lack of knowledge regarding the number of Syrians coming into the country, I don't understand how people like her get into these positions.

You want to know why Washington DC and the Federal Govt is a complete and utter joke??? Because there are thousands of useless idiots like this chick with Philosophy degrees from Liberal Arts schools who do nothing and know nothing and get paid well to do it...

2014
BURRIESCI,KELLI ANN 00 ES $154,131.00 $0.00 DHS HEADQUARTERS WASHINGTON MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATION AND PROGRAM 2014

http://www.bupipedream.com/news/52744/fr...her-story/

MIND = BLOWN at how low IQ and primitive she comes across. She speaks with that characteristic "slut accent". How does it feel to know that a stripper could make it as a top government official in control of your life? This is some next-level dystopian shit.

I used to work in the government, at the same "assistant deputy secretary" scale, although it was in a state, not federal agency.

How does this chick get her job you ask?

1. Because she can talk the stupid acronyms like its her native language. Words come out of her mouth that mean nothing, but sound like something. She can parrot general policy like a speak n spell. You type in the letters and she'll spit them out.

2. This slut is ruthless. She will deflect any mistake, error or criticism that comes her way down to her underlings. She also knows the HR rulebook inside and out and will use it to entrap her in-office opponents.

3. Because this chick has no life outside of her job. She will respond to emails at 1:15am while wiping cum off of her ass and live at the office all weekend if need be.

This chick cannot do her job and is an idiot in terms of technical and policy knowledge. However, she is an expert at social climbing, back stabbing and passing the buck.

In her tenure as assistant deputy whatever she will simultaneously make no achievements for her department and also take no heat for any disasters. If she were the captain of a cruise ship and it hit a reef and sank she would say "When I stepped onto this ship, the last captain had pointed it due west at 10 knots. I didn't touch the controls after that. If it crashed into some rocks, it was because none of the crew members told me that we were in danger of hitting those rocks. The crew failed to keep me informed, and thats why the ship crashed." She would not get fired, and she in turn would not fire any of her crew.

Another way to look at who this kind of upper level government cunt is, is to think back to your elementary school days. Remember group projects where some girl would say "I'll do the presentation, if you guys do the research". Thats this girl...if the presentation goes well, she is in the spotlight and gets all the credit...if it goes poorly she just blames her team for sloppy work and she'll say it right on stage "This isn't my fault, my team does shit research" Did you ever see the kids who went and complained to the teacher when the group got a low mark and somehow negotiated an A for herself because the collective C+ wasn't her fault?

That is this woman. She is an expert in self promotion and preservation, that is how she got this job despite knowing jack shit about anything the agency actually does.

Quote:Rich liberal women prefer conservative men
http://dailycaller.com/2014/02/14/rich-l...ative-men/

Heh. I've know this one for a long time

Liberals have this naive notion that culture is like light and when mixed with other cultures it becomes more colorful.

The truth is, culture is more like paint. What happens when you start mixing different colors of paint?

You get a nasty shade of brown.

(12-18-2015 12:37 AM)MrLemon Wrote:  

(12-18-2015 12:19 AM)Wutang Wrote:  

(12-17-2015 12:21 PM)Wutang Wrote:  Posted on Roosh's twitter, a guy who appears to be a Polish Catholic priest gives a speech at a rally calling for defending the spirit of his nation and for his church against leftism and the migrant invasion accompanying it





I'm not Polish (or even white) nor Catholic but I'm getting chills from this.

Something I noticed is that in the above video you hear mostly men in the audience. Compare it to this video where a bunch of Dutch sing a song welcoming refugees as they arrive from the airport

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d9c_1441497156

Notice the difference in the gender balances of both groups?

And this is why it's always been men that preserves civilization and culture.

If invaders take over your country, the women ultimately don't care, because they just sleep with the invaders. Women down deep are happy to see their men slaughtered if they get stronger men in their place. Women will always dump their boyfriend or husband if a richer or stronger man takes them.

This is why giving women the right to vote is beyond retarded. At best, only married mothers of 2 or more children (a number to be decided upon by the men) should be allowed to vote on SOME issues. The reason being, of course, that married mothers already have children by men of the state and therefore have a vested interest in the continuation of the state, so their votes should in theory have some value to them.

For example, married mothers of the state could vote on stuff like how schools are run, community churches, town fairs, and welfare for single-mothers. Practical stuff that a woman's mind is naturally suited for.

But more abstract and important matters, like border security, tax policy, tariff agreements, criminal punishments, etc, can only rightfully and properly judged by men (and these men must be selected on criteria as well: military service, tax contribution, etc).

Voting is a privilege, not a right. Spread the meme.