Post: #51

^ Jesus AB. That's brutal.

Post: #52

(11-30-2015 09:50 PM)HighSpeed_LowDrag Wrote:  Open letter to Deen by feminist writer Margaret Corvid

Post: #53

(11-30-2015 09:05 PM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  I really don't see how his supposed racism even factors into this debate.

Unless your trying to score SJW rep points.


(And isn't racism supposed by nature?)

Let me ask you this: would you help a man who actively hates you for your skin colour?

Didn't think so.

If he is a racist then sorry bro, you get no sympathy from me.

Post: #54

"i #standwithstoya because no woman is obligated to provide evidence of her rape to the public and support shouldnt be conditional upon that"

Insanity.

WIA

Post: #55

"She says that only now with other women stepping forward to tell their stories does she feel comfortable speaking up about her experience.

Post: #56

(11-30-2015 08:18 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

(11-30-2015 08:03 PM)Razgriz Wrote:  "Why should I care about the fate of a man who sides with women against other men and would shame me as a misogynist, given the chance, and probably tell me to 'listen and believe' if it was happening to any other man?

I'm not about to waste time or energy trying to save him from the mob. He's not in my tribe."

This. So much. People always going on about how some big Hollywood star is being cannibalized by the left. Who cares. They are not one of us.

first they came for the betas, then they came for the male feminists, next they came for the Mgtows and then they came for me.

Thats why you should at least pay attention.

Deen has enough followers/supporters to defend himself, so I agree we don't need to jump to his defense, but this is an opportunity to announce to other male feminists that being a water boy for SJW's won't provide immunity from the mob.

Post: #57

(11-30-2015 10:51 PM)WestIndianArchie Wrote:  Insanity.

As per my point on the previous page, how do you fight insanity? I've watched 35+ years of people arguing with Feminism and Socialism. Being fair and rational doesn't work against the delusional. Hell, presenting observable reality in front of their faces doesn't work either.

Seriously, what possible counterattack is there that won't be handwaved away as being based on some 'phobia' when every politician, social institution, media construct and three quarters of the male population will rush to ignore reality in the name of defending a woman's hurt feelings?

Post: #58

(11-30-2015 11:11 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Deen has enough followers/supporters to defend himself, so I agree we don't need to jump to his defense, but this is an opportunity to announce to other male feminists that being a water boy for SJW's won't provide immunity from the mob.

No. If anything it makes the mob burn even hotter: heathens at least have the excuse that they are ignorant of and do not follow the One True Faith, but Official Believers who carry on against the creed commit treason, heresy, turn their backs on former friends.

And in Deen's case, he never actually said he was a feminist - only said he believed in "respecting others' rights and boundaries."

Post: #59

Quote:how do you fight insanity?

With might.

The current narrative can't be argued or reasoned out of existence.

Post: #60

(11-30-2015 11:18 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(11-30-2015 10:51 PM)WestIndianArchie Wrote:  Insanity.

As per my point on the previous page, how do you fight insanity? I've watched 35+ years of people arguing with Feminism and Socialism. Being fair and rational doesn't work against the delusional. Hell, presenting observable reality in front of their faces doesn't work either.

Seriously, what possible counterattack is there that won't be handwaved away as being based on some 'phobia' when every politician, social institution, media construct and three quarters of the male population will rush to ignore reality in the name of defending a woman's hurt feelings?

The only one that has lasted for eight hundred years of English jurisprudence: the court, and the precious presumption of innocence. That's why women avoid it as much as possible: he who behaves badly hates the light.

Post: #61

(11-30-2015 11:18 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(11-30-2015 10:51 PM)WestIndianArchie Wrote:  Insanity.

As per my point on the previous page, how do you fight insanity? I've watched 35+ years of people arguing with Feminism and Socialism. Being fair and rational doesn't work against the delusional. Hell, presenting observable reality in front of their faces doesn't work either.

Seriously, what possible counterattack is there that won't be handwaved away as being based on some 'phobia' when every politician, social institution, media construct and three quarters of the male population will rush to ignore reality in the name of defending a woman's hurt feelings?

Between people like this and obesity, I've come to the conclusion that our bodies and minds have evolved in a way to interact with external environmental pressures (scarcity, war, etc.). So to put it shortly, and not to sound pseudo macho, but the only way these things go away is when these environmental pressures (a.k.a. Reality outside the concrete jungle) can have their influence. In terms of the 'civilized' world, I don't think there is a counterattack. Civilization is as much physically artificial as it is socially artificial.

Post: #62

(11-30-2015 11:20 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  The only one that has lasted for eight hundred years of English jurisprudence: the court, and the precious presumption of innocence.

I guarantee you the legal system has already been infiltrated by women with hair like this, with a wave of new Ideological Drones being indoctrinated at Universities everywhere ready to overthrow the legal system in the name of Social Justice.



This is why I find the idea that Feminists still claim the Police as being a Patriarchal Institution laughable.

(11-30-2015 11:20 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Quote:how do you fight insanity?

With might.

The current narrative can't be argued or reasoned out of existence.

I knew that was the only answer. Fear via oppression is the only winning state. Even Feminists understand this, which is why they're attempting to create a culture of fear now.

This is why I feel the Islamisation of the West is inevitable, (if Paris was largely met with shrugs of acceptance and any criticism was met with 'phobic' labelling, I think the numbers just aren't there to fight it). I've come to accept it as a necessary, (if over), correction. Women crave to feel hard done by, and won't stop inventing ways to feel like martyrs. Why stop them achieving the state they want to be in?

Post: #63

Ex-porn star Aurora Snow gave her take on James Deen in The Daily Beast. Check it out.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/20...-porn.html

She used to be hot but it's obvious from her photos that wall impact has already occured.

Post: #64

(11-30-2015 11:24 PM)nek Wrote:  Between people like this and obesity, I've come to the conclusion that our bodies and minds have evolved in a way to interact with external environmental pressures (scarcity, war, etc.). So to put it shortly, and not to sound pseudo macho, but the only way these things go away is when these environmental pressures (a.k.a. Reality outside the concrete jungle) can have their influence. In terms of the 'civilized' world, I don't think there is a counterattack. Civilization is as much physically artificial as it is socially artificial.

Yep.
An obvious & ridiculous contradiction of those who rant against "privilege".
The fact that they have so much spare time due to the modern structures of a functioning society.
To the point where they're able to rant about nonsense such as "manspreading" as opposed to
having to scratch a living out of the ground.
Always seems to be lost on these SJW retards.

Forest for the trees...

Post: #65

(12-01-2015 12:13 AM)mrbiggs Wrote:  Ex-porn star Aurora Snow gave her take on James Deen in The Daily Beast. Check it out.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/20...-porn.html

She used to be hot but it's obvious from her photos that wall impact has already occured.

Nooooooooo..... how the mighty have fallen.... she could take face fucking with the best of them
I wish I had never seen these pics you posted.. I still have a video of her getting used in my spank bank... now I shall never be able to fap to it again

Post: #66

(11-30-2015 08:57 PM)Fortis Wrote:  I read that interview where he says "the Jews are better than everyone." Or something like that and I think he may have been joking. I think we should be careful about saying someone is racist or an ethnic eugenicist. I hate that sort of shit but it still might not be true.

On the same token I can't in good faith stand behind this man simply a because he was kowtowing to feminists before.

His "racist" interview response was sarcastic.

Quote:Do you happen to have any Jewish role models or figures in the industry?

I don’t go into a place and think, “I’m Jewish. Who else is Jewish? I need to work with them.” Respect goes universally across all races, creeds, colors, religions, everything. The Jews know we’re better than everyone else. That’s all that matters.

That’s going to be the blow-up quote in the article.

(Laughs) It’s true. We’re the Chosen People. (Laughs) It’s a fact.

Don't assume things just because you might have read something somewhere a couple years ago...

Post: #67

I think what we're all shocked by is the speed and ease with which the establishment is caving in before the SJW onslaughts.

The cowardice of the establishment is seen in these incidents:

France: reacting to apocalyptic Islamist attacks with peace vigils and candle-light hymns.

America: reacting to SJW attacks (BlackLivesMatter provocations, feminist provocations, destroying the military with "gender equality", destroying the traditional gender roles with promotion of perverse lifestyles, undermining the police, turning the educational system into a PC indoctrination system, etc.)

And it just goes on and on.

It's hard to say where all this will lead.

Perhaps it is as AB says: into the void left by the collapse of the patriarchy will move the muscular forces of Islam, restoring order and smashing the faces and hands of the SJW scum and ruling-class sellouts who got us where we are now.

Or maybe we will see the West take a stand, and draw battle lines at some point.

It is not easy to say what will happen.

I personally have been alarmed by the lack of will I see at the top to stand up for the legacy that they were put there to safeguard. There is the smell of blood in the water, and the sharks are circling.

What is in store? Is it to be Spain, 1936? With a conservative take-over and all-out war against cultural Bolshevism?

Or will it be just a long, slow collapse into nothingness?

I don't know.

But I do still sense that a reaction will be coming, and coming soon.

Post: #68

Quote:how do you fight insanity?

By all means available.

The UVa rape hoax case broke out just over a year ago. Posters on this forum, and other voices in the 'sphere, called it out as a hoax as soon as the Rolling Stone article appeared; and because of the courage of Richard Bradley, and the tenacity of good Washington Post reporters (particularly T. Rees Shapiro), the hoax was soon exposed for all to see, including all the juicy details about Jackie Coakley's catfishing antics and the invention of "Haven Monahan" out of the whole cloth. Rolling Stone was forced to retract the article, and Sabrina Rubin-Erdely was forced to stop writing more of the same garbage, at least for the time being. Now the magazine is being sued by the fraternity it slandered.

It was by no means a complete win; Teresa Sullivan was not removed as president of UVa despite her shameful willingness and indeed eagerness to go along with the hoax, and to persecute the falsely accused. And more generally, college campuses have doubled down on "rape" hysteria. But it was not a complete loss, either. Some of the worst monsters and proselytizers, like Jessica Valenti, Amanda Marcotte, and the Jezebel crew, had to eat a lot of crow and although they were in disbelief that any lie could ever be successfully challenged, there was nothing they could do about it. It showed that they were not invincible, and that dogged reporting and persistent airing of the truth could have a real effect.

The conclusion is that the battle should always be joined, and the lies should be countered at all times and by all means available. Most of the specific cases may be lost, but you never know that ahead of time, and the one thing that guarantees a loss is not fighting back. And if nothing else, even when a case is lost there will be a few decent people who will see through the charade and get an inkling of what is going on; the more such converts we make, the stronger our cause becomes. But this only happens if someone makes the effort to expose the lies in public, each and every time, and never tires of it despite having few wins to show for it.

Patience and perseverance will eventually pay off, though it may take what seems like forever. This is not the time to stop fighting back in every way possible.

Post: #69

Whatever happened to the presumption of innocence? That is one of the pillars of American law. Thought it has always been "Innocent until proven guilty," not "Guilty until proven innocent." This is the SJW agenda. They will hop on anything that is rape related and immediately run with it demanding the chopping block without evidence of the event transpiring.

If he didn't do it, he is screwed. If he did do it, he is very screwed.

Unfortunately, a woman's word is enough to ruin a man's life.

Post: #70

(12-01-2015 01:00 AM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  I think what we're all shocked by is the speed and ease with which the establishment is caving in before the SJW onslaughts.

The cowardice of the establishment is seen in these incidents:

France: reacting to apocalyptic Islamist attacks with peace vigils and candle-light hymns.

America: reacting to SJW attacks (BlackLivesMatter provocations, feminist provocations, destroying the military with "gender equality", destroying the traditional gender roles with promotion of perverse lifestyles, undermining the police, turning the educational system into a PC indoctrination system, etc.)

And it just goes on and on.

It's hard to say where all this will lead.

Perhaps it is as AB says: into the void left by the collapse of the patriarchy will move the muscular forces of Islam, restoring order and smashing the faces and hands of the SJW scum and ruling-class sellouts who got us where we are now.

Or maybe we will see the West take a stand, and draw battle lines at some point.

It is not easy to say what will happen.

I personally have been alarmed by the lack of will I see at the top to stand up for the legacy that they were put there to safeguard. There is the smell of blood in the water, and the sharks are circling.

What is in store? Is it to be Spain, 1936? With a conservative take-over and all-out war against cultural Bolshevism?

Or will it be just a long, slow collapse into nothingness?

I don't know.

But I do still sense that a reaction will be coming, and coming soon.

The Dark Ages lasted how long? And yet we have world changing tech, medical care and thinking of going to Mars within a decade, another planet!

Hell surgeons are proposing an actual head transplant in the near future. Millions of peasants can make ocean journeys and movements across land mass in a month which would normally take years and wipe out a good number of them normally.

If we are to suffer then I doubt it will lead to humanity's destruction. It will be painful for our generation and those yet to come but for those down the line it should be ok and once again the human race shall move forward.

I just believe what must be done to sort this mess is beyond rational thought for the masses as of now. Extreme mass violence has always been the fire to cleanse a forest anew.

Post: #71

It's a sad day when Buttman is caving to SJWs. Is he afraid some beat out hags are going to quit working with his company? Believe me, there are thousands of girls with bad fathers or horny uncles waiting to take Stoya's place.

And Stoya is 29 - that's ancient in the porn world.

Quote:Major Porn Companies Cut Ties With James Deen

Kink.com and Evil Angel distance themselves from the performer, who stands accused of sexual assault.

Porn company Evil Angel, which has distributed nearly 100 films starring Deen, told Vocativ that it has decided to stop selling new scenes featuring the performer, at least for the time being. “In light of the recent accusations against James Deen, Evil Angel today has decided not to sell any newly created scenes featuring Deen,” the company’s president John Stagliano said in a statement. “While our company presents what is consensual and exploratory about aggressive and rough sex, these accusations are of a nature so contrary to our company values that we feel it necessary to suspend the sales until more information is available.”

HA! A porn company with corporate "values". Making a girl drink urine and her own vomit - those don't violate their values.

Post: #72

(12-01-2015 09:55 AM)Remington Wrote:  Unfortunately, a woman's word is enough to ruin a man's life.

There needs to be a law where a false rape accusation is defined as a first degree felony, with a prison sentence of a bare minimum of 15 years without parole.

Even that may not be enough to deter women from ruining a man's good name just because she can.

Post: #73

(12-01-2015 12:29 PM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  It's a sad day when Buttman is caving to SJWs. Is he afraid some beat out hags are going to quit working with his company? Believe me, there are thousands of girls with bad fathers or horny uncles waiting to take Stoya's place.

And Stoya is 29 - that's ancient in the porn world.

Quote:Major Porn Companies Cut Ties With James Deen

Kink.com and Evil Angel distance themselves from the performer, who stands accused of sexual assault.

Porn company Evil Angel, which has distributed nearly 100 films starring Deen, told Vocativ that it has decided to stop selling new scenes featuring the performer, at least for the time being. “In light of the recent accusations against James Deen, Evil Angel today has decided not to sell any newly created scenes featuring Deen,” the company’s president John Stagliano said in a statement. “While our company presents what is consensual and exploratory about aggressive and rough sex, these accusations are of a nature so contrary to our company values that we feel it necessary to suspend the sales until more information is available.”

HA! A porn company with corporate "values". Making a girl drink urine and her own vomit - those don't violate their values.

Now even the porn industry is caving to SJWs? Fucking hell!

Post: #74

(12-01-2015 12:50 PM)Kaii Wrote:  Now even the porn industry is caving to SJWs? Fucking hell!

Given the porn they produce, it amuses me greatly that they've just shown weakness to the SJW's. I'm sure they'll be spared.

(12-01-2015 09:00 AM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  The UVa rape hoax case broke out just over a year ago. Posters on this forum, and other voices in the 'sphere, called it out as a hoax as soon as the Rolling Stone article appeared; and because of the courage of Richard Bradley, and the tenacity of good Washington Post reporters (particularly T. Rees Shapiro), the hoax was soon exposed for all to see, including all the juicy details about Jackie Coakley's catfishing antics and the invention of "Haven Monahan" out of the whole cloth. Rolling Stone was forced to retract the article, and Sabrina Rubin-Erdely was forced to stop writing more of the same garbage, at least for the time being. Now the magazine is being sued by the fraternity it slandered.

It didn't take down Rolling Stone, and they can easily absorb the cost of that lawsuit.

It didn't take down any of the Feminists who backed it.

It didn't take down any the academics involved.

It didn't weaken the 'rape culture' narrative at all: SJW's just doubled-down.

The writer never directly apologised for lying, she just shifted blame.

Rolling Stone never apologised for allowing the lies an audience, they just shifted blame.

The girl in question never apologised for lying, and no-one involved, (politicians, journalists, or police), described her with the 'L' word.

The majority of women I know still bring the case up as a real event, not a hoax.

As I said earlier, presenting facts and evidence against a strong religious belief do nothing.

If you feel empowered by the Manosphere's role in taking down Rubin-Erdely for promoting a false narrative based upon what she wanted to see, then if we presume all narratives will play out this way, we're just as guilty as she is.

The social norms of women are always in flux. If they've been shown they can get some semblance of justice for oversharing on social media, it doesn't necessarily follow that all public rape accusations will be false after a couple of years of this. It is simply women conforming to what has been normalised, acting in what they perceive as their best interest based upon a Culture of Fear Feminists have created that the police won't believe them.

Coakley's story was obviously-false: there was no verisimilitude to her tale, and multiple signs of delusion. The ridiculous story about everyone laughing at her in a bar after a bottle being broken over her head was the sheltered conception of a naive girl about what rich people are like and what they're allowed to do based upon watching too many CW dramas.

Dunham's story: obviously-false, attention seeking drama.

Madonna's story: given her poverty, probably happened, but she just never spoke about it because it held no currency.

This story? Who the hell really knows? Neither porn actors or actresses are reliable narrators. These are damaged people. She's nuts, sure, but most likely, he is too. His history of constant virtue signalling is a huge red flag for me. Given the savage darkening of porn in general, and the dehumanisation, degradation and loathing for both the male and female that seems to be have become the norm over the last ten years or so - buried under the excuse of being 'gonzo' - the idea of both actors and producers ignoring her safe word during a scene strikes me as a reasonable idea. Could be false, but could just as likely be true. It's for the police and courts to decide.

I don't want to defend every rape accusation as false just because a man is involved, even if previous accusations against other men were false, particularly given the amount of disinformation 4 and 8 Chan filter into each public event. (Look how /pol/ quickly tried to paint Deen as Racist). Let the police sort it out, or choose to back the wrong horse and end up looking like Rolling Stone when facts are eventually revealed.

I see no advantage in going to bat for someone who isn't on my team anyway. Progressive types have a different moral code to me, and lack honour and integrity. Their words and claims of grand virtue are meaningless.

Post: #75

Isn't Stagliano on that Charlie Sheen? Didn't he bang Sheena Shaw without disclosing it?

Smh