Post: #1301

(11-23-2015 01:33 AM)N°6 Wrote:  ^@syrianguy Deep down and certainly under the apparent dispute between Israel and the Arab world over Palestine, Jews and Muslims share one very important raison d'être: their historical opposition to European 'Caesarism'. Judaism was born in the Roman province of Judea when the last temple was destroyed while much of Islam was influenced by the Byzantine Caesar's rejection of Mohammed's claims.

Christianity in contrast, renders that which is God's to God and that which is Caesar's to Caesar thus allowing the Christian to have a religious and secular allegiance. It was only when corrupt Caesars wanted Christians' religious allegiance (that which is God's) did the persecutions begin.

As late as the 20th Century, secular Caesarism still existed in Europe in its Germanic (West Roman Empire) and Russian (East/ Byzantine Roman Empire) forms but were both destroyed: the Kaiser and the Tzar both theoretical Caesars fell due to the revolution which can be traced to the freeing of the revolutionary Barabbas in the court of Pilate. In both Germany and Russia, the fates of the Second Reich and Byzantine Russia were said to be due to Jewish influence out of proportion to the population.

In Europe, the last remnant of Caesarism is the Roman Church which is led by the pontifix maximus and the Roman curia. Outside Christendom, when people think of Christianity, they think of Rome.

What are people in the West likely to be called if they oppose the international SJW agenda? Fascist. Isn't historical Fascism the attempted revival of the Roman ethos married to the return of the Roman Church's medieval guild system (the corporate state)?

Top comment.
Worth bumping up.

Post: #1302

(11-22-2015 12:56 PM)Odin Wrote:  This video is worth a viewing and provides a refreshing outlook on what is happening in the world today.. all fueled by neo-colonialism

(11-22-2015 08:38 PM)Disco_Volante Wrote:  Muslims have been abusing Europe for 1400 years now. Great video on the denial of white people to face the reality of Islam. Very informative if your history is not up to snuff.

Sorry to be a bore gentlemen, but both of those videos have been posted in this thread. Undoubtedly, both offer very interesting perspectives.

Post: #1303

(11-23-2015 01:08 AM)scotian Wrote:  

(11-23-2015 01:01 AM)Mike5055 Wrote:  That woman in the video is stupid. All buzzwords and no substance. She's the type of person that thinks feelings equal facts. Her and people like her can't possibly grasp the complexities of geopolitics yet they always have to add their two cents. The whole piece repeatedly showed she just didn't understand.

Fucking embarrassment to my country, she's a Rhodes school and an "all star" member of parliament in Canada's new federal government being appointed to the cabinet of Canada as trade minister.

She´s what?
I don´t know her and thought she must be some dumb celebrity or journalist they invited, and now you are telling me she´s the new trade minister of Canada? Unbelievable.
And what´s with her voice?
All the other guys are discussing in a calm, civilized way, taking turns, and she´s shrieking and screeching like a harpy, interrupting and discarding statistics and facts in favor of her believes.
And Canadians voted her into government?

Post: #1304

(11-23-2015 08:39 AM)Celtic_Austrian Wrote:  

(11-23-2015 01:08 AM)scotian Wrote:  

(11-23-2015 01:01 AM)Mike5055 Wrote:  That woman in the video is stupid. All buzzwords and no substance. She's the type of person that thinks feelings equal facts. Her and people like her can't possibly grasp the complexities of geopolitics yet they always have to add their two cents. The whole piece repeatedly showed she just didn't understand.

Fucking embarrassment to my country, she's a Rhodes school and an "all star" member of parliament in Canada's new federal government being appointed to the cabinet of Canada as trade minister.

She´s what?
I don´t know her and thought she must be some dumb celebrity or journalist they invited, and now you are telling me she´s the new trade minister of Canada? Unbelievable.
And what´s with her voice?
All the other guys are discussing in a calm, civilized way, taking turns, and she´s shrieking and screeching like a harpy, interrupting and discarding statistics and facts in favor of her believes.
And Canadians voted her into government?

Unsurprisingly she was elected in a federal riding of the Canadian city of, wait for it......Toronto!

Post: #1305

(11-23-2015 12:36 AM)Latinopan Wrote:  

(11-23-2015 12:08 AM)Tex Pro Wrote:  

Ask that bitch in the violet dress how many "refugees" she is going to move to her house? let see if she is so open about it when Hamed see her infidel legs being exposed.

I saw this the other day. It was seriously like watching an emotional child on that stage. I had no idea who she was and was floored when it was revealed that she's a Canadian bureaucrat.

Post: #1306

^As you guys saw with Roosh's Canada SJW fiasco, we have a large, vocal minority of raging useful idiots who also have an inferiority complex vis-a-vis the United States, under Prime Minister Trudeau I expect Canada/US relations to sink to a new low that hasn't been seen since the Bush Iraq war days. We just voted out a very pro-US PM who although lacked charisma, he kept his Members of Parliament on a short lease and didn't embarrass us on the international stage. Outside of the big cities most Canadians aren't like this woman, but unfortunately places like Toronto are full of them.

Post: #1307

Post: #1308

2:28 "I may not be the most comfortable neighbor for you, but I do not blow up your cities and do not kill your fellow citizens."

Nailed it.

Europe doesn't get it because they scream "TOLERANCE ! DIVERSITY !"

Post: #1309

Frankie Boyle nails it with his diminutive sense of humour.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/no...are_btn_tw

Post: #1310

Gay men will be included among Syrian refugees accepted into Canada

Quote:Gay men will be among the Syrian refugees the government is willing to bring to Canada under a plan that will primarily welcome only women, children and families. Security concerns over extremists potentially slipping in to Canada mean the Liberal government will likely exclude unaccompanied males from its planned resettlement of 25,000 refugees by Dec. 31.

: http://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/d...p-cautions

I'd like to know how the Canadian government plans to figure out if a Syrian refugee is gay or not.

Post: #1311

(11-23-2015 05:58 PM)scotian Wrote:  Gay men will be included among Syrian refugees accepted into Canada

Quote:Gay men will be among the Syrian refugees the government is willing to bring to Canada under a plan that will primarily welcome only women, children and families. Security concerns over extremists potentially slipping in to Canada mean the Liberal government will likely exclude unaccompanied males from its planned resettlement of 25,000 refugees by Dec. 31.

: http://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/d...p-cautions

I'd like to know how the Canadian government plans to figure out how a Syrian refugee is gay or not.

So their Minister of Treasury or whatever is on Bill Maher embarrassing herself about how "not all Muslims are extremists" and that we shouldn't discriminate against Muslims because of that.

Well, apparently it is ok to discriminate against Muslims, but only the straight males.

Post: #1312

(11-23-2015 06:01 PM)RioNomad Wrote:  

(11-23-2015 05:58 PM)scotian Wrote:  Gay men will be included among Syrian refugees accepted into Canada

Quote:Gay men will be among the Syrian refugees the government is willing to bring to Canada under a plan that will primarily welcome only women, children and families. Security concerns over extremists potentially slipping in to Canada mean the Liberal government will likely exclude unaccompanied males from its planned resettlement of 25,000 refugees by Dec. 31.

: http://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/d...p-cautions

I'd like to know how the Canadian government plans to figure out how a Syrian refugee is gay or not.

So their Minister of Treasury or whatever is on Bill Maher embarrassing herself about how "not all Muslims are extremists" and that we shouldn't discriminate against Muslims because of that.

Well, apparently it is ok to discriminate against Muslims, but only the straight males.

It's actually based on a scandalous stereotype : to think that gay men are weak, sissies, and that they can't shoot a gun.

I mean, Canadian government seems to think along the lines of: We can take in gay men, because faggots and flamboyants can't shoot at us with Kalashs, gays can't be terrorists.

It's a scandalous, non-liberal, way of thinking and casting gays as inoffensive wimps. I am soo shocked! I'll write a letter to the Huffington Post to denounce this!

Post: #1313

Interesting how they are discriminating against all men except gays, after one of the shooters was confirmed gay.

Post: #1314

I guess noone remembers that gay black guy who shot that woman on live TV during the interview

Post: #1315

Looks like the Chinese don't fuck around when it comes to dealing with terrorists:

Chinese forces 'used flamethrowers' in Xinjiang operation

Quote:A Chinese military newspaper has given details of a raid in Xinjiang province against suspected militants.

The People's Liberation Army Daily said that, at one point, flamethrowers were used to flush out militants hiding in a cave, who were then shot.

It said they were behind a "brutal" attack on the public, which may refer to an attack on a mine in September in which officials said 16 people died.
Xinjiang, often hit by unrest, is home to a Uighur ethnic minority.

The PLA Daily said special forces tracked the militants to their mountain hideout "like eagles discovering their prey".

Police tried to drive the suspects out with tear gas and stun grenades, before an officer ordered the use of flamethrowers, the article said.

China strictly controls media access to Xinjiang so reports are difficult to verify.

It is thought the latest report may refer to militants linked to the incident at the Sogan colliery in Asku on 18 September.

The US government-funded Radio Free Asia (RFA) was the first to report the attack and said at least 50 people were killed.

Earlier this month, RFA said 17 suspects from three families, including women and children, had been killed in the police operation in response to the mine attack.

China says "foreign terrorists" are behind the violence in the region. Hundreds of people have died in attacks over the past three years.

Ethnic Uighurs, who are mostly Muslim, say Beijing's repression of their religious and cultural customs is provoking the violence.

Post: #1316

(11-23-2015 04:04 PM)Traktor Wrote:  Frankie Boyle nails it with his diminutive sense of humour.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/no...are_btn_tw

Quote:There were a lot of tributes after the horror in Paris. It has to be said that Trafalgar Square is an odd choice of venue to show solidarity with France; presumably Waterloo was too busy.

Post: #1317

(11-23-2015 03:20 PM)Silvestroyer Wrote:  

Something that people in the Western world and liberal thinker don't understand is the big Putin's appeal among Russians, mostly young people and mostly young women unlike Obama who was mostly a momentum in 2008 and slower in 2012, Putin popularity is constant, what leader has this devotion:



The irony of the whole debate and presidential race in USA is that Trump is the only candidate who understand that Putin is a human being, and is doing the best for his country and people, the idea of a leader placing more importance on the native and what is best for the majority is foreign to many people today, and not what other leader thousand of miles away want, gays are not even 3% of the population and most people don't want their kids being exposed to that, when Russia passes the "anti-gay" law, it is just doing what the majority of the people want, but we are fed by the media that "homosexuality" is the norm and "just like us".

Meanwhile Obama

Post: #1318

(11-23-2015 04:04 PM)Traktor Wrote:  Frankie Boyle nails it with his diminutive sense of humour.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/no...are_btn_tw

I got lost in between the author absolving Islam of any crime and his fascination with the mythical Islamic golden age. This is yet another example of western guilt-ridden and self-hating conscience.

Invading Iraq did not create Islamic terrorism, attacks all over the world were being carried out well before that. What is happening would have occurred no matter what action the west took or did not, this regret talk is completely inconsequential. The Muslims will justify their aggression in any way possible, they will bring up Iraq, Israel, the crusaders, the apostle Paul...you name it.

I am tired of hearing about this politically correct version of history where The Islamic caliphate ushered an utopian golden age. The Abbasid caliphate in Baghdad flourished thanks to the services of non-muslims who went on to translate most of the texts from invaded cultures such as greek, persian and Indians. Islam did not invent anything new. Translators like Al-Kindi and Avicenna were Zorostrian, others were greek orthodox. The knowledge survived in spite of Islam not because of it, and either way has nothing to do with the religion. In fact, Christianity has a better claim of credit for the work of Gallileo...

I am thankful that the muslims of that era more or less allowed secularism ( still collected poll tax from Dhimmis, who wore different clothe to separate them) as they ruled over a large number of minorities like christians, jews and persians who were not ethnically cleansed yet.

The knowledge would not have been lost if it wasn't for the Islamic conquests in the first place. Let's not forget them immeasurable amount of historical texts destroyed in the Alexandria library destroyed around 685 AD ( containing historical records possibly covering half a millennium of history) or the libraries set on fire in India later on. This is a much greater loss to humanity than anything contributed by Islam.

Post: #1319

Checked my hometown news again today. In the 11 days since the attack:

- My hometown announces plans for a major Islamic Centre
- A mosque is announced in a town an hour to the west
- and today, another mosque is announced an hour to the south

They're moving quickly, but it makes sense: the last few years there saw an amazing avalanche of immigrant settlement, almost like they were being dumped out there en masse.

Post: #1320

(11-23-2015 09:01 PM)syrianguy Wrote:  

(11-23-2015 04:04 PM)Traktor Wrote:  Frankie Boyle nails it with his diminutive sense of humour.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/no...are_btn_tw

I got lost in between the author absolving Islam of any crime and his fascination with the mythical Islamic golden age. This is yet another example of western guilt-ridden and self-hating conscience.

Invading Iraq did not create Islamic terrorism, attacks all over the world were being carried out well before that. What is happening would have occurred no matter what action the west took or did not, this regret talk is completely inconsequential. The Muslims will justify their aggression in any way possible, they will bring up Iraq, Israel, the crusaders, the apostle Paul...you name it.

I am tired of hearing about this politically correct version of history where The Islamic caliphate ushered an utopian golden age. The Abbasid caliphate in Baghdad flourished thanks to the services of non-muslims who went on to translate most of the texts from invaded cultures such as greek, persian and Indians. Islam did not invent anything new. Translators like Al-Kindi and Avicenna were Zorostrian, others were greek orthodox. The knowledge survived in spite of Islam not because of it, and either way has nothing to do with the religion. In fact, Christianity has a better claim of credit for the work of Gallileo...

I am thankful that the muslims of that era more or less allowed secularism ( still collected poll tax from Dhimmis, who wore different clothe to separate them) as they ruled over a large number of minorities like christians, jews and persians who were not ethnically cleansed yet.

The knowledge would not have been lost if it wasn't for the Islamic conquests in the first place. Let's not forget them immeasurable amount of historical texts destroyed in the Alexandria library destroyed around 685 AD ( containing historical records possibly covering half a millennium of history) or the libraries set on fire in India later on. This is a much greater loss to humanity than anything contributed by Islam.

It is the fault of the Western man to gain knowledge from 'edu-taining' documentaries from the mass-media.

After the American-created modern Jihad went viral round 9/11, the BBC stepped up its glossy documentaries on Islamic golden age programming (emphasis on 'programming') such as several series by Qatar's Al-Jazeera's Somali journalist Rageh Omaar. He became the multicultural poster boy that would not be out of place at north London dinner parties of the liberal chattering classes and he also became the object of affection whom middle class women could exotically yearn for without hypergamic guilt. Of course he married a British woman, but not just anyone, he married a woman from the Norman/ Scots Montgomery-Cuninghame baronets.

It is always useful to look at who the children of the Anglo-Celtic élite are marrying as this points to things to come and also gives us an idea who they are socialising and networking with.

Not once has any BBC documentary mentioned that when the First Crusade was called, the Jihad against Christendom had already been in operation for 400 years and 2/3 of Christian lands had already been conquered. The Crusades were therefore too little too late.

Post: #1321

(11-23-2015 07:19 PM)Latinopan Wrote:  

(11-23-2015 03:20 PM)Silvestroyer Wrote:  

Something that people in the Western world and liberal thinker don't understand is the big Putin's appeal among Russians, mostly young people and mostly young women unlike Obama who was mostly a momentum in 2008 and slower in 2012, Putin popularity is constant, what leader has this devotion:



The irony of the whole debate and presidential race in USA is that Trump is the only candidate who understand that Putin is a human being, and is doing the best for his country and people, the idea of a leader placing more importance on the native and what is best for the majority is foreign to many people today, and not what other leader thousand of miles away want, gays are not even 3% of the population and most people don't want their kids being exposed to that, when Russia passes the "anti-gay" law, it is just doing what the majority of the people want, but we are fed by the media that "homosexuality" is the norm and "just like us".

Meanwhile Obama

The discarded Obama election campaign poster sums up Western financial-democracy.

It seems that Putin has started a charm offensive in Europe.

It was Francis Parker Yockey who predicted in 1948 when American international capital and Stalinism had triumphed over Europe that Russia would one day take the mantle of Western civilisation from the corrupt Anglo democratic élites. Just after WW2, it wasn't easy for the average reader to see anything civilised with Russia and his prediction was unpopular.

In the Soros Pussy Riot era against Putin's conservative Russia, one wonders if we are seeing a struggle for the Western soul.

Post: #1322

Syrianguy nailed it.

Frankie Boyle is a left leaning liberal, that's why he writes for the Guardian.

I never bother reading Guardian links. I'm getting narrow minded in my old age.

Post: #1323

(11-23-2015 05:58 PM)scotian Wrote:  Gay men will be included among Syrian refugees accepted into Canada

Quote:Gay men will be among the Syrian refugees the government is willing to bring to Canada under a plan that will primarily welcome only women, children and families. Security concerns over extremists potentially slipping in to Canada mean the Liberal government will likely exclude unaccompanied males from its planned resettlement of 25,000 refugees by Dec. 31.

: http://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/d...p-cautions

I'd like to know how the Canadian government plans to figure out if a Syrian refugee is gay or not.

Same way they are going to "vet" them : by politely asking.

"Sir, are you a terrorist? No? Cool. And, wait, are you gay? Yes? Ok, cool, welcome to the West."

This vetting process is a joke (there are no trustworthy police databases left in Syria or Irak, so how the hell could we check their pasts?).
We should call it, cuck-vetting!

Cuck-vetting of gimmegrants! Cuck-Screening refugeehadists.. : good luck with that!

Do you know what the Afghans do to get vetted and obtain asylum in the West?

They buy a.. letter, in Kabul, letter supposedly from the Talibans and threatening them. Just a printed letter with a taliban-logo on it, and it's enough to get asylum in Germany or Canada. Such false letters are for sale, between 200 and 1000 dollars in Afghanistan..

Post: #1324

(11-24-2015 03:02 AM)Direct or subtle Wrote:  

(11-23-2015 05:58 PM)scotian Wrote:  Gay men will be included among Syrian refugees accepted into Canada

Quote:Gay men will be among the Syrian refugees the government is willing to bring to Canada under a plan that will primarily welcome only women, children and families. Security concerns over extremists potentially slipping in to Canada mean the Liberal government will likely exclude unaccompanied males from its planned resettlement of 25,000 refugees by Dec. 31.

: http://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/d...p-cautions

I'd like to know how the Canadian government plans to figure out if a Syrian refugee is gay or not.

Same way they are going to "vet" them : by politely asking.

"Sir, are you a terrorist? No? Cool. And, wait, are you gay? Yes? Ok, cool, welcome to the West."

This vetting process is a joke (there are no trustworthy police databases left in Syria or Irak, so how the hell could we check their pasts?).
We should call it, cuck-vetting!

Cuck-vetting of gimmegrants! Cuck-Screening refugeehadists.. : good luck with that!

Do you know what the Afghans do to get vetted and obtain asylum in the West?

They buy a.. letter, in Kabul, letter supposedly from the Talibans and threatening them. Just a printed letter with a taliban-logo on it, and it's enough to get asylum in Germany or Canada. Such false letters are for sale, between 200 and 1000 dollars in Afghanistan..

I've literally been losing sleep over PM Trudeau's commitment to continue with his October campaign promise to admit 25,000 Syrians before the end of the year, they will be landing airplanes with 900 refugees on each flight in the next week or so. The refugees will come from camps in neighbouring countries and the government has basically admitted that they won't be properly screened over there but we shouldn't worry because members of our armed forces will do that when they arrive here and stay on military bases before being allowed into Canadian cities. My concern is that in the coming months a terror attack happens, then the US will freak the fuck out and who knows what they'll do, God forbid a Syrian passes through Canada and commits an act of terror stateside, they'll probably invade us!

Post: #1325

(11-23-2015 11:47 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  ...the last few years there saw an amazing avalanche of immigrant settlement, almost like they were being dumped out there en masse.

I know I won't be the only one:

Moved to a large city in the north of England a few years ago. As a born and bred Londoner I was amazed how white, still working class, and culturally English the city was. Any real pub was like Cheers – the same people who drank in them thirty years ago were still propping up the bar today. In the city centre it was rare to see a foreigner who wasn't a member of the local student population. This goes for service staff who were local and white. Even the tramps were white until Romania et al were recently granted EU travel rights and the city was flooded with Gypsies.

Fast forward to 2015: Muslims everywhere. A quick walk to the shops and one will encounter Somali Muslims, Pakistani Muslims and – who have appeared in droves during the last six months – nondescript Arabic Muslims. While the first two appeared following the benefits shake up of a couple years prior (i.e. immigrant arrivals to London who would normally be housed there are being sent on buses up north for more affordable housing under the guise of welfare cuts), the latter is mystifying by how quickly and en masse they have arrived. My eyes and ears tell me 'refugees' have been brought into the UK under the rug and in extreme numbers for many months now.