(11-19-2015 05:40 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  What I meant was pure combat missions not surveillance or assassinations - women have been used very successfully for those tasks. But that James Bond fantasy of hiring female bodyguards or warriors is just pure fantasy.

I believe I would be a super easy victim for a female assassin

(11-19-2015 10:10 PM)Direct or subtle Wrote:  According to some, this migrant invasion (or, gimmegrants invasion) is under way because the global "elites" want "cheap labor force"..

Problem is.. less than 4% of these "refugees" actually work! Less than 4% are productive :

Yesterday, Germany has had to release official figures (because of disclosure laws) about the refugees and the workforce..

http://www.20minutes.fr/economie/1733177...oi-faibles

So : Between September 2014 and October 2015, among the migrants having obtained refugees status, only 3,8% have found a job. Precisely, in Germany : only one male refugee in 26 has found a job during last year, and one female refugee in 43.

It's real proof that these migrants do not come to work "and drive labor prices down, to please the Elites".. They come to make many, many children, to colonize and replace us. Certainly not to work. Their only purpose is, colonizing us by making children!

There are other reports, that about 90 % of them will live from social welfare for the next 15 years.
And there you have the link to terrorism. Its not that refugees commit acts of terrorism. Its often the immigrants that are born in the country and struggle with employment and life. A lot of those so called refugees also turn their faces into more or less radical mosques. So those people can not participate in society by work and have even now a more radical islamic point of view. In the future a big number of them will turn even more radical. Its naive by German politicians that they think they can integrate this huge number of people. I mean it not even work with the muslim immigrants we get since the 1970s.

When those people get released from the refugee camps, neighbourhoods will turn down in a short period of time.

Quintus and I did a podcast tonight:





We cover Europe in the first half.

Yay.

(11-19-2015 09:14 PM)LEMONed IScream Wrote:  http://taylormarshall.com/2015/11/islami...-both.html

Frankly, a pretty good article by a Christian, on accepting refugees or not.

Seriously, liberal Christians forget that all this "love thy neighbor" scripture is about upholding the common good. As such it should always be weighed against that, to the detriment of exploiters (which if I recall is one of the worst things you can be in Christianity since it's thievery, deceit, and a whole host of sins rolled into one).

(11-19-2015 09:14 PM)LEMONed IScream Wrote:  http://taylormarshall.com/2015/11/islami...-both.html

Frankly, a pretty good article by a Christian, on accepting refugees or not.

Great article. Liberatarians should read it who think there is no such thing as a community. We can see how 'individualism' especially among Western men has been highly damaging - look at Sweden.

Part of the problem is that few people read the works of religious and secular philosophers who have gone before us, favouring pop culture. However, people in the West still have a sense of the burden of 'doing the right thing' and some sort of 'moral obligation'. This is perhaps why (despite incessant accusations of 'racism' directed towards those of European descent), White countries, counties, cities, suburbs, streets, are the places where people of non-European backgrounds would ideally like to settle.

With no religious or traditional secular backgrounds, White people have no moral foundation onto which they can place this 'White man's burden" of moral responsibility. This puts them into the position that we see today that through nihilist SJW movements, materialist capitalism and pop culture from the mass-media, the enemies of European people are not only dictating what these moral codes are but changing these codes to suit them.

This is why cuckservatives are always on the back foot and why they are stunned when a member of the morality forming groups denounces them with a nasty name.

To use the most foundational of Christian parables, cuckservatives are like seed sown in stony earth. They grow quickly but they are easily picked off by the birds and they wither away the first time the sun shines on them. They have no moral root at all cleaving to good and deep ground.

(11-19-2015 10:38 PM)RIslander Wrote:  Gimmegrants?

I'd like to say I invented the word gimmegrants, but, no : it's Hannibal (not the warrior with elephants, mind you.. or is he?) from the forum who first used it, in his excellent post below :

https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-50253...pid1152950

So I guess it's the first time in history, that Hannibal meets Menelas..



By the way, both Hannibal and Menelas are proof that ruthless invaders can destroy a civilization..

Commenting on the Roosh-Quintus podcast, first 20 minutes :

1- We should wait until the 6th of December to see if the French are really totally stupid and spineless. If the 6th of December they fail to give the most votes to the FN (plus some other nationalistic parties), then yes, hope is lost, France is done with.

2- "demoralized, fragmented, brainwashed" : excellent definition of Western men.

3- Quintus you are right about France having lost so many men in WW1.. but one thing is worth adding : France lost not just hundreds of thousands of men, but (real) elite men. Officers. Because at that time (WW1), officers went first into the fray, and died first.

So true reason France lost WW2 is : all good military families and officers had been decimated by WW1..

4- Roosh seems very pessimistic about Europeans' capabilities of fighting back and turning the tides. Quintus is more optimistic, giving the Ceaucescu example of quick turn of events. I agree with Quintus on that.

5- I agree with Roosh's analysis on how we spoil the Muslim migrants so much that they walk over us, laughing at us. And that we should direct our anger at the politicians, essentially..

6- I disagree with Roosh thinking that (if I understood well) only 40% of Europeans are against this migrants invasion. I'd think, 60% of Europeans are against.. maybe 65%.

7- I agree with Roosh on the other, next point though : European nationalists will not take up arms. Or not soon enough to save our continent. "Too much comfort and standard of living, plus permanent media brainwashing, make Western men soft" : excellent Roosh' analysis..

8- A funny tourism marketing campaign for France, from Roosh : "Foreigners, Come to romantic France, now.. Now!.. Because in 5 years, you'll hear only Arabic here"

9- I agree with Roosh, the elites have underestimated the migrants threat.. they won't be able to control their Frankenstein..

10- Roosh says he wants to see at least some French fighting back.. Roosh, I saw one thing : French police cars going out of Saint-Denis after the police assault.. after having killed the remaining terrorists.. well, from a police car rolled-down window, a French elite policeman, masked, covered in blood, gave the middle finger to the crowd of migrants watching the scene.. this gives me hope! hard to explain but it means something.
Also, there's been since last Friday a huge increment in gun and pepper-sprays sales in France (common people start preparing) : http://www.lepoint.fr/societe/les-armure...856_23.php

(11-20-2015 12:47 AM)Direct or subtle Wrote:  

(11-19-2015 10:38 PM)RIslander Wrote:  Gimmegrants?

I'd like to say I invented the word gimmegrants, but, no : it's Hannibal (not the warrior with elephants, mind you.. or is he?) from the forum who first used it, in his excellent post below :

https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-50253...pid1152950

So I guess it's the first time in history, that Hannibal meets Menelas..



By the way, both Hannibal and Menelas are proof that ruthless invaders can destroy a civilization..

As much as I'd like to take credit for it (lol), it was memcpy who used it first.

https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-51785...immegrants

(11-17-2015 09:06 AM)memcpy Wrote:  Start labeling refugees as refu-jihadis and gimmegrants.

The left loves to label is so we get to do the same.

Refujihadist is pretty good too.

I've always been a fan of James Woods, I'm even more of a fan now.

I like the Roosh Quintus chat, men feel so disenfranchised in the financially wealthy Feminist countries their natural territoriality is greatly muted.

As Roosh argues in the chat, there's a vast naivete about what primitive evil is-- a willingness to grow many Frankensteins. Hubris.

A lifestyle of "individual self-defense" as Roosh described seems to become by far the most realistic adaptation --"You can't solve a globalized problem ...with all these useful idiots {against you}."

Expatriation, at least partial ( part-time), although in absolute numbers very few men do it, stands out as the most effective means to avoid the demasculinization. As an older guy, I have to balance the diminishing healthy time I have left with the amount of change that might/might probably happen before I start to really fade. I could put a ton of effort into fighting anti-male feminism, and I will be gone before any of my efforts have any effects.

I do however feel the use of the term "social justice warrior" is a non-starter for social discourse, as it embodies sarcasm--there is nothing "just" in the behavior of the censor-style feminists or reverse racism of those unfairly criticizing and mocking white men.

The term SJW is confusing to the masses, because if you ask a reasonable person if they want geniune, common-sense social justice, they do. They don't want thugs brutalizing those they don't agree with (like the women dumping beer on Roosh), criminals cheating vulnerable individuals. They don't understand the "code" of the term refers to brainwashed people who end up persecuting others because of unrealistic beliefs.

Much better and more honest and clearly defined is his focus on the craziness of consumerism, total focus on work, and desertion of biologically appropriate roles. When Roosh talks about his meeting people in Washington it sounds less sarcastic and more effective. It's clear, straightforward speech-- more effective than the backhanded slap of "social justice warrior."

I was in a Trader Joe's today on an exquisitely beautiul, clear, warm day in California . The food is great and healthy.

Compared to the impoverished Philippines, hardly anyone laughs-- and this in a paradisaical environment. Many look so self-important, so serious. They have everything but fun.

^ Podcast sounds very interesting. Will listen into it.

Just today I saw the Polish media, which is not completely globalist owned:



'Ewa Kopacz - the now deposed prime minister - will create hell for us on Berlin orders"

Even the leftist magazines sport title pages like this:



"The new Poles?"

Of course they are going to spin it inside and use their full manipulative skills to twist the opinions mentally. Also note how they picked a smiling good-looking family - probably 0,1% of all migrants.

Still - many covers are not exactly PC:



One on the left:

"Those are invaders and not refugees"

"They are coming! Germans enforce suicidal plan - Tusk and Kopacz give in"

Ah - what the media would look like if it wasn't so tightly top-down controlled. I personally think that in some countries which are not as far-right leaning as Poland the covers you see above would result in a magazine being withdrawn the printing license. Media is not only controlled via ownership, but other means - embedded agents (for example operation Mockingbird - they even admit it openly now in the US - but this goes on around the world), controlled news sources and the final tool the giving of licenses. Of course if a country is that right leaning like Poland withdrawing a license would be a hellish job. In Germany or Sweden - that would be the matter of a few days.

(11-19-2015 01:23 PM)philosophical_recovery Wrote:  Just tired of all this. Have to give away 40% of my earnings in taxes already. But what's the point with these brainwashed people.

This. I have stopped reading my news feed because all my friends/colleagues/random skanks I met from the US are posting about how we need to welcome the migrants, and everyone who is against it is a racist caveman. Interestingly, every Polish person I know is posting against accepting them.

The posts are all over the place:

- Republicans are scared of orphans!
Yes, very scared of the 80%+ 20-30year old fighting age islamist men who make up the refugee population.

- Refugees haven't caused any attacks!
Paris & Baltimore disagree.

- This is just like what happened with the Jews! What about Jewish refugees?
Actually, the situation is exactly opposite. Muslim migration to Europe has resulted in the biggest wave of antisemitism & attacks on Jews since Nazi Germany. Of course, not a word about Israel not accepting refugees.

I really pity one friend, who is overall a nice guy but parrots every single talking point MSNBC gives him, and never offers a differing viewpoint. This is a guy who will say without irony that conservatives parrot Fox News.

Recently he posted something about welcoming the refugees. Another acquaintance asked if he is willing to open up his home and have them live with him? Of course not, but (literally his words): "I don't mind my tax dollars going to giving them a home."

This is a guy who doesn't pay anything in taxes, he is a stay-at-home dad who mooches of his rich wife. How much more stereotypical can you get? He won't open his own home to these WONDERFUL refugees but wants us to foot the bill for them?

In the meantime I doubt I will ever be able to afford to have kids because a large sum of my money goes to taxes.

(11-20-2015 12:47 AM)Direct or subtle Wrote:  

(11-19-2015 10:38 PM)RIslander Wrote:  Gimmegrants?

I'd like to say I invented the word gimmegrants, but, no : it's Hannibal (not the warrior with elephants, mind you.. or is he?) from the forum who first used it, in his excellent post below :

https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-50253...pid1152950

So I guess it's the first time in history, that Hannibal meets Menelas..



By the way, both Hannibal and Menelas are proof that ruthless invaders can destroy a civilization..

Hannibal and the Cartagenans were a semmittic barbaric civilization who practiced child sacrifice to Baal in the thousands.

This is mentioned in Greek, Roman and Judean texts, even if modern scholars try to change the narrative to that they were 'child burials' and not sacrifice by fire to the bull god Baal. The same god who in the Torah is named a couple of times as Moloch.



Child sacrifice by fire to Baal was widespread in ancient Israel and North Africa, including the Carthagians.

Naturally, the Roman, being the civilized people they were, recognized the threath of semittic bloodcults and did the only sensible thing and utterly erased the Carthagians, burned them to the ground and destroyed everything that was ever written, painted or sculpted from their culture. Complete annihilation.

Interestingly enough, what did the Israelittes worship when Moses came down from the mountain? A golden bull - Baal.

What do the Israelittes worship today in the US:

The Wall Street Bull



Worship of Baal is alive and well today.

http://www.pch24.pl/gowin-degraduje-nauk...533,i.html

Appearently, Poles begin a purge of subversive academia. that was unexpected.

I need a confirm on source, I can't read Polish.

(11-20-2015 11:33 AM)Yagibozan Wrote:  http://www.pch24.pl/gowin-degraduje-nauk...533,i.html

Appearently, Poles begin a purge of subversive academia. that was unexpected.

I need a confirm on source, I can't read Polish.

I read in another english article (cant remember where) is that they are removing all scientific studies done towards LBGT w.e they go by these days.

Which is good of course.

Edit: Oh yeah and I think they are dropping Gender Studies as a course from universities/colleges.

(11-20-2015 01:33 AM)Direct or subtle Wrote:  Commenting on the Roosh-Quintus podcast, first 20 minutes :

1- We should wait until the 6th of December to see if the French are really totally stupid and spineless. If the 6th of December they fail to give the most votes to the FN (plus some other nationalistic parties), then yes, hope is lost, France is done with.

If that's how we gonna judge this, then France is done with.

On other notes, even if 60% or more people are against immigration, the problem is that the leftist cucks have more political and social power, including sexual power (majority of leftists are women or manginas). They also tend to be the most militant so it will always be easier to impose their will over others people.

Upticks in arms buy doesn't mean a lot when the frame is still held by the traitors. If you are gang raped by 10 muslims and shoot them in defense you are still going to jail. Would be interesting to see when (not if) a pretty blonde woman has to kill a muslim to defend herself. Will the left protect its feminist overlord or their muslim overlord?

(11-20-2015 11:33 AM)Yagibozan Wrote:  http://www.pch24.pl/gowin-degraduje-nauk...533,i.html

Appearently, Poles begin a purge of subversive academia. that was unexpected.

I need a confirm on source, I can't read Polish.

Countries can reverse that when there is enough political will - Norway for example cut the government sponsoring of gender studies after one very popular documentary that most Norwegians saw. The ruling party simply would look like a bunch of morons adhering to that crap.

But - as I said before - the elite won't stop. One party may reverse the progressive changes and 5-15 years later they are back as the next group of scoundrels are in and bring the country back on track with the global agenda. Those buggers never stop.

As far as human sacrific is concerned - Christianity was a big improvement on that front.

Even the Romans or Greeks before sometimes sacrificed Roman soldiers before a battle to the Gods.

Almost all cultures did so in the past. However it matters somewhat whether it was a grisly daily slaughter on the scale of the Aztecs or whether it was a rare occurance. Still - we should not excuse those tendencies.

(11-20-2015 06:11 AM)iknowexactly Wrote:  I do however feel the use of the term "social justice warrior" is a non-starter for social discourse, as it embodies sarcasm--there is nothing "just" in the behavior of the censor-style feminists or reverse racism of those unfairly criticizing and mocking white men.

The term SJW is confusing to the masses, because if you ask a reasonable person if they want geniune, common-sense social justice, they do. They don't want thugs brutalizing those they don't agree with (like the women dumping beer on Roosh), criminals cheating vulnerable individuals. They don't understand the "code" of the term refers to brainwashed people who end up persecuting others because of unrealistic beliefs.

I use the acronym "SJW" a lot online and with friends who are "in the know", basically the people who are more aware of internet trends and know about the corners of it like Tumblr and Reddit and such. With "regular" people (for the lack of a better term to describe them) I avoid using it along with a lot of other internet lingo. I think for a lot of people like us who are a bit more internet based forget that the majority of people do NOT post on forums and are not involved in online communities so they don't really see the vast amounts of madness first hand that we do, they only get the trickle down. With a lot of the girls I know, even the ones who would describe themselves as feminists or are at least sympathetic to it will be going "No way, there's people that think that way?" when I tell them there's women out there who get offended by "man spreading" and create hashtags like #KillAllMen.

If you wanna ruin your mood, take a look at his website:

http://www.w2eu.info/

Apparently run by "no borders" activists, it provides detailed data, information and legal advice for migrants coming to Europe.
Available in English, French, Arabic and Farsi!
It lists every country in Europe and what to know about it when seeking asylum, although a bit outdated at times.

Here for example is just the introduction for Germany:

Quote:Overview
Usually refugees or non-EU migrants are able to obtain temporary or permanent residence in Germany by applying for asylum or marriage. It’s more or less impossible – except for a few highly qualified experts and specialists – to get papers concluding a labour contract.

Contacts
More or less in all bigger cities in Germany various groups and organisations are active in solidarity with refugees and migrants, offering also political, social and legal support. In the following list you will first find some most recommended self-organisations of refugees and migrants and also a few antiracist groups. Following some links to more specific initiatives concerning legal and medical aid as well as for labour and minors problems, you can find a list of the (more institutionalized) refugee councils, which are located all over Germany and might help to find useful contacts in every city.

Asylum
There are several multilingual guidebooks for refugees available, which may help you to understand the asylum system in Germany. The asylum system is complicated and the legal practice changes often.It is recommended to contact one of the counselling groups named in the contact-list additionally.

Minors
This guide especially for minors provides an overview of your rights here in Germany. These rights apply to all minors (children and teenagers under the age of 18) independent of their origin, gender, religion, etc..

Deportation
The following information is intended to help people who do not wish, or are unable, to return to their country of origin or another country, to prevent their deportation while still at the airport. If you can, inform your friends that you want to resist the deportation. They can support you from outside by speaking to the airline and informing them that you will not fly voluntarily. At Frankfurt Airport (where most deportations in Germany take place) there is a group who go to the airport in these cases, to inform passengers and airlines and to protest against your deportation.

Medical Assistance
Undocumented migrants are excluded from the regular health system in Germany. Medical Aid Groups for Refugees offer practical medical assistance for refugees and migrants:
- who are afraid of visiting a doctor's practice because they don't have residency status or papers,
- whom, despite of owning valid papers, ‚Sozialamt’ refuses to cover the costs of health care,
- who, through the experience of torture, war or exile, need psychological support.

Work
You‘re entitled to rights - even if you‘re undocumented!
Low pay or no wages at all? You can sue your boss.
Work accident or on sick leave? You‘re entitled to receive health care and sickness benefits.
No annual leave? Take legal action for your statutory right.
A 14-hour workday and just 8 hours‘ wages? Sue your boss for outstanding pay.

God knows how many sites like this exist and which ones are the most popular with the migrants.
They already have all the work done for them and can choose the country with the best chance of getting asylum à la carte.

Only fools would believe they don´t do their homework before departing for the long journey to Europe and share helpful info with each other.
But an organized system like this, various Europeans interest groups providing guide books and assistance clearly tailored towards inviting economic migrants?

There´s a whole industry of NGOs and SJWs behind this, enemies from within, opening the gates. Traitors that want to see Europe buried under a flood of third world migrants, its natives replaced, its wealth redistributed and ruined, its cities burning and desolate, its culture, history and knowledge erased.

I wonder what will be the reaction of the European organism to this cancerous infestation.
Will it overcome it, or will it succumb?
Will it fight, or will it surrender?

Interesting times lie ahead of us.

So let's do something about it.

Can we find that site's owners through whois?

If so, let's strike back, like we struck back numerous other times with some success. Think offense.

(11-20-2015 06:24 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  "Those are invaders and not refugees"

100% the truth was spoken, indeed these muslims are invaders,
not refugees.

Thousands of "refugees" muslim soldiers like this one are now deep inside European Union:

(11-20-2015 01:33 AM)Direct or subtle Wrote:  I agree with Roosh's analysis on how we spoil the Muslim migrants so much that they walk over us, laughing at us. And that we should direct our anger at the politicians, essentially..

I'd think, 60% of Europeans are against.. maybe 65%.

I also think more than 2/3 of europeans are against these waves of invading muslims
who came partly funded by billionaire Soros foundations for their trips.

The massmedia is in control of those few globalists, so the massmedia does not paint honestly the opinions of the masses of europeans

(11-20-2015 05:54 PM)Libertas Wrote:  So let's do something about it.

Can we find that site's owners through whois?

If so, let's strike back, like we struck back numerous other times with some success. Think offense.

The "no-borders" crew has been accused by French police of actively inciting migrants to throw stones at the police, one week ago in Calais.. These no-borders jerks were actually on the ground, 100 meters behind the migrants, cheering and shouting at them to "kill the pigs"

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/6186...-activists

Our army is being deployed in (the city centre of) Brussels. No Belgian media is reporting it, they are probably being restricted by the government. I'm getting this off off /pol/ and Twitter:

(11-20-2015 05:54 PM)Libertas Wrote:  Can we find that site's owners through whois?

Ah, it seems I too fell victim to the length of this thread.
w2eu has already been a topic here:
1
2
3

(09-28-2015 05:37 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

Quote:w2eu.info is apparently run by Bernd Kasparek (bordermonitoring.eu)

And who's funding them? W2EU and Border Monitoring are both very secretive about their donors and owners, but judging by their affiliations such as http://www.migrantsrights.org.uk/news/20...oundations , my bet is on this:

https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/
George Soros

FOUNDER / CHAIRMAN

Quote:George Soros is the founder and chairman of Open Society—a network of foundations, partners, and projects in more than 100 countries.

To the surprise of absolutely no one.

Brussels (not Belgium in general) has just raised the threat level, thats why there is army in the streets. There will be more news tomorrow because the national security council is going to keep a press conference tomorrow morning.

Soldiers guarding the Ancienne Belgique, a concert hall/theatre in Brussels: