"The current migration wave [into Europe] is made up of islamists. These are people from a totally different culture.
They exclude fifty per cent of their population, namely women, from public life and from access to education.
These people must not be given the right to vote in this country, but we should make sure that they will not even be able to enter our territory,"
said Czech President Miloš Zeman in the Central Bohemian town of Lanškroun to about a thousand enthusiastic local supporters who lapped his every word.
"Well-fed young men in countries such as Iraq or Syria where there is war, should take up arms and fight if they do not agree with the regime which rules there.
But, of course, people come also from some other islamic countries where there is no war such as Albania or Kosovo, and from Bangladesh or Senegal.
These young men should stay in their countries and work for their benefit."
Miloš Zeman also sends the following message to the immigrants:
1. Nobody invited you here, you are not welcomed.
2. If you happen to be in our country, you have to follow our laws and rules.
3. If you don't like it here, GO AWAY!
Anyone else not able to enjoy the decline? I've stuck my dick in enough women that it doesn't seem to dull the painful fact that the face of my culture is being completely and utterly destroyed.
Even booze and drugs aren't helping. The level of government antagonization is on par with what parliament did to the colonies back in the 18th century. At least the Americans then only had to deal with overzealous taxes instead of rampaging muslims...
I've thought about this, and possibly it's because true "alpha" (an overused term) in terms of leaving a legacy for the future is not just racking up a lot of bangs that don't produce children but building up a family and community, providing leadership, etc.
If society is declining around you and doesn't support that goal, well then that's obviously going to be disappointing on some level.
(11-10-2015 09:48 AM)The Beast1 Wrote: Anyone else not able to enjoy the decline? I've stuck my dick in enough women that it doesn't seem to dull the painful fact that the face of my culture is being completely and utterly destroyed.
It's quite depressing. I'm glad I moved back to the US. Has anybody heard how Spain is faring throughout this? I left just before the crisis, but on FB I see the leftist governments of Madrid and Barcelona are encouraging their citizens to give up rooms/salons for refugees for a tax discount.
After apartheid, White South Africans and Rhodesians suffered a nearly complete destruction of their culture. The difference is that they fought until they were overpowered by black-African governments and a zealous majority. Europeans seem to be taking this lying down, with the process being expedited by their own governments. Does anybody remember reading about what happened after the populace of the Central Powers in 1918 began to believe that effete leaders and capitalist conspirators had stabbed them in the back?
(11-10-2015 09:48 AM)The Beast1 Wrote: Anyone else not able to enjoy the decline? I've stuck my dick in enough women that it doesn't seem to dull the painful fact that the face of my culture is being completely and utterly destroyed.
It's quite depressing. I'm glad I moved back to the US. Has anybody heard how Spain is faring throughout this? I left just before the crisis, but on FB I see the leftist governments of Madrid and Barcelona are encouraging their citizens to give up rooms/salons for refugees for a tax discount.
After apartheid, White South Africans and Rhodesians suffered a nearly complete destruction of their culture. The difference is that they fought until they were overpowered by black-African governments and a zealous majority. Europeans seem to be taking this lying down, with the process being expedited by their own governments. Does anybody remember reading about what happened after the populace of the Central Powers in 1918 began to believe that effete leaders and capitalist conspirators had stabbed them in the back?
Spain was part of Bush and Blair's "War on Terror" when the Jihad came to bomb Madrid. The Spanish electorate swiftly got rid of the government and elected an anti-war one. Regardless of the rights and wrongs surrounding the war, the Madrid bombing was a moral boosting victory for the Jihad which knows that European minds are demoralised.
The lesson of Rhodesia is that its forces never lost the bush war. The Red Chinese and Soviet backed guerrillas were the affirmative action choice of the UN. In fact Rhodesia was more prosperous under a decade of UN sanctions at the height of the civil war than Zimbabwe is today despite numerous bail-outs.
Quote:European leaders are expected to offer African countries billions of euros in exchange for repatriating migrants that have moved to Europe in search of work, not to escape war. At a migration summit in Valetta, Malta this week the European Commission is expected to announce a 1.8 billion euros ($2 billion) in development funds for African nations that agree to the plan.
The fund is part of a larger list of initiatives to send some thousands of migrants that have entered the EU back to Africa or to keep them from entering the regional bloc at all. Incentives include more educational exchange scholarships, reduced travel restrictions, and more work permits for skilled immigrants. African countries will be asked to strengthen their pre-screening centers and refugees camps as well as re-admit failed asylum seekers, according to a draft of the plan.
It’s not a new strategy. Last month, the EU offered Ankara 3 billion euros in aid, as well as easier visa rules for help controlling the flood of refugees from Syria and elsewhere entering the EU from Turkey.
More than 773,000 migrants seeking asylum or job opportunities have entered the EU this year, a figure that could reach 3 million by 2017, according to EU estimates. Critics of the EU plan say that human rights will suffer as a result of more people are kept in transit camps or detainment centers. Others say that even if African nations agree, they are unlikely to be able to enforce any meaningful limits on migration to Europe.
Quote:Each year, over $30 billion in remittances is sent to sub-Saharan Africa by some 30 million African migrants living in the diaspora. The cash transfers help households pay for housing, healthcare and education, boost foreign reserves, and even compose a significant part of the GDP in some countries.
But sending money home is expensive. The global average cost of sending a $200 remittance—in the second quarter of 2015—7.7% of the amount sent, according to the World Bank. The transaction costs rise to 9.7% for remittances to sub-Saharan Africa, the most expensive region in Africa for remittances.
Global remittance flows now surpass official development assistance (ODA) (pdf, pg. 3) from the developed world, proving to be a more stable external financial source than private capital.
A World Bank brief (pdf, pg. 7) on migration and remittances, released last month, shows how banks remain the most expensive channels to send remittances, despite a decline in costs in recent years. According to the World Bank, banks charged an average cost of 11% in the second quarter of 2015, while remittance transfers made through money transfer operators (MTOs) and post offices were cheaper—at an average of 6.6% and 5.1% respectively in the same quarter.
Gents, I know this is dispiriting, but all is not lost, at least in the public consciousness.
Here's a new article from The Guardian on the migrant crisis. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/no...gee-crisis
The article itself is full of the usual Globalist propaganda, but the comments were a real surprise for me.
I would say four in every five comments is calling into question the sanity of what's going on, with the most upvoted comments by far being particularly anti this insanity we're seeing.
There's a few voices in there who want European countries to take quotas and that we're doing enough and the usual nonsense, but overall like I said, the mood is very much against this invasion.
Lest I remind you, this is The Guardian, the very bastion of superior middle class liberalism in the UK and one of Europe's most prominent liberal broadsheet newspapers.
If even Guardian readers are starting to see through the propaganda, then I think there is still hope.
A very interesting essay is read by a man who speaks like Ewan McGregor.
The essay is: Is European Civil War Inevitable by 2025?
While it is relevant for us to consider relative fertility rates per woman compounded by the mass invasion and the retreat by the White bourgeoisie to the US and to the White Commonwealth, the essay concentrates on the male fighting age demographic of 18-40.
The essay forecast using 2007 rates that Europeans would only have a 5:1 numerical advantage in the 18-40 male demographic by 2025 and if the media-led demoralisation of European men continued and if Europeans' comfortable lives continued, Muslims would fancy their chances by 2025.
You may have noticed that Turkish and Saudi Arabian ambassadors take great interest in the lives of second and third generation Muslims in Europe who have never carried a Middle Eastern passport.
Who will look out for the fighting aged European in 2025?
America? Recent history shows it backs the Jihad and by 2025, its European population might be raising its children as new minorities.
(11-10-2015 07:53 AM)Wrec Wrote: Czech President speaks about immigration.
"The current migration wave [into Europe] is made up of islamists. These are people from a totally different culture.
They exclude fifty per cent of their population, namely women, from public life and from access to education.
These people must not be given the right to vote in this country, but we should make sure that they will not even be able to enter our territory,"
said Czech President Miloš Zeman in the Central Bohemian town of Lanškroun to about a thousand enthusiastic local supporters who lapped his every word.
"Well-fed young men in countries such as Iraq or Syria where there is war, should take up arms and fight if they do not agree with the regime which rules there.
But, of course, people come also from some other islamic countries where there is no war such as Albania or Kosovo, and from Bangladesh or Senegal.
These young men should stay in their countries and work for their benefit."
Miloš Zeman also sends the following message to the immigrants:
1. Nobody invited you here, you are not welcomed.
2. If you happen to be in our country, you have to follow our laws and rules.
3. If you don't like it here, GO AWAY!
Each country should just hand each immigrant a copy of the Quran and a pack of matches at the border crossing. The price of of admission is to light it afire. Refusal means denial of entry. Problem solves itself
(11-10-2015 01:57 PM)amity Wrote: Gents, I know this is dispiriting, but all is not lost, at least in the public consciousness.
Here's a new article from The Guardian on the migrant crisis. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/no...gee-crisis
The article itself is full of the usual Globalist propaganda, but the comments were a real surprise for me.
I would say four in every five comments is calling into question the sanity of what's going on, with the most upvoted comments by far being particularly anti this insanity we're seeing.
There's a few voices in there who want European countries to take quotas and that we're doing enough and the usual nonsense, but overall like I said, the mood is very much against this invasion.
Lest I remind you, this is The Guardian, the very bastion of superior middle class liberalism in the UK and one of Europe's most prominent liberal broadsheet newspapers.
If even Guardian readers are starting to see through the propaganda, then I think there is still hope.
Guardian readers have been calling out this insanity for months.
Which is why I don't approve of the defeatism that creeps into this thread.
The liberal SJW Marxist globalist cucks have clearly overplayed their hand in recent years, and the reaction is starting. Even in Sweden the nationalist party is surging.
They have bitten off more than they can chew. Like many hegemons in history, they started to believe in their own myth of invincibility.
Their fall is inevitable. The only question will be how bad it becomes and how bad the reaction will be. Will we manage to preserve the post World War II political settlement or will we go Starship Troopers?
Maybe I'm optimistic, but I don't think Camp of the Saints is going to be allowed to happen.
Quote:The essay forecast using 2007 rates that Europeans would only have a 5:1 numerical advantage in the 18-40 male demographic by 2025 and if the media-led demoralisation of European men continued and if Europeans' comfortable lives continued, Muslims would fancy their chances by 2025.
In the age of drones and intelligent weapons systems, numbers mean very little. A group of 1000 trained and armed with top-notch gear men can single-handedly kill all Muslims in Europe provided they get rid of the idiotic notion of sparing the lives of civilians.
Now, obviously in the real civil war scenario things will be significantly more complicated due to dispersion among the general population but the outcome will be the same.
As soon as any force realises another is out to end it the consequences will be drastic. Guerrilla warfare can defeat many militaries who get hamstrung by humanity.
Its all well saying the military machine should disregard civilian lives but the real thing in all of its glory is one of the most brutal acts when carried out. You simply cannot just exterminate thousands to kill the few.
On another point my dad showed the latest video (found in this thread recently), to a woman who has many connections in the female business world in manchester. According to him she couldn't understand why this isn't on the MSM and that was before she came upon the rape statistics.
She is making sure her entire social circle knows about this. Her business has a lot of women employees.
Most historians consider this book fiction but it's lessons still stand. The commentary of Hans Josef Wagemueller's in regards to the way to wage war in the modern era is very much like the western countries today.
Quote:You simply cannot just exterminate thousands to kill the few.
I think you are saying "can't" when you mean "shouldn't".
The perceptions of what is acceptable and what is not change with the circumstances.
When everything you value is at stake, anything is fair game.
(11-10-2015 09:48 AM)The Beast1 Wrote: Anyone else not able to enjoy the decline? I've stuck my dick in enough women that it doesn't seem to dull the painful fact that the face of my culture is being completely and utterly destroyed.
Even booze and drugs aren't helping. The level of government antagonization is on par with what parliament did to the colonies back in the 18th century. At least the Americans then only had to deal with overzealous taxes instead of rampaging muslims...
The thing about "enjoy the decline" is that it doe not make you joy when the decline involve being conquered in your own land by a group of sexually frustrate low IQ men with a system of belief based on book designed to work as a blue print for warriors in the middle ages.
How can you enjoy the decline when the shop around the the corner stopped selling alcohol because the shopkeeper was threaded by the invaders? or that you can't see women wearing nice clothing because they are being forced to dress like a beekeeper or else they be beating on the street, some people are saying to let the place burn, but, I don't want to live under a legal system where you have to be married just to see a woman's face.
Expectation
Reality
(11-10-2015 11:33 AM)RaccoonFace Wrote: I wanted to 'quit' this thread for a while because it depresses me but I keep coming across things that I think need to be posted here:
Many Europeans have this "smug" complex when criticizing American love for guns and the idea of self defence, just look at the reactions of two terrorist attack, Charlie Hebdo in Paris had people chanting Je us Charlie, American Chattanooga attack, civilians with guns, office patrolling U.S. military recruiting station in Cleburne Texas
Quote:Billionaire investor George Soros has appeared to admit he is losing the argument over open borders and mass migration, although he still claims he and his foundation are in “direct opposition” to the tough policies of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán.
In an interview with the Wall Street Journal Mr Soros said his Open Society Foundation was working in Hungary and opposes Mr Orbán’s principles, but also appeared to admit he was on the losing side of the argument.
He conceded that the European Union would never impose mandatory migrant quotas on its members, saying:
“I’m opposed to compulsory quotas—they don’t work and they contravene the legal framework of the European Union and the international convention on refugees. There are many countries in European Union that are not willing to accept voluntarily.”
He also admitted that it will be very difficult for Europe to absorb “more than one million” migrants as the political will is lacking, while the cost could exceed 10 billion euros a year. European leaders, he said, “Don’t know where they would find the money.”
Mr Soros has been a lifelong advocate of soft border policies and mass migration. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, who stemmed the migrant crisis in his own country by building a border fence, accused him of deliberately encouraging the crisis.
Mr Orbán said: “This invasion is driven, on the one hand, by people smugglers, and on the other by those (human rights) activists who support everything that weakens the nation-state.
“This Western mindset and this activist network is perhaps best represented by George Soros.”
Mr Soros later responded by claiming his foundations help “uphold European values” and saying: “His plan treats the protection of national borders as the objective and the refugees as an obstacle. Our plan treats the protection of refugees as the objective and national borders as the obstacle.”
However, Mr Soros has now admitted how unpopular his position is. He told the Wall Street Journal:
“My own and the foundation’s principles are not generally accepted, and we have many people opposed to us. But we stand by our principles. We are actively engaged with everyone, particularly in my native Hungary, where our approach is in direct opposition to the one advocated by the current prime minister, Viktor Orban, he is currently engaged in attacking my views.”
Mr Soros has been a strong backer of transnational bodies such as the European Union, and his foundation provides assistance for pro-migration activists. He has also supported “progressive” causes such as the Centre for American Progress, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
Reality always wins in the long run. The elites became hubristic and ignored reality. As a result, the majority of the current elites will pay the consequences for their actions.
(11-10-2015 11:33 AM)RaccoonFace Wrote: I wanted to 'quit' this thread for a while because it depresses me but I keep coming across things that I think need to be posted here:
Be aware of those Facebook post, many of them are just lies and fake stories from neonazis. They can not pass a counter check.
In a post before, I quote a police officer that said only about 10 % commit crimes, maybe its 20 % but its not as worse as social media makes it. You have now hard crimes in Germany yes, but most of them behave. I don't worry really about the little rise of crime now, I worry more about the long term effects. And I consider the lies of Neonazis as not productive to have a honest talk about the invasion that is happening now.
Its like the kid that call for wolves. Neonazis spread fake crimes, they don't pass a check and at the end? Many people will not trust the real crimes and problems anymore.
And the mood is already shifting, no need to fake crimes. The real issues are enough to worry.
Yes there are rumours that the police don't report all crimes, also that the media hide it. But the view on the invaders is switching, so lets deal with the invasion in a way that brings a solution. The real issues now worse enough.
The warrior spirit of America is the reason American cannot be easily conquered like Europe is. Mass immigration can backfire tremendously if different parts of the USA simply stop paying their taxes to the federal government and shut off their state borders to the ones connected to mass immigration states. The Federal government will be unable to fight off a well-armed citizenry and most of the military forces would easily rebel.
Conversely, in Europe, the citizens will be easily killed by their own governments should they rebel. They are going to get raped or die. The Christian warrior spirit is alive and well in large swaths of America, and the fall of Europe will merely be like the fall of Constantinople as the center of power finishes transferring from Europe to America.
The historical analogy is the 4th Crusade was to Europe what WW2 was to America, and WW3 is to Europe what the Fall of Constantinople was to the Byzantine Empire.
On Facebook, CBC news keeps posting articles on Canada's role. We are apparently taking in 25k before the end of the year. About 500 per day. When they post these stories the comment section explodes and the general attitude (I would say 80% at least), is that people do not like this happening. There is the occasional lefist bullshit comment but it gets lost in the overwhelming majority.
I know the numbers that are going to come into Canada is nothing compared to Europe, but this is still insanity and it is absolutely mind boggling that the government doesn't listen to the very people who elected them.
Seems all the pro pot people who voted in Trudeau forgot about this other bullshit election promise he made.
At least we don't have the so called Nazi guilt here so if we speak out we aren't immediately labeled Neo Nazis and what not.
This is going to be interesting. Fuck you Justin Trudeau.