(09-23-2015 01:57 PM)TonySandos Wrote:  What is a working replica exactly? I remember hearing that the first time I watched Lock, stock and 2 smoking barrels.

The majoirty of replicas cannot shoot real bullets

(09-23-2015 02:09 PM)iop890 Wrote:  

Merkel annoyed in caucus: "I don't care, that I'm at fault for the influx of #refugees. Now they're just here."

(09-23-2015 11:50 AM)TonySandos Wrote:  

(09-23-2015 11:25 AM)KC4 Wrote:  I don't know if this is an appropriate thread to ask this question but what the hell is a uncle tom?

I was owning this idiot marxist who asked me what I voted for in the last election. I straight up told him SD even though I didn't last election. As soon as I turned around he called me a "uncle tom". What the fuck is that.
It wasn't worth doing anything because I don't know what the fuck "uncle Tom" means.

"Uncle Tom" is derived from an American novel written by an abolitionist white woman named Harriet Beecher Stowe.

Relevant in a thread which reports modern middle class White women encouraging the invasion of 'soulmates' and 'future spouses'.

(09-23-2015 01:17 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Good thing that I found out recently that I can legally buy and own any working pre 1885 gun replica in Poland:

You can legally buy almost any kind of gun in Poland for SPORTS purposes - this includes any handgun, AK-47's, and machine guns.

However, the law does not allow you to defend yourself with these weapons. Be warned: even if you shoot someone invading your home, trying to kill you, you will be prosecuted for illegal use of a weapon.

(09-23-2015 02:13 PM)Travesty Wrote:  ^ This is why women leaders don't work out. The woman inside at some point will always win.

Exodus 2:5-12 Wrote:Then Pharaoh’s daughter went down to the Nile to bathe, and her attendants were walking along the riverbank. She saw the basket among the reeds and sent her female slave to get it. 6 She opened it and saw the baby. He was crying, and she felt sorry for him. “This is one of the Hebrew babies,” she said.

7 Then his sister asked Pharaoh’s daughter, “Shall I go and get one of the Hebrew women to nurse the baby for you?”

8 “Yes, go,” she answered. So the girl went and got the baby’s mother. 9 Pharaoh’s daughter said to her, “Take this baby and nurse him for me, and I will pay you.” So the woman took the baby and nursed him. 10 When the child grew older, she took him to Pharaoh’s daughter and he became her son. She named him Moses, saying, “I drew him out of the water.”

11 One day, after Moses had grown up, he went out to where his own people were and watched them at their hard labor. He saw an Egyptian beating a Hebrew, one of his own people. 12 Looking this way and that and seeing no one, he killed the Egyptian and hid him in the sand.

This is well off Western women's wildest fantasy. From Merkel in the Reich Chancellery to the blonde spinsters singing hymns to the young invaders as they hand out food aid, they are dreaming of finding their Moses to raise up against their country's patriarchy.

A few weeks ago I had clicked on a NYT article and checked out the comments to gauge where people stood on the issue, almost all were in full support of the migrants. I checked out an NYT article today and almost all of the "Readers Picks" comments were strongly against what's happening, some were even "NYT Picks" surprisingly. The tide has definitely turned as has been noted by others.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/23/world/...ugees.html

Quote:So statements like - it's the Jews - those are simply not correct. It's like saying that all Americans are bombing Iraq, meddling in the Ukraine and killing thousands in 98%-collateral-damage drone strikes. No - the American people are not deciding on that and don't hate brown people. It's the money elite who own it all. They own the US, EU and also Israel - they are now mopping up other countries - unifying it all in terms of culture. They use various people and sects when it suits them and discard them when they have served them sufficiently.

Jews are disproportionately represented at the top, yes, but I see them as the intellectual elite that feeds ideas to the money elite to better achieve a globalist vision. Even if you ship all Jews to an island tomorrow, the remaining non-Jewish elite will just resume their march towards globalism using leftism and technology as devices in the existing industrial/banking systems. I'm starting to wonder if Jews are in fact useful idiots of a few families at the very top, meaning that there are layers of useful idiocy, with SJW's and feminists at the very bottom. The Jews mentioned in durango's post are nowhere near the top. They may be rich and have power, but they are certainly being used by those above them to achieve a globalist agenda.

(09-23-2015 07:45 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

(09-23-2015 07:25 AM)whoishe Wrote:  http://wyborcza.pl/1,75968,18895237,robe...l#MTstream

"Gazeta Wyborcza" - biggest polish non-tabloid newspaper and huge supporter of bringing as many refugees/immigrants as possible...

That's because "Gazeta Wyborcza" is owned by Cox Communications, a USA-based media corporation in turn owned by the Cox Enterprises conglomerate.

I understand your point, but I can assure you that even without US owners "Gazeta Wyborcza" would have exactly the same stance on refugees/immigrants. They were using propaganda tricks like that long time before they were bought by Americans and they were always supporting all minorities/immigrants/etc...

(09-23-2015 07:55 AM)storm Wrote:  

(09-23-2015 07:25 AM)whoishe Wrote:  http://wyborcza.pl/1,75968,18895237,robe...l#MTstream


[quote='storm' pid='1117418' dateline='1443012949']
[quote='whoishe' pid='1117407' dateline='1443011120']
http://wyborcza.pl/1,75968,18895237,robe...l#MTstream

Of course the comments are disabled. No credibility.

Of course they are. They disabled them a few weeks ago stating "unacceptable hatred/racism/etc..." under all articles about immigrant/refugees.

It's kind of funny, cause people started to comment political situation under different articles - for example about soccer

(09-23-2015 03:21 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Quote:So statements like - it's the Jews - those are simply not correct. It's like saying that all Americans are bombing Iraq, meddling in the Ukraine and killing thousands in 98%-collateral-damage drone strikes. No - the American people are not deciding on that and don't hate brown people. It's the money elite who own it all. They own the US, EU and also Israel - they are now mopping up other countries - unifying it all in terms of culture. They use various people and sects when it suits them and discard them when they have served them sufficiently.

Jews are disproportionately represented at the top, yes, but I see them as the intellectual elite that feeds ideas to the money elite to better achieve a globalist vision. Even if you ship all Jews to an island tomorrow, the remaining non-Jewish elite will just resume their march towards globalism using leftism and technology as devices in the existing industrial/banking systems. I'm starting to wonder if Jews are in fact useful idiots of a few families at the very top, meaning that there are layers of useful idiocy, with SJW's and feminists at the very bottom. The Jews mentioned in durango's post are nowhere near the top. They may be rich and have power, but they are certainly being used by those above them to achieve a globalist agenda.

Just a casual observation, but it seems the elite gentile families at the top really sort of intermarry with elite Jews and it becomes hard to keep track of over the years. You even see this sort of thing with Donald Trump's daughter and, I believe, one of his sons. The really rich marry the really rich, I think that's pretty much a given and if a disproportionate amount of the super rich are Jews then there will be intermarriage between them and gentiles of the same status.

The problem isn't obviously that the Jews control everything or whatever. They don't. It's that powerful Jews have a disproportionate amount of influence in politics, law, finance, media and the real levers of power in this country and use them to promote their own group interests and pet ideologies. If those interests do not interfere with the gentile elites' interests then there is harmony among the elite -- and they usually don't in capitalist democracies where money is god. More often than not they overlap. There are plenty of rich gentiles who benefit off guys like George Soros and Sheldon Adelson acting as puppeteers.

At the top levels American politics is in some ways basically a weird proxy civil war between globalist leftist Jews and globalist zionist Jews. Unfortunately they seem to agree on the issues that matter most to the rest of us.

(09-23-2015 03:06 PM)AFS Wrote:  You can legally buy almost any kind of gun in Poland for SPORTS purposes - this includes any handgun, AK-47's, and machine guns.

However, the law does not allow you to defend yourself with these weapons. Be warned: even if you shoot someone invading your home, trying to kill you, you will be prosecuted for illegal use of a weapon.

Firearm ownership in Poland has tripled in the last fifteen years[1]:

Quote:Calculated Rate of Licensed Firearm Owners per 100 population
2014: 0.89
1999: 0.34

How hard is it to acquire firearms in practice? Do you personally know anyone who has gone through this process? How much did it cost and how long did it take?

Regardless, there are still half a million guns[2] (both legal and illegal) in Poland. Put in context, russia's paramilitary has 510,000 men[3]. It is not a small number.

If I had a firearms-related company right now I would be lobbying the hell out of central and eastern european states. Pilot military style firearms training for harcerzy, a militia, and second amendment style referendums. Push the consensus forward. Everyone who has a smartphone can afford a gun, and that is more than half of the population[4]. Poland already has two reasons to have a strong military tradition. This latest reasons should be reasons enough.

20 million new gun owners. With protectionist tariffs this could boost GDP growth by fifty percent.

I wonder what politics is like over there that nobody has done this yet.

1. http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/citation/quotes/4312
2. http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/citation/quotes/5
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co...e_note-148
4. http://www.emarketer.com/Article/Czech-R...n/1012047#

I am honestly surprised that the Poles don't have laxer gun laws than they do given their history of being invaded.

Czech Republic seems like it has the best gun laws in all of Europe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politi...h_Republic

I just picked up this book. It's from Paul Collier, a Professor of Economics and Public Policy at the University of Oxford.

I'm just 50 pages in, but it's great stuff. As an economist, he uses models, studies, data etc. to examine immigration and multiculturalism. He analyses the effects on societies/ economies through a scientific lense adopting three perspectives: of the immigrants, of the natives, and of the ones left behind. He acknowledges the moral/ emotional aspects of the issue, but excludes them from his investigation. The result is a pretty good read so far. Well written, data-driven and sober.

Seriously, if you are interested in getting some in-depth analysis from a guy who knows his shit. Go to the next library and grab a copy.

The young Sergey Brin (founder of Google) with a couple of hipsters.

White Flight in Sweden

Quote:A new study from Linneuniversitet confirms that Sweden is becoming more and more segregated along ethnic lines as a direct result of mass immigration from the Middle East and North Africa. Those who move first are highly educated and/or have a high-income giving credence to my post from last year.

–Yes, we’ve found a so-called “tipping point” at around 3-4%, says Emma Neuman, research economist at Linneuniversitet. When the non-European immigrants are that many in a residential area then the native Swedes start moving out.

Emma claims the effects were stronger in the 1990’s. Back then the tipping point was somewhat lower. According to Forskning & Framsteg this could be interpreted as people becoming more tolerant. Perhaps, or the odd million immigrants since then has limited the supply of white neighborhoods.

-The effect doesn’t revolve around immigrants generally. Immigrants from European countries give a no-move effect, instead it revolves around non-European immigrants. It is reminiscent of the phenomenon white flight in the USA where whites move away from neighbourhoods where many blacks move in.

Acceptance of diversity is in proportion to your distance from it

-Many people talk about ethnic diversity as an enriching factor, but when you choose a school for your kids or are going to move the question becomes very concrete, and then you often choose some form of Swedishness, according to Maja Lilja, sociologist at Örebro University.

(surprise-surprise)

-People pick whats best for their child, she says. They don’t want their kids to be in a minority, (curiously an overwhelming majority of the population vote for political parties that are working full-time to make their children and grand-children minorities in their own country – my note) or they place a lot of weight on the Swedish language.

In other words it’s about giving of the perception that you embrace diversity but when push comes to shove you aren’t willing to risk your own childrens well-being by raising them in Tensta and sending them to the Al-Azhar school in Stockholm.

I thought diversity was our greatest strength? I guess Sweden has not yet learned to be multicultural.

The key ideas here are that women become more conservative when they have a family, culture and ethnicity are an extension of your family, and liberals are delusional hypocrites.

Relevant to the last point above:
Some Swedish nationalists bring "cultural enrichment" to a rich white liberal neighborhood in Sweden.

----------------------------------------

Typical border scene:

(09-23-2015 02:13 PM)Travesty Wrote:  ^ This is why women leaders don't work out. The woman inside at some point will always win.

Remember how I said Australia's new PM was considered too Leftist to be Conservative by his own party? Here he is peacocking his new female members of cabinet so he doesn't appear Sexist, (since Abbott was criticised for keeping women out of power).

Eight out of nine of them have the sort of hair I recognise from Education, Public Service, Policing, Psychology and Catholic subversion. Once it's chin level or higher, the institution marches to the left.



Expect more concern for refugees soon.

   

(09-23-2015 05:06 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(09-23-2015 02:13 PM)Travesty Wrote:  ^ This is why women leaders don't work out. The woman inside at some point will always win.

Remember how I said Australia's new PM was considered too Leftist to be Conservative by his own party? Here he is peacocking his new female members of cabinet so he doesn't appear Sexist, (since Abbott was criticised for keeping women out of power).

Eight out of nine of them have the sort of hair I recognise from Education, Public Service, Policing, Psychology and Catholic subversion. Once it's chin level or higher, the institution marches to the left.



Expect more concern for refugees soon.

Australia Has A New Prime Minister: Ex-Goldman Partner Turnbull Overthrows Tony Abbott

if Europe needs immigrants to boost demographics and tax revenue, why don't they have targeted immigration from the Philippines, Thailand, and similar countries?

(09-04-2015 09:50 AM)rhino Wrote:  I don't think that our American members fully realize the gravity of the migrant crisis unfolding in Europe in 2015.

Here is brief recap:

1. So-called "migrants" from third world countries are storming Europe in historically unprecedented numbers. The number is in thousands daily. Most of them are from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Afghanistan, Albania/Kosovo (all Islamic countries). Then there are those from sub-Saharan Africa (Congo, Mali, Nigeria, etc. etc.)

2. The original entry points were via Mediterranean sea towards Italy and Spain, but in the last few months there was a notable shift towards the quickest overland route: Turkey > Greece > Macedonia > Serbia > Hungary > EU countries deemed rich/with open multiculturalist policies/with good welfare... so vast majorities eventually end up in Austria, Germany, Scandinavia, Netherlands/Belgium, France/Italy/Spain, and the UK.

3. In typical EU fashion governments are unable to do much except to watch things unfold while they give conflicting statements. After some thought, Germany, as the EU leader, claimed that it will receive over 800,000 asylum claimants in this year alone. A few days after that statement, Germany issued a jarring new policy saying that all claimants from Syria will now be processed as legit... basically inviting the entire country of Syria to move into Germany. Angela Merkel followed that with the statement that "Islam belongs in Germany".

Schenghen rules (Lisboa rules) out of window, free for all.

Gates of Vienna, apparently, are now wide open with a stroke of vassal pen.

4. One notable characteristic of this crisis is that most migrants are able-bodied men 18-50. And they are arrogant (and at times very hostile) bunch with immediate entitlement issues as soon as they step on the European soil. Again, this is not a typical refugee fleeing the war... this is smart-phone enabled migrant looking for the biggest tite to suck.



Another characteristic is that none are moving into Turkey and other Islamic countries. All are *gunning* (ahem) for Western Europe.

5. Because images of hordes of unwashed masses ending up in your neighborhoods overnight is a tough pill to swallow for many current Europeans (even if subconsciously), the Cathedral is busy crafting comical PR campaigns.

Here are three basic examples:

a) The image of drowned Syrian boy (false flag?) who washed ashore the Turkish beach is overused as a symbol of migrants struggle. Even if that event was not manufactured purposefully, we are manipulated to cry for one lost boy (this coming largely from pro-choice liberals) while ignoring a million (millions) of adults finding their way.

b) Recent NPR (PR?) report featured a story of a middle-aged (being middle aged is deemed safe/non-aggressive, at par with teddy bears) Syrian (read: legit) dude who worked in high tech in Dubai (notice the 'white collar work in another Islamic country' angle) but who couldn't have his family join him there (bring on the violins) because the UAE authorities wouldn't let them... so he went to Germany to re-unite with them (again, more strings). The report ends with a story of a Syrian woman (legit) and her babies (aww, lil darlings) struggling to get to EU after losing everything (oooh, poor things).

c) "At a Berlin church, Muslim refugees converting in droves"

Consequences of these events will be wide-reaching and all-encompassing for the future of Europe. As they gather strength through numbers and power, ideologically suspect and sexually frustrated imports will increasingly be resorting to terrorist acts to air their misplaced grievances. The Europe of future will resemble third world (low economic opportunities, crime-infested, corruption/bribery, daily violence...) Some things will change practically overnight. Some will change with time. Intermingling and intermarrying will become "new normal", what's left of pure will be diluted, and the new European will be a mongrel without roots and sense of singular history and tradition, just like the Zionists masters devised it.

And if you think this isn't a part of the bigger plan, I direct you to an Italian art piece unveiled in Sarajevo almost 20 years ago.

The statue curiously reads: "L'uomo multiculturale costruirà il mondo"

"Multicultural mankind will built the world"



And what doesn't become multicultural, will simply be overtaken, with foreign culture replacing host culture as the new sheriff in town.

(09-23-2015 03:40 PM)TheWastelander Wrote:  

(09-23-2015 03:21 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Quote:So statements like - it's the Jews - those are simply not correct. It's like saying that all Americans are bombing Iraq, meddling in the Ukraine and killing thousands in 98%-collateral-damage drone strikes. No - the American people are not deciding on that and don't hate brown people. It's the money elite who own it all. They own the US, EU and also Israel - they are now mopping up other countries - unifying it all in terms of culture. They use various people and sects when it suits them and discard them when they have served them sufficiently.

Jews are disproportionately represented at the top, yes, but I see them as the intellectual elite that feeds ideas to the money elite to better achieve a globalist vision. Even if you ship all Jews to an island tomorrow, the remaining non-Jewish elite will just resume their march towards globalism using leftism and technology as devices in the existing industrial/banking systems. I'm starting to wonder if Jews are in fact useful idiots of a few families at the very top, meaning that there are layers of useful idiocy, with SJW's and feminists at the very bottom. The Jews mentioned in durango's post are nowhere near the top. They may be rich and have power, but they are certainly being used by those above them to achieve a globalist agenda.

Just a casual observation, but it seems the elite gentile families at the top really sort of intermarry with elite Jews and it becomes hard to keep track of over the years. You even see this sort of thing with Donald Trump's daughter and, I believe, one of his sons. The really rich marry the really rich, I think that's pretty much a given and if a disproportionate amount of the super rich are Jews then there will be intermarriage between them and gentiles of the same status.

The problem isn't obviously that the Jews control everything or whatever. They don't. It's that powerful Jews have a disproportionate amount of influence in politics, law, finance, media and the real levers of power in this country and use them to promote their own group interests and pet ideologies. If those interests do not interfere with the gentile elites' interests then there is harmony among the elite -- and they usually don't in capitalist democracies where money is god. More often than not they overlap. There are plenty of rich gentiles who benefit off guys like George Soros and Sheldon Adelson acting as puppeteers.

At the top levels American politics is in some ways basically a weird proxy civil war between globalist leftist Jews and globalist zionist Jews. Unfortunately they seem to agree on the issues that matter most to the rest of us.

Gonna quote a recent post of mine:

Quote:Globalist liberalism manifests itself most importantly in these four ways:

1. “Social justice” and multicultural policies at home based on victimhood and identity politics (ie: political correctness).
2. Neoliberal economic policies such as “free” trade agreements that incentivize the outsourcing of jobs and capital, and which erode national laws and sovereignty.
3. Mass immigration, primarily into Western countries.
4. Foreign interventionism, usually perpetrated by the United States, that destabilizes countries and regions in favor of a vision of the applicability of universalist “democracy.”

Now you may understand why most politicians don’t fundamentally differ from each other, because in these important ways, most of them are the same.

The effects of these policies are essentially the destruction of the family unit and the destruction of the nation-state. The former comes through offshoring of jobs, destruction of income, destruction of the bonds between men and women through feminism and other politically correct policies, etc. The latter comes through wars in some cases (like Iraq, Syria, and Libya), and identity politics and immigration that undermine social cohesion in others (in more advanced countries), as well as the steady transfer of sovereignty through “free” trade agreements and organizations like the European Union.

You can recognize it easier this way.

Typical, isn't it?

Hmmm how do I make a big splash now that I've ousted the democratically elected Prime Minister? I know... Promote a bunch of dykes!

Let me guess the next move when his popularity starts to drop... "We need to have a serious discussion in this country about marriage equality"

Also note some tens of millions he threw at our 'Domestic violence epidemic'

(09-23-2015 05:54 PM)Nineteen84 Wrote:  EU refugee & migrant crisis: Serbia bans all cargo vehicles, goods from Croatia

Sooner or later, they'll turn on each other, alliances will form.

This is the fall of the EU.