(09-14-2015 01:08 PM)N°6 Wrote:  

(09-13-2015 08:20 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

(09-13-2015 08:06 PM)Blaster Wrote:  That BBC Fuckface was infuriating. Holy Shit.

What a bastard.

We were told by the BBC that the majority of (non-Christian) Syrians oppose Assad in favour of the...er...'rebels'. The West's rebels have been exposed to being Al-Nusra and other Al-Qaeda affiliates who have used sarin gas.

Now the BBC expects us to believe that a random sample of any Syrian group flooding into Europe which its media has demoralised has no Jihadi elements (and this is before we consider the ISIS/ Daesh queston).

The man was made to look a fool repeatedly on his own radio show. I know those clips are a compilation over several days, but it shows how few people believe in this rubbish any more. What a sanctimonious arse, no arguments beyond 'think of the children', or 'did you eat today?'. Breitbart has already got two articles up on this debacle. No doubt he will be replaced by a more effective propogandeer in due time.

In the 21st century, we're on the cusp of something big as far as the exchange of ideas, media and journalism is concerned. These lumbering dinosaurs like the BBC will be collapsed within our lifetimes, and we won't have to listen to their ridiculous prattle any more.

"The father of drowned Syrian toddler Aylan Kurdi was working with smugglers and driving the flimsy boat that capsized trying to reach Greece, other passengers on board said..."

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/09/1...BE20150911

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...world.html

(09-14-2015 09:14 AM)rudebwoy Wrote:  South Africa!!!! Great example dude....

You mean a African (black) country gets taken over by white "migrants"...

...I am sure no blacks were murdered/raped/looted in the takeover.

Great example indeed. Let me give you another example that, as a "Caribbean" (as you define yourself, but would an Amerindian agree?), you will enjoy: Haiti.

Haiti: Country created as such by Whites, who most certainly took it by ruse (and force) from its only legitimate inhabitants, the "native Amerindians" (let's call them Arawaks, or native-Haitians). Then Blacks take weapons, fight and kill without mercy all the Whites and remaining Arawaks, and take over the country - which soon becomes, mostly through massive murders and rapes, Black only. Do you like this example?

And to quote you: "I am sure no Whites or Arawaks were murdered/raped/looted in the takeover of Haiti."

So you see, Blacks also have, in History, colonized other people's countries: Haiti and all of the Caribbean (taken from the Whites who themselves took it from the native 'Arawaks'). Sudan (taken from the Arabs by mass immigration and countless wars). Mali. And now Lampedusa. And the North of Paris, one might add...

(And yes, Mali. Do you know that in Mali, Blacks have fought, killed, terrorized the native original Malians (Touaregs), to hunt them from their historic land, Azawad, where Tuaregs would like to leave in peace...)

So you see, all races (Blacks included) occasionally do "bad things" and sometimes steal lands from other "native" races. But only Whites get guilt-tripped for it!!

"Norway's local elections test welcome for Syrian refugees"
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2015/09/14...KG20150914

Norway goes maximum overcuck, shifts left as it's anti-immigration party faces it's worst loss in 20 years.


Still waiting for Europe to come to it's senses. Any day now...

^^ I liked that example but your history seems to differ from what I know and have read.

Haiti created by whites, you mean the country that Columbus landed on and systematically wiped out all the indigenous people. Otherwise known as Hispanola. When you say whites took the island, is that what you mean? Genocide of the native Indians, the Caribs and Arawaks.

I am not familiar with Blacks killing Arawaks.

I do know about the story of Toussant Overture, I don't have to tell you because I am sure you already know.

What is your email address? I would love to send you a copy of a book in my collection......They Came before Columbus.

(09-14-2015 05:05 PM)iop890 Wrote:  "Norway's local elections test welcome for Syrian refugees"
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2015/09/14...KG20150914

Norway goes maximum overcuck, shifts left as it's anti-immigration party faces it's worst loss in 20 years.


Still waiting for Europe to come to it's senses. Any day now...

I thought Norway closed its borders?

If I was a human traficker I would operate in the high end segment. I'd dress the refugees up in a lavish manner, Suits for men, mini skirt + make up for women, no headscarves. I'd rent a high end ship, and sail it towards Europe. Of course I'd charge much more than the going rate of $1000, I'd charge at least 10k. I'm sure there are plenty of syrians willing to give 10k to get to Europe in a safe way.

Haha nice idea, but that saying 'You can't polish a turd' comes to mind.

I'm still waiting on French and German authorities plan of defense with regards to 2016 European tournament. You know, hundreds of thousands of western foreigners inside a country which sustained violent attacks this year from a type of terrorist you need blind luck and hope to stop.

Not sure about you but a world stage event with many juicy soft targets in a country with plenty of hiding places nearby might not be such a good idea but then again it would be fascist to point out the glaringly obvious. I just hope the soft headed idiots haven't infected GCHQ.

Solid article from 'The Spectator' in recent days on the ongoing chaos and Merkel's role in it:
http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/9628...hs-at-sea/
Some good comments too.

(09-14-2015 05:10 PM)Libertas Wrote:  I thought Norway closed its borders?

I mistranslated. They were "considering it".

Seems like they decided against it.

(09-13-2015 06:39 PM)Going strong Wrote:  The country of FYROM (Macedonian Republic) also looks to be about to build an "anti-migrant" barrier, made of a fence combined with soldiers...

Note that, in just one day, the FYROM (a tiny country) gets... 7600 illegal migrants coming in!!

http://greece.greekreporter.com/2015/09/...th-greece/

"FYROM could soon be erecting a fence at its southern border with Greece to curb rising immigration to the country.

FYROM Foreign Minister Nikola Poposki told Hungarian weekly Figyelo that his country is considering the “physical defense” option for the border, which could include a fence, soldiers or both.

The country has become a stepping stone for thousands of migrants and refugees seeking to reach Hungary, a Schengen Area signee. Reuters cited a United Nations refugee official who claimed that between 6 pm Wednesday and 6 pm on Thursday 7,600 migrants and refugees entered FYROM from Greece.
"

Meanwhile, the Honorary Consul of France in Bodrum (a Turkish female citizen) is selling cheap inflatable boats to wealthy illegal Afghan migrants posing as poor Syrian refugees ... Crazy times indeed: you can't even understand who actually is, or pretend to be, French, Turk, Syrian or Afghan, who's the diplomat, who's the migrant, who's the merchant, who swindles whom... When Monthy Python enters the Twilight Zone, a movie produced by Frau Merkel and Herr Juncker...

http://www.francetvinfo.fr/live/message/...0/200.html

Well with UNHRC figures of 70% male migrants - and think that's old data (May I think?), from the low end, and not representative of what we're seeing, which is like 80-90% male populations - we aren't seeing "War Refugees." These would be 50/50 sex ratioed.

Instead, we're seeing heavily male populations. This means we're seeing economic opportunism/welfare state greed.

(09-14-2015 05:05 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  ^^ I liked that example but your history seems to differ from what I know and have read.

Haiti created by whites, you mean the country that Columbus landed on and systematically wiped out all the indigenous people. Otherwise known as Hispanola. When you say whites took the island, is that what you mean? Genocide of the native Indians, the Caribs and Arawaks.

I am not familiar with Blacks killing Arawaks.

I do know about the story of Toussant Overture, I don't have to tell you because I am sure you already know.

What is your email address? I would love to send you a copy of a book in my collection......They Came before Columbus.

[b"...the country that Columbus landed on and systematically wiped out all the indigenous people. "[/b]

There is much debate over that in the literature. Why? The data on "indigenous" population levels is very poor. And therefore the range of extremes for native population estimates is too wide to conclude much.

So Norway closed its borders. Good. I figure they would.

Question: why does the Australian regime change matter? Is Turnbull a turncloak (huehuehue)?

(09-14-2015 07:33 PM)Orson Wrote:  Well with UNHRC figures of 70% male migrants - and think that's old data (May I think?), from the low end, and not representative of what we're seeing, which is like 80-90% male populations - we aren't seeing "War Refugees." These would be 50/50 sex ratioed.

Instead, we're seeing heavily male populations. This means we're seeing economic opportunism/welfare state greed.

If they were actual war refugees, it would be more women then men, not including children. Instead all those fighting aged males ditched their families because they're better at hopping fences.

(09-14-2015 07:48 PM)Eskhander Wrote:  So Norway closed its borders. Good. I figure they would.

Question: why does the Australian regime change matter? Is Turnbull a turncloak (huehuehue)?

Abbott was socially-conservative. Turnbull isn't considered conservative enough by many within his own party. Turnbull's popularity is high with people who vote for the opposing party.

We have gone from a male cabinet to now having a female Deputy PM.

Friends were crowing on Twitter this morning that now we having a Prime Minister and Opposition Leader who both believe in gay marriage, so "Suck it, bigots!"

All of this happens without Public Vote. This kind of interparty fighting and backroom dealing is exactly how we ended up with a female Prime Minister a few years ago without the public electing her into office.

This quote doesn't bode well:

Quote:He promised to “recognise the disruption we see driven by technology … is our friend, if we are agile and smart enough to take advantage of it”.

(09-14-2015 02:46 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  

(09-14-2015 11:42 AM)Sweet Pea Wrote:  

(09-14-2015 11:13 AM)rudebwoy Wrote:  Celtic-Austrian - not sure what you are on about, but the killing of whites in South Africa is no way comparable to the amount of blacks that have been slaughtered in South Africa for centuries.

I guess you agree with Apartheid?

Yes, and that's all terrible, but Africans killed other Africans for thousands of years before whites came into the picture. There are something like 5 dominant ethnic groups in all of Africa where thousands of years ago there were hundreds of different ethnic groups. Did Europeans wipe them all out, or did the strong groups conquer the weaker ones?

Just as the Dacians and Illyrians go extinct in Europe due to destruction by other white groups, so too did many groups in Africa because of blacks.

The Han Chinese blobbed out and devoured countless lost groups.

The Arabs exploded out of the Arabian Peninsula and conquered their way across North Africa and into Central Asia, Arabizing and assimilating ancient cultures.

The Turks completely cleansed Anatolia of Greeks.

It doesn't matter what's right, only that the strong exercise their power over the weak. You're the one playing the race card, and I highly doubt you'd be posting the same messages if native South Africans had colonized Ireland and instituted segregation, or if Ethiopians had been the ones to colonize South Africa.

Using that rationale, I guess it was alright for the Americans to drop a bomb on Japan twice during WW2. After all, the Japanese were killing Chinese before right!

Or one of my favourites.

http://deoxy.org/wc/wc-death.htm

Yes, it was the right thing to do at the time. You're still looking at history through the magical lens of hindsight. It was "right" for us to drop those bombs because the alternative was sending our own citizens to be slaughtered in what would have been vicious room-to-room fighting against men, women and children who believed their emperor to be a god. It would have made Stalingrad look like a playground fistfight.

But I guess it would have been "the right thing to do" for the American government to put the lives of foreigners ahead of their own people, because that's just what good white people do.

(09-14-2015 07:37 PM)Orson Wrote:  

(09-14-2015 05:05 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  ^^ I liked that example but your history seems to differ from what I know and have read.

Haiti created by whites, you mean the country that Columbus landed on and systematically wiped out all the indigenous people. Otherwise known as Hispanola. When you say whites took the island, is that what you mean? Genocide of the native Indians, the Caribs and Arawaks.

I am not familiar with Blacks killing Arawaks.

I do know about the story of Toussant Overture, I don't have to tell you because I am sure you already know.

What is your email address? I would love to send you a copy of a book in my collection......They Came before Columbus.

[b"...the country that Columbus landed on and systematically wiped out all the indigenous people. "[/b]

There is much debate over that in the literature. Why? The data on "indigenous" population levels is very poor. And therefore the range of extremes for native population estimates is too wide to conclude much.

Really!!!!!

Columbus installed himself as Governor of the Caribbean islands, with headquarters on Hispaniola (the large island now shared by Haiti and the Dominican Republic). He described the people, the Arawaks (called by some the Tainos) this way: "The people of this island and of all the other islands which I have found and seen, or have not seen, all go naked, men and women, as their mothers bore them, except that some women cover one place only with the leaf of a plant or with a net of cotton which they make for that purpose. They have no iron or steel or weapons, nor are they capable of using them, although they are well-built people of handsome stature, because they are wondrous timid.... [T]hey are so artless and free with all they possess, that no one would believe it without having seen it. Of anything they have, if you ask them for it, they never say no; rather they invite the person to share it, and show as much love as if they were giving their hearts; and whether the thing be of value or of small price, at once they are content with whatever little thing of whatever kind may be given to them."[3,pg.63;1,pg.118] After Columbus had surveyed the Caribbean region, he returned to Spain to prepare his invasion of the Americas. From accounts of his second voyage, we can begin to understand what the New World represented to Columbus and his men -- it offered them life without limits, unbridled freedom. Columbus took the title Admiral of the Ocean Sea and proceeded to unleash a reign of terror unlike anything seen before or since. When he was finished, eight million Arawaks -- virtually the entire native population of Hispaniola -- had been exterminated by torture, murder, forced labor, starvation, disease and despair.[3,pg.x] A Spanish missionary, Bartolome de las Casas, described first-hand how the Spaniards terrorized the natives.[4] Las Casas gives numerous eye-witness accounts of repeated mass murder and routine sadistic torture. As Barry Lopez has accurately summarized it, "One day, in front of Las Casas, the Spanish dismembered, beheaded, or raped 3000 people. 'Such inhumanities and barbarisms were committed in my sight,' he says, 'as no age can parallel....' The Spanish cut off the legs of children who ran from them. They poured people full of boiling soap. They made bets as to who, with one sweep of his sword, could cut a person in half. They loosed dogs that 'devoured an Indian like a hog, at first sight, in less than a moment.' They used nursing infants for dog food."[2,pg.4] This was not occasional violence -- it was a systematic, prolonged campaign of brutality and sadism, a policy of torture, mass murder, slavery and forced labor that continued for CENTURIES. "The destruction of the Indians of the Americas was, far and away, the most massive act of genocide in the history of the world," writes historian David E. Stannard.[3,pg.x] Eventually more than 100 million natives fell under European rule. Their extermination would follow. As the natives died out, they were replaced by slaves brought from Africa. To make a long story short, Columbus established a pattern that held for five centuries -- a "ruthless, angry search for wealth," as Barry Lopez describes it. "It set a tone in the Americas. The quest for personal possessions was to be, from the outset, a series of raids, irresponsible and criminal, a spree, in which an end to it -- the slaves, the timber, the pearls, the fur, the precious ores, and, later, arable land, coal, oil, and iron ore-- was never visible, in which an end to it had no meaning." Indeed, there WAS no end to it, no limit.

(09-14-2015 07:59 PM)Hannibal Wrote:  

(09-14-2015 07:33 PM)Orson Wrote:  Well with UNHRC figures of 70% male migrants - and think that's old data (May I think?), from the low end, and not representative of what we're seeing, which is like 80-90% male populations - we aren't seeing "War Refugees." These would be 50/50 sex ratioed.

Instead, we're seeing heavily male populations. This means we're seeing economic opportunism/welfare state greed.

If they were actual war refugees, it would be more women then men, not including children. Instead all those fighting aged males ditched their families because they're better at hopping fences.

I'm wondering how many of the men might actually have gone ahead alone because they were best fit to make the trip (not that leaving women and children behind in supposed war zone make that at all a noble venture), and then plan on importing their families as soon as the laws in the country they end up in allow it.
Disaster either way whether it's 75% males on their own (the initially scariest prospect in terms of violence, rape, terrorism and other crimes), or doubling, tripling or quadrupling the total numbers later if many do in fact have their families invade in the months and years to come.

I'd say most of them.

What's worse is that the guys who were smart enough to make it all the way to the EU are the same kind of aggressive, driven young men who would be laying down the infrastructure necessary for civilization.

All that's going to happen now is the countries where these guys are from will continue to spiral into a brain-drained third world shithole and the countries they're going to will follow suit.

The ineptitude of the EU leaders (especially Merkel) and the entire situation makes my blood boil. Just thinking about how these third world dinguses managed to simply launch boats towards Italy and demand asylum is fucking preposterous.

The fact that it not only worked, but that there's legions of libtards out there who are cheering these invaders on makes my head spin. Fuck me, don't any of these people read history books? I'm glad I lived in Germany for six months back in 2012 because that country will not be there if I ever decide to come back.

This heartwarming piece of propaganda was broadcast on the national news here in Canada tonight.





I watched it twice, the second time on mute. When you watch it without the woman SJW journalist blabbering on, the images speak volumes. Every wide angle shot shows hordes and hordes of young men pouring into Germany. But of course, she finds the few women and children present and distracts us with their story. At one point the family she profiled is speaking on camera with a stream of young men passing by in the background. Any other close up shots featured crying women or young children.

I don't expect a slow death like Rhino suggests.

The issue is front and center now. People will know.

And, the main problem group has made it its mission to take over and is not know for its patience.

(09-14-2015 07:33 PM)Orson Wrote:  

(09-13-2015 06:39 PM)Going strong Wrote:  The country of FYROM (Macedonian Republic) also looks to be about to build an "anti-migrant" barrier, made of a fence combined with soldiers...

Note that, in just one day, the FYROM (a tiny country) gets... 7600 illegal migrants coming in!!

http://greece.greekreporter.com/2015/09/...th-greece/

"FYROM could soon be erecting a fence at its southern border with Greece to curb rising immigration to the country.

FYROM Foreign Minister Nikola Poposki told Hungarian weekly Figyelo that his country is considering the “physical defense” option for the border, which could include a fence, soldiers or both.

The country has become a stepping stone for thousands of migrants and refugees seeking to reach Hungary, a Schengen Area signee. Reuters cited a United Nations refugee official who claimed that between 6 pm Wednesday and 6 pm on Thursday 7,600 migrants and refugees entered FYROM from Greece.
"

Meanwhile, the Honorary Consul of France in Bodrum (a Turkish female citizen) is selling cheap inflatable boats to wealthy illegal Afghan migrants posing as poor Syrian refugees ... Crazy times indeed: you can't even understand who actually is, or pretend to be, French, Turk, Syrian or Afghan, who's the diplomat, who's the migrant, who's the merchant, who swindles whom... When Monthy Python enters the Twilight Zone, a movie produced by Frau Merkel and Herr Juncker...

http://www.francetvinfo.fr/live/message/...0/200.html

Well with UNHRC figures of 70% male migrants - and think that's old data (May I think?), from the low end, and not representative of what we're seeing, which is like 80-90% male populations - we aren't seeing "War Refugees." These would be 50/50 sex ratioed.

Instead, we're seeing heavily male populations. This means we're seeing economic opportunism/welfare state greed.

I would say that war refugees are normally made up of women, children and elderly men. Men of fighting age should make up around 10%.

(09-14-2015 02:47 PM)rhino Wrote:  

(09-14-2015 02:20 PM)spalex Wrote:  So right now our anger level is at: the stage where we don't want to pay taxes so shitcunts can live for free.

Then soon enough we are going to be at the point where we dont want to pay taxes so the government will intentionally make our lives worse.

Sooner or later there is going to be a civil war, or countries are just going to be handed over to the foreign invaders.
Give it two generations max.

We are calling this The End of Europe. But what is your plan for when it is actually The End of Europe? It is going to happen.
You going to seek refuge in Russia? or some other place that wasn't stupid enough to go along with all this? Start up a militia? What are our options here?

I have revised my opinion. It's official There is no fast End of Europe yet because the masses of Zombies are not present in critical mass numbers.

There's big time deterioration of Europe though.. and the trend will undoubtedly continue so. But with each new generation they won't have memories of significantly better Europe (like some of us now) so they won't feel like much is lost... neither they will care about it anyway since they are going to be busy with the most trivial pursuits.

For similar vision look at the US now:

General population as dumb as obese
Entire cities dipilated no-go zones
Minority thugs playing Knockout Game and posting it to YouTube
Random mass shootings
Violent burglaries, rapes, murders
Trigger-happy Police
Confederate flags down, faggot flags up
Whites minority in California and (soon) Texas
9/11
etc. etc.

And people are STILL watching football on Sundays and plan holidays in Vegas.

Humans -- since dawn of time not giving shit more than the bubble in which they orbit in.

In other words, Europe is still doomed very soon. The only thing that saves civil US communities is space and armament. Europe doesn't have these luxuries. Once the situation is uniform to the UK, a great acceleration toward destruction will take hold.

Your numbers perception lacks dimension to see this. The intimidation of migrant gangs, trafficking rings, white privilege heirarchy/blacklivesmatter pander leaving Europeans unable to defend themselves, lack of racial unification will lead to higher deaths, lack of births, economic decline, cultural erasure and finally violent takeover.

10-20% is the event horizon. Look at how the UK is practically set on a terminal course. Rotherham for instance might as well count those 1400 girls as casualties since many will likely have emotional/bonding issues; leading them to never start families, kill themselves or burden the public with drugs and behavior disorders. Meanwhile, muslim car gangs threaten and batter anyone in their neighborhoods, yet not a local news story concern(that white privilege!).

Having a full spectrum perspective of what is happening tells those looking that the end is now if it's not changed

What's the situation like in Straya? Is the new PM cucking hard?