Post: #26

While everyone has the right to free speech, I think a new right needs to be added.

The "right to ignore" whatever we think is to fucking stupid to pay attention to. Like this shit. Because I seriously think, these mofos do not think we should be allowed to ignore them. Why else would the world need to endure this incessant bitching and moaning.

Post: #27

I thought it would be "Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transsexual Queer Asexual".

The fact that there are two equally valid readings for this nonsense scares me.

Post: #28

(08-25-2015 09:22 PM)Horus Wrote:  His "parents" are effectively massively increasing the odds that he will be another statistic.

If your gay child kills himself you get lifetime Class-A victim status, become a certified GoodPerson™, and no longer have to check your privilege.

Phatom Wrote:I personally don't have a problem with gay people.

There's no need to preface your posts with that here. This is a safe space.

Post: #29

For people who claim they are discriminated against at every turn they sure do attention whore a lot and attempt to force their lifestyle and dogma onto the rest of us. I don't have a problem with gays either as long as they aren't trying to indoctrinate people.

A lot of the recent popularization of gay culture isn't so much about tolerance and awareness. There's definitely a grooming aspect to it that's taboo to mention in the mainstream. It's very shady how gays want to push their ideology into schools where young kids can learn about how ass plowing is normal.

Statistically gays make up probably way less than 10% of any given population. Why should every detail of their lifestyle be forced into the mainstream. If people really want to know they will find out for themselves. There's no reason to push it unless they are of course trying to groom young kids into "questioning" status.

Post: #30

They already added to the world salad. Last I heard it was LGBTTIQQ2S. Which includes intersex and two spirited. And of course like all feminism activism, it includes the most important qualifier. Post pictures of yourself. No better way to get women to join in then to let them attention whore worldwide. It's the common theme among all feminist activism, even when they're claiming to do something against objectifying women they still somehow find a way to objectify themselves. Examples would be slutwalks and #allfeministsareugly movements.

Post: #31

(08-25-2015 09:28 PM)cascadecombo Wrote:  While everyone has the right to free speech, I think a new right needs to be added.

The "right to ignore" whatever we think is to fucking stupid to pay attention to. Like this shit. Because I seriously think, these mofos do not think we should be allowed to ignore them. Why else would the world need to endure this incessant bitching and moaning.

To be honest, this is the thing that winds me up.

Men are visual creatures. We know it. Bitches know it. And the gays know it too.

Everytime I hear about the plight of the gays, in whatever capacity, be it marriage, equality, or even just a story related I AM TRIGGERED.

Triggered by the fact that making me think about gay issues also makes me picture in my mind disgusting gay behaviours. I would rather not have to have my mind directed to the idea of faggotry & all the deviant shit they do. It makes me feel sick.

Just like I have heard many of my gay mates go on & on about how disgusting vaginas are etc. It makes them want to puke.

I don't like feeling nauseous. Its as simple as that.

Post: #32

(08-25-2015 10:13 PM)EuphoricWizard Wrote:  They already added to the world salad. Last I heard it was LGBTTIQQ2S. Which includes intersex and two spirited. And of course like all feminism activism, it includes the most important qualifier. Post pictures of yourself. No better way to get women to join in then to let them attention whore worldwide. It's the common theme among all feminist activism, even when they're claiming to do something against objectifying women they still somehow find a way to objectify themselves. Examples would be slutwalks and #allfeministsareugly movements.

Even some of them are starting to wonder if it's a bit much:

http://m.thestar.com/#/article/news/prid..._long.html

For the record, the official Toronto Pride-endorsed acronym is LGBTTIQQ2SIA.

Post: #33

(08-25-2015 10:35 PM)HighSpeed_LowDrag Wrote:  For the record, the official Toronto Pride-endorsed acronym is LGBTTIQQ2SIA.

I guess they're more comfortable with that gibberish than the standard word: deviant.

Post: #34

The narrative is changing...



From "Film you don't want to see" to "Film you're not allowed to see"

Anyone still unconvinced about the progressive agenda & the MSM's role in this deviant coercion?

Post: #35

(08-25-2015 08:55 PM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  

That picture is incredibly creepy.

Post: #36

There is another aspect of this that people don't like to acknowledge or discuss.

The acceptance of gays has a detrimental effect on men specifically because it opens the door for lesbian relationships to women who otherwise would not go in that direction. This hampers the dating and marriage market for men.

Women's sexuality is different than men's. Studies have long shown that male sexuality is "fixed" by around age 15, but women's is more malleable (Vox Day at Alpha Game reported on a new study yesterday). This is something anyone knows by observation and I won't belabor it here.

If you take all the women who "turned lesbian" at some point, it does impact the dating pool. Years ago I would have never believed this -- and thought anyone saying something like this was nuts.

But as the decades have worn on and our societal acceptance of lesbians (specifically) has broadened, I can now count a good number of women I know who would otherwise have been straight and married, but who experimented with lesbianism in college or after and never came back.

On top of that, I know several whose college experiences with lesbianism altered their sexuality and made them unfit for long-term relationships. In fact, I'd almost characterize these specific women as being sexually assaulted by aggressive college lesbians -- but since it's woman-on-woman, they don't see it like that.

I know you all might think, "Come on! A handful of anecdotal experiences don't make your case." Maybe not. But I think that if we got 100 people together to talk about how many such women they knew, we'd all have a lot of stories and it would become more than "anecdotal" real quickly.

Another thing people don't like to discuss: While men definitely like seeing two women together in porn, they often avoid women who have experimented with lesbianism when it comes to marriage. Again, I have no statistical evidence for this -- but I know which kind of women guys will say they'll settle down with and which they'll have flings with.

So that takes yet more women out of the marriage market. It also might be the great un-talked about factor that underpins a lot of stories on dating we read about (i.e. "Why won't he commit?" "Because you dated Hayley in college -- but he's too politically correct to come out and say so").

This probably doesn't affect top-tier men -- or women for that matter. But in the end, Beta makes suffer. So what else is new.

Post: #37

(08-26-2015 12:04 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  There is another aspect of this that people don't like to acknowledge or discuss.

The acceptance of gays has a detrimental effect on men specifically because it opens the door for lesbian relationships to women who otherwise would not go in that direction. This hampers the dating and marriage market for men.

Women's sexuality is different than men's. Studies have long shown that male sexuality is "fixed" by around age 15, but women's is more malleable (Vox Day at Alpha Game is reported on a new study yesterday). This is something anyone knows by observation and I won't belabor it here.

My conspiracy theory is that there is a tremendous amount of unreported or suppressed child rape going on, which plays into the formation of a deviant sexual identity later in life.

We already know there's a massive proportion of those who were abused as children that go on to rape kids themselves; certainly virtually all those paedophiles who are caught put up that biographical detail when being sentenced.

This is not meant to offend those here who might have been subject to child abuse: it's an unfortunate but real fact of the Venn diagram that applies here. Invariably the psychology is that, having been violated at an early age in that manner, the child's sexual identity and attachment part of the brain alters to see that form of behaviour as natural, as the only one that actually applies.

There may be a tiny proportion of the population who are genetically wired to fuck butt or lick carpet, in the same way there's a tiny proportion of the population that cannot help but get its jollies from fucking trees or animals. But these are outliers, fuckups in utero, misfiring hormones. The much larger proportion of deviant sexual behaviours, I believe, forms as a result of indoctrination or sexual trauma in youth and/or conscious lifestyle choice. Not infrequently do you see women saying how they turned lesbian after what they describe as an incident of heterosexual "rape" (inverted commas, but some of it will be real) in their late youth. If the brain was not capable of massively changing itself, not capable of rewiring itself to suit someone else's agenda, then all the brainwashing studies in the world for nothing. Sexuality is no more sacrosanct than any other form of behaviour that can be consciously (or unconsciously) altered.

It will be decades before any sort of statistical information around this idea can be uncovered as to how the children of lesbians or homosexuals behave towards kids and how their sexual identity is affected while it's forming. The Left will fight tooth and nail to suppress, stop, or downplay any research along these lines until something big like the Rotherdam case breaks involving lesbian or homosexual child abuse by parents. The strongest research will be among those lesbian or homosexual couples who adopt their kids: if you see a high proportion of those kids identifying as homosexual or lesbian themselves, that will be a potent force to indicate that all is in fact rotten in the state of Denmark after all. It will not longer be a subject for sympathy: it will be a lifestyle choice in the way alcohol addiction and/or drug abuse is a lifestyle choice and nothing more.

The question to be pressed on all alphabet-soup sexuality is: when did you know you were this way, who were your parents, and were you sexually assaulted as a child.

Post: #38

Hold the phone.

What the fuck is '2 spirited'?

Post: #39

(08-26-2015 02:35 AM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  Hold the phone.

What the fuck is '2 spirited'?

Bestiality.

Post: #40

(08-26-2015 03:00 AM)spokepoker Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 02:35 AM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  Hold the phone.

What the fuck is '2 spirited'?

Bestiality.

Really? Shit, this has been a weird day.

Been pondering this for the past hour & a half. Anyone heard of VICE's answer to Jezebel: Broadly ?
Vice Publishes Pro-Beastiality Article On Their New Feminist Blog Broadly

After reading that, I'm starting to agree with what Roosh has been predicting for a while now.

Post: #41

Next they will add pedophilia to the acronym salad, but in an artsy-fartsy way to make it sound nice.
Young spirited? Presexual? Who the fuck knows.

Post: #42

(08-26-2015 12:04 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  There is another aspect of this that people don't like to acknowledge or discuss.

The acceptance of gays has a detrimental effect on men specifically because it opens the door for lesbian relationships to women who otherwise would not go in that direction. This hampers the dating and marriage market for men.

Women's sexuality is different than men's. Studies have long shown that male sexuality is "fixed" by around age 15, but women's is more malleable (Vox Day at Alpha Game reported on a new study yesterday). This is something anyone knows by observation and I won't belabor it here.

If you take all the women who "turned lesbian" at some point, it does impact the dating pool. Years ago I would have never believed this -- and thought anyone saying something like this was nuts.

But as the decades have worn on and our societal acceptance of lesbians (specifically) has broadened, I can now count a good number of women I know who would otherwise have been straight and married, but who experimented with lesbianism in college or after and never came back.

On top of that, I know several whose college experiences with lesbianism altered their sexuality and made them unfit for long-term relationships. In fact, I'd almost characterize these specific women as being sexually assaulted by aggressive college lesbians -- but since it's woman-on-woman, they don't see it like that.

I know you all might think, "Come on! A handful of anecdotal experiences don't make your case." Maybe not. But I think that if we got 100 people together to talk about how many such women they knew, we'd all have a lot of stories and it would become more than "anecdotal" real quickly.

Another thing people don't like to discuss: While men definitely like seeing two women together in porn, they often avoid women who have experimented with lesbianism when it comes to marriage. Again, I have no statistical evidence for this -- but I know which kind of women guys will say they'll settle down with and which they'll have flings with.

So that takes yet more women out of the marriage market. It also might be the great un-talked about factor that underpins a lot of stories on dating we read about (i.e. "Why won't he commit?" "Because you dated Hayley in college -- but he's too politically correct to come out and say so").

This probably doesn't affect top-tier men -- or women for that matter. But in the end, Beta makes suffer. So what else is new.

While I'm sure there are a few girls who take up rug munching in college, the majority of them can be classified as "Daddy's money lesbians." Here's a quote from encyclopedia dramatica explaining them.

Quote: The name itself comes from another commonly-heard battle cry, "Listen Daddy, you're going to have to find a way to come to terms with the fact that I am a powerful, beautiful woman who loves other powerful, beautiful womyn. Also, I need you to transfer over $9000 into my checking account." She will most usually break up with her boyfriend in her sophomore year in order to be true to her new-found lesbian nature, but will get back together with him late in her junior year, when she realizes that she has no interest in carpet-munching at all. Every "Daddy's money" lesbian has been almost raped "at least a hundred times", or at least as many times as it takes for the other lesbians to accept her whiny bitch story of why she hates men.

As for those who switch sides and never return, that's a different discussion about the fucked up and dysfunctional nature of most lesbian relationships. There's a reason why lesbian couples are like 20 times more likely to live in poverty than gay male couples.

Post: #43

(08-26-2015 03:31 AM)spokepoker Wrote:  Next they will add pedophilia to the acronym salad, but in an artsy-fartsy way to make it sound nice.
Young spirited? Presexual? Who the fuck knows.

The technical term for paedophilia and its related form ephebophilia is chronphilia. We could just call them all chronies.

Post: #44

(08-26-2015 04:05 AM)porscheguy Wrote:  As for those who switch sides and never return, that's a different discussion about the fucked up and dysfunctional nature of most lesbian relationships. There's a reason why lesbian couples are like 20 times more likely to live in poverty than gay male couples.

Come on, man. You gotta know that the real reason that lesbian butt-buddy couples are poor is because of the glass ceiling. Someone should mandate that half of CEOs are female, so that lesbos can get out of poverty.

Post: #45

Just look at the boys' faces.

Oh yes, I'm so privileged you literally can't even.
Interested in joining the FFL? I tried (and failed).

Post: #46

These people confuse and terrify me.
I cringe when I hear the word "brave" associated with these freaks.

Post: #47

(08-26-2015 03:31 AM)spokepoker Wrote:  Next they will add pedophilia to the acronym salad, but in an artsy-fartsy way to make it sound nice.
Young spirited? Presexual? Who the fuck knows.

The euphemism I remember hearing is intergenerational love. That doesn't seem to have the same negative connotations as kiddy fucker in the same way that gay sounds nicer than fudge packer.

Post: #48

(08-26-2015 04:48 AM)Horus Wrote:  The euphemism I remember hearing is intergenerational love. That doesn't seem to have the same negative connotations as kiddy fucker in the same way that gay sounds nicer than fudge packer.

Intergenerational love will be the next big thing. Of course, it won't be an option for straight men.

Post: #49

(08-26-2015 04:53 AM)Suits Wrote:  Intergenerational love will be the next big thing. Of course, it won't be an option for straight men.

'You're like 30 and you like 20-year-olds? That's disgusting, like, why don't you, like, get a womon your age? A bit older would be good; a 40-year-old womon is determined, experienced and, like, knows what she wants. You're so disgusting, like, seriously man. I literally cannot describe how disgusting you're acting right now; you're, like, a fucking shitlord.'

Oh yes, I'm so privileged you literally can't even.
Interested in joining the FFL? I tried (and failed).

Post: #50

Late in the discussion, but continuing on what DoBA and Paracelsus wrote and which might again seem conspiratorial, controversial and there is no way that we can actually prove it. But here it goes:

As we know the western society in which we live in has foregone its traditional values to become a hypersexualised society. As with everything else in life, this so called progressive and liberalised society has advantages and disadvantages. For example, access to sex without commitment (good for all of us here in the forum), but as we also know the riding of the carousel creates women with a lot of baggage; this tends to mess up a womans' capability to pair bond with their future husband and partner (beta bucks). This is show in the statistics of divorce rates of non-virginal women.

Another aspect which we need to consider is that this liberal society, the Bonobo masturbatory society as Jack Donovan (The Way of Men) puts it, creates boys and not men - For those who do not know, the Bonobo is a primate similar to the chimpanzee which is very matriarchal. Due to the lack of struggle - they do not need to hunt because they are mostly vegetarians, they have no natural predators, because their habitat is pretty secluded - they live a very hedonistic lifestyle, where women are in charge. Homosexuality, male and female, is common practice and sex is seen as a way to diffuse conflicts within the groups. The lack of real struggle in western civilization, where most of us have all our needs met, food, shelter, clothing, etc. is allowing us to live a hedonistic lifestyle similar to that of the Bonobos. Women have more and more freedom, while men are being shamed for having natural male urges and behaviors. As Heartiste puts it: The feminist goal is removing all constraints on female sexuality while maximally restricting male sexuality.

In this Bonobo society, boys are growing up without masculine male role models, because their fathers might be pussy wiped, emasculated, betas, whatever you want to call it; women wear the pants and are in charge. In addition to this, the encouragement by the media and general population to be in touch with their feminine side, and that it's okay to be gay (which it is as long as it's not rubbed in my face, and there are without a doubt, as Paracelsus puts it, a tiny proportion of the population who are genetically wired to fuck butt or lick carpet. However, not as much as we tend to see in society) has had, as we've seen, a significant impact and creates a lot of confusion in some more impressionable young men.

We therefore end up with passive boys who are in touch with their feminine/nurturing side, who still want/need sex, love and intimacy. However, these boys cannot get girls, because they've been sold a reality of women that is incorrect, and what they have been taught throughout their lives doesn't really work, AKA blue pill. The fact that the price of pussy is so high and that women no longer want good/kind men until they are ready to settle down doesn't help the situation.

In addition to this, normal male friendship and affection has been sexualised to the point where we have to use terms such as NoHomo to describe the non-romantic love for another man. See this link from the Art of Manliness of a not too distant past (Link).

So when these men find good companionship with other guys, they sexualise it, because that's the time we live in, they think they are gay/bi, or whatever other letters they want to use, and make it their identity.

The consequences of this have yet to be studied...