Post: #26

(08-05-2015 08:38 PM)Suits Wrote:  

(08-05-2015 07:51 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  

Would bang.

I'd bang and then ejaculate in her hair.

Post: #27

(08-06-2015 12:19 AM)eradicator Wrote:  I'd bang and then ejaculate in her hair.

The writer isn't as pretty as this girl, but you get the point.

Post: #28

Well - the irony to me is that both capitalism AND socialism/Marxism have ever increasing population growth baked into their assumptions. Capitalism needs the consumers and socialism needs ever increasing number of workers to sustain the welfare state.

Post: #29

"Surely they'd want to debunk the assertion that Red Pillers hate women by not dismissing me on the basis of my gender?"

Actually, no, I think we're all done trying to prove anything to women

Post: #30

I was at the London lecture, and Roosh had to be his own greeter at the stated arrival time because she wasn't there to do her job.

Little wonder: "I arrived at the venue in Knightsbridge flustered and hot from the tube delays and oppressive London heat." Knightsbridge is a mile from the actual venue.

That this appears in her article, when the London event page clearly shows Earl's Court indicates either poor understanding of reality or lack of attention to facts.

She was milling around during the breaks, but the sole woman at an event for men sets off the "attention whore" alarm instantly. Her 'contribution' to the Q&A was meaningless and self-absorbed "as a marxist, I..." and Roosh was right to shut down her babbling.


Roosh was justifiably pissed with the BBC interviewing her, it's understandable why they would do it, but as he said to them in the pub after, "she's the coat-check girl! Her opinion is worthless!", and "I paid her, even when she couldn't do the job, and she sold me out because I hurt her feelings"

"I'd hate myself if I had that kind of attitude, if I were that weak." - Arnold

Post: #31

(08-05-2015 11:07 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  Guys who were at the London lecture: How were the hostess's titties? She seems to go to lengths to insert them into the conversation.

Like the article exaggerated!

From the jargon filled article here is what it very briefly covers:
-Where she heard about red pill
-Criticising attendees and roosh talking
-Talking about her point about capitalism
-Speakign to BBC about her opinion (Real reason was nobody wanted to entertain them) and being worried that so many people attended and share the same views

The whole article is just being written for what she thinks other feminists will agree with, I don't think that she could think of anything worthwhile to write about but wanted to try and get her opinion across about the capitalism question as her ego had been hurt.

Post: #32

Make no mistake: she applied to work as Roosh's hostess with the specific intention of writing an article about her experience.

Post: #33

She should have been fired when she was late.

Post: #34

(08-06-2015 12:19 AM)eradicator Wrote:  

(08-05-2015 08:38 PM)Suits Wrote:  

(08-05-2015 07:51 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  

Would bang.

I'd bang and then ejaculate in her hair.

Post: #35

Yeah, no irony in a feminist taking a job as a hostess.

Post: #36

(08-06-2015 06:35 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  She should have been fired when she was late.

Pussy pass.

Post: #37

The German hostess did her work well, did not attend the lecture and was way hotter.

Good help is hard to find.

Post: #38

She looks extremely European, feature-wise. Does that make her hair cultural appropriation?

EDIT: And the fact that she called this a Men's Rights seminar absolutely 100% precludes the possibility she didn't plan the whole thing from the start. The only class with a vested interest in associating Roosh with the MRM is radical feminists. Do it, faggots, you're only radicalising your enemies.

Post: #39

(08-06-2015 09:54 AM)TheMaleBrain Wrote:  The German hostess did her work well, did not attend the lecture and was way hotter.

Good help is hard to find.

Location, location, location.

Post: #40

While due diligence could have prevented this, it is sad that an entrepreneur has to worry about hiring employees who are essentially white collar, slip and fall, lawsuit-chasers like Ellen Pao. They are moles who take jobs with the sole intention of exploiting and or suing or extorting their employer. All business owners like myself, you have been warned.

Post: #41

(08-06-2015 12:19 AM)eradicator Wrote:  

(08-05-2015 08:38 PM)Suits Wrote:  

(08-05-2015 07:51 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  

Would bang.

I'd bang and then ejaculate in her hair.

Was it known that this hostess was actually a former feminist,
and was writing for Huffington Post blog?

Post: #42

[/quote]

How dare you trigger this biracial angel! How dare you!

Post: #43

(08-06-2015 12:25 PM)vinman Wrote:  

How dare you trigger this biracial angel! How dare you!
[/quote]

Post: #44

If I recall correctly, when she was "silenced" during the Q & A, it wasn't in a "Shut up stupid woman" manner. Roosh tooled her gracefully, like a perfectly executed AMOG. That was probably the first time shes been tooled in her life so she retreated into sullen silence.

Post: #45

(08-05-2015 07:51 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  I hope Roosh paid her enough to buy a brush. Must be a jungle down there. Can anyone from the presentation confirm?

Can't get past the hair. WNB

Post: #46

It must be a great place to live where the biggest story the national newscaster can find is following around an unemployed woman pointing out things that offend her.