Post: #476

If I was the baker, I'd make a cake all right, but I'd be sure to drop a nice deuce into the chocolate mix.

Post: #477

(07-03-2015 02:37 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  How long do you guys think it will be before a gay man can aggressively hit on you and if you beat his ass, you'd be arrested for a hate crime?

I don't think it will go in that direction.

The more likely scenario is that the gay lifestyle will be more and more legitimized in the media in order to "convert" more people to that type of lifestyle.

The real problem will be with respect to transgender people. In that case, any heterosexual people who don't find transgender "women" or transgender "men" attractive will be shamed for being "bigoted". You can already see it kind of happening now with the media gushing about how "beautiful" Caitlyn Jenner is supposed to be.

Post: #478

----------------------------------------

Post: #479

(07-03-2015 04:01 PM)Easy E Wrote:  

(07-03-2015 02:37 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  How long do you guys think it will be before a gay man can aggressively hit on you and if you beat his ass, you'd be arrested for a hate crime?

I don't think it will go in that direction.

The more likely scenario is that the gay lifestyle will be more and more legitimized in the media in order to "convert" more people to that type of lifestyle.

The real problem will be with respect to transgender people. In that case, any heterosexual people who don't find transgender "women" or transgender "men" attractive will be shamed for being "bigoted". You can already see it kind of happening now with the media gushing about how "beautiful" Caitlyn Jenner is supposed to be.

That's actually awful to think about. I mean, I know it seems some of the gay bashing here is a bit over the line- but the moment society shames me for not finding a transsexual attractive I'll know Western civilization is over.

Post: #480

The strange thing about the Supreme Court ruling and the Confederate Flag banning is that it seems like most of the hostility created by both is not between heterosexuals and homosexuals and whites and blacks. These issues are creating a war between sane people and the SJWs. I doubt many gay people give a shit about some bakery in Oregon or Indiana or that certain Christians have a religious beef against them. I would guess most black people couldn't care less about the Dukes of Hazzard or Nascar. Most of what we see on the news and social media is a bunch of heterosexual white people on a witch hunt to discredit, defame, and demoralize anyone that doesn't share their "enlightened" beliefs.

Post: #481

(07-03-2015 02:51 PM)Phoenix Wrote:  ^ You wouldn't actually do that though. I think it's one of the occasions where running away like a coward is the best thing to do. I'd never even touch a gay even in self defense if I could manage it, much less start throwing punches that could break the skin.

What if he walks up and slaps your ass? Has happened to me a few times in Boston.

Post: #482

I was reading Heartiste's recent article on homosexual marriage, and came across the following excellent video on the topic:

Post: #483

(07-03-2015 05:04 PM)Samseau Wrote:  What if he walks up and slaps your ass? Has happened to me a few times in Boston.

I just don't know really, I rarely run into them. My instinct would be to walk away, and if they followed pick up a chair and say "it's up to you". A gay is not the same thing as a antagonistic man. Given the disease statistics, a gay is more like a rabid dog, and the response in that case is to use a distance-keeping weapon.

Post: #484

Arthur Chu straight up admits that public shaming and social justice lynch mobs is the way to go for advancing their causes:

http://www.salon.com/2015/07/01/outrage_..._and_rage/

"Anger got us here. Outrage got us here. And yes, public shaming got us here: drawing a line in the sand and making it clear that the status quo was not OK, was not tolerable because it had been tolerated long enough.

Enough with the shame-shaming. There’s nothing wrong with shaming people. Sometimes it’s the only way to help them."

Post: #485

(07-04-2015 05:26 AM)amity Wrote:  I was reading Heartiste's recent article on homosexual marriage, and came across the following excellent video on the topic:

That was one of the best and most information-dense clips I've ever seen articulating this perspective from a non-religious, non-hateful and rational perspective. You can tell that dude is wickedly brilliant.

Unfortunately, it's so much easier to say "why deny the right to love?" than to make this guy's case. The liberal position is so much easier to turn into slogans, social media memes and bumper stickers even though it is far more vacuous and devoid of substance. You don't have to think it through, you just have to feel. This guy's perspective on the other hand takes an attention span, deeper thought, long-term thinking. If you have an IQ under 100 you probably won't even understand much of what he was saying. There's no way you can take his 9 minute video and reduce it to an effective bumper-sticker slogan or turn it into a cute Facebook meme. Yet the amount of substance offered is above and beyond anything you'll find on the other side.

What's frustrating is that the whole issue was framed as love vs hate. If you are pro SSM, you are pro love. If you oppose it, you represent hate. A perspective like this guy's was nowhere to be found in the mainstream dialogue in the past decade. They'd put up pictures of religious freaks with "God hates fags" signs as being the opposition to two lovable gay men that want the same rights as you. No wonder they won.

Post: #486

(07-04-2015 02:23 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  Unfortunately, it's so much easier to say "why deny the right to love?" than to make this guy's case. The liberal position is so much easier to turn into slogans, social media memes and bumper stickers even though it is far more vacuous and devoid of substance. You don't have to think it through, you just have to feel. This guy's perspective on the other hand takes an attention span, deeper thought, long-term thinking. If you have an IQ under 100 you probably won't even understand much of what he was saying. There's no way you can take his 9 minute video and reduce it to an effective bumper-sticker slogan or turn it into a cute Facebook meme. Yet the amount of substance offered is above and beyond anything you'll find on the other side.

What's frustrating is that the whole issue was framed as love vs hate. If you are pro SSM, you are pro love. If you oppose it, you represent hate. A perspective like this guy's was nowhere to be found in the mainstream dialogue in the past decade. They'd put up pictures of religious freaks with "God hates fags" signs as being the opposition to two lovable gay men that want the same rights as you. No wonder they won.

I don't really care for defeatism on this point since for thousands of years of human history it was entirely uncontroversial that marriage was between men and women, and viewpoints to the contrary were seen as absurd and destructive.

The only reason why the current Western populace has changed opinions on this subject is due to constant ongoing deceit and propaganda by every major media outlet. If that stopped, in 10-20 years you would see a dramatic shift in opinion back to default attitudes recognizing that homosexuality is deviant and destructive. Of course, creating change in the media itself is going to be difficult but I believe red pill / neomasculine / truth-based ideas are making inroads.

Post: #487

(07-03-2015 04:47 PM)CH-Toronto Wrote:  

(07-03-2015 04:01 PM)Easy E Wrote:  

(07-03-2015 02:37 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  How long do you guys think it will be before a gay man can aggressively hit on you and if you beat his ass, you'd be arrested for a hate crime?

I don't think it will go in that direction.

The more likely scenario is that the gay lifestyle will be more and more legitimized in the media in order to "convert" more people to that type of lifestyle.

The real problem will be with respect to transgender people. In that case, any heterosexual people who don't find transgender "women" or transgender "men" attractive will be shamed for being "bigoted". You can already see it kind of happening now with the media gushing about how "beautiful" Caitlyn Jenner is supposed to be.

That's actually awful to think about. I mean, I know it seems some of the gay bashing here is a bit over the line- but the moment society shames me for not finding a transsexual attractive I'll know Western civilization is over.

Well, to a degree we are already there. In the last few years there have been a number of times where feminists and trannies go ape shit over the suggestion that a hetero man should have the right to know if the "woman" he meets is actually a man.

There argument is usually that it puts the tranny in danger of being assaulted or killed.

I find this absurd because they are tacitly admitting that straight normal guys would be so disgusted by their freak nature that we would lose control and murder somebody. Think about that for a moment.

I guarantee there will be a day where you will lose a job or get kicked out of school for "mis-gendering" someone or simply thinking that you have a right to know that the "woman" who just asked you for a date is actually a man.

Post: #488

(07-02-2015 09:28 AM)Aenigmarius Wrote:  I don't think we'll see that many high value men actually marrying more than one woman. I think most high value Alphas would realize it won't end well -- hell, they don't really want to marry one, let alone two. And even "high value" (i.e., rich) Betas won't because the first wife will have their balls in a little case next to her bed.

You are missing the huge number of rich or even Alpha guys who are essentially Blue Pill. Getting laid like a celeb/athlete conveys to you easy pussy, but doesn't tell you anything about the Red Pill. Most high-profile men are still in the Blue Pill land. They will just suffer less than Robin Williams when they get divorce raped - they will simply upgrade to a younger model. But their money will be gone for sure.

Post: #489

At the street level in my country (Australia), things are getting gayer, although gay marriage is still not legalised here. Since the Supreme Court's decision in the US, Ive been on 3 major nights out at fairly mainstream venues and encountered many more trannies and gays than usual. In fact I dont even recall seeing trannies in those venues, ever. I dont mind gays so much as they often are accompanied by decent looking women but every cross dresser and tranny I ran into on those nights out was with monstrous kaijus.

Last night at a club, one gay guy even got in my face and asked me to dance with him. This has never happened before here, and only once in my life while I was in NYC. I politely got out of there, but I hope this is not the beginning of something worse.

Post: #490

(07-03-2015 04:47 PM)CH-Toronto Wrote:  

(07-03-2015 04:01 PM)Easy E Wrote:  

(07-03-2015 02:37 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  How long do you guys think it will be before a gay man can aggressively hit on you and if you beat his ass, you'd be arrested for a hate crime?

I don't think it will go in that direction.

The more likely scenario is that the gay lifestyle will be more and more legitimized in the media in order to "convert" more people to that type of lifestyle.

The real problem will be with respect to transgender people. In that case, any heterosexual people who don't find transgender "women" or transgender "men" attractive will be shamed for being "bigoted". You can already see it kind of happening now with the media gushing about how "beautiful" Caitlyn Jenner is supposed to be.

That's actually awful to think about. I mean, I know it seems some of the gay bashing here is a bit over the line- but the moment society shames me for not finding a transsexual attractive I'll know Western civilization is over.

I've already seen leftists try to shame men for not wanting to date trannies.

Post: #491

(07-05-2015 03:55 AM)StrikeBack Wrote:  At the street level in my country (Australia), things are getting gayer, although gay marriage is still not legalised here. Since the Supreme Court's decision in the US, Ive been on 3 major nights out at fairly mainstream venues and encountered many more trannies and gays than usual. In fact I dont even recall seeing trannies in those venues, ever. I dont mind gays so much as they often are accompanied by decent looking women but every cross dresser and tranny I ran into on those nights out was with monstrous kaijus.

Last night at a club, one gay guy even got in my face and asked me to dance with him. This has never happened before here, and only once in my life while I was in NYC. I politely got out of there, but I hope this is not the beginning of something worse.

They are only going to be more and more aggressive and emboldened (and more obnoxious and rude).

On another note, I'm looking on AirbnB now for a place to rent and literally almost every guy they show in the various backgrounds seems like he could be gay and/or the two guys could easily be a gay couple. At first it was just the first one, but then I saw a few others and just though "wait a minute" and sure enough almost every one seemed to have effeminate men of one sort or another.

The gay propaganda is literally EVERYWHERE now.

Like a lot of guys have said before, they will start pushing "experimentation" full-on pretty soon...I mean, the only way that the powers can be can be fully sure that we're all fully behind the LBGT movement is if we "fully" except them right?

Post: #492

I wonder how long until we hear stories about gay men raping straight men?

Post: #493

(07-05-2015 07:39 PM)Samseau Wrote:  I wonder how long until we hear stories about gay men raping straight men?

Those stories have been all over the place for a long time. Google prison rape. Because I don't buy that shit that "it's not gay inside."

Post: #494

^ I mean outside of prison.

Post: #495

(07-05-2015 07:39 PM)Samseau Wrote:  I wonder how long until we hear stories about gay men raping straight men?

It happens quite often, but you simply don't hear about it. You see, the modern day view that rape isn't about sex, it's about power means you can't consider male on male rape as "gay" rape. I would say it is similar to why man-on-boy pedophiles aren't considered homosexual (though clearly they are).

Men need to be careful with becoming blackout drunk while out partying. When a married man recently passed out in the bathroom at a Vegas hotel party recently, a homosexual tried to fuck him in the ass.

Here is a Guardian article from 2003 which states that between 10 and 15% of people who reported being roofed and sexually assaulted are men. I would bet that there are far more men wouldn't report it so who knows how high the number really is.

Post: #496

President Obama is told to stop being such a fag lover by Kenyans:

Quote:President Obama is likely to have a packed agenda when he visits east Africa later this month, but Kenyans are already using Twitter to advise him on what he should - or shouldn't - be discussing.

#KenyansMessageToObama is trending in the country, with nearly 3,000 tweets in just a few hours Monday morning. One prominent topic of conversation is gay rights. "Spare us the gay talk," one user comments, while another tweets: "That gay vibe should remain in America."

Last month the US Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage is legal across the country, a decision that was hailed by Obama - although he had expressed opposition to gay marriage in the past. More broadly, Obama has used previous trips to Africa to urge governments to decriminalise homosexuality. Gay sex is illegal in Kenya, and punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

Anti-gay activists held a protest in Nairobi on Monday morning. Most of the messages mentioning gay rights under the #KenyansMessagetoObama tag are anti-homosexual, but a few Kenyans do offer an opposing view. "Gays are part of our society," one says, "we need to give them some space."

Doesn't Obama have bigger things to deal with than promoting faggotry across the globe?

Post: #497

A part of me was hoping that they would have used this opportunity to say that the government has no right to define what marriage is and isn't since it is and will forever be a religious institution.

Then go and re-write the entire tax code to call it a "union of two" or whatever.

This would have been the responsible ruling that would have put this rest forever. However what we have now isn't appropriate, in the same way Obamacare is.

Post: #498

Post: #499

(07-05-2015 07:39 PM)Samseau Wrote:  I wonder how long until we hear stories about gay men raping straight men?

I stomped the fuck out of a gay, dressed like he was at the Blue Oyster, that grabbed my ass in Chicago 10 years or so ago.

Does that make me a hater?

The bad thing is, my pounding his ass into the turf actually turned him on.

Fucking freaks.

Post: #500

Akulas sig Wrote:"If you want to know who is in power, simply find out who you cannot criticize." Voltaire

I wonder how long it takes before SJ warfare turns violent