Post: #76

Seeing the responses on Twitter AND the Huffington Post have me feeling all warm and fuzzy. I wonder if we're reaching critical mass yet.

Post: #77

(04-23-2015 12:16 PM)heavy Wrote:  

(04-23-2015 12:09 PM)Slim Shady Wrote:  Can we actually make a compendium of studies and articles showing how the rape/false accusation/wage gap etc stats are myths? Has anyone collected the ones that have been posted on the forum before? I would like to keep them handy.

They aren't interested in facts.

You can mention a fact in a conversation, which I do occasionally, as if 'I read this article a couple weeks ago that had this study that said...'

That line works well, but you aren't changing minds. Women will never understand.

It's like talking to my chic friends about how "heavy, if you approached a girl like this or that, it would totally work". I can't tell them "Yeah, but you're 30. When you were 20 walking over and saying that wouldn't have worked, because you were hot shit and the world was your playground." (note, a great response is, "and how many women have you slept with?", because chics have no idea how to pick up a dude)

*Sometimes* they sorta see what I mean, but rarely.

This is what it's like presenting facts to a feminist.

I'll agree that *they* aren't interested in facts.

But some people are. Like college guys, high school boys, men dealing with weird office situations and not knowing why, unhappily married guys, mothers of sons who got screwed by the system, etc.

Such a list might not sway feminists, but having it out there would be a great resource for the many people who disagree with them but can't quite articulate why. In fact, calling it something like "Why feminists are factually wrong" would make it easy to find on Google.

I think the audience is there, they just don't know it. And that's really how you get successful in any realm: give people stuff they want but didn't realize they even wanted.

Post: #78

^Exactly. I see the tide turning in some cases these days. I think some of the overt demonstrations of feminist mendacity in the last few years have confused some guys out there and showing them real numbers would help sway them. We need these people because the more people we have on our side, the more acceptable it becomes to speak the truth in public and call out feminist bullshit.

A lot of colleges especially are going under all out feminist tyranny these days, and spreading the facts will help guys resist these policies. Otherwise people voicing an opinion against feminist policies on campuses are told: why would you oppose that? Do you not oppose rape?

If we had a compendium of facts, people could call out feminist speakers in post speech Q&A sessions and embarass them - for example.

Post: #79

(04-23-2015 12:47 PM)Slim Shady Wrote:  ^Exactly. I see the tide turning in some cases these days. I think some of the overt demonstrations of feminist mendacity in the last few years have confused some guys out there and showing them real numbers would help sway them. We need these people because the more people we have on our side, the more acceptable it becomes to speak the truth in public and call out feminist bullshit.

A lot of colleges especially are going under all out feminist tyranny these days, and spreading the facts will help guys resist these policies. Otherwise people voicing an opinion against feminist policies on campuses are told: why would you oppose that? Do you not oppose rape?

If we had a compendium of facts, people could call out feminist speakers in post speech Q&A sessions and embarass them - for example.

I posted about feminists pushing too far on another forum probably about 7 or 8 years ago.

Women simply cannot stop pushing until they are forced too. It is almost like their entire existence is one big shit test and it is up to men to stop them. No one is stopping the feminists. And they will end up pushing so far that either they bankrupt society and lose their rights in the rebuilding or they piss off enough men and the decent women that they become a running joke for generations and the backlash is severe.

If women were able to stop themselves, they would have stopped this nonsense sometime in the late 1990's. I think that was when women were still decent enough to get away with their shenanigans and not get called out on it. They still dressed mostly feminine, they didn't push too far into men's fields/areas without first some what earning it, and men were still at least some what respected. Sometime in the early 2000's they pushed too far, IMO, and they have been going full steam ahead.

Many young guys know something is not right. They can't put their finger on it. They turn to the internet and many are finding the answers. The internet is so powerful, I am sure the feminists would love to have it heavily regulated and limited. The older guys mostly know something is wrong, and are split between those who want to find out what exactly and those who just keep trying to find that magical princess.

But the more women who get fat, get facial piercings, get tats, dress like slobs, are rude and arrogant for no reason and get promoted based on no merit, the more men who wake up or are ready to be awaken. And the comments on this article are extremely exciting to see.

Post: #80

(04-23-2015 12:00 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Her Twitter account is back up and running by the way.

I'm not a Twitter User, so maybe I'm reading it wrong, but where did all the critical tweets to her article post go? This includes the very evidence she asked for that Rational Male provided.

On the plus side, she got favourited by Hugo Schwyzer.

Post: #81

(04-22-2015 09:06 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  ... This woman would not be fixating on Roosh if she was busy with kids and a husband.

Explains all of modern society in 17 words.

Post: #82

(04-23-2015 01:00 PM)It_is_my_time Wrote:  The older guys mostly know something is wrong, and are split between those who want to find out what exactly and those who just keep trying to find that magical princess.

There's a third group: those of us just trying to make enough cash fast enough so we can get the fuck out with our wives and kids when the shit hits the fan.

Post: #83

(04-23-2015 08:42 PM)MrLemon Wrote:  

(04-23-2015 01:00 PM)It_is_my_time Wrote:  The older guys mostly know something is wrong, and are split between those who want to find out what exactly and those who just keep trying to find that magical princess.

There's a third group: those of us just trying to make enough cash fast enough so we can get the fuck out with our wives and kids when the shit hits the fan.

True. That is the group I am in. I graduated college and got my first professional job 15 years ago. And I was amazed at how much post college life sucked/how much it sucks to sit in a cube 8 hours a day and stare at a computer screen. How much it sucks to work with a majority of women and the blue pill beta men. And within the first week I started to live beyond cheap and went out and found a weekend job.

I never stopped. And it has paid off greatly working 7 days a week for 15 years. Because I simply want out. There is no happiness in the USA without millions of dollars, at least not for me. Someone will always be trying to pull me back down into the hellish pit of American middle class life. Someone will always be trying to prevent me from happiness and success. A jealous blue pill beta man or an ugly feminazi. And I don't want that in my life, and if I have kids, I sure as hell don't want that for them.

So I keep working and fighting, and either I will have enough to insulate myself here one day or enough to leave. All in all, we see eye to eye on this goal.

Post: #84

(04-23-2015 08:42 PM)MrLemon Wrote:  There's a third group: those of us just trying to make enough cash fast enough so we can get the fuck out with our wives and kids when the shit hits the fan.

You forgot the fourth group like me who will stick around and thrive while running guns and hookers.

Post: #85

^^^ wait, aren't you doing that already?

Post: #86

(04-24-2015 06:30 PM)Akula Wrote:  ^^^ wait, aren't you doing that already?

Shhhh. Keep it on the DL.

Post: #87

(04-24-2015 08:29 AM)IvanDrago Wrote:  You forgot the fourth group like me who will stick around and thrive while running guns and hookers.

That's always been my life goal.

I'm most of the way there already - just aching for the collapse.

Post: #88

^^^^

Guys, take a good look at that photo of Humongus. I mean, take a good look.

That's pretty close to what Anonymous Bosch looks like, for real, and in the flesh.

(Except he doesn't wear a hockey mask.)

And that's no joke, either. He has an imposing physical presence, to put it mildly.

Post: #89

^^^

LOL, QC. Thanks for blowing smoke up my arse, but I'm more Classic Short Man Syndrome / Walking Fireplug than Humungous.

That being said, I'm looking forward to ruling my post-apocalyptic settlement with an iron-studded first. First task to order, paint some some corrugated iron with my blood.

"Welcome to Boschtown.
My way or the wasteland.
No Fat Chicks!"

By the way, 'Pantheon' finally arrived late yesterday. Looking forward to it.

Post: #90

https://instagram.com/laurenmesservey/

There's a pic there from 2 months of her holding a baby. She doesn't look fat. WB if can be reasoned with.

Post: #91

(04-25-2015 06:33 PM)Game_Started Wrote:  https://instagram.com/laurenmesservey/

There's a pic there from 2 months of her holding a baby. She doesn't look fat. WB if can be reasoned with.

Since she had the Instagram locked the other day, I'm assuming that since she knew her attractiveness was being discussed, she locked the profile, did some Persona Curation, unlocked it, and is now fishing for compliments.

Read the caption:

Quote:From when Bella Bean was only days old. She's grown so much!

That's a then photo, not a now.

I've seen chicks ruin themselves in 10 weeks.

The Rule of Women's Online Profiles stand: if they've got it, they flaunt it to get male attention, and to be an object of envy to their friends.

Note her Throwback Thursday photos are Full Body, and that her recent ones are head and shoulders / angelic glow Beta bait.

WB the fantasy she's projecting.

UPDATE:

Also note:

- First photo - note the obvious 'noise' evident the background wall behind her. That's the same filtering she's applied to her soften her face.

- Second photo - 'Going out like teenagers' either taken in low-light or with deliberate after-grain to soften skin.

- Angelic Glow 'No Makeup' tagged picture with Horse-faced Friend to look far more attractive by comparison. Note she deliberately backs right off from the camera to let Sarah Jessica Parker take up prime position and show all her blemishes, whilst the minimising and distance hides hers. She knows what's she's doing. # QueenBeeBitchGame

- A pic of an overweight, flabby-armed friend getting a tattoo. A rule of female social circles: like attracts like, and, to some degree, creates like. If she's not fat now, her flabby, feminist peers will naturally degrade her until she is.

Post: #92

Quote:We don't just want to see your YouTube videos, Roosh. We want evidence from scientists that aren't gender biased, including genetic samples, brain scans, and tissue samples that prove without a shadow of a doubt that women are less valuable than men and only capable of traditional "feminine" tasks. We want massive polls and censuses into the habits and ideals of the American (and international) woman, showing that every single woman out there can be categorically sorted according to your theories. We want reference materials, stacks of reputable, unbiased non-fiction sources, citing that all women are meant to be obedient, modest beings that don't also contain the word "God" in them.

"Roosh, I DARE you to conduct years of research costing upwards of hundreds of millions of dollars to prove me us wrong!"
"Uh, no."
"You see? We got him ladies!"

Post: #93

(04-25-2015 09:45 PM)dads Wrote:  

Quote:We don't just want to see your YouTube videos, Roosh. We want evidence from scientists that aren't gender biased, including genetic samples, brain scans, and tissue samples that prove without a shadow of a doubt that women are less valuable than men and only capable of traditional "feminine" tasks. We want massive polls and censuses into the habits and ideals of the American (and international) woman, showing that every single woman out there can be categorically sorted according to your theories. We want reference materials, stacks of reputable, unbiased non-fiction sources, citing that all women are meant to be obedient, modest beings that don't also contain the word "God" in them.

"Roosh, I DARE you to conduct years of research costing upwards of hundreds of millions of dollars to prove me us wrong!"
"Uh, no."
"You see? We got him ladies!"

All she would have had to do was Google "Kibbutz" and she would have found the answer in 2.5 seconds.

Whether or not she would care is another story though.

Post: #94

(04-24-2015 08:04 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  ^^^^

Guys, take a good look at that photo of Humongus. I mean, take a good look.

That's pretty close to what Anonymous Bosch looks like, for real, and in the flesh.

(Except he doesn't wear a hockey mask.)

And that's no joke, either. He has an imposing physical presence, to put it mildly.

This will make you laugh, Quintus.

Was going riding with some mates this morning, and one of the old dears at the petrol station called me 'Humongus', and said she'd jump on the back of my bike except she was 'still holding out for Mel after all these years, even if he's bazarack'. (<- Aussie slang for 'crazy' that will probably die out in common use when people two generations above me finally pass away).

I don't see the resemblance, myself.





Still, I'm aiming to gather a better class of Post-Apocalyptic Thug in Boschtown. Violent rule under an iron fist, sure, but elegant, gentlemanly violence.

All bodies must be beach ready. Toleration will not be tolerated: if you have an issue, fight it out. Structured toxic masculinity will be highly-encouraged. Uttering certain phrases, (such as 'social construct' or 'genderfluid'), means we dye your hair SJW blue and introduce you to a Fat Activist with a Strap-On before you become meat for the Radioactive Mutants.

Philosophical readings will be mandatory.



"Get some learning into yer thick skulls, Wastelanders! I except serious discussion of Neoplatonism on the ride to our next loot and pillage mission."

Post: #95

Lmao Bosch

The classic, I'm a bad ass tough guy crossing my arms, but I'm also an intelligent thought provoking reader.

Post: #96

(05-05-2015 12:06 PM)kaotic Wrote:  The classic, I'm a bad ass tough guy crossing my arms, but I'm also an intelligent thought provoking reader.

I do my best, despite being an obese, low IQ neckbeard loser living in my mom's basement who only hates women because he's a virgin and can't get a real girl.

I'm still working my way through QC's book, and it's a work of art. He'd have been celebrated for his wisdom and intelligence even 100 years ago, and he should be - quite rightly - very proud of his achievement.

Yet, every snarky Female Typist who hates on ROK - like the idiotic HuffPo one above - thinks they're the intellectual elite, and that we need to 'educate' ourselves, whilst dropping lightweight article after lightweight article of barely-articulated, half-illiterate drivel about nothing more than their 'feels' and their narcissistic, entitled fantasies of what they mistakenly-believe they deserve from society. Hell, HuffPoSIF is actually expecting Roosh to engage in a battle of wits with her, not realising her Rapier is a balsa wood stick and she's facing in the opposite direction.

It drives me to frustration that QC will only cultivate a small, admittedly-intelligent, audience whilst rubbish like this will be widely-read and publicly-discussed by every 'educated' Female Typist out there:



Raise your fucking game, ladies.

Post: #97

That literally was flowing poetry man, damn.