Post: #101

Look at how He dominated and dominated the women on the View. I especially like it when he handles their shit tests.

Post: #102

(07-31-2016 09:52 PM)Herr Lucifer Wrote:  What would you have him say instead? In dealing with Julien Blanc situation?

I've seen footage of him in bars and clubs picking up women. He has been deeply involved in pick-up artistry for as long as he's been famous. He even had Neil Strauss on his radio show. He knows all about this world better than me. He once phoned an old man live on the radio to inform the guy he fucked his granddaughter, which got him suspended from the BBC, but now prattles on about "respect".

You'll also notice he gave a different answer to CNN than he did on his YouTube show. On his YouTube show he sided with the mob and with the leftist millennials, but on CNN he was a little more honest. I guess you could argue on both occasions he deflected, appeased, and continued on as normal. Fine, but I guess my problem with Russell is I never trusted him.

Post: #103

Quote:Russel Brand has great game, but let's not forget that when the Julien Blanc scandal erupted, Russel couldn't wait to join the chorus of naysayers. In that video he says: "Any system for chatting up women is in itself questionable, and anything that's based on objectifying women or disrespecting women I'm against." I lost total respect for Russel then. Totally sanctimonious. He gave a front page blurb for The Game for fuck sake - and this is also the man who dumped Katy Perry by text. if anybody embodies the player lifestyle it's Russel Brand, but he couldn't wait to make sure people knew he was in step with the official narrative.

Been about a decade since I've read it, but wasn't Straus's whole conclusion in The Game that the systems he and his buddies employed where questionable?

Would love to see clips of Brand verbal sparring with someone on his level, as entertaining as it is to see him take down morning talk show airheads.

Post: #104

^^ His blurb on the book was something about Neil Strauss having turned him from a shy wallflower into a seducer of women.

Post: #105

(08-01-2016 10:10 AM)nmmoooreland20 Wrote:  

Quote:Russel Brand has great game, but let's not forget that when the Julien Blanc scandal erupted, Russel couldn't wait to join the chorus of naysayers. In that video he says: "Any system for chatting up women is in itself questionable, and anything that's based on objectifying women or disrespecting women I'm against." I lost total respect for Russel then. Totally sanctimonious. He gave a front page blurb for The Game for fuck sake - and this is also the man who dumped Katy Perry by text. if anybody embodies the player lifestyle it's Russel Brand, but he couldn't wait to make sure people knew he was in step with the official narrative.

Been about a decade since I've read it, but wasn't Straus's whole conclusion in The Game that the systems he and his buddies employed where questionable?

Yes it was towards that, despite his journey Strauss starts the book a beta and ends the book a beta. You could say that he was advanced on outer game but didn't have a fucking clue on inner game, in other words he just came across as a massive pussy even at the end of it.

As for Russell Brand he's clearly pandering to the masses on the Trews show on Youtube and is a hypocrite.

Everytime I think of Russell Brand I think of him wanking off a man in the toilets of a gay pub hard to get that image out your head:

Post: #106

There is nothing inherently wrong with the statement "Any system for chatting up women is in itself questionable, and anything that's based on objectifying women or disrespecting women I'm against."

Lets break it down.

First off, calling something questionable doesnt make it good or bad. It does imply that a healthy amount of skepticism should be used when evaluating it, and to be honest based off of so many bogus PUA "systems" I think that this is valid. Futhermore, there is a difference between teaching a "system" and teaching tips for improving your interactions with women and how to be more confident and charismic in general.

Moving on, he says he is against objectifying and disrespecting women. I think most of us are against disrepecting women, so nothing contraversial here. Probably fewer of us are against objectifying women, but some people really do enjoy their interactions with women in general. Regardless, would you make a stand on national TV that you are for objectifying women?

I think this was a skilled answer by a highly talented wordsmith, that you can twist to mean however you want it to mean, leaving him room to wiggle out from an attempted trap. I like it, skilled move.