Post: #26

Sorry, I'm on a roll. This subject has dredged up something deep inside of me. I'll try to make sense even though I'm going slightly OT.

If I was the big brother of one of these young girls, I would not be happy about my little sis slutting it around like that. Even if she really was an innocent. I can't stress this enough: I am not calling these children sluts. I am calling out the parents.

But what if you are also a prepubescent boy and your parents think it's ok to parade your little sister around like that. Surely you would notice? Surely you would feel protective of her as grown men lech over her in front of you? Surely that would make a mark on objective reality as you observe it? How to make sense of it.

I'm not talking about when your little sister reaches 16 and she can legally be married and have kids. She's all but grown up then, I'm talking the years before that.

I've never had a little sister, though for a brief time I did, and this is what has 'triggered' me to write another post on this. It was the daughter of one of my father's girlfriends. We absolutely fell in love with each other - she was the little sister I had never had, and I was the big brother she would never have.

Child molestation was rife in her family. Her mother didn't shut up about it. That sounds bad. But at the time something didn't seem right. I had only just met her but she was telling me about how her father had molested her and her siblings. The mum I'm talking about here, to be clear, not my new little sister.

There was evidence of some serious triangulation going on in the family as my little sister's only sibling - an older sister (say 18) - was somewhat distant and afraid of the mother who had bipolar. It's often the case when Narcisstic abuse takes place that the older child becomes the scapegoat or blacksheep.

I really liked the older sister as well. But she was distant. Being polite, but making her excuses to gtfo of the house when she could. She was warm and genuine and I sensed her fear, being a fellow empath and blacksheep/scapegoat. I didn't register this at the time of course, only some time later. Now it makes sense.

So we didn't spend any time together even though there was supposed to be a marriage on the cards and we would be kind of half-brother/half-sister (sorry, don't know the correct terminology - suffice to say it never happened).

She was definitely the scapegoat and would have borne the brunt of the abuse that the mother was dealing out. I don't know if the child molestation even happened (on the part of the mother). BPD and Narcs and other Cluster B personality disordered types make shit like this up all the time. They are the ultimate victims. They are the ultimate predators.

See Ted Bundy. He got to kill so many women by playing the victim. He would pretend to have a broken arm or leg and would need help to put the books in to the back of his VW. He had it worked out to a T.

And talking of brothers and sisters, he tried to abduct one young child - a female - and she was just about to walk off with him when her big brother came along and took on this grown man - what balls - as a kid. But he was looking out for little sister. He saved her life. The bonds between siblings can be incredibly strong. I would have gone through torture in place of my brother, but I wouldn't have done it for my parents.

But back to my 'temporary' little sister. We didn't spend that much time together, probably only a few days over a few weeks, if that. But we went to the park and walked about and took some trains out to a few places. We were getting ready to share our new lives together. As brother and sister.

There is no fucking way on this Earth that I would have ever allowed her to dress like that. But you see, I was a grown man, and she was just a young child of six years old. It was obvious to me.

She wasn't even my flesh and blood, but I would have protected her, because that is what big brothers do. So what the fuck happened to the parents in all of this? Why do they allow their children to parade around like this? Does a 5/6 year old really need to wear skin tight lycra with all the showing up of the intimate body parts that ensues from that?

I'm just drawing parallels here. My little sis at the time was very modestly dressed. I still remember her favourite dress - a floral print number that went down to her knees. It had shades of Green and it sparked off her beautiful Italian olive skin and deep Brown eyes.

That little girl. My little sister. She stirred something deep in me that I never knew existed. She reached the uttermost depths of my soul. And this is why I remember the few days we spent together so well.

Men have an innate instinct. It's who we are. It's why we go to war and fight. It's why we are prepared to give our own lives to protect those closest to us. Women and children first!

These are not empty words. Many such cases in history where this has been proven to be true. Men make this world go around, but we can not give birth. We are not life-givers as women are, but we are life-protectors. And when it comes the time, cometh the hour, cometh the man. We will do that. We will form a bridge for our women and children to walk over us to safety, even if it means a certain end for us in the process. It's what we do. We protect. We fight to protect.

That is what that little girl stirred in me. I never knew I had it in me. But I found it with her. She guided me to my innermost greatest strength.

I would have died for her. I would have replaced myself in any torture she would have faced. I would have taken on any illness that she had had, just so she could be safe. I may not be able to give life as a woman does. But I can do my duty as a man and protect. Yin and Yang.

I'll never forget how she looked in to my eyes when she was sat on my knee. She was totally absolutely unconditionally in love with me, as only a sibling can be. It's not possible to have this kind of relationship with a wife or girlfriend for longer than the romance period of that relationship lasts. But this was forever!

I didn't instigate any of the physical closeness between us, but she was all over me like a little monkey. I held her back as much as I could, and we settled on a comfortable balance of just sitting on my knee when waiting for the train, or holding hands when walking through the park.

As brother and sister!

Somehow, somewhere, men have lost their voice to be able to express closeness like this with our children and our loved ones - our siblings. We are made out to not just be savages and brutes, but beasts and monsters.

If I had booked the pair of us in to a hotel for a day out and night overstay, I'd have some jealous interfering bitch calling the police and saying there's a pedo in room 29. It's happened. Real fathers and daughters. With passports and driving licenses. What a sick society we live in.

But it's all by design. To castrate men.

My father and that mad bitch of a mother split up a little while later. I never got to see my little sister ever again. I have no idea if she is still alive, and if she is, if she is happy, and if she is happy, if she is thriving. I hope she is. I loved that little girl with all my heart.


I'm not going to insult myself and I'm certainly not going to insult anyone else on this forum by giving certain qualifications about how "I'm not _this_, I'm not _that_, honest".

Those of you with kids will understand. Those of you with siblings will understand. Both brother and sister.

And those of you without kids:

Get out there and find your niche. The world is seriously fucked. I doubt even this forum will exist in 5 years time. A week is a long time in politics. Will we still be able to say these things? Will we still be able to talk? Us men from oh so many different backgrounds, creeds and colours?

White men: If you find an ebony beauty that you love, then go for it. As long as it's doable with family and friends (always to be considered as part of the equation). Don't give a fuck what others think of you. Find a loving wife, keep her in line and modest as a good woman should be and as a good man should be able to do (pimp hand).

And even if you believe in white genocide (which I do to an extent), realise that there is the micro and there is the macro, and the game is just about spent now anyway. What matters is you and your family, your offspring.

Black men: If you find a pale-skinned shield maiden warrior that can take you on, the same goes. Don't give a fuck what others think of you. I'm offering greater advice here as you sure as fuck don't need my approval. But you get my point.

We are entering new days.

We are already living in a world where men can not object to children dressing 'like' sluts.

We live in a world where it's ok to dress a boy like a girl like a women like a prostitute, but doing it to a girl would get you banged up for child abuse.

And (((their))) game moves forward, while we still try to catch our breath.

Sometimes I don't think we know just how defeated we are.

WE must get some situational awareness. OODA.


That's about it. I'm going to grab another beer. Make some tasty Japanese style food then get some sleep.

I will pray to a God I don't believe in. Then hope the nightmares don't kick in too hard and wake me up...

But even then I just smile, because reality itself has become its own nightmare. It's just another day, another long dark night of the soul.

What more can be taken?


I lost the only little sister I would ever have in this life. Our short few days together have truly enriched my being for as long as I will draw breath. Alas it was not meant to be.

Our parents fucked us up, they don't mean to, but they do (©Larkin).

I pray she is out there somewhere, happy, thriving...

... along with her big sister ...

Post: #27

DA time.

Mrs Mass is virtue signalling in her own way. This should have been a discussion levelled against the parish priest with as many supporters as she could get with the aim of establishing a dress code.

If that fails you fuck off and find a church that doesn't court the devils children just to fill the fucking pews.

I sympathise but what does anyone expect will happen when they use social media to call out whores when social media is dominated by whores.

Post: #28

The easiest way to get a THOT to show her tits or ass is simply to suggest that she shouldn't, especially if you cite some appeal to social or moral decency. Every girl is a slutty exhibitionist at heart and is just dying for a "just" opportunity to expose her body without the possibly of being deemed a slut (ironically a title none yet truly embrace). But under the guise of fighting the puritanical patriarchy, she feels vindicated in her sluttiness and will spread her ass for all social media to see in the name of self-expression. In reality we know the truth. She just wants to flash. The true perverted gender.

Post: #29

With Notre Dame going the way it has been for some time, I doubt they have any type of traditional Catholic Church authorities working there anymore, but if they do, maybe some "brave" i.e. legitimate priest would have the stones to deny the girls communion when they approached. The embarrassment caused and the ensuing reaction would be about 1000x what we just read in these articles and saw from Twitter.

I could see some women legitimately writing that it would be a greater offense than priests touching kids.

Post: #30

If every interest group makes demands of everyone else to respect their rights and even taking it a step further demanding society at large to adopt their traditions, then a Catholic woman has every right to demand women not dress like whores at Mass to flash the goods and attention whore.

The only solution for this Catholic woman is to double down and be even more demanding. Those who scream the loudest get their way in our modern clown world. Her demands will catch on with others also annoyed by leggings at Mass, and pretty soon a big enough group will have the power to shame whores into compliance.

Post: #31

Honestly, the priest of the congregation should be the one calling these hoes out, but given the sorry state of the church I’m not surprised that it’s some wholesome little lady doing his job.

Post: #32

I'm just surprised these whores are going to mass.

Post: #33

(03-29-2019 02:11 AM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  I'm just surprised these whores are going to mass.

Have experience of sexting a chick I met who not only told me how wet she was, her nipples so hard etc. also said that she was currently sexting me whilst waiting in line to receive communion -how dangerous and risqué!-

Later transpired that same chick was married with kids..

Robert Green goes into what went on back in the day and the presence in Europe within church congregations of known prostitutes who dressed respectably and, knowing their profession, were a source of much distraction for the men in the congregation.

Women love the juxtaposition of religion and church and any kind of vice that is 'forbidden'.

Check out Madonna video Like A Prayer in late 80's /early 90's.

Post: #34

I think Muslims have the right idea, men and women shouldn't be together in the church or mosque. Women should be at the back out of view.

Post: #35

"My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of whores!"

Post: #36

(03-29-2019 02:44 AM)Pride male Wrote:  I think Muslims have the right idea, men and women shouldn't be together in the church or mosque. Women should be at the back out of view.

This is actually a valid point.

Post: #37

Strange. There are dress codes at Catholic high schools and elementary schools. Why not at universities? School admins and priests should actually grow a pair and say: You can't celebrate mass or come to class like that. I guess people get a pass at higher learning institutions -- dollars speak louder than values.

Post: #38

-Pride yourself on an 'open culture' where women are given more freedom than in countries run by those mean brown and Asian men

-Wonder why they defy you

Post: #39

Go to Latin mass.

No leggings there (yet)

Post: #40

Nah, fuck that Catholic mom.

Why? Because she clearly had insufficient balls to go up to the four whores in her church and confront them about their clothes - because that would risk her being seen as a prude to the people who know her - so instead she fires off a letter to a fucking student newspaper scolding an entire world of cumbuckets.

What exactly was the intent of that? What did she intend to prove by that?

You don't change shit like whoresuits on Sunday by firing off lectures to kids who're still masturbating, that's just in support of your own identity as a good mom who doesn't actually have to take a stand or risk getting hit or punched in the face. You change shit like that by confronting it there, first, then going around to your friends and neighbours and asking "What the shit is this?", then going to the university, then forcing the university into an overreaction to your request, then winning. But doing all of that requires you risk some rejection, risk your standing, risk having to actually go out and demonstrate your principles. In some cases, you risk your life. That's a stronger lesson to her sons than instructing them (and, if he's there, their beta Dad) to look down at their fucking balls when the whores' asses jiggle. It's also the lesson that Jesus left: speak truth to power. Writing letters to the fucking editor is not speaking truth to power, it's whining and supporting your fucking identity. Get some Moms together. Go see the Dean. See him again. And again, until he caves or an archbishop stops by on his way to fuck another kid and declares that the school's policy will now be no visible cookies from 8-11 on campus.

Real Catholics are the MAGAkid. Regardless of whether you believe in what he does or not, he was prepared to risk a punch and prepared to take national humiliation in defence of what he believed.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #41

(03-29-2019 03:37 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  Go to Latin mass.

No leggings there (yet)

Non est ocrearum (tamen)

Post: #42

In the 1917 Canon Law, separation of men and women was strongly advocated.

Canon 1262, § 1. “It is desirable that, in harmony with ancient Church order, the women in church be separated from the men.”

http://www.traditionalcatholicpriest.com...ic-church/

Post: #43

It pisses me of when girls don't wear a veil or a short skirt at my Orthodox Church. Though I do approaches after the service)

Post: #44

(03-29-2019 03:37 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  Go to Latin mass.

No leggings there (yet)

Go to an Eastern Orthodox service. Most women cover their heads with a scarf.

Post: #45

If you wanted evidence to show just how shameless, self absorbed, and vulgar Western women are, this is it. Let me count the ways...

-Total disrespect for a sacred space. Christianity urges humility and modesty, especially among young women (for obvious reasons as it turns out). These girls have neither, and feel entitled to parade their near nude bodies around in the second most inappropriate context possible, the only one worse would be a funeral.

-Adding to the above, we now know that temporal sexual attention from men is more important to these "Christian" women than eternal salvation. Kind of mind blowing if you think about it; they could have eternity in the loving arms of Jesus Christ, or a Church dad staring at their legging covered butt. They chose the latter.

-"Christian" men command ZERO respect in their own spaces. These girls know they can distract men with their bodies and degrade themselves, and none of these guys will do a thing about it. Pathetic.

-Refusal to understand their dependence on the rest of the community, especially men who (again) they clearly don't respect at all. This part infuriated the women in the comments section, which was revealing: " 'makes it hard on Catholic mothers to teach their sons that women are someone’s daughters and sisters' - Really? How about that they're SOMEONE. full stop.

on another note, I'm pretty sure I have jeans that make my "backside" look better than my leggings so be careful what you wish for...."

Amazingly haughty and brash. Sorry sweetie, you are not "SOMEONE" independent of the people around you. She hates knowing that she depends on men to build the society around her, keep her safe and comfortable, pay taxes, start companies, and everything else. The notion that she has social obligations to not behave like a total slut and do anything she wants causes her to react like a spoiled child being told "No" for the first time.

These women will one day suffer the consequences for their actions, and it will not be pretty. I can only imagine how women were treated in the immediate dark ages and chaos after the fall of Rome, for example.

For what it's worth, I also think that in our lifetimes we will see a Christian counter-trend in the West. Someone, somewhere, is charismatic enough and understands the timeless value of Christianity enough to leverage it into real power. When that guy emerges, watch out.

Post: #46

And the Lord spoke unto the women saying:

"ye shall not attire yourselves with leggings in my holy places, for such thin cloth as ye do thereby carry does cling too closely to the profile of your comely arses and even unto the secret places which I have created for the earthly delight of your menfolk. And your menfolk beholding this do sin thereby, and are filled with contemplations of the poosy paradise and not of my eternal rest. Ye shall wear cloth of wider cut, that your menfolk be not disturbed in prayer, and that ye be not as sluts cast out into the wilderness"

"Upon the leaving of my holy places, ye shall be open to the cold approaches of your menfolk, when they do discourse of petshops and all that does pertain thereto. Forsake the temptations of sluttiness, but raise your bitch shields not too high and be merciful in your shit-tests, for woman as man is made of clay and is not perfect and without stain."

Post: #47

I went to Catholic Latin Tridentine Mass for the first time last week. It was an amazing and sacred experience. I will for sure go to these masses from now on every chance I get. This is an easy and effective way to tacitly support and endorse conservative values in the church and among the congregation.

I remember when Catholic colleges and universities across America folded and allowed student performances of "The Vagina Monologe" to be performed. I was too young and ignorant to realize at the time, but that was a huge indicator of corruption and weak leadership (or perhaps they had their hands tied).

Post: #48

Personally, I prefer girls in modest outfits. I think they try too hard when they get into sexy clothing. I like the more conservative dressing girl, the one that makes you want to pin her down and corrupt her. Or the type that has some decency, yet knows when to reveal that side of her and when not to. It's also the type of girl I want as a wife. Wear how you live. I wear suits for work, casual jeans and hensey/ t-shirt for everyday life. But if you're wearing male attention clothing every hour of the day, then I know how you live. I am not for that. Good for a short term date. Bad for a long term relationship.

Post: #49

(03-28-2019 06:10 PM)BlastbeatCasanova Wrote:  JFC, her request was rational and understandable. Personally I’m all for leggings but “Don’t show your plump juicy fertile ass in church” makes sense to me.

Girl #2’s shameless lack of sucking in that gut says a lot about the current SMP. Can’t wait until SexBots/legal prostitution put these dumb slags in their place

First thing I noticed too. Suck in that gut woman! Also "don't dress like a whore" in church shouldn't even need to be said. The men in these women's lives need to step up and shut that shit down before they leave the house for church.

Post: #50

Leggings are everywhere these days but you hardly see camel toes. I think only Brazilian and Slavic women can pull off a good camel toe