Post: #526

A country sends its female "leader" dressed in the costume of subjugation and oppression into its invaders temple to apologise and placate the invaders.

Could there be a bigger symbol of surrender and capitulation?

Post: #527

(03-20-2019 01:57 AM)Transsimian Wrote:  Sometimes the Chans can be really twisted

Call me sick, but I actually think this is pretty funny.... putting "the shoe on the other foot" style. Kudos to the artist, at least.

And YES, I do not condone or support the violence in NZ the other day. That churn is not the way to go about it. I am only saying that this is a good graphical political commentary.

(Plus one if any in the final pic wear a hijab... including the killer.)

Question: who or what is "baka" ?

Post: #528

(03-20-2019 10:27 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(03-20-2019 07:55 AM)Jetset Wrote:  

(03-20-2019 01:20 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I think it's fair to be extremely hostile to the "bitter incel" nonsense being pushed by the mainstream and to some degree being accepted here too. To put it bluntly it's bullshit.

It's a weapon being targeted against men to claim that the thousands of factors causing them to rebel against society, sometimes violently, can be boiled down to "lolllzor that loser can't get laid!!!".

It presents rebellion against our shit-tier modern society as being inherently anti-masculine while presenting the acquisition of casual sex as being the panacea for everyone's problems. It's utter bullshit and it shouldn't be promoted here or anywhere else.

As fair as this is, Leonard, and I think regulars all know your feelings on it...

Fine, so this isn't because he's a bitter incel. Casual sex isn't the answer.

Alright.

So where the fuck is his traditionalist, church-going wife bearing him lots of children?

Where's one broad he ever banged, saying "lovely bloke, wouldn't have seen that coming" or "he was abusive and I always knew he'd do something like this"?

Not one? Not even an attention-seeker claiming they used to text a lot? All we get is a female coworker at the gym who basically said "that guy, yes, he did exist".

Where, even, is a comment from his mother or sister?

All we get is her boyfriend telling us that he became very introspective when his father died - his parents had apparently been split up a long time - and his elderly grandmother complaining that he was never into girls, spent all his time holed up on his computer, and said getting married sounded "too hard".

The only guy I ever knew who dismissed getting a girl as "too hard" out loud, in real life, had obvious undiagnosed autism and got killed in a fight a few years later. To say Tarrant was a loner is an understatement. Even his own neighbors were surprised to find out he was their neighbor.

Nothing offered at the university interests him. Jobs aren't really his thing. Marriage is too hard. He wanted to buy a camper for his travels because he couldn't stand contact with other humans at hostels. I think it's fair to say that as society goes, be it modern, traditional, or otherwise, he was a non-participant. His failure to engage with ordinary life in any meaningful way certainly played a role in where he ended up.

I don't disagree with anything you're saying.

My warnings against people chalking this stuff up to the MSM "bitter incel" mantras is a general warning and not related to Tarrant in particular.

If people want to call him a fucking sperg then I've got no issues with that. Best to leave specific references to pussy or a lack there-of out of the equation. It does the work of the deep state for them.

I see your point Leonard. But still, it is I think a fact that most Islamist terrorists are desperate and clueless virgins (incels is the word for them, now), while non-Muslim terrorists are mostly gays!

And mind you, I am not "playing into MSM hands" by saying that, as MSM is totally hiding this fact (to protect their dear LGBTs).

I am quite positive about this, so, well, I'll repeat: most non-Muslim mass-killers are bloody gays (or with heavy gay tendencies). Whites or Blacks alike (for example, I'm sure the 2 Black dudes shooting from the trunk of their car years ago, were gays too, crammed all day long in the same shitty car)...

More precisely, I contend that all non-Muslim mass-killers who allow themselves to be caught alive by the cops, are quite certainly gays.

For no straight man would accept being caught alive by the cops after a killing spree. On the other hand, gays are not that afraid of jail. Gays actually, consciously or not, dream of being imprisoned. It explains all these cases of mass murderers quietly waiting for the cops , and yes, it includes the Tarrant guy and even, no disrespect intended, but, the Norwegian dude too (no girlfriend, happy to go to jail ).

So, most of the mass murderers are, I am quite sure of it, gays. Reason why their social media is devoid of women, and as jetset said, no attention-seeking woman comes forward saying, Hey, I used to go out with him

Post: #529

(03-20-2019 06:06 PM)Max RNR Wrote:  Question: who or what is "baka" ?

It's the only Japanese word that weebs know.

Post: #530

Post: #531

Seems everything is unblocked now.

Post: #532

There were a lot of articles about a year ago on how a number of very wealthy individuals were building bunkers in New Zealand.

Imagine you're a Banker/Bilderburger/Sillycon Valley exec and you just bought another bunker in New Zealand. There's great LOTR scenery, great weather, and most importantly you're away from all of the looting going on back home. Only one problem, New Zealand has about 1.2 million guns in private possession.

I'm not saying this is what happened, but let's just say I wouldn't be surprised either. It's not as though they're above that sort of thing.





https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2018-...-preppers/

Quote:In recent months, two 150-ton survival bunkers journeyed by land and sea from a Texas warehouse to the shores of New Zealand, where they’re buried 11 feet underground.

Seven Silicon Valley entrepreneurs have purchased bunkers from Rising S Co. and planted them in New Zealand in the past two years, said Gary Lynch, the manufacturer’s general manager. At the first sign of an apocalypse — nuclear war, a killer germ, a French Revolution-style uprising targeting the 1 percent — the Californians plan to hop on a private jet and hunker down, he said.

“New Zealand is an enemy of no one,” Lynch said in an interview from his office in Murchison, Texas, southeast of Dallas. “It’s not a nuclear target. It’s not a target for war. It’s a place where people seek refuge.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-1...s-paradise

Quote:Of course, the wealthy have many options for doomsday preparedness, as we’ve noted time and time again - from personal bunkers to memberships to luxury post-apocalyptic communities.

But New Zealand represents something different: A sparsely populated island with plenty of resources - essentially clay for wealthy capitalists to mold a new society from the ashes of the old after the collapse sets in…

But while Thiel’s New Zealand investment was more of a novelty news story in the US, in New Zealand, it has become a major scandal, sparking a national debate over how much leeway wealthy individuals should be given to become citizens and provide property.

And Thiel isn't the only one: The Guardian points out that several other wealthy Silicon Valley figures have also taken an interest in the country...

When Nippert broke the story, there was a major public scandal over the question of whether a foreign billionaire should be able to effectively purchase citizenship. As part of his application, Thiel had agreed to invest in New Zealand tech startups, and had implied that he would use his new status as a naturalised Kiwi to promote the country’s business interests abroad. But the focus internationally was on why Thiel might have wanted to own a chunk of New Zealand roughly the size of lower Manhattan in the first place. And the overwhelming suspicion was that he was looking for a rampart to which he could retreat in the event of outright civilisational collapse.

Because this is the role that New Zealand now plays in our unfurling cultural fever dream: an island haven amid a rising tide of apocalyptic unease. According to the country’s Department of Internal Affairs, in the two days following the 2016 election the number of Americans who visited its website to enquire about the process of gaining New Zealand citizenship increased by a factor of 14 compared to the same days in the previous month. In particular, New Zealand has come to be seen as a bolthole of choice for Silicon Valley’s tech elite.

In the immediate aftermath of Trump’s election, the theme of American plutocrats preparing for the apocalypse was impossible to avoid. The week after the inauguration, the New Yorker ran another piece about the super-rich who were making preparations for a grand civilisational crackup; speaking of New Zealand as a “favored refuge in the event of a cataclysm”, billionaire LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman, a former colleague of Thiel’s at PayPal, claimed that “saying you’re ‘buying a house in New Zealand’ is kind of a wink, wink, say no more”.

Post: #533

(03-20-2019 02:26 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  Even fucking neanderthals cared for their sick and infirm, despite this being a massive cost of resources and a direct threat to survival.

This shooting shows how caring for the sick & infirm is actually critical to human survival. This guy was a sicko whose aim was to kill & sow discord on a massive, society-wide scale. As heavy and others point out, had he been integrated and cared for by others, perhaps it wouldn't have happened. What happens when these guys get more sophisticated tech like drones, bioweapons or nukes?

From an evolutionary & survival perspective, perhaps the optimal unit of society is not the individual but rather the community. And perhaps the best way someone can "ensure existence of our people" (apparently the shooter's goal) is to work on building real-life communities (social circles, companies, churches, hobby groups/meetups, etc).

Post: #534

(03-20-2019 06:54 PM)The Catalyst Wrote:  Seems everything is unblocked now.

Depends where you are. Looks like NZ and AU are still blocking a lot. They aren't even waiting for government legislation to virtue signal their way deeper into cuck territory.


I guess it's all part of the false flag </sarcasm>

Post: #535

(03-20-2019 06:48 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  

Let's say you wanted to "do something" or "say something" about this bit of contempful trolling against your society, for example some non-violent act of civil disobedience against the government pumping this assault against you over the air, or gather your neighbors to discuss the implications of a government of a free people adopting sharia.

You "can't." Even the mildest of spoken hesitation against the invasion has been pre-positioned in the minds of the sheep as being equal to horrible death of "innocents."

These Global Communists have something nasty in the works that is for sure.

Post: #536

Via Breitbart

Quote:Media Silence Surrounds Muslim Massacre of Christians

by Thomas D. Williams | 17 Mar 2019

Political leaders and public figures were falling over themselves this weekend to condemn the mosque attacks in New Zealand, while dozens of Christians were slaughtered by Muslims in Nigeria to the sound of crickets.

The mosque attacks were indeed a horrific affair and worthy of universal condemnation. Presidents, prime ministers, royalty, and religious leaders rushed to extend their condolences to victims and their families — as well they should — while decrying the hate that purportedly motivated the shootings.

Without exception, the mainstream media gave top billing to the shootings, with newspapers carrying the story on their front pages and television news channels leading off their broadcasts with the story.

The bizarre aspect of the coverage was not, in fact, the attention paid to a heinous crime committed in New Zealand, but the absolute silence surrounding the simultaneous massacre of scores of Christians by Muslim militants in Africa.

As Breitbart News alone reported among major news outlets, Fulani jihadists racked up a death toll of over 120 Christians over the past three weeks in central Nigeria, employing machetes and gunfire to slaughter men, women, and children, burning down over 140 houses, destroying property, and spreading terror.

The New York Times did not place this story on the front page; in fact, they did not cover it at all. Apparently, when assessing “all the news that’s fit to print,” the massacre of African Christians did not measure up. The same can be said for the Washington Post, the Chicago Tribune, the Detroit Free Press, the LA Times, and every other major paper in the United States.

The news shows from the three major television channels did not mention the story, and nor did CNN or MSNBC.

There are several possible explanations for this remarkable silence, and none of them is good.

Since, in point of fact, Muslim radicals kill Christians around the world with alarming frequency, it is probable that one more slaughter did not seem particularly newsworthy to the decision-makers at major news outlets. Muslims being killed, on the other hand, may strike many as newsworthy precisely because it is so rare.

A second motive for the media silence around the massacre of Christians in Nigeria may be geo-political and racial. New Zealand is a first-world country where such things are not supposed to happen, whereas many people still consider Africa to be a backwards place where brutal killings are par for the course.

Moreover, the slaughter of black Christians in Africa may not enkindle rage among westerners the way that the murder of white and brown Muslims in New Zealand would.

Finally, the story simply does not play to the political agenda that many mainstream media would like to advance. How much mileage can be gained from Muslims murdering Christians, when Christians in America are often seen as an obstacle to the “progress” desired by liberals? The left sees Christians in the United States as part of the problem and seeks to undermine their credibility and influence at every turn rather than emboldening them.

Anti-Christian bias has been rightly called “the last acceptable prejudice,” one that few bother condemning.

“No one much cares about offending Christians,” wrote the coalition of African-American pastors in an essay last Tuesday. “In fact, mocking, belittling, and blaspheming Christianity is becoming a bit of a trend in our culture. Anti-Christian bigotry truly is the last acceptable prejudice.”

“The hypocrisy on display is astounding,” the pastors continued. “Christianity is the dominant religion of our country. It is the foundation of our government and morality. And yet, Christians are treated as fair game for mockery and insult.”

Christians are by far the most persecuted religious group in the world, but the mainstream media routinely ignore this fact as if it were unimportant or uninteresting. As a result, many people do not even realize how widespread the persecution is or that 75 percent of the victims of religious persecution around the world are Christians.

Whatever the reason — or reasons — for the media silence surrounding the most recent massacres of Christians in Nigeria as well as numerous other such events, it should give right-thinking people pause.

By all means, the lethal shootings of dozens of Muslims in New Zealand is a massive story and merits extensive coverage. But it only stands to reason that similar coverage should be devoted to the slaughter of Christians.

For the moment, it serves as a poignant reminder that a double standard is at work when it comes to news coverage, and that it is Christians who inevitably draw the short straw.

Post: #537

Well RVF-Gunners, here's the beginnings of your NZ gun ban--ban of all semi auto guns and assault rifles, effective in 3 weeks:

Quote:New Zealand to ban all military-style semi-automatic guns and assault rifles
Ardern says all weapons used in Friday’s terrorist attack will be banned.

She says: “I absolutely believe there will be a common view amongst New Zealanders, those who use guns for legitimate purposes, and those who have never touched one, that the time for the mass and easy availability of these weapons must end. And today they will.

“Today I am announcing that NewZealand will ban all military-style semi-automatic weapons. We will also ban all assault rifles. We will ban all high capacity magazines. We will ban all parts with the ability to convert semi-automatic or any other type of firearm into a military-style semi-automatic weapon. We will ban parts that cause a firearm to generate semi-automatic, automatic or close to automatic gunfire.

“In short, every semi-automatic weapon used in the terrorist attack on Friday will be banned in this country.”

Post: #538

Images & tweets via @nickmon1112...

Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) is VERY FAMILIAR with Australian/New Zealand politics, so to hear him chime in on Christchurch stuff is fascinating.




Edit.

Post: #539

10 years jail for a mere video.
While only 3 years jail for a semi-auto rifle...?

Hmmm, I know which one I'd choose.

Mean-time, the clown show goes on :

Post: #540

The New Zealand education system does not teach children world history. Only that white man bad because he took land from Maori, and to this day pays compensations.

You can talk to the gun owners and the concept of needing to use your weapons against your own out of control government does not even register.

Communism, socialism - hell anything slightly political or philosophical is just not on their radar.
All their pop media is direct from Hollywood and filtered by a cartel of left wing media. There is no alternative news programming in NZ.

They voted the current PM into power...

Tall poppy syndrome is also rife. No one wants to rock the boat.

Post: #541

(03-19-2019 09:00 PM)putos Wrote:  How about we all stop killing each other? Black, white, Muslims, Hispanics whatever.

I know your account is new but drop that "we all" business. Speak for yourself... and actually say something. You didn't say anything worthwhile with that post because A) none of us are killing each other and B) what is your message if it doesn't apply to anyone here?

Post: #542

(03-20-2019 09:59 PM)Heuristics Wrote:  Well RVF-Gunners, here's the beginnings of your NZ gun ban--ban of all semi auto guns and assault rifles, effective in 3 weeks:

Quote:New Zealand to ban all military-style semi-automatic guns and assault rifles
Ardern says all weapons used in Friday’s terrorist attack will be banned.

She says: “I absolutely believe there will be a common view amongst New Zealanders, those who use guns for legitimate purposes, and those who have never touched one, that the time for the mass and easy availability of these weapons must end. And today they will.

“Today I am announcing that NewZealand will ban all military-style semi-automatic weapons. We will also ban all assault rifles. We will ban all high capacity magazines. We will ban all parts with the ability to convert semi-automatic or any other type of firearm into a military-style semi-automatic weapon. We will ban parts that cause a firearm to generate semi-automatic, automatic or close to automatic gunfire.

“In short, every semi-automatic weapon used in the terrorist attack on Friday will be banned in this country.”

Guns for "legitimate purposes" - who decides?
Free speech for "legitimate purposes" - who decides?
Don't worry, the (real) terrorists and gangbangers can still get them.

Kiwis it's up to you to stand up to this (legally, non-violently), or you'll become Sweden.

Post: #543

THIS is what happens when you live in a country with no gun rights and no freedom of speech. The government can decide at a moment's notice to take away both.

Now ask yourselves- If this same attack were committed by Muslims against non-Muslims, would the same actions be taken? I think we all know the answer to that.

Post: #544

(03-20-2019 07:24 PM)Hedonist94 Wrote:  There were a lot of articles about a year ago on how a number of very wealthy individuals were building bunkers in New Zealand.

Imagine you're a Banker/Bilderburger/Sillycon Valley exec and you just bought another bunker in New Zealand. There's great LOTR scenery, great weather, and most importantly you're away from all of the looting going on back home. Only one problem, New Zealand has about 1.2 million guns in private possession.

I'm not saying this is what happened, but let's just say I wouldn't be surprised either. It's not as though they're above that sort of thing.

Post: #545

https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/nz-mosq...rsal-video

Post: #546

(03-21-2019 06:33 AM)Dirtyblueshirt Wrote:  Now ask yourselves- If this same attack were committed by Muslims against non-Muslims, would the same actions be taken? I think we all know the answer to that.

Yes. I think the easiest double-standard that has been possible to spot during this NZ case is how literally no one from the left has come out to say that not all extreme right-wingers are terrorists. No one has tried to point that out and said we need to be careful to blame all far right-wingers even though they saw this guy as right-wing. No, now we should ban everything.

Meanwhile, that's all we ever hear after a Muslim terrorist attack, that not all Muslims are terrorists and the most important thing now is that no one looks angry at a Muslim woman at the grocery store.

This shooting really showed how much the left is in bed with Islam.

Post: #547

If muslim shooter went to a church and killed 50 people everyone would ok, nothing new here, business as usual

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Is...st_attacks

Post: #548

(03-21-2019 07:22 AM)Bananaman711 Wrote:  If muslim shooter went to a church and killed 50 people everyone would ok, nothing new here, business as usual

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Is...st_attacks

Wow that surprised even me. The length of the list in the last 5 years, as well as the number of deaths at many of them.

Sheesh, I was gonna say your comment was heavy-handed, but it's on-point.

Post: #549

So a foreigner enters your country and murders a bunch of people, and as a result you take away your own people's guns?

What kind of logic is that.

Post: #550

New Zealand is a hunting location for red deer, tahr, stag, and other species (not native to the islands).



I wonder how much of an impact this whole series of events will have on the hunting industry there (no doubt it will have an impact). I wonder how much of an impact the impact on hunting will have on the deer populations, and ultimately, the ecosystem in general.

NZ is a trophy hunting paradise, worth big bucks for tourism

Quote:...
But the small commercial hunting industry, which contributes an estimated $50 million a year into the New Zealand economy, is determined to put its best foot forward. Its aim is to show that through dogged professionalism it deserves to be recognised as a valid industry.

We are not hunting lions here of course; it's mostly stags, tahr, chamois and fallow deer.
...

I'm sure they'll still allow firearms for hunting, but we all know the headaches and red tape after today will be worse. And that's not including the visceral thought of "going to NZ to hunt" means.