Post: #26

(02-09-2019 04:25 PM)godfather dust Wrote:  LDN I don't see much in the way of moral judgement from DOBAs posts just statements on human nature that to me have merit. He ultimately is arguing against step parenting entirely not saying "go ahead, fuck the step daughter."

As a father I believe society's first imperative is to protect it's children, physically and psychologically.

I apologize to DOBA for being extremist but there's more history to this subject on the forum than simply this thread.

The West has morally equivocated and applied a perverted "situational understanding" to shit like this for decades, and it's always the foot in the door for the most disgusting and depraved bullshit to wriggle and squirm its way into our societies.

We will rediscover over time that even bothering to explain this phenomenon gives it a power to claim rightful existence, as if the people committing it are a slave to the phenomenon rather than the opposite.

In saner times people like Woody went in the bog, no ifs and no buts. If I could do it without spending the rest of my life in a cage I would snuff him without hesitation. If this is what he undertakes publicly then God and his victims alone know what he does in private.

If you put a child under your care in any sense of the word then they are off limits sexually for all time. This is a fundamental premise of civil society that shouldn't need to be qualified with specific laws. It's as presumed by civilised people as declining to fuck your cousins. Our inability to see what's happened here and deal with Woody swiftly and appropriately is a microcosm of the rot infesting our entire societies.

Even depraved Hollywood as recently as 2005 hadn't presumed this degeneracy, in Sin City where Willis' character struggles to avoid the affections of a 19 year old girl he merely rescued from a pedophile when she was 11. The moral choice was blatantly obvious despite every excuse imaginable immediately springing to mind.

If you undertake a role in the care of a child then they are sexually off limits forever.

Post: #27

Is Ronan Farrow really Woody Allen's son with Mia Farrow, or is he the son of Frank Sinatra ?

From wikipedia:

Quote:In a 2013 interview with Vanity Fair, Mia Farrow stated that Ronan could "possibly" be the biological child of Frank Sinatra, with whom she claimed to have "never really split up"

In a 2018 New York magazine article, Woody Allen said that Farrow may indeed be Sinatra's son: "In my opinion, he's my child … I think he is, but I wouldn't bet my life on it. I paid for child support for him for his whole childhood, and I don't think that's very fair if he's not mine."

Post: #28

Allen? Bezos?

Let them fight... haggle... argue.

Post: #29

(02-09-2019 10:12 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  As a father I believe society's first imperative is to protect it's children, physically and psychologically.

First, society needs to allow parents to protect their children. Anytime I hear about society protecting children, I cringe. This often means breaking up families and removing fathers.