Post: #26

(01-15-2019 09:34 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  This is part of a system designed to criminalise all dissent

I saw this happen in several companies : one day some new company guidelines come out and you're supposed to sign them.
However when you read them they are basically impossible to follow all, but your HR guy tells you no problem, they are only here for compliance with whichever rule or regulation, and won't be enforced.

Except the day they need to fire you of course, then they can use half the content of the guidelines to justify their decision.
Hey, you did sign them right ? Well refusal to sign was a valid ground for contract termination so you did, sure.
The goal is not the new rules, nobody cares, it's just CYA legalese to be able to get rid of anyone they don't like with zero hassle.

To me these new laws are simply the "democratic" equivalent of that.

Post: #27

(01-31-2019 04:53 AM)Oberrheiner Wrote:  

(01-15-2019 09:34 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  This is part of a system designed to criminalise all dissent

I saw this happen in several companies : one day some new company guidelines come out and you're supposed to sign them.
However when you read them they are basically impossible to follow all, but your HR guy tells you no problem, they are only here for compliance with whichever rule or regulation, and won't be enforced.

Except the day they need to fire you of course, then they can use half the content of the guidelines to justify their decision.
Hey, you did sign them right ? Well refusal to sign was a valid ground for contract termination so you did, sure.
The goal is not the new rules, nobody cares, it's just CYA legalese to be able to get rid of anyone they don't like with zero hassle.

To me these new laws are simply the "democratic" equivalent of that.

This is the issue of anarchy-tyranny on a state and legal level.

Apparently if you paid all the taxes on the books in the Congo you would have to pay 200% of your earnings/assets. There is never a limit to how much tax they can claim if they don't like you.

China let their triads run amok for a while whilst cracking down hard on some very unthreatening fellow Chinese citizens.

This PC bullshit is one of the reasons that the Uk has gone to shit.

I don't want to return to my home country, and I don't say that lightly.

Post: #28

Most likely the petition will remain just that---a petition.

My belief is a lesson has been learned from the effects of McCarthyism.

...just replace "Commie!" with "Misogynist!"

Pretty sure there's a concerted effort to lump the redpillers, MRA's, PUA's, and other manospherians into one single category ("misogynists"); and this move would make such label "official" or as defined by the law. But as mentioned above, this would only result in a massive shitstorm reminiscent of the McCarthy era.

Besides, the innate sadism of the liberal kind far more enjoys meting out punishment for thoughtcrime EXTRAJUDICIOUSLY*




*extra- to mean "outside"
*comes with free extrajudicial killing of livelihood/employment

Post: #29

(01-31-2019 04:53 AM)Oberrheiner Wrote:  I saw this happen in several companies : one day some new company guidelines come out and you're supposed to sign them.
However when you read them they are basically impossible to follow all, but your HR guy tells you no problem, they are only here for compliance with whichever rule or regulation, and won't be enforced.

Those things exist?

Post: #30

They do, surprising as it can be
In my experience it also says a lot about the company's future success.

The problem with HR in general is that a lot of the actual work is basically secretariat, so some women always end up being hired.
Now that we're talking about it, that's a job which I have never seen a man do : secretary.