Post: #1

If there's one thing SJWs like to do is act as casting police. They will give a movie a high-five even if it's shit as long as the casting is diverse (Ghostbusters) and will bash a project if there is some sort of casting violation.

Well, turns out JK Rowling has now been on both sides of the equation here. She didn't get much praise for the Harry Potter movies other than making Dumbledore gay, then she scored some virtue points for blackwashing Hermione. But those points have now been lost.

SJWs giveth, and SJWs taketh away.

This thread is going to be very long I'm sure because it seems like no day goes by without another overblown controversy.

Post: #2

From the JK Rowling article:

Quote:Some have criticised the fact the only Asian actor in the cast plays a reptile that is a villain's slave.

As I've said before, the left are now the new conservatives. They are in the process of erasing old ways of doing things and replacing them with their own way of doing things. Just as in the past you would have been socially ostracised for something like having a child out of wedlock; you'll now be ostracised for something like casing a gay actor as a villain.

They are coming up with a tiny avenue of acceptable behaviour and thought, that not even a large number of people may agree with. But due to the extreme fear of anyone in mainstream society making an argument that doesn't side with the supreme rights of certified victims means there are few voices of reason; and those that are are increasingly banned by NSA spy nets like Twitter.

Over the past few decades, most people not on the left have been expunged from the mainstream, particularly fake news, to the extent 97% of journalist donations were to Crooked. Particularly in Europe, many young people have heard virtually no positions counter to the left. As a result we have seen a build-up of counter-arguments from independent outlets and individuals. They're now heavily in the process of trying to ban the outlet they created from banning such voices from being allowed in the mainstream.

I think the next step, which is already in the making is non-corporate and decentralised solutions. Real.Video, created by Mike Adams, who was banned from YouTube for no apparent reason is already up to about 150,000 visits per day.

The first time I came across all this was when I saw the Wikipedia page for peado-bashing classic, Taken, staring Liam Neeson in around 2013. An SJW outed the film as racist for negative depictions of Albanians and Middle Easterners as sex traffickers. While completely ignoring the depiction of a rich French man as an elite sex trafficker. I deleted it. No doubt the SJW was far more concerned about the negative depictions than the actual reality of Albania and The Middle East being two to of biggest centers for sex trafficking. Just in the same way that the modern left pretends to care more about the cira 2 million people enslaved in America, studiously ignoring the cira 50 million currently enslaved and 100s of millions who were historically enslaved elsewhere, particularly in Afirca.

One of the first things I did on getting back home was deleting almost all my films and TV series. At least I never paid for their pedophile droppings.

Post: #3

They don't police - they are the creators of SJWs even if they are often conservative personally.

Post: #4

There are other threads on this topic but this article is a doozy. It's basically the mother of all self-serving SJW rationalizations for blackwashing greco-roman dramas. So, We Waz Greco-Romanz and Sheet.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/...-sculpture



Typically, find an article like this and link back to the author's other articles and an agenda emerges.

https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/margaret-talbot

here is one article where she praises Lena Dunham's Girls and quotes Carl Marx.

This person is not really randomly stumbling on research about pigments on statues but is just reaching for it to justify blackwashing historical revisionism.

Post: #5

Saw this on some Asian news sites, nobody there gives a rat's arse. Talking about a storm in an A cup.

Post: #6

This article yet again shows that when you attempt to pander to SJWs, they'll never be satisfied. It started with gay dumbledore, continued with black hermione, and now, nothing is good enough.

BTW, it goes without saying that this article is a TL;DR nightmare. It's patronizing and condescending as if this woman is a college professor issuing grades. Rowling has enough F-U money to go off and live on a desert island like Marlon Brando if she wanted, and with this sort of backseat-driving, I don't know why she doesn't do just that. There's no way, as a white woman, she'll ever meet the approval of SJWs, even though so many SJWs themselves are white women.

BTW, here is the author's goodbye letter to io9 which explains her judgmental writing style:

Quote:I started here as an intern in 2010, just out of college and with no idea what I wanted to do. The job market was bad, so after a while toiling in the writing fields and retail, I gave up and went to law school. My idealism prompted me to think that if I couldn’t write on the internet for a living, I could maybe help fight for the rights of people who did. I, in fact, went to law school with dreams of one day working at the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

And then, while I was in law school, something amazing happened: io9 had some money to hire a researcher, which is what I did while also trying to graduate. Staring down the barrel of a truly miserable career in law, Annalee Newitz saved me by offering me a job as the night editor here.

So there you go. Her reviews aren't reviews, they are her way of 'fighting for rights'. The world needs more people writing about film and TV who understand and love the medium and fewer failed lawyers and activists who are fluffed up with delusions of grandeur to think they can school billionaires like JK Rowling on how to be woke enough.

Post: #7

This affected the Young Adult novel market and not in a good way.

I've been a fan of author Sarah Dessen since I interviewed her about ten years ago. She wrote believable stories about white suburban teens in various modes of crisis.

Even though her books were from a female point of view, she was good at understanding "teen guy" culture, and this especially goes for my favorite of all her books "Along For The Ride," in which the male leads are competitive cyclists.

I've read all of Dessen's books except her newest one, "Once And For All," which I stopped reading about three chapters.

SJW fever seems to have gotten to this author. It felt like the cliched "diverse" cast of characters were picked by a committee, not the author herself. As such, the characters came off as wooden and predictable and the story line itself was not engaging.

(For those of you who never heard of Sarah Dessen, two of her early books were used as source material for the 2003 teen movie "How To Deal," which features Mandy Moore at 18 looking pretty fine, even with short hair.)

Post: #8

(10-25-2018 01:28 AM)questor70 Wrote:  There are other threads on this topic but this article is a doozy. It's basically the mother of all self-serving SJW rationalizations for blackwashing greco-roman dramas. So, We Waz Greco-Romanz and Sheet.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/...-sculpture



Typically, find an article like this and link back to the author's other articles and an agenda emerges.

https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/margaret-talbot

here is one article where she praises Lena Dunham's Girls and quotes Carl Marx.

This person is not really randomly stumbling on research about pigments on statues but is just reaching for it to justify blackwashing historical revisionism.

Quote:These near-life-size portraits, which were painted on funerary objects, present their subjects with an array of skin tones, from olive green to deep brown, testifying to a complex intermingling of Greek, Roman, and local Egyptian populations.

So - White, White, and White People?

Good lord, these people are so wilfully ignorant. At the time, North Africa was entirely White; it wasn't until ~1000 AD that sub-Saharan Africans began migrating north (although Ethiopians have been part of the known world for millennia). The term "sub Saharan" exists for a reason; up until recently, it was a major barrier against travel.

Post: #9

If I'm watching a new TV show/Movie that's a period piece, it completely throws me off from the movie's immersion with full "DIVERSITY IS OUR STRENGTH" anachronism

Period pieces be it fiction or non fiction.

Post: #10

I am watching rugby. Rainbow ? flags worn by the officials and a female rugby player is moderating the commentary team. There’s no escape.