Post: #451

(09-18-2018 11:49 PM)SlickyBoy Wrote:  

WNB

Sweet neanderthal forehead!

Varg approves.

Post: #452

(09-18-2018 11:49 PM)SlickyBoy Wrote:  

Post: #453

(09-19-2018 03:17 PM)Horus Wrote:  

(09-18-2018 11:49 PM)SlickyBoy Wrote:  

I wanted to post this comparison for Serena Williams as well. She has the same kind of over developed bone structure in her face.

Post: #454

LMAO! I thought of that old movie "Mask" but wanted to see if I was the only one!

Post: #455

I keep on imagining feminists marching through the Amazon warehouses chanting "He will not divide us"

Post: #456

I figured out why they didn't take Game off Audible: both parties sign a mutual 7-year agreement. So I believe they can't take it down for reasons of content.

Post: #457

(09-10-2018 08:34 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Doubtful. They contacted me in July, which I assume is when they contacted Amazon. So Amazon takes no action until Game comes out? From my perspective, Game's rising sales was the most proximal trigger.

Your live stream #20 was quite explicit about a few topics that don't fit Political Correctness 2.0... I think that may have been it.

This thread is pretty long so my apologies if this has been mentioned before - but I heard you say in one of the interviews you did that litigation would cost 100k. Have you thought about doing a crowdfunding campaign for that? Anglin did that and successfully raised the money - probably easier for you than it was for him.

Post: #458

(09-20-2018 05:27 AM)Roosh Wrote:  I figured out why they didn't take Game off Audible: both parties sign a mutual 7-year agreement. So I believe they can't take it down for reasons of content.

Nice! I was half way through listening to it when the e-book burn came down, but my audible copy stayed in place. Still there now. I guess I have a little less than seven years to enjoy it before one day it magically evaporates. Need to figure out how to keep the downloaded version for posterity.

I bet their lawyers are scrubbing future versions of that contract to eliminate such inconsistencies. I would be interested to see what the rights of the purchaser are in that contract. Usually if you buy a book, they can't come back seven years later and take it away. If they can do this with audible they really ought to call it an audio book *rental* service.

Post: #459

Had to buy the book to fight 1984 in some way.

Post: #460

It's not only books that are being banned but ads too. AMS has (recently now that I think about it) been rejecting ads that are 'not in line with Amazon's TOS' and yet being as vague as possible in any followup reply to me. Now, I've not had trouble with any ads EXCEPT the one book I wrote on gaming asian chicks.

Indonesia. Thailand. Philippines. Just a small book on stuff I picked up with my dealings with them online and off. Nothing major.

It published okay but when I went to run AMS ads on it... rejection after rejection after rejection with the same canned responses whether on AMS U.S or UK. Didn't matter which site and this was regardless of keywords or adcopy used to appeal to potential buyers.

Post: #461

(09-20-2018 01:33 PM)Soothesayer Wrote:  It's not only books that are being banned but ads too. AMS has (recently now that I think about it) been rejecting ads that are 'not in line with Amazon's TOS' and yet being as vague as possible in any followup reply to me. Now, I've not had trouble with any ads EXCEPT the one book I wrote on gaming asian chicks.

Indonesia. Thailand. Philippines. Just a small book on stuff I picked up with my dealings with them online and off. Nothing major.

It published okay but when I went to run AMS ads on it... rejection after rejection after rejection with the same canned responses whether on AMS U.S or UK. Didn't matter which site and this was regardless of keywords or adcopy used to appeal to potential buyers.

I think Roosh has pointed out the following before, but I'll do it again.

We're protecting people from written ideas in a world where everyone (including kids) can find a violent anal gangbang with two mouse clicks.

It would be one thing if these companies were banning ideas as "profane" and we had the kind of society we did circa 1955. Then that would fall under the legal concept of "community standards."

But banning things in the era of Motherless.com and PornHub is either willful naivety or outright hypocrisy. It's important to also mention here that the biggest male star in mainstream porn, James Deen, earned his rep by slapping and choking women. The guy was boycotted because of things he allegedly did to women, but I don't recall anyone calling for a ban on his work (and Amazon sells a bunch of Deen stuff, like mainstream films he was in and posters).

The verdict: Choking and slapping women before having sex with them is OK. But writing about merely trying to have sex with them? BANNED!!!!

Post: #462

(09-20-2018 04:29 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(09-20-2018 01:33 PM)Soothesayer Wrote:  It's not only books that are being banned but ads too. AMS has (recently now that I think about it) been rejecting ads that are 'not in line with Amazon's TOS' and yet being as vague as possible in any followup reply to me. Now, I've not had trouble with any ads EXCEPT the one book I wrote on gaming asian chicks.

Indonesia. Thailand. Philippines. Just a small book on stuff I picked up with my dealings with them online and off. Nothing major.

It published okay but when I went to run AMS ads on it... rejection after rejection after rejection with the same canned responses whether on AMS U.S or UK. Didn't matter which site and this was regardless of keywords or adcopy used to appeal to potential buyers.

I think Roosh has pointed out the following before, but I'll do it again.

We're protecting people from written ideas in a world where everyone (including kids) can find a violent anal gangbang with two mouse clicks.

It would be one thing if these companies were banning ideas as "profane" and we had the kind of society we did circa 1955. Then that would fall under the legal concept of "community standards."

But banning things in the era of Motherless.com and PornHub is either willful naivety or outright hypocrisy. It's important to also mention here that the biggest male star in mainstream porn, James Deen, earned his rep by slapping and choking women. The guy was boycotted because of things he allegedly did to women, but I don't recall anyone calling for a ban on his work (and Amazon sells a bunch of Deen stuff, like mainstream films he was in and posters).

The verdict: Choking and slapping women before having sex with them is OK. But writing about merely trying to have sex with them? BANNED!!!!

ADL probably gives the porn industry pass because guess who controls the porn industry largely. Lollll

Post: #463

Victor Pride comes out in support of Roosh

Post: #464

(09-20-2018 04:48 PM)jordypip23 Wrote:  

(09-20-2018 04:29 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(09-20-2018 01:33 PM)Soothesayer Wrote:  It's not only books that are being banned but ads too. AMS has (recently now that I think about it) been rejecting ads that are 'not in line with Amazon's TOS' and yet being as vague as possible in any followup reply to me. Now, I've not had trouble with any ads EXCEPT the one book I wrote on gaming asian chicks.

Indonesia. Thailand. Philippines. Just a small book on stuff I picked up with my dealings with them online and off. Nothing major.

It published okay but when I went to run AMS ads on it... rejection after rejection after rejection with the same canned responses whether on AMS U.S or UK. Didn't matter which site and this was regardless of keywords or adcopy used to appeal to potential buyers.

I think Roosh has pointed out the following before, but I'll do it again.

We're protecting people from written ideas in a world where everyone (including kids) can find a violent anal gangbang with two mouse clicks.

It would be one thing if these companies were banning ideas as "profane" and we had the kind of society we did circa 1955. Then that would fall under the legal concept of "community standards."

But banning things in the era of Motherless.com and PornHub is either willful naivety or outright hypocrisy. It's important to also mention here that the biggest male star in mainstream porn, James Deen, earned his rep by slapping and choking women. The guy was boycotted because of things he allegedly did to women, but I don't recall anyone calling for a ban on his work (and Amazon sells a bunch of Deen stuff, like mainstream films he was in and posters).

The verdict: Choking and slapping women before having sex with them is OK. But writing about merely trying to have sex with them? BANNED!!!!

ADL probably gives the porn industry pass because guess who controls the porn industry largely. Lollll

I think you're on the right track, but there's more.

The ADL gives the porn industry a pass because in their mind, porn is "breaking down oppressive mainstream, Christian norms." This is apparently the WORST THING EVER to some people.

When discussing the ADL, keep in mind a lot of Jews abhor these people (just as a lot of Italians despise the Mafia). There is also a lot of Jewish-Christian inter-marriage.

Also, there are a lot of non-Jewish liberal/black nationalist/liberal college profs who feel the same and I'd argue they have more influence, since they're molding young minds.

It's almost like a bizarro church, where the ADL declares who the "sinners" are, and the college profs go about "cleansing" students and converting them to this mindset.

Anything that chips away at the society we had in the 1950s is beloved by such people: Mass immigration from the Third World, anti-white hatred from any minority group, anti-male hatred from feminists, and any profanity and obscenity, ranging from porn to rap.

So, this way of thinking is like a disease that's endemic to the left. To try and say "it's Jewish" actually doesn't quite capture the scope of how widespread it is.

And if white Christians raise any objections? "OMG! Hate speech!!!"

Post: #465

Amazon nailed it delivering the book quicker than expected (ETA was for next week, luckily I ordered it as soon as it got published), and the package was optimal for the book's size (the book arrived in perfect condition). From a pure operations management point of view they've done an excellent job making a customer happy and delivering goods with no delays, perfect conditions of the package etc, and I'm sure they have excellent logistics.

Pity that this PC image they want to have, those policies they have for banning content (when it can benefit white straight men, of course) from their website, and the ban to Roosh's books messed all that up.

Not bad for the last book I'll buy from them.
To put it short, my paperback copy arrived today. I'm looking forward to read it.

Post: #466

Red Ice interviews Roosh on Amazon's book burning.

Post: #467

That's a great shot, except for the tiny face growing out the back of Roosh's head.

Ought to see a doctor about that.

Post: #468

Got the book today. It's a very nice book, thick, solid, tight. High production value. I'm excited to see what's inside that is so dangerous they had to ban it.

Post: #469

(09-21-2018 12:33 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  The verdict: Choking and slapping women before having sex with them is OK. But writing about merely trying to have sex with them? BANNED!!!!

You also likely have to be viewed as right wing to be banned. If Roosh rewrote his books through the lense of banging women as part of their sexual emancipation, he would have given a pass like Cenk Hugecakes who was given a pass for running a pick up show and career womanising under the cover of liberal progressivism. But Roosh writes from a position of men getting what they want. You're only allowed to get what you want under the cover of breaking down oppressor groups.

I was reading Mark Manson's Models book on a plane. It's just as focused on guys getting as much sex as possible as Roosh's, but it's delivered with nice hushed tones and if I remember correctly it even gives a nod to feminism. Manson will never be on the radar. Casual sex is not a hate crime. It's Roosh saying men should not debase themselves to give women what they want and criticism of the social, political and corporate structures that seek to redistribute the value of higher worth men to women.

The irony is those structures are only redistributing value to the same type of men who push the agenda, like Bezos and François-Henri Pinault. The later is the King of Corporate Feminism. But the reality is he likely uses feminism to push other men down who would be more competitive, while banging throngs of his 20 something interns.

Porn is a weird one as like abortion it seems so far away from the left's principles. If I was asked to give an example of misogyny it would be porn. That the left isn't freaking out about billions of terrible men watching mainstream porn in which women are gagged, drug about before being held down and spermed seems unusual.

The reason the above is now celebrated by junk leftist teen news sites like BuzzFeed is probably because porn is such a major factor in the fall of men. It has women venerated who are mostly all $700 an hour prostitutes, vapid women with little self respect. And is likely stopping many men from persuing women, which will lower their status.

But, of course, the left has no principles. They will support whatever is at the opposite of what is seen as tradition to support their new hierarchy. You can do pretty much anything within it just so long as they don't threaten it.

It's their Achilles Heel. When they find out how many low status guys are living with their parents into their 30s, drinking glasses of raw milk while curling one off to videos of women being slapped about and humiliated they will have the reason to ruin their husbands, brothers and sons.

Post: #470

When will it be available in paperback?

Post: #471

(09-22-2018 04:54 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  



Red Ice interviews Roosh on Amazon's book burning.

I didn't watched all the video yet, but at 13:00, Roosh talks about his appearance on the Dr Oz show.

Post: #472

Roosh has all of his other books on Amazon. Why not just reupload GAME and see what happens Roosh?

Post: #473

Just checked and the mainstream media seems to have scrubbed all the videos of Roosh on Dr. Oz.

But I found this little gem:





Always the hot ones who are sympathetic. Wonder if she got rooshed, but a gentleman shouldn't tell in this case, because she isn't that public.

Post: #474

You can see "Dr Oz VS Roosh, the world leader of the fat shaming movement", here:

Post: #475

(09-22-2018 01:03 PM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  Just checked and the mainstream media seems to have scrubbed all the videos of Roosh on Dr. Oz.

But I found this little gem:





Always the hot ones who are sympathetic. Wonder if she got rooshed, but a gentleman shouldn't tell in this case, because she isn't that public.

"I don't think it was a thought experiment."

And then she describes a thought experiment.