Post: #26

(08-21-2018 05:36 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  Imagine the roles were reversed - you would likely need a male model to pull in even 5-10 women, but the outrage would be immense.

This could have been your price:



And she is a few cheeseburgers away from falling to a 5 or lower:



The viral part is one thing, but the reality of the female-favored dating market are amazing.

And that is even a low-tier version of it. She could have gotten 1000 men if she promised a non-filmed gang-bang record. There would be a line waiting around several blocks.

Laugh it up harpies as long as you can - late stage Rome does not last forever.

Also - there were some attractive guys among them as well - many of the tall muscular good-looking blokes left almost instantly. Maybe some stayed for the distant chance of hate-fucking that bitch.

If the gender roles had been reversed, the cops would have been called as soon as the women discovered other women were there. And if the cops weren't called, the newspapers would have been called in to cover the "deception" and "taking advantage of vulnerable women." Everyone would have immediately screamed "fraud!" and "catfish!"

The "male model/actor" who lured the women would also likely have been arrested on a plethora of charges and the marketing company would have been shut down by force or by #metoo-like pressure.

There's a lesson here. Not sure what it is.

Post: #27

The ONLY thing I liked about this was the PA system feeding back
Representing femininity ruined by feminism and entitlement

Post: #28

I could have swore some dude did this with bumble a few years ago in Washington DC but I’m too lazy to dig up old threads. He pulled 5 fat girls, he didn’t try to stagger the meeting times

Post: #29

I dare this rancid cunt to try her little stunt in Pakistan.

Post: #30

When the genders were reversed and women couldn’t get into a free movie it was treated like a serious news event. The Daily News vowed to make things right for them.


“The "Sex and the City" premiere at Radio City Music Hall became all the rage Tuesday night after a ticket snafu left thousands of fashionistas all dressed up with absolutely no place to go.

Organizers of the celeb-studded event overbooked the 6,000-seat theater, leaving bounced fans fuming.”

https://www.google.com/amp/www.nydailyne...utType=amp

Post: #31

I honestly expect more of this. Advertisers targeting a male audience* can upload a profile of a female 7, mass swipe on every dude in the target demographic, outsource the interactions to India, then drive the traffic to a set point. An event needs bodies, done. Need phone numbers for dudes in a certain city (that could then be sold done the line to other advertisers), done. A bar or coffeeshop needs more traffic, done.

If done serially instead of together at once, the dudes would never know what was happening. They'd just think the chick had flaked. The advertiser who can routinely pull this off has tapped an infinite resource by monetizing male thirst.

*I don't think that female thirst can be effectively monetized. Also, bitches would complain, and the platforms would take those complaints much more seriously.

Post: #32

(08-21-2018 01:45 AM)atlant Wrote:  Most guys don't have the means to randomly relocate just for pussy.

True but I guess some guys don't know it from the they talk about those of us in liberal shitholes like Toronto.

As for the psychocunt, one perspective to be considered here is that of addiction. They dopamine hit she got from rejecting guys, flaking on them, getting them to buy her food/drinks/entertainment then reject him, etc. This no longer gets her high, make her eyes widen and nipples harden. So she needs the next level of rejection-sadism: Lying to get men into a situation in which they can be publicly humiliated while still hoping they would compete for her. This is the part of her life story where she goes off the rails and tries heroin.

Post: #33

The "Walking Around" video was supposed to show how women are sexually assaulted all day just walking around the city. What's the point of this one? That the vast majority of men on Tinder are just looking for a hookup. That thirsty dudes will allow themselves to be humiliated for a chance to talk to a 5. Like any of that is news.

Here's what I think. They're going to try to show that, after "winning" the competition, men expect things from women. Whether it's a date or sex, men feel entitled to a woman's time or body. It's another part of rape culture.

If it is twisted into something like that, imagine how disingenuous the original Walking Around video was.

Post: #34

(08-22-2018 12:44 AM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  The "Walking Around" video was supposed to show how women are sexually assaulted all day just walking around the city. What's the point of this one? That the vast majority of men on Tinder are just looking for a hookup. That thirsty dudes will allow themselves to be humiliated for a chance to talk to a 5. Like any of that is news.

Here's what I think. They're going to try to show that, after "winning" the competition, men expect things from women. Whether it's a date or sex, men feel entitled to a woman's time or body. It's another part of rape culture.

If it is twisted into something like that, imagine how disingenuous the original Walking Around video was.

Yeah, how dare those nasty, disgusting men compete with each other, empty their bank accounts, and provide comfort and security in return for sex and children!

Post: #35

The girl is a narcissistic piece of work for essentially cat fishing guys.

And I want to feel bad for all the men who showed up. But damn, if they are actually going to stick around and "compete" while being recorded to go on a date for this girl, I refuse to feel sorry for them. Have some respect for yourself.

Post: #36

Contagion, there's no way of knowing for certain that these competitors are not part of the stunt as well.

Same goes for the crowd but in this case, they're more likely passers-by who stopped to check out the spectacle.

Post: #37

(08-21-2018 05:31 AM)MPD Wrote:  - Most guys, even most RVFers, would've gone on that date, assuming they found her attractive and she was pleasant enough over text. Nothing about the "setup" sounds terrible in a normal dating dynamic, which brings us to

Actually.... Nope.

I ALWAYS used to make them talk to me on video first. There's a lot of things you can hide over photo/text that come out very quickly over video.

Post: #38

(08-22-2018 10:00 AM)Easy_C Wrote:  

(08-21-2018 05:31 AM)MPD Wrote:  - Most guys, even most RVFers, would've gone on that date, assuming they found her attractive and she was pleasant enough over text. Nothing about the "setup" sounds terrible in a normal dating dynamic, which brings us to

Actually.... Nope.

I ALWAYS used to make them talk to me on video first. There's a lot of things you can hide over photo/text that come out very quickly over video.

I think that you are the exception - if you watch the video - the most attractive tallest hunks left the scene after it turned out to be a stupid stunt. They had better things to do.

Post: #39

I thought it was pretty funny. Would not bang, annoying voice.

I have had 2-3 girls show up at the same time through a dating app, but i didnt let them compete. Just have a drink and relax.

You can also go to a place where 100 women show up to get banged by a cool guy like you and they compete for your attention. These places are called "bars" and "clubs".

Post: #40

https://nypost.com/2018/08/23/tinder-tra...ping-guys/







How did I know she will eventually play the victim and pick a black guy. I must have magical superpowers. None of this is real, just social engineering 101.

Post: #41

(08-23-2018 12:18 PM)Big Papi Wrote:  https://nypost.com/2018/08/23/tinder-tra...ping-guys/

Stupid cunt liberals - so the crap was officially to prove how evil you are when having a bunch of requirements and quick selection criteria based on looks?

Bitch - most of those you mentioned height, race etc. - they were unalienable requirements of women. The list of female conditions is legion.

The men who posted "no tats" or "no fatties" are likely few and far in between - besides - those criteria are not unalienable. You choose to get tattoos and it's up to you what you make with your body. Besides - everyone has looks preferences.

I hope that the black "winner" gets to hate-fuck her - though I very much doubt that. I also liked that other black anti-feminazi hero who interrupted her in her ego-interview.

You don't waste time of people and play with their emotions just for giggles, business and your own political agenda.

Fuck off with that bullshit - no wonder that some guys were even talking with the cop over whether this was illegal. It's not - it's just fucked up and bad taste. You saw it in the faces of all those men when they heard it was some kind of stupid scam.

I predict that the stunt will backfire on the company.

Comments on the videO:

Quote:This is no more than a view-grabbing stunt disguised as insightful commentary. Not only did you maliciously manipulate hundreds of people for the sake of a prank video, you also also minimized their humanity by leading many on who genuinely looked forward to meeting someone they felt they could've had a connection with. Instead of making a video with hundreds of volunteers to participate in your social media-Bachelorette (which I'm absolutely sure you could have), you chose to trick innocent men who had no ill intentions into clearing their schedules, taking trains, and trying to appear their best into being humiliated. Rather than actually swiping on eligible matches, you swiped on anyone and everyone, including people I'm sure felt extremely lucky to go on a date with someone who was so willing to meet them.

And here her own statements:

Quote:Interesting quotes from Natasha from her Elite Daily article: [b]""I wanted to show the world that women are the ones with the power nowadays. For years, women have been oppressed in society by men, and only recently have we managed to turn the tables."

"My main goal was public humiliation, to showcase the obsessive nature men have (as is evident by the fact that lots of them stuck around after the ruse had been revealed.) I feel like this goal was achieved."

"This was something I had been thinking of doing for a long time ever since my ex-boyfriend [editor's note: name has been redacted] cheated on me a couple of years ago, and at last I was finally there. The humiliation factor of it for the men was a great feeling, and I felt very desirable."[/b]

So yeah - her MAIN GOAL WAS HUMILIATION BECAUSE SHE GOT DUMPED BY HER EX (and likely quite a few other good-looking high-achieving men in NYC)

Problem is that she is attractive, but not super-attractive and she is a cunt. Who wants that?

Post: #42

Holy hell.
Please Jesus just come back already and end this. We've gone far enough.

Post: #43

(08-23-2018 01:04 PM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  And here her own statements:

Quote:"My main goal was public humiliation, to showcase the obsessive nature men have (as is evident by the fact that lots of them stuck around after the ruse had been revealed.) I feel like this goal was achieved."

"This was something I had been thinking of doing for a long time ever since my ex-boyfriend [editor's note: name has been redacted] cheated on me a couple of years ago, and at last I was finally there. The humiliation factor of it for the men was a great feeling, and I felt very desirable."

So yeah - her MAIN GOAL WAS HUMILIATION BECAUSE SHE GOT DUMPED BY HER EX (and likely quite a few other good-looking high-achieving men in NYC)

Problem is that she is attractive, but not super-attractive and she is a cunt. Who wants that?

About half based on how many initially stuck around. And notice how little respect she has for the men who stayed.

I'm sure the guy she picked will make a great BFF. She can tell him all about the newest guy she's banging.

Post: #44

Video is downvoted and ripped apart in the comment section by both men and women.

Sometimes those companies are really clueless - from what I understand - it's the same company that brought you this:





That time then the feminazi agenda was better sold at least to the indoctrinated cunts.

They thought that they could double down on it and make it bigger now.

Wait when more Youtubers get wind of it and go into the details.

Post: #45

Someone posted the text script they used to Twitter:



It looks like she suggested to the men that sex was a possibility with "get a drink or something and see what happens (smirk emoji)"

The producer is being blasted on Twitter: https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&vert...0&src=typd

Looks like the one guy from the video who called her out also got roughed up by security:

I wonder if this video has the potential to be a watershed red-pill awakening moment? The thirst is probably too strong in our current society, but one can hope.

Post: #46

I think Tinder peaked in 2015 when it coincided with the "Netflix and Chill" meme.

Nowadays the women left on Tinder were the bitches that were only using it to promote their Instagram and so on.

Facebook is allegedly launching its' own dating service so I think that will revitalize online dating for a few years but then it will become like Tinder once enough (less bitch) women burn out or find boyfriends / husbands off it.

Post: #47

(08-23-2018 06:01 PM)Nemausus Wrote:  I wonder if this video has the potential to be a watershed red-pill awakening moment? The thirst is probably too strong in our current society, but one can hope.

For some reason male SMV seems is plummeting across the world hard. Another way of saying woman's hypergamy is skyrocketing I guess. Woman's appearances are also declining too (increasing female obesity) I guess because they feel like guys will date them no matter what (the thirst).

A lot of this is pushing men to travel just to score pussy. For example, when I went to the Thai Islands in the 2000s it was like 90% women but when I watch travel vlogs of Thai Islands now it's a big sausage fest full of western dudes.

If a guy knows of an area with too many women then he needs to keep it a secret and cannot brag about it on the internet or else 1000s of wanna PUAs will go there.

Post: #48

(08-23-2018 06:01 PM)Nemausus Wrote:  Someone posted the text script they used to Twitter:

I wouldn't have shown up based on that word salad "she" spits out. No woman is that verbose on tinder, you have to fucking drag shit out of them.

Post: #49

This girl would not have got a right swipe. Hair is not long enough. Don't @ me.

Post: #50

(08-23-2018 08:41 PM)DJ-Matt Wrote:  I wouldn't have shown up based on that word salad "she" spits out. No woman is that verbose on tinder, you have to fucking drag shit out of them.

Yeah I can't remember the last time a woman responded to me with a full sentence on Tinder (let alone a apargraph).

They don't have to because Tinder's gender ratio is bad in most places. I made a fake female that was a 3/10 wearing ugly clothes and she had 100+ matches within a hour. Whereas I'm lucky to get 6 matches in a week but they rarely convert into meeting up.