Post: #1

Curious what others think of this.

I have always viewed thong panties as being a sign of showing submission. Here is why.

When she wears a thong/g string, she is conceding the fact that she has visible panty lines and is trying to correct that. Thus, she is accepting the fact that someone (most likely a man) is going to be checking out her ass and she is trying to make it look better (e.g. by hiding her otherwise panty lines). Thus, she wears a thong to ensure the viewer has an undisturbed view of her ass cheeks.

If this isn't submission, then I don't know what is. If I were to frame this another way: I don't know of any alpha men that wear thongs, and when a guy does wear a thong, then he is gay and is often submissive.

Thus, thong panties are a sign of submission.

Thoughts?

Post: #2

Post: #3

(08-04-2018 08:07 AM)misogynist Wrote:  Thoughts?

   

Post: #4

Post: #5

Suits feels pretty submissive when he wears thongs

Post: #6

Post: #7

I think girls on a date with no panties are more submissive according to your rationale. But at least guys in this thread guys aren't bragging about their thongs.

Post: #8

Post: #9

Post: #10

Bras are a sign of dominance because she’s trying to puff out her chest.

Push up bras are super dominant, nearly combative because they use metal which is a weapon.

Post: #11

Choker collars and harnesses are a better tell, less ambiguous.

All women are submissive if you flip an attraction trigger and have the right frame

Post: #12

Post: #13

No panties are submissive.

Post: #14

OP is right and kind of misunderstood.

The whole of woman's clothing is actually designed as a promise of submissiveness, From high heels that inhibit ability to run away to thongs that induce idea of spanking that ass and short skirts that induce idea of getting under it and to chokers around neck that imitate a dog leash. Women are always walking around displaying their goods and wish to submit them to a high value man.

Post: #15

(08-06-2018 01:58 AM)Mage Wrote:  OP is right and kind of misunderstood.

The whole of woman's clothing is actually designed as a promise of submissiveness, From high heels that inhibit ability to run away to thongs that induce idea of spanking that ass and short skirts that induce idea of getting under it and to chokers around neck that imitate a dog leash. Women are always walking around displaying their goods and wish to submit them to a high value man.

This is one of those truths that would drive an incel insane.

Post: #16

(08-06-2018 08:54 AM)loremipsum Wrote:  

(08-06-2018 01:58 AM)Mage Wrote:  OP is right and kind of misunderstood.

The whole of woman's clothing is actually designed as a promise of submissiveness, From high heels that inhibit ability to run away to thongs that induce idea of spanking that ass and short skirts that induce idea of getting under it and to chokers around neck that imitate a dog leash. Women are always walking around displaying their goods and wish to submit them to a high value man.

This is one of those truths that would drive an incel insane.

But they would substitute "high value man" with "Chad".

Post: #17

(08-06-2018 01:58 AM)Mage Wrote:  OP is right and kind of misunderstood.

The whole of woman's clothing is actually designed as a promise of submissiveness, From high heels that inhibit ability to run away to thongs that induce idea of spanking that ass and short skirts that induce idea of getting under it and to chokers around neck that imitate a dog leash. Women are always walking around displaying their goods and wish to submit them to a high value man.

High heels are to accentuate the legs and make the calves look better.

Anything other than sneakers inhibits your ability to run. Lord knows in my dress shoes my time would suffer greatly over 100 meters.

Post: #18

Suits....don't stop.

G

Post: #19