(04-19-2019 10:00 PM)NoMoreTO Wrote:(04-19-2019 01:16 PM)911 Wrote: Ashkenazis are of Khazarian descent, they started out in central Asia, spread into Ukraine.
They are a Turkic tribe that spread into Slav land and mixed a bit with them, so borderline white....
So how did they get way up there? They were exiled out of Israel by the muslims?
Or is there just no connection to Old testament Jews geographically, and they were just always from there and took on the religion somehow?
Quote:Christian of Stavelot, in Expositio in Matthaeum Evangelistam (864):
"At the present time we know of no nation under the heavens where Christians do not live. For [Christians are even found] in the lands of Gog and Magog -- who are a Hunnic race and are called Gazari (Khazars)... circumcized and observing all [the laws of] Judaism. The Bulgars, however, who are of the same seven tribes [as the Khazars], are now becoming baptized [into Christianity]."
Ahmad ibn Fadlan, in his travellogue (c. 922):
"The Khazars and their king are all Jews."
Ibn al-Faqih (c. 930):
"All of the Khazars are Jews. But they have been Judaized recently."
(04-20-2019 08:07 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:(04-19-2019 02:29 PM)Lampwick Wrote: ...
Now some people take it one step further and get into the more conspiratorial side that Jews run the world, are trying to poison white society, etc. For me personally, that stuff gets into crackpot territory pretty quickly, and I find it hard to take it seriously. But the above observation of Jews' attitude towards business I think is pretty matter of fact. The annoying thing is that simply pointing it out gets you lumped into the anti-semite camp very easily. Even though the observation often arises from personal experiences in dealing with some Jews, as the article states.
"...some people take it one step further and get into the more conspiratorial side that Jews run the world..."
"...the above observation of Jews' attitude towards business I think is pretty matter of fact. The annoying thing is that simply pointing it out gets you lumped into the anti-semite camp very easily..."
(04-18-2019 07:12 PM)911 Wrote:(04-16-2019 09:21 AM)Irenicus Wrote:(04-15-2019 06:23 PM)911 Wrote: The restriction on cellphone porn was actually enforced in Israel weeks before it was in the UK. In any case, the UK's position is very unique in the West, so it doesn't detract from my main point, it's a pretty minor sideshow in my main point establishing that the porn industry is mostly Jewish.
Nope, it's vice versa. Again, you want to discuss things you didn't research. Again, I did some homework for you.
From what I've gathered, the ISP's in the UK had, since 2012, filters blocking access to websites that provide pornographic content - likely due to pressure from their clients.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/i...onths.html
Those filters became mandatory on 27 April 2017, when the Digital Economy Act 2017 was passed. Link down below (you aren't going to read it, I know):
https://services.parliament.uk/bills/201...onomy.html
On the other hand, the Knesset passed a more liberal version of the bill in...January 2019. 2 years after the UK. That law requires the ISP to add filters to pornographic content only if the user asks for it. In UK...those filters are on by default. Here, a snippet of yet another article you will not read:
Quote:The Knesset approved at a first (that means it became law) reading Tuesday a bill that will require internet service providers to offer their customers censorship of pornographic sites and ensure that a choice is made on the extent to which they wish to block pornographic content, if at all.
The legislation, sponsored by Likud MK Miki Zohar and Jewish Home MK Shuli Moalem-Refaeli, passed with 18 votes in favor and 12 against.
The bill has in the past faced heavy criticism from lawmakers over privacy concerns, among them Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. An earlier version of the bill that was unanimously approved by the Ministerial Committee for Legislation in late October required internet service providers to block pornographic content by default, and only lift site filtering at users’ request.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/knesset-ap...s-to-porn/
If you did a proper research (took me 10 minutes, I have timed it), you would have realized that South Korea has a similar law since 2007. You would have realized that anti pornography laws are also present in other Western countries such as Iceland, Latvia and Estonia. Not only that, but you claimed that Israel started to block pornography weeks before the UK implemented a similar law, despite the fact that the article you have provided did not mention such a thing. Not to mention that Israel was lagging two years behind the UK.
I am sorry, but you are either a liar (and you, as a supposedly "good" Catholic, are not supposed to lie) or not intelligent (like most of the Alt Right/Left) for such discussion. Unlike Leonard, as can be seen a page back.
Sp5 refuted your claim that the porn industry is mostly Jewish, so I won't discuss things that have already been discussed.
...
Please stop that projection trick of yours, it's tedious and it's insufferable. It's also out of line, you can't go around accusing people of lying just because they happen to establish uncomfortable truths that might have cut too near your bone...
The anti-porn law was passed in Israel weeks before it was passed in the UK. Regardless, this is practically a red herring, a side issue. And you know it. That's why you've used a wall of emotionally charged prose in a futile attempt to divert this debate, trying to establish the notion that Israelis suddenly learned not to subvert their people from England, or sidetracking into Gaza fertility rates.
The main issues here are that:
1- Jews are the primary vector for porn in the West.
2- This effort is not merely driven by financial motives, it has a strong motive of deliberate moral subversion of Christian mores.
You have, on one hand, a bunch of Jewish scholars, Jewish pioneer porn peddlers and Jewish porn moguls making statements on the record that unequivocally prove the two assertions above.
And then you have you, and Sp5, trying to deny this.
OK...
.(04-18-2019 11:18 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote: The funny thing is I didn't even give a shit about Jews/Judaism/conspiracies up until about 10 years ago. I grew up in a nominally Jewish family (my father's side) but we were never religious. I did hear a lot of self-praising from certain family members but that was about it. Never attended a synagogue, seder, bar mitzvah etc. etc.
It wasn't until I was in my early 20s that I got into Jewish history. It was purely out of interest and curiousity of my own background. I remember reading Saul Friedlander's Holocaust, watching Schindler's List. Shit was depressing. Then I met my now ex-wife, who was a big reader, and she gave me a copy of a book called "Russophobia" by Igor Shafarevich (not sure if it's widely available). Anyway, that's when I opened my eyes and got confused, because I had no idea of Jew involvement in Communism and the suffering they brought to the people. From then on, I got my hands on anything related to "alternative" books/articles on Jewish history, anything from Kevin Macdonald to JJ Goldberg. You know that scene at the end of the Matrix where Neo wakes up from the dead and sees the code? That's how I felt like after doing research on the JQ.
Looking further in the media, I started noticing Jews everywhere. Some guys here would argue that Judaism is "evil" and stormfronters genuinely hate them. I don't. I just think they are annoying. They're everywhere. They have too many opinions and they are far too active (politically). You open a copy of WaPo or NyTimes and all you see are Jewish names. It's irritating. The other day Trump retweeted a video of some AIPAC guy complaining that Jews are "the most victimized minority in the US". Most victimized!. The wealthiest, most privileged ethnic group in America is the "most victimized". Jews have a an axe to grind with white culture. They can't just make their money, enjoy life, and relax. They always have to be activists. ANNOYING. And their opinions are often anti-white, anti-traditional culture and pro-Israel. You start thinking, "what the fuck is wrong with these people?" Why is it that, for example, Indian-americans are highly successful and educated and yet they don't insert themselves into every fucking topic, media organ, or university? This is my major gripe with them. And by the way, this extends to my personal dealings with Jewish people. They have a certain psychological intensity that is off-putting.
The reason I criticize Jews before other people is because you should always engage in self-reflection before focusing on others. Jews typically do not engage in any self-criticism, and so this is why antisemites must do it for them. Like Rambo says - they drew first blood.
(04-18-2019 11:18 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote: The funny thing is I didn't even give a shit about Jews/Judaism/conspiracies up until about 10 years ago. I grew up in a nominally Jewish family (my father's side) but we were never religious. I did hear a lot of self-praising from certain family members but that was about it. Never attended a synagogue, seder, bar mitzvah etc. etc.
It wasn't until I was in my early 20s that I got into Jewish history. It was purely out of interest and curiousity of my own background. I remember reading Saul Friedlander's Holocaust, watching Schindler's List. Shit was depressing. Then I met my now ex-wife, who was a big reader, and she gave me a copy of a book called "Russophobia" by Igor Shafarevich (not sure if it's widely available). Anyway, that's when I opened my eyes and got confused, because I had no idea of Jew involvement in Communism and the suffering they brought to the people. From then on, I got my hands on anything related to "alternative" books/articles on Jewish history, anything from Kevin Macdonald to JJ Goldberg. You know that scene at the end of the Matrix where Neo wakes up from the dead and sees the code? That's how I felt like after doing research on the JQ.
Looking further in the media, I started noticing Jews everywhere. Some guys here would argue that Judaism is "evil" and stormfronters genuinely hate them. I don't. I just think they are annoying. They're everywhere. They have too many opinions and they are far too active (politically). You open a copy of WaPo or NyTimes and all you see are Jewish names. It's irritating. The other day Trump retweeted a video of some AIPAC guy complaining that Jews are "the most victimized minority in the US". Most victimized!. The wealthiest, most privileged ethnic group in America is the "most victimized". Jews have a an axe to grind with white culture. They can't just make their money, enjoy life, and relax. They always have to be activists. ANNOYING. And their opinions are often anti-white, anti-traditional culture and pro-Israel. You start thinking, "what the fuck is wrong with these people?" Why is it that, for example, Indian-americans are highly successful and educated and yet they don't insert themselves into every fucking topic, media organ, or university? This is my major gripe with them. And by the way, this extends to my personal dealings with Jewish people. They have a certain psychological intensity that is off-putting.
The reason I criticize Jews before other people is because you should always engage in self-reflection before focusing on others. Jews typically do not engage in any self-criticism, and so this is why antisemites must do it for them. Like Rambo says - they drew first blood.
(04-20-2019 12:58 PM)Irenicus Wrote: All in all, my main point here, like yours is that Jews MUST have Intospection. They aren't angels, who turn everything into gold. And..they aren't devils who turn everything into crap. LIKE EVERY OTHER NATION ON THIS PLANET. Like the Germans, Chinese, Russians.... .
(04-20-2019 05:03 PM)nomadbrah Wrote: Why would you make up stories like child sacrifice, if there wasn't any truth to it? It's not like child sacrifice is an unknown among semittes (Moloch).
Europeans have never accused anyone else of that. Not muslims, not chinese, not even savages (except those who actually were cannibals).
(04-21-2019 05:11 AM)Sp5 Wrote:(04-20-2019 05:03 PM)nomadbrah Wrote: Why would you make up stories like child sacrifice, if there wasn't any truth to it? It's not like child sacrifice is an unknown among semittes (Moloch).
Europeans have never accused anyone else of that. Not muslims, not chinese, not even savages (except those who actually were cannibals).
Why would you make up stories about rape / "rape culture?"
Why would you make up stories about "the pay gap?"
Why would you make up stories about "weapons of mass destruction?"
Why would you make up stories about Americans harvesting organs in Iraq? (the Turks did that)
From your point of view, why would people make up stories about the Holocaust?
Get real. People lie all the time for religious, cultural, political and material advantage.
It could be as simple as trying to grab the Jews' property. That's why.
And you're talking about a time where half the population was illiterate and superstition was everywhere.
Quote:In his book "Pasque di Sangue" [Passovers of Blood], Toaff discusses at length the possibility that Jews murdered Christian children to use their blood in religious rituals, and argues that confessions to such acts extracted under torture should not be dismissed.
(04-21-2019 06:10 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:(04-21-2019 05:11 AM)Sp5 Wrote:(04-20-2019 05:03 PM)nomadbrah Wrote: Why would you make up stories like child sacrifice, if there wasn't any truth to it? It's not like child sacrifice is an unknown among semittes (Moloch).
Europeans have never accused anyone else of that. Not muslims, not chinese, not even savages (except those who actually were cannibals).
Why would you make up stories about rape / "rape culture?"
Why would you make up stories about "the pay gap?"
Why would you make up stories about "weapons of mass destruction?"
Why would you make up stories about Americans harvesting organs in Iraq? (the Turks did that)
From your point of view, why would people make up stories about the Holocaust?
Get real. People lie all the time for religious, cultural, political and material advantage.
It could be as simple as trying to grab the Jews' property. That's why.
And you're talking about a time where half the population was illiterate and superstition was everywhere.
Any one of those you mention are exaggerations based on stuff that happens. Rape happens, men do make a bit more when adjusted for "controllable variables, Iraq had used chemical weapons, Turks harvesting organs (during US occupation), Holocaust did kill jews.
I mean, people don't just make slander up from thin air, you take something with a kernel of truth and magnify it. The myth of jewish ritual sacrifice of children has been around for thousands of years. God even has to command his followers not "to put their children through the fire to Moloch" and we know just how much the israelities care about following the commandments.
The book SS was talking about is "Pasque di Sangue" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passovers_of_Blood) written by an Israeli historian:
https://www.haaretz.com/1.4807988
Quote:In his book "Pasque di Sangue" [Passovers of Blood], Toaff discusses at length the possibility that Jews murdered Christian children to use their blood in religious rituals, and argues that confessions to such acts extracted under torture should not be dismissed.
(04-21-2019 07:38 AM)nomadbrah Wrote: Christians have nothing in their history to suggest child sacrifice was ever part of culture.
Judaism is BASED on ritual child sacrifice. God asks Abraham to sacrifice his first born and Abraham is willing to do it. I find it appalling and disgusting! Only tremendous propaganda keeps normal people from questioning what kind of culture has a God which asks for child sacrifice.
Can you imagine if this was only in Islam?
![[Image: fza1tsjobut21.jpg]](https://i.redd.it/fza1tsjobut21.jpg)
Quote:We just have to be patient.
And wait for you to pass into that good night, first politically, and then, well…
Do you hear it?
The sound of your empire dying? Your nation, as you knew it, ending, permanently?
Because I do, and the sound of its demise is beautiful.
So know this.
If you thought this election was payback for 2008, remember…
Payback, thy name is…
Temporary.
Quote:His paternal grandfather was Jewish
Quote:Wise has referred to himself as Jewish[6] and as an anti-Zionist Jew[21] but does not practice Judaism.
(04-20-2019 12:58 PM)Irenicus Wrote: (2) believe that they, as a collective, are perfect, and others aren't. As you saw, they, like any other nation and ethnicity of this planet (well, bar the Eskimos and Bushmen), aren't . Yes, they did plenty of good to their host nations, and the world in general. But...they did also some bad things - heavily involvement with feminism (number's sadly, don't lie), communism (many joined the party in Eastern Europe to get revenge on the system that persecuted them) and social "justice" (you know that, probably, so I won't explain). Also, some are applying one sets of laws for Israel and another for the rest of the world. I (and Bibi as well, not a big fan of his by the way, I prefer Feiglin) believe that the same laws should apply for everyone. If Israel has a beautiful wall (seen it first hand, even a fly can't pass it), America should too. If Israel can be a country of immigrants of Jewish decent, and those who want to join it...France should be as well. And so on.
Quote:Norwegian pastors obtained two anonymous letters that handwriting experts said matched Gjertsen’s script. The letters had been turned over by a 28-year-old Swedish woman, Esther (Bienakowsky) Paulsen, who converted from Judaism in New York in 1892, was baptized in the Lutheran Church and married a Norwegian lay preacher.
The couple returned to Europe in 1898, where Esther followed Gjertsen to speaking engagements during his summer trip back to Norway. When Gjertsen rebuffed her request to take her back to the States with him, the scandal erupted.
The Augsburg seminary in Minneapolis sent an investigator to Norway. Declaring his innocence, Gjertsen returned to Norway with his wife, Sarah, to “meet the accusation and, if possible, bring the instigator to justice.”
By 1901, a Norwegian book, “Falk and the Jewess,” appeared on the streets of Minneapolis. When a Norwegian weekly newspaper in Minneapolis reprinted the passionate letters in 1903, the publisher was fined $35 for mailing indecent material.
In the end, Gjertsen was more or less cleared of the accusations, although he admitted writing the second letter. That prompted church officials to conclude that it was improper for a married man to write an unsigned letter “containing such strong statements and sending it to another man’s wife.”
Despite winning a church vote 82-63, Gjertsen resigned — explaining that he wrote the letter because Esther had threatened suicide if he didn’t take her back to America and he considered it his duty to be kind.
Defying Lutherans’ staid stereotype, the crowded church meeting in 1901 devolved into a “pathetic scene … there were hisses and threats” before the meeting was adjourned “to avoid a general row,” the Minneapolis Tribune reported.
Insisting he was the victim, Gjertsen said: “There are few in the congregation who have any idea of the sufferings I have gone through.” His supporters splintered from Trinity Lutheran and started Bethany Lutheran Church in 1904 with Gjertsen as its first pastor.