Post: #26

Quote:And they found that women who grew up with moms who worked spend less time on housework, are more likely to be employed, and even hold supervisory positions. These women are also more likely to be financially successful.

In fact, in the United States, daughters of working mothers earned 23% more than those women who grew up with stay-at-home mothers, collecting an average annual income of $35,474 compared to $28,894.

So the number for daughters of non-working moms includes women who go on to be non-working themselves? And, even with their income being $0, the difference is only $6-7k?

They should have asked if their husbands (the ones who can attract one) are satisfied in the marriage.

Post: #27

(05-13-2018 10:12 PM)StrikeBack Wrote:  Even if we just talk financially...

Quote:In fact, in the United States, daughters of working mothers earned 23% more than those women who grew up with stay-at-home mothers, collecting an average annual income of $35,474 compared to $28,894.

How quickly will they blow that 23% difference and then some on:

- eating out
- alcohol
- anti-depressants
- excessive travelling
- day care + babysitting

And that's not even close to a full list for "career" bitches.

That 23% is like the wage gap and seems to be about as fake.
There is no way in hell I will believe that THE ONLY REASON WHY THE NEXT GENERATION OF WOMEN IS MAKING MORE MONEY JUST BECAUSE THEIR MOTHERS HAVE BEEN WORKING FOR 1 month+ in 1-12 years. That is about as logical as claiming that if media, comics and movies show women as top scientists, then far more women will become scientists - WRONG!

See - if you see your mom working, then you will be working too! No shit - the poor mothers working behind the cash registers truly raised their self-confidence to reach for greatness!

Post: #28

^^ actually that's exactly the wage gap. Women making 77c to a man's dollar. Is there something special about the number 23 that these fakenews feminists love so much?

Post: #29

"Working moms" is a funny term that can have multiple meanings.

If the driveshaft on my car snaps then regardless of whether the engine is redlining I'm not going anywhere. The engine is screaming. It's sucking down fuel by the litre. But I'm stuck.

In one sense the car is working really really hard. In another sense it's not working at all.

Women are the same, particularly when they're working in non-feminine fields. They're "working" but are they performing the purpose that they were built for? No. So in the greater sense they're not working, they're defective.

Then we come to the last half of the thread title. "Do better in life". In progressive speak this equates to "engine screaming, going nowhere". In natural terms it means "more likely to end up defective, ie: not serving nature's intended purpose".

Funny how wrong a single sentence can be.