(05-04-2018 04:19 PM)PapayaTapper Wrote: (05-04-2018 12:34 PM)Rhyme or Reason Wrote: Quote:CEOs of big tech companies: You almost certainly have incels as employees. What are you going to do about it?
Women hate betas and incels so fucking much. Years ago it was "nice guys of okcupid" or the 'nice guys are really assholes' meme. Then it was the friendzone doesn't exist meme. Now it's incels must die.
What do they all have in common? Women directing their hate towards men they don't want to fuck. The worst crime in a matriarchy is to dry up the pussy.
Conversely that's why they hate the idea of "game" being an acquired skill set. The possibility that pussy tingling attributes are not 100% innate and can be "manufactured" in some way is terrifying. So much so that its labeled as "tricking" women rather than developing the skills to give women what they want.
Myths for women are called fairy tales* for a reason (Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, Beauty and The Beast etc etc) all have one fundamental common thread. The "heroine" of the story archetype is not the one that vanquishes the evil step mother, witch, or spell but is rather rescued by the "hero". The Prince has to do the conquering. God forbid that Prince Charming wasn't born handsome strong and rich
and had to put in work to over come obstacles in order to acquire his vanquishing skills.
Pussy only responds to final results, it doesn't prepare to respond.
Women in general have very little problem admitting that everyone besides themselves have an inner nature with guiding instincts.
They see animals moving around, eating (hunting or grazing), mating, etc, and think the animal nature is cute or just the way it is for these animals. They see men drawn to beautiful women, or tasty food, they see children crying for no reason, and understand that "that's just the way it is." They have no problem accepting other animals having an inner nature.
But point out that they also have an inner nature, and watch how badly women become uncomfortable, or start to rage. I think AB is onto something here - if women acknowledge they also have animal instincts, it would force them to become accountable for their actions. They could not pretend they did not know what they were doing - they didn't mean to eat that food, cheat on their man, get angry at this or that - if they knew they would react so predictably in the first place.
Therefore, in order to avoid feelings of guilt, they must deny that they have an animal nature, lest they be held accountable for their actions. Once a woman understands, for example, that receiving attention from a man in a private situation could easily lead to sex, they no longer have any excuse for cheating since the man can just ask why she allowed herself to be isolated in the first place.
In the same way a woman can rightfully become suspicious when a man is checking out other women (he who lusts with his eyes), a man can attempt to control his nature by avoiding situations where he might succumb to his instincts - the same is true for women. But only if women acknowledge their animal nature, which is extremely rare for any woman to do.
Women acknowledging their nature also leads to other uncomfortable situations for them. For example, why are men better than women at so many tasks? Is it a conspiracy? No, it's because
women have been fucking superior men for hundreds of thousands of years, so the superiority of men was actually created by female nature. Thus women maintain the doublethink regarding animal instincts - everyone has them except women.
The entire feminist narrative is a denial of female nature, and therefore in today's lying fantasy culture, talking about female nature threatens the entire political and cultural order maintained by the elites at the top of the "Western" world. Thus they hate and target men like Roosh with such vitriol.