Post: #251

britchard Wrote:I don't know anything about Australia and I'm American, therefore no Australian can really know anything about America'.

This is what this whole argument started as.

Not true at all.

You're describing an abstract argument, wherein an entire group of people is described and criticized. But TravelerKai's argument was strictly and distinctly PERSONAL.

TravelerKai wasn't talking to "Australians"; he was talking to Leonard Neubache. And he was saying, "How the fuck can you know what you're talking about when you use your opinions on American politics primarily to shit on American Blacks? (Especially when you live in Australia.)"

Funny, though, TravelerKai was more correct than he realized because Leonard lives in Tasmania, which (as I posted earlier) is so devoid of Blacks, Browns, Asians, Jews, and non-Whites that scientists use it to study population genetics. In non-scientific terms, this means that if Leonard had never married his Latina wife, he probably would've never seen a Latino - and that he's arguably never seen a Black person. (And, no, the dark-skinned relatives of his Latina wife don't count; they're Latino.)

Britchard, you're not the first person to mistake a concrete personal argument for an abstract one.

Here's a link to help.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_and_concrete

Post: #252

(04-20-2018 02:35 AM)speculator Wrote:  On the other hand, I completely understand TravelerKai. You just can't sit and pretend that nothing happened. I don't want him to join WIA, Moma, and other remarkable black forum members that only post in one thread because of this misunderstanding. The forum is in a dire need of catharsis and silencing viewpoints will make things worse.

Those excellent contributors have not been silenced because of misunderstandings. RVF has become a platform where it is acceptable to advocate ideologies designed to usher in a reality where it would be acceptable to treat men like Moma, WIA and TK as second class citizens.

It's not like all the talk about race and IQ isn't intended to lead somewhere.

Post: #253

What a shit show..... I can only really think of one poster on the forum who I genuinely don't like and as of recently I've come to just accept them. I've never had to block or ignore anyone cause they posted things that hurt my feelings on the internet.

Race.... what a tricky tricky topic to try to discus. However I've noticed a few members posting things in this thread like "angry white man talk."
Let's put the shoe on the other foot... what if some white members were going on about "angry black man talk" how well received do think that would be? Racism is not just a one way street despite what MTV tells you.

How did racial tensions get so bad? Not just on the forum but in the world? Things seem waaaaay worse now then they did growing up in the 80's-90's even 2000's... Sure you had some random racist rednecks but it was nothing like it is now.

Post: #254

Wait? Leonard D Neubache is married to a Latina woman?




Having argued a couple of times with him in the immigration and Donald Trump threads and based on his opinions I never would have imagine that he would be married to a Latina, especially the way he talks down on the minority Americans in the forum and his strong anti-immigrant stance.


Being Latino myself, I am extremely curious to know which country his wife is from.

Post: #255

(04-20-2018 02:50 AM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  The idea that a female Starbucks manager in a major east coast city is actually a closet KKK member just dying to punt the lesser races out of her store just beggars belief.

I don't know man, what about all the dating profiles where white bitches put "I'm not racist, I just don't like to date black guys".

Post: #256

(04-20-2018 09:02 AM)Cr33pin Wrote:  How did racial tensions get so bad? Not just on the forum but in the world? Things seem waaaaay worse now then they did growing up in the 80's-90's even 2000's...

Because since the 90's the government has pumped in at least 40 million foreigners through legal + illegal immigration. It's human nature to identify with your tribe, you can't mix a bunch of different cultures together and get a pleasant result.

That'd be like if you dumped 500k Somalis into Japan then wondered 'gee how did the tension become this bad'?

(04-20-2018 09:04 AM)Pancho Wrote:  Having argued a couple of times with him in the immigration and Donald Trump threads and based on his opinions I never would have imagine that he would be married to a Latina, especially the way he talks down on the minority Americans in the forum and his strong anti-immigrant stance.

Latinos themselves don't want to live in latino countries, it seems their biggest goal is to flee their own people so it's hard to have any other conclusions than they create shithole countries. A lot of things that happen in mexico/Honduras/elsalvador/etc.. are absolutely horrifying. I don't need to see that type of violence first-hand before I understand we need to keep that out.
The real 'white privilege' is the white libtards who can't imagine society decaying to that level. They think they can make any policy they want and their quality of life will maintain or improve.

Post: #257

(04-20-2018 09:02 AM)Cr33pin Wrote:  What a shit show..... I can only really think of one poster on the forum who I genuinely don't like and as of recently I've come to just accept them. I've never had to block or ignore anyone cause they posted things that hurt my feelings on the internet.

Race.... what a tricky tricky topic to try to discus. However I've noticed a few members posting things in this thread like "angry white man talk."
Let's put the shoe on the other foot... what if some white members were going on about "angry black man talk" how well received do think that would be? Racism is not just a one way street despite what MTV tells you.

How did racial tensions get so bad? Not just on the forum but in the world? Things seem waaaaay worse now then they did growing up in the 80's-90's even 2000's... Sure you had some random racist rednecks but it was nothing like it is now.

Cr33pin, with all due respect, which of the black guys on the forum engage in angry black guy talk? As far as I can see, I can't think of a single black guy here who sounds like a member of BLM. If you can think of one name him. We don't get any BLM types here because they're views wouldn't be tolerated here. I can however think of numerous posters who engage in angry white guy talk on the forum and Neubache is the leader of this cabal, the guy who stirs up much of the racial animus here and gets the others going. If he was able to get a gentleman like Traveler Kai angry, then its clear to me who the troublemakers are on this forum. Again, I'm not calling for their views to be censored but I have no qualms about challenging these fools. They just can't deal with having their views challenged which is not my problem. At all.

Post: #258

speculator Wrote:On the other hand, I completely understand TravelerKai. You just can't sit and pretend that nothing happened. I don't want him to join WIA, Moma, and other remarkable black forum members that only post in one thread because of this misunderstanding. The forum is in a dire need of catharsis and silencing viewpoints will make things worse.

The most concerning thing to me in all this drama is that forum members hold grudges against each other. This is a recipe for meltdowns like this. We say that we are above women but holding grudges is the most womanly thing a man can do. If someone's behavior bothers you, tell them on the spot, not several months later when that person is in a vulnerable position.

I hope cool heads will prevail and the forum will purge itself of this toxicity and identity politics. Otherwise, we will become what we have been fighting against, SJWs

Your instincts are way, way off. And your argument falls for Leonard's bullshit argument that he's being silenced for his "opinions". The truth is that Leonard is being "silenced" for taking his opinions way too far, and for causing 1,000,000 power level drama in response to a 100 power level criticism.

I'm a White Nationalist / Segregationist. Comte de Saint Germain is Black. About a year ago, Comte de Saint Germain neutral repped me, with description "Lowest energy cuck on the forum". I didn't like getting neutral repped, but I think he had a point. And so, rather than starting Forum drama by neutral repping him back or following him from thread to thread "to ask questions", I positive repped him - because he's good at what he does, and his writing style and character are sufficiently unique to be nearly irreplaceable.

Six months later, Comte de Saint Germain rewarded us all with his brilliant posts in this Sigma thread, and he continues to excel at helping men self-improvement through Game advice.

But if I followed Leonard Neubache's path, I'd accuse Comte de Saint Germain of attacking my family, exactly like Leonard accused TravelerKai of doing. And I'd claim that Comte de Saint Germain's entire forum legacy is destroyed because he started Forum drama with me!

Speculator, if a White Nationalist / Segregationist like me can "work with" criticisms from Black RVF members by silencing the part of me that wants to "get back at them", then surely Leonard should be held to the same expectation. Except Leonard was already given that opportunity to "work with" TravelerKai's criticism, but he responded by personally attacking TravelerKai along increasingly ridiculous lines of argument.

And as for "the most feminine thing one can do", clearly it's wanting everyone to get along without holding them to reasonably fair standards of right and wrong. Leonard's enormous escalation of drama in response to utterly mild criticism means he can't be trusted to "work with" anyone.

Post: #259

(04-20-2018 09:13 AM)DJ-Matt Wrote:  

(04-20-2018 02:50 AM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  The idea that a female Starbucks manager in a major east coast city is actually a closet KKK member just dying to punt the lesser races out of her store just beggars belief.

I don't know man, what about all the dating profiles where white bitches put "I'm not racist, I just don't like to date black guys".

And Roosh does not find Asian girls attractive - is he a riceball racist because of that?

I have a half-black friend who has never fucked a black girl, because he does not find them attractive. Is he racist now?

The current SJW want to call you a transphobic racist for not wanting to fuck trans "women". So you better suck that trans-dick of the neo-woman or be called a racist.

Every fucking thing seems to be racist and sexist now - it's as if the entire fucking world has become an eternally screeching Anita Sarkeesian.

Post: #260

(04-20-2018 09:04 AM)Pancho Wrote:  Being Latino myself, I am extremely curious to know which country his wife is from.

You guys need to get off these fantasy ideas that it's some sort of fact that Leonard lives in Tasmania, has a wife and small children lives in a rural area. For all we know, he could be an overweight single guy in his 50s in a basement in Auckland New Zealand, Vancouver Canada, Edinburgh Scotland or anywhere else in the world.

The only fact we can be sure of this:

There is someone who is writing at least 10 (usually very long and incendiary) posts on RVF every single day for 2 years straight with no interruption. No one I know can generate that much output on RVF or elsewhere unless they are doing nothing, and I mean NOTHING, else in their lives. No job, no wife, no kids, no family, no rural area maintenance and upkeep...nothing. If you have just 1 of these things going on a regular basis, you just will not have enough waking hours in the day to generate that kind of output on RVF or elsewhere.

Unless you meet him, stop believing Leonard's fantasy stories.

Post: #261

(04-20-2018 09:23 AM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

speculator Wrote:On the other hand, I completely understand TravelerKai. You just can't sit and pretend that nothing happened. I don't want him to join WIA, Moma, and other remarkable black forum members that only post in one thread because of this misunderstanding. The forum is in a dire need of catharsis and silencing viewpoints will make things worse.

The most concerning thing to me in all this drama is that forum members hold grudges against each other. This is a recipe for meltdowns like this. We say that we are above women but holding grudges is the most womanly thing a man can do. If someone's behavior bothers you, tell them on the spot, not several months later when that person is in a vulnerable position.

I hope cool heads will prevail and the forum will purge itself of this toxicity and identity politics. Otherwise, we will become what we have been fighting against, SJWs

Your instincts are way, way off. And your argument falls for Leonard's bullshit argument that he's being silenced for his "opinions". The truth is that Leonard is being "silenced" for taking his opinions way too far, and for causing 1,000,000 power level drama in response to a 100 power level criticism.

I'm a White Nationalist / Segregationist. Comte de Saint Germain is Black. About a year ago, Comte de Saint Germain neutral repped me, with description "Lowest energy cuck on the forum". I didn't like getting neutral repped, but I think he had a point. And so, rather than starting Forum drama by neutral repping him back or following him from thread to thread "to ask questions", I positive repped him - because he's good at what he does, and his writing style and character are sufficiently unique to be nearly irreplaceable.

Six months later, Comte de Saint Germain rewarded us all with his brilliant posts in this Sigma thread, and he continues to excel at helping men self-improvement through Game advice.

But if I followed Leonard Neubache's path, I'd accuse Comte de Saint Germain of attacking my family, exactly like Leonard accused TravelerKai of doing. And I'd claim that Comte de Saint Germain's entire forum legacy is destroyed because he started Forum drama with me!

Speculator, if a White Nationalist / Segregationist like me can "work with" criticisms from Black RVF members by silencing the part of me that wants to "get back at them", then surely Leonard should be held to the same expectation. Except Leonard was already given that opportunity to "work with" TravelerKai's criticism, but he responded by personally attacking TravelerKai along increasingly ridiculous lines of argument.

And as for "the most feminine thing one can do", clearly it's wanting everyone to get along without holding them to reasonably fair standards of right and wrong. Leonard's enormous escalation of drama in response to utterly mild criticism means he can't be trusted to "work with" anyone.

Lol - "Lowest energy cuck on the forum". That's one of the funniest things I've read on the forum. When I'm not on my phone I'll rep you for sharing that.

Post: #262

Wahawahwah Wrote:I have no opinion on LDN and the current situation but what's this thing about disregarding people's opinions just because they haven't met anyone?

It's a potentially potent tool in defusing Forum drama.

For example, anyone who finds me controversial / annoying can ask anyone who posts in the New York City local meetup thread what I'm like in real life. Asking ten of those people and "averaging their opinions out" can give better insight into me and (potentially) defuse Forum drama.

Leonard hasn't met anyone, so no one knows whether his constant anger is part of his character, or part of his online persona.

And, no, the Forum as a whole won't start disregarding people who haven't met anyone. First, a poster will have to cause Forum drama and then they'll be disregarded for having not met anyone.

Post: #263

(04-20-2018 09:19 AM)doc holliday Wrote:  Cr33pin, with all due respect, which of the black guys on the forum engage in angry black guy talk? As far as I can see, I can't think of a single black guy here who sounds like a member of BLM. If you can think of one name him. We don't get any BLM types here because they're views wouldn't be tolerated here. I can however think of numerous posters who engage in angry white guy talk on the forum and Neubache is the leader of this cabal, the guy who stirs up much of the racial animus here and gets the others going. If he was able to get a gentleman like Traveler Kai angry, then its clear to me who the troublemakers are on this forum. Again, I'm not calling for their views to be censored but I have no qualms about challenging these fools. They just can't deal with having their views challenged which is not my problem. At all.

I wasn't really referring to actual members speaking "angry black talk" perse. Just the phrase itself with the races reversed sounds a lot more sinister... however no one bats a eye when people are talking about the old angry white folk. However I did think of a member who spoke "angry black man talk" his name was anicca and you were correct... they got banned.

I don't want to get fully dragged into this mess... however I did feel strongly enough to post the tidbit that I did. Thank you for respectfully addressing my post. It's a lot easier to have these kinds of conversations on these kinds of topics when its approached the way you approached it.

Post: #264

(04-20-2018 09:23 AM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

speculator Wrote:On the other hand, I completely understand TravelerKai. You just can't sit and pretend that nothing happened. I don't want him to join WIA, Moma, and other remarkable black forum members that only post in one thread because of this misunderstanding. The forum is in a dire need of catharsis and silencing viewpoints will make things worse.

The most concerning thing to me in all this drama is that forum members hold grudges against each other. This is a recipe for meltdowns like this. We say that we are above women but holding grudges is the most womanly thing a man can do. If someone's behavior bothers you, tell them on the spot, not several months later when that person is in a vulnerable position.

I hope cool heads will prevail and the forum will purge itself of this toxicity and identity politics. Otherwise, we will become what we have been fighting against, SJWs

Your instincts are way, way off. And your argument falls for Leonard's bullshit argument that he's being silenced for his "opinions". The truth is that Leonard is being "silenced" for taking his opinions way too far, and for causing 1,000,000 power level drama in response to a 100 power level criticism.

I'm a White Nationalist / Segregationist. Comte de Saint Germain is Black. About a year ago, Comte de Saint Germain neutral repped me, with description "Lowest energy cuck on the forum". I didn't like getting neutral repped, but I think he had a point. And so, rather than starting Forum drama by neutral repping him back or following him from thread to thread "to ask questions", I positive repped him - because he's good at what he does, and his writing style and character are sufficiently unique to be nearly irreplaceable.

Six months later, Comte de Saint Germain rewarded us all with his brilliant posts in this Sigma thread, and he continues to excel at helping men self-improvement through Game advice.

But if I followed Leonard Neubache's path, I'd accuse Comte de Saint Germain of attacking my family, exactly like Leonard accused TravelerKai of doing. And I'd claim that Comte de Saint Germain's entire forum legacy is destroyed because he started Forum drama with me!

Speculator, if a White Nationalist / Segregationist like me can "work with" criticisms from Black RVF members by silencing the part of me that wants to "get back at them", then surely Leonard should be held to the same expectation. Except Leonard was already given that opportunity to "work with" TravelerKai's criticism, but he responded by personally attacking TravelerKai along increasingly ridiculous lines of argument.

And as for "the most feminine thing one can do", clearly it's wanting everyone to get along without holding them to reasonably fair standards of right and wrong. Leonard's enormous escalation of drama in response to utterly mild criticism means he can't be trusted to "work with" anyone.

I'm black? This is the first I've heard of this. Hey Rudebwoy can I come on your podcast now?

Post: #265

Comte negative-repped me too

But to be fair, he had a point about me not having met anyone. It's not that I didn't want to, I was just lazy. I actually plan on meeting some of you guys this year (even you, Comte).

Post: #266

I neutraled you after you neutraled me even though I have never ever interacted with you.

The first of my neutrals coming before I neutraled someone else. Congrats!

And no thanks I'll pass.

Post: #267

(04-20-2018 09:56 AM)Cr33pin Wrote:  

(04-20-2018 09:19 AM)doc holliday Wrote:  Cr33pin, with all due respect, which of the black guys on the forum engage in angry black guy talk? As far as I can see, I can't think of a single black guy here who sounds like a member of BLM. If you can think of one name him. We don't get any BLM types here because they're views wouldn't be tolerated here. I can however think of numerous posters who engage in angry white guy talk on the forum and Neubache is the leader of this cabal, the guy who stirs up much of the racial animus here and gets the others going. If he was able to get a gentleman like Traveler Kai angry, then its clear to me who the troublemakers are on this forum. Again, I'm not calling for their views to be censored but I have no qualms about challenging these fools. They just can't deal with having their views challenged which is not my problem. At all.

I wasn't really referring to actual members speaking "angry black talk" perse. Just the phrase itself with the races reversed sounds a lot more sinister... however no one bats a eye when people are talking about the old angry white folk. However I did think of a member who spoke "angry black man talk" his name was anicca and you were correct... they got banned.

I don't want to get fully dragged into this mess... however I did feel strongly enough to post the tidbit that I did. Thank you for respectfully addressing my post. It's a lot easier to have these kinds of conversations on these kinds of topics when its approached the way you approached it.

Of course man, I wouldn't think of not being respectful to you or anyone else here as long as the posts are thoughtful, even if there is disagreement on the subject matter. It's the way it should be and as Zelcorpion and others have stated, most of us have more in common than we have differences. However, there are troublemakers here who care more about their egos and self-aggrandizement and I don't hesitate to challenge them.

Post: #268

(04-19-2018 10:12 PM)doc holliday Wrote:  

(04-19-2018 09:42 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(04-19-2018 09:35 PM)doc holliday Wrote:  Seriously LDN man, how do you have over 7K posts in two years? That's a legit question that you ought to answer (but won't I'm sure).

I have my reasons but much of it is personal.

Here's a proposition. Nominate a trusted member who's neutral on my politics and on who's word I can be sure will not breach trust.

I will explain my situation to him on the proviso that if he says it makes sense you will drop the issue.

This is an offer I'm willing to make because it actually is a legitimate question, but I'm not laying my life bare on the demand of a bunch of hostile strangers.

Ok fine, we can play this clandestine game if you so choose. I would say though that some explanation beyond a "yes he's legit" is required here if you want to quell any doubts and be taken seriously. Respect is earned, not demanded.

I'll give you 3 names, all white Aussies since that's what you're most comfortable with: Dream Machine, Parcelus, or Anonymous Bosch. AB already chimed in here, admonishing your thin skin so you may not want him. The other two are solid in my mind. More than one member would be better to see if the stories corroborate since no one has ever met you.

I missed this post in the churn. AB is not suitable as he's already made his mind up on me as of months ago.

Are you referring to Dream Medicine?

Anyhow, there's no point in private messaging another member for him to just paraphrase to everyone else everything I've told him. What exactly would be the point of that?

As for whether I regain this so-called credibility among the thin skinned forum members, I really don't give a shit. This drama has nothing to do with whether I'm really real. That's just the vector of attack the self-appointed forum censors have taken to deligitimise me. They're not going to come around regardless of what I do or don't reveal about myself, and frankly half of them would dox me as reliably as any antifa.

You nominate a trusted and neutral member who agrees to participate. I deal with them. They give the thumbs up or down. Nothing more. The end.

So you take the compromise or you suck eggs. Your choice.

Post: #269

(04-20-2018 09:02 AM)Cr33pin Wrote:  What a shit show..... I can only really think of one poster on the forum who I genuinely don't like and as of recently I've come to just accept them.

Sorry for being unlikeable. I'll try to improve.

Post: #270

(04-20-2018 09:30 AM)Mercenary Wrote:  

(04-20-2018 09:04 AM)Pancho Wrote:  Being Latino myself, I am extremely curious to know which country his wife is from.

You guys need to get off these fantasy ideas that it's some sort of fact that Leonard lives in Tasmania, has a wife and small children lives in a rural area. For all we know, he could be an overweight single guy in his 50s in a basement in Auckland New Zealand, Vancouver Canada, Edinburgh Scotland or anywhere else in the world.

The only fact we can be sure of this:

There is someone who is writing at least 10 (usually very long and incendiary) posts on RVF every single day for 2 years straight with no interruption. No one I know can generate that much output on RVF or elsewhere unless they are doing nothing, and I mean NOTHING, else in their lives. No job, no wife, no kids, no family, no rural area maintenance and upkeep...nothing. If you have just 1 of these things going on a regular basis, you just will not have enough waking hours in the day to generate that kind of output on RVF or elsewhere.

Unless you meet him, stop believing Leonard's fantasy stories.

I'm still waiting, Mercenary.

What is the term for deep state agents tasked with undermining and discrediting movements by flooding them with bizarre and ridiculous conspiracy theories?

This is your thing. The term should roll off your tongue easily.

I can post simple enough proof of my location and family man status, but I'm not going to be pushed around by crybabies, and I'm enjoying turning this back on you and watching you squirm.

What is the term for deep state agents tasked with undermining and discrediting movements by flooding them with bizarre and ridiculous conspiracy theories?

Post: #271

Suits Wrote:It's not like all the talk about race and IQ isn't intended to lead somewhere.

Vox Day referred me to a very interesting article on Genetics and IQ that I'll eventually post in the IQ and success thread.

For now, though, I'll note that it's really fucking funny that you're complaining that a central scientific finding (verified through over 100 years of scientific research) may be used to shape public policy.



Do you prefer we use witchcraft instead?

Post: #272

(04-20-2018 10:47 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(04-19-2018 10:12 PM)doc holliday Wrote:  

(04-19-2018 09:42 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(04-19-2018 09:35 PM)doc holliday Wrote:  Seriously LDN man, how do you have over 7K posts in two years? That's a legit question that you ought to answer (but won't I'm sure).

I have my reasons but much of it is personal.

Here's a proposition. Nominate a trusted member who's neutral on my politics and on who's word I can be sure will not breach trust.

I will explain my situation to him on the proviso that if he says it makes sense you will drop the issue.

This is an offer I'm willing to make because it actually is a legitimate question, but I'm not laying my life bare on the demand of a bunch of hostile strangers.

Ok fine, we can play this clandestine game if you so choose. I would say though that some explanation beyond a "yes he's legit" is required here if you want to quell any doubts and be taken seriously. Respect is earned, not demanded.

I'll give you 3 names, all white Aussies since that's what you're most comfortable with: Dream Machine, Parcelus, or Anonymous Bosch. AB already chimed in here, admonishing your thin skin so you may not want him. The other two are solid in my mind. More than one member would be better to see if the stories corroborate since no one has ever met you.

I missed this post in the churn. AB is not suitable as he's already made his mind up on me as of months ago.

Are you referring to Dream Medicine?

Anyhow, there's no point in private messaging another member for him to just paraphrase to everyone else everything I've told him. What exactly would be the point of that?

As for whether I regain this so-called credibility among the thin skinned forum members, I really don't give a shit. This drama has nothing to do with whether I'm really real. That's just the vector of attack the self-appointed forum censors have taken to deligitimise me. They're not going to come around regardless of what I do or don't reveal about myself, and frankly half of them would dox me as reliably as any antifa.

You nominate a trusted and neutral member who agrees to participate. I deal with them. They give the thumbs up or down. Nothing more. The end.

So you take the compromise or you suck eggs. Your choice.

Yes I mean't Dream Medicine, sorry.

Look man you proposed this idea, not me. I gave you 3 names and you've rejected who I proposed. I'll give you another few: Cr33pin here if he's willing, Gmac, or Beyond Borders. Lots of guys here who are neutral that you could Skype or talk on the phone with to establish some bonafides but as I've previously stated, my guess is that you won't agree to do this at all. I don't care really what you do, it's not my problem but again, part of being an adult is following through on your proposals. Just don't cry when no one other than the members of your fan club give you any respect or push back on your bullshit. You stir up a lot of trouble on this forum and guys like TK and Mercenary are right to call you out on your nonsense.

Again, you're post just drips with hostility with no frame control, but it really is on you to demonstrate why anyone should take you seriously when you can't even explain how you have close to 8K posts in two years other than to say that it's your way or suck eggs or whatever.

Post: #273

One more for the night and I'm turning in.

I just want to thank MMX and Mercenary for dropping in and doing their level best to put the shiv in. Nothing lends a fellow more credibility than making foes of people like that, and I can only imagine Travelerkai grimacing at the prospect of Laurel and Hardy here riding in backward on a donkey to save the day.

I expect to wake up tomorrow to find MMX with a thesaurus in one hand and his dick in the other, as usual, and Mercenary coming up with a new theory about how I'm really some sort of half cyborg half emu from Pine Gap.

Thankyou, God. You've done me a real solid here today.

Post: #274

You are clutching at straws Leonard.
Roosh values guys who work together and meet in the real world, not keyboard jockeys who refuse to meet anyone and are stirring up trouble in multiple threads daily and creating divisions in the community, while bragging about lives they can't possibly lead.
With your hostile attitude, I predict your RVF account won't last beyond 2018 on here.

If you really have a wife and children, why don't you go spend some time with them for change, instead of spending every waking hour, of every single day on RVF.

Post: #275

This thread has gone on for far too long without MJ