Post: #76

Latest Joe Rogan ep with Kevin Smith they talked about her being fired from the show. She blamed it on Ambien, the sleeping aid. But then again she has a history of these remarks.

Post: #77

All this talk about presidents being monkeys had me looking:

Post: #78

(06-01-2018 12:20 AM)tobehero Wrote:  Latest Joe Rogan ep with Kevin Smith they talked about her being fired from the show. She blamed it on Ambien, the sleeping aid. But then again she has a history of these remarks.

As far as I'm aware; Roseanne is scheduled to appear on the Joe Rogan Podcast on Friday (CA time).

Post: #79

Makes sense they were talking to each other to organise / fit into each other's schedule. Doubt any main stream media wanna touch her so Rogan is best to get her side of the story. Not bothered about this episode to be fair. Think I will skip it.

Post: #80

Joe Rogan talked with her, and his basic view is that she is in her sixties, insanely overworked doing a popular series, did take Ambien and was out of her head when she posted.

Unfortunately in this clip he is talking to Kevin Smith, so half of it is SJW condescension. I would recommend fast forwarding past anything Smith says. You won't miss anything.

Post: #81

Would have been an interesting podcast that's for sure :

@joerogan
5h

Quote:The Roseanne podcast is not happening today. She’s not doing well and doesn’t want to travel, and she’s gone radio silent on me, so I’m just going to step away. The whole thing has been pretty brutal on her, and I hope she can find some peace.

Post: #82

Rape is less offensive than liking Trump.

Post: #83

^
Now is it correct that they replaced Roseanne's new show with repeats of Cosby?

Post: #84

Had a suspicion they'd do this.

The pussy-hat wearing aunt / sister would be too much of a stretch as that character was always a side character.
Whereas in being a producer as well, no surprise Sara Gilbert will gladly usurp the former queen to now take up the sitcom throne.

Post: #85

One word can get you fired and lynched in this anti-White sentiment.

A black guy can say how happy he is to kill all the White people in his movie - Jamie Foxx. That is fine.

It should be funny when Whites are in the minority - those progressives will then find out how much that will be worth - they can look to South Africa for inspiration already.

Post: #86

(06-01-2018 10:02 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Had a suspicion they'd do this.

The pussy-hat wearing aunt / sister would be too much of a stretch as that character was always a side character.
Whereas in being a producer as well, no surprise Sara Gilbert will gladly usurp the former queen to now take up the sitcom throne.

Hilarious - will she turn lesbian like in real life? It's amazing already how Hollywood pushed this ugly incapable actress with one facial expression for so long. They will soon find out that she will reach 10% of the core demographic of Roseanne.

Post: #87

Clown world.

Who on the Right watches this shit anyway? When your level of right wing political involvement doesn't even surpass "won't watch left wing networks no matter what" then I don't give a single fuck if Roseanne's new show being cancelled triggers you.*

*Not directed specifically at anyone here.

Turn off the fucking television. Read a book. Read the RVF. Kill video game terrorists if you want. Just stop sucking from the progressive boob tube because they toss you a conservative bone every now and then. Is it really that hard?

The collective response of the entire Right over this cancellation should have been, "doesn't affect me, I don't watch the ABC". The problem is not that Roseanne was cancelled. The problem is that anyone gives a shit.

Post: #88

(06-02-2018 03:31 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(06-01-2018 10:02 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Had a suspicion they'd do this.

The pussy-hat wearing aunt / sister would be too much of a stretch as that character was always a side character.
Whereas in being a producer as well, no surprise Sara Gilbert will gladly usurp the former queen to now take up the sitcom throne.

Hilarious - will she turn lesbian like in real life? It's amazing already how Hollywood pushed this ugly incapable actress with one facial expression for so long. They will soon find out that she will reach 10% of the core demographic of Roseanne.

I keep saying this, and I fear the message is getting overlooked: Lesbians are 100% pure evil. They always, always, always will end up fucking over anything that anybody else has built.

Roseanne worked like a crazed bitch to build that show. Creating a TV show is insanely hard work. Sure she made a dumb mistake...all too easy when you're the person in the arena, covered with blood and dirt, fighting to build something. (Former hubby Tom Arnold said "she was probably getting no sleep at all, I'm not surprised she was taking Ambien").

Then there are the parasites like Gilbert who are paid a pittance to come in and say a few lines. Making no real contribution. But being a Lesbian, of course constantly seething with hatred every second against the man or straight woman who is actually building the product.

When the Lesbo parasite gets her chance to strike and kill, she does it without hesitation. Kills the show, kills the startup, kills the organization. Slowly or quickly. They kill and tear down anything they can. That's what lesbians DO.

Remember again, that lesbians are fundamentally different from gay men. Gay men are a minor quirk of nature. Lesbian women are a rejection of nature itself.

Shun them. I can't put it any more clearly. Shun them because they will ALWAYS fuck you over. Always. Because fucking over others is their world view.

Post: #89

< Generally yes - lesbians are often in positions of power, in child protective service amply applied and misuse that power often with a male hatred.

But a few exceptions exist:




Camille Paglia

Rosa Koire:



Fighter against the globalist Agenda 21 for a long time already.

But alas - those women are extremely high in IQ and intellectual prowess. For everyone of those you get 10 fat feminazis on steroids who hate men and families - they lap up the anti-male feminist SJW doctrine up like nothing.

Post: #90

I've used Camille Paglia on a lot of my leftwing and feminazi friends. Some of them have pretty much wrote her off as "internalizing the patriarchy" even when they know she is a fucking lesbian.

I'm convinced these lefties are actually truly evil people because I can't wrap my head around this many people being so blatantly fucking stupid when logic is hitting them in the face. I feel like one would have to be getting paid in some way to outwardly support such insane ideas.

I mean I just watched a video of a based Pakistani guy literally telling gay guy that we kill homosexuals. The homo starts telling the former Muslim Paki he's racist, Islamophobic and Homophobic. The Pakistani guy looked like his head was going to explode attempting to explain this shit to him. The Paki finally says yeah when I was growing up in Pakistan and a practicing Muslim I thought homos should die in the most violent way possible and the gay guy goes see you're Homophopic. The Pakistani guy is like dude, I'm talking about when I was a Muslim which I'm not a Muslim now.

To be this blind in logic and still have the ability to cross the street without getting hit by a car seems impossible to me.

Post: #91

(06-02-2018 03:11 PM)nola Wrote:  I've used Camille Paglia on a lot of my leftwing and feminazi friends. Some of them have pretty much wrote her off as "internalizing the patriarchy" even when they know she is a fucking lesbian.

I'm convinced these lefties are actually truly evil people because I can't wrap my head around this many people being so blatantly fucking stupid when logic is hitting them in the face. I feel like one would have to be getting paid in some way to outwardly support such insane ideas.

I mean I just watched a video of a based Pakistani guy literally telling gay guy that we kill homosexuals. The homo starts telling the former Muslim Paki he's racist, Islamophobic and Homophobic. The Pakistani guy looked like his head was going to explode attempting to explain this shit to him. The Paki finally says yeah when I was growing up in Pakistan and a practicing Muslim I thought homos should die in the most violent way possible and the gay guy goes see you're Homophopic. The Pakistani guy is like dude, I'm talking about when I was a Muslim which I'm not a Muslim now.

To be this blind in logic and still have the ability to cross the street without getting hit by a car seems impossible to me.

"I've used Camille Paglia on a lot of my leftwing and feminazi friends. Some of them have pretty much wrote her off as "internalizing the patriarchy" even when they know she is a fucking lesbian."

They're not thinkers. They're the modern-day variation of the old religious fanatics you tried to avoid growing up.

"Internalized the patriarchy" is the pseudo-intellectual version of "He's controlled by Satan." Back in the old days, if you mentioned to my old Catholic aunts that someone had a reasoned critique of Catholicism, they dismissed it saying he was possessed by Satan.

I'm not kidding about this. People really used to believe that and if you argued, they'd counter-argue "How do you know he isn't possessed?" I had this discussion with both my old aunts and a "Catechism" teacher, who genuinely believed in the devil possessing people.

This is one reason the movie "The Exorcist" was so big. It was a "told you so!" moment for these nuts. They saw it as a confirmation of their beliefs: "Look what happens when you let Satan in!!" See? SEE????!!"

So, I'll repeat a phrase from the above post: To be this blind in logic and still have the ability to cross the street without getting hit by a car seems impossible to me.

Post: #92

^ and ^^ shared

Post: #93

(06-02-2018 06:18 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  They're not thinkers...

So, I'll repeat a phrase from the above post: To be this blind in logic and still have the ability to cross the street without getting hit by a car seems impossible to me.

Rather amusing that the Useful Idiot type lives in an era / age where life could not be any easier.
Instant coffee.
Instant entertainment.
Instant this, that & the other.

Yet they cling to whatever deluded juvenile fantasy of theirs happens to be. Simply to avoid the harsh truths of life.
Socialism does not work. Diversity leads to division. Alternate lifestyles are rarely stable. Etc., etc.

They can barely handle the convenience of the modern world.
If we were to cut off the power, I'd bet we'd encounter level of reee-steria previously unheard of...

As for Roseanne.
On the podcast interviewing Candace Owens, Joe Rogan mentioned that Roseanne herself was nigh on worn out physically while making that latest season (at age 66).
So it's doubtful she would have been able to do much with a 2nd season anyway.

Post: #94

< They could make John Goodman the star of the show and continue Roseanne without Roseanne. He is popular enough among the core audience. They could have Roseanne die of a heart-attack and him dating other women - even that is funny at his age.

But I guess that would be blasphemy to have a man be the patriarch of the household. Let's just make the loser daughter the star that no one really likes.

Post: #95

(06-03-2018 02:50 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  < They could make John Goodman the star of the show and continue Roseanne without Roseanne. He is popular enough among the core audience. They could have Roseanne die of a heart-attack and him dating other women - even that is funny at his age.

But I guess that would be blasphemy to have a man be the patriarch of the household. Let's just make the loser daughter the star that no one really likes.

Oh well.
The crash & burn of 'Darlene' will allow us to chuckle from the sidelines if nothing else.

Post: #96

Interesting how “7th Heaven” reruns eventually came back on after the Stephen Collins, A SELF ADMITTED PEDOPHILE, situation came to light.

Libtard logic dictates that it's much more acceptable to be a pedophile than to say something purportedly “raycisss”.

Post: #97

(06-03-2018 08:49 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

(06-03-2018 02:50 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  But I guess that would be blasphemy to have a man be the patriarch of the household. Let's just make the loser daughter the star that no one really likes.

Oh well.
The crash & burn of 'Darlene' will allow us to chuckle from the sidelines if nothing else.

Reminds me of the spinoff that chick had from Beavis and Butthead.

Post: #98

Who cares about (((Roseanne))), she is just a distraction. However, she is right when she mentioned that George Soros is an evil SOB and Valerie Jarrett is an ape!

Post: #99

(06-03-2018 02:50 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  < They could make John Goodman the star of the show and continue Roseanne without Roseanne. He is popular enough among the core audience. They could have Roseanne die of a heart-attack and him dating other women - even that is funny at his age.

But I guess that would be blasphemy to have a man be the patriarch of the household. Let's just make the loser daughter the star that no one really likes.

Goodman will be kept out. It will be just Gilbert. She's the hateful lesbian and so naturally, she'll arrange it all with her lesbian network executive friends to make it a lesbian show.

Parasite behavior.

Post: #100

A Roseanne Spinoff Could Be Announced This Week

https://screenrant.com/roseanne-spinoff-...ment-soon/

A Roseanne spinoff is looking more and more likely, with insiders expecting an announcement from ABC as early as this week. ABC has been contemplating a potential spinoff centered around Darlene Conner (Sara Gilbert) ever since they canceled the hit Roseanne revival last month; a move made in response to a horrifically racist tweet that Roseanne Barr had written on her personal Twitter account.

Roseanne had already been renewed for a second season when the series was canceled, so that left ABC with an open primetime slot to fill. While some people were hoping ABC would revive Agent Carter, it seems they plan on moving forward with a Roseanne spinoff. Aside from Gilbert, the Roseanne executive producers are reportedly scrambling to find a way to bring back Dan (John Goodman), Jackie (Laurie Metcalf), and possibly the rest of the revival cast– minus Barr, of course.